NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2017, at 186%. Sud Sardegna had the lowest, at 51%. The median was 88% and the figure for Italy was 98%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2017
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2017 (%) | Change on 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 186 | -4 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 156 | -1 pts |
| 3 | Bologna | 137 | -1 pts |
| 4 | Roma | 132 | -3 pts |
| 5 | Modena | 131 | -1 pts |
| 6 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 127 | +1 pts |
| 7 | Firenze | 126 | -2 pts |
| 8 | Parma | 124 | -2 pts |
| 9 | Trento | 122 | -2 pts |
| 10 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 120 | 0 pts |
| 11 | Genova | 117 | -1 pts |
| 12 | Brescia | 115 | 0 pts |
| 12 | Verona | 115 | -1 pts |
| 12 | Vicenza | 115 | 0 pts |
| 15 | Padova | 114 | -1 pts |
| 15 | Trieste | 114 | +1 pts |
| 17 | Bergamo | 112 | -1 pts |
| 18 | Treviso | 110 | -2 pts |
| 19 | Belluno | 109 | -2 pts |
| 19 | Cremona | 109 | +3 pts |
| 21 | Forlì-Cesena | 108 | -2 pts |
| 21 | Mantova | 108 | +1 pts |
| 21 | Siena | 108 | -4 pts |
| 24 | Cuneo | 107 | 0 pts |
| 24 | Piacenza | 107 | -2 pts |
| 24 | Prato | 107 | +1 pts |
| 24 | Ravenna | 107 | -3 pts |
| 24 | Torino | 107 | 0 pts |
| 29 | Lecco | 106 | 0 pts |
| 29 | Monza e della Brianza | 106 | -1 pts |
| 31 | Venezia | 105 | -2 pts |
| 32 | Pisa | 103 | -1 pts |
| 33 | La Spezia | 102 | -2 pts |
| 33 | Pordenone | 102 | -3 pts |
| 35 | Rimini | 101 | -1 pts |
| 36 | Novara | 100 | -1 pts |
| 36 | Udine | 100 | -2 pts |
| 36 | Varese | 100 | -3 pts |
| 39 | Ancona | 99 | -2 pts |
| 40 | Como | 98 | 0 pts |
| 40 | Sondrio | 98 | -3 pts |
| 42 | Alessandria | 96 | +1 pts |
| 43 | Lucca | 95 | 0 pts |
| 44 | Arezzo | 94 | +2 pts |
| 44 | Cagliari | 94 | -2 pts |
| 44 | Savona | 94 | 0 pts |
| 47 | Vercelli | 93 | 0 pts |
| 48 | Gorizia | 92 | -2 pts |
| 49 | Ferrara | 91 | -1 pts |
| 49 | Lodi | 91 | -2 pts |
| 51 | Biella | 90 | -1 pts |
| 52 | Livorno | 89 | -3 pts |
| 52 | Pesaro e Urbino | 89 | -2 pts |
| 54 | Chieti | 88 | 0 pts |
| 54 | Macerata | 88 | +2 pts |
| 54 | Pistoia | 88 | -2 pts |
| 57 | Massa-Carrara | 86 | 0 pts |
| 57 | Perugia | 86 | -1 pts |
| 57 | Rovigo | 86 | -1 pts |
| 60 | Asti | 85 | -2 pts |
| 61 | Fermo | 84 | -2 pts |
| 61 | Grosseto | 84 | -1 pts |
| 63 | L’Aquila | 83 | -1 pts |
| 63 | Pavia | 83 | 0 pts |
| 63 | Pescara | 83 | -2 pts |
| 63 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 83 | +1 pts |
| 67 | Ascoli Piceno | 82 | -1 pts |
| 68 | Imperia | 80 | -2 pts |
| 68 | Teramo | 80 | -1 pts |
| 70 | Terni | 79 | +1 pts |
| 71 | Potenza | 78 | -1 pts |
| 72 | Frosinone | 76 | 0 pts |
| 72 | Latina | 76 | -1 pts |
| 74 | Bari | 72 | -2 pts |
| 74 | Campobasso | 72 | 0 pts |
| 74 | Viterbo | 72 | -1 pts |
| 77 | Isernia | 69 | 0 pts |
| 77 | Sassari | 69 | 0 pts |
| 79 | Catanzaro | 68 | -1 pts |
| 80 | Napoli | 65 | -1 pts |
| 80 | Siracusa | 65 | 0 pts |
| 82 | Rieti | 64 | 0 pts |
| 83 | Avellino | 63 | 0 pts |
| 83 | Palermo | 63 | -1 pts |
| 85 | Catania | 62 | -1 pts |
| 85 | Matera | 62 | -1 pts |
| 85 | Nuoro | 62 | 0 pts |
| 85 | Salerno | 62 | -1 pts |
| 85 | Taranto | 62 | 0 pts |
| 90 | Brindisi | 60 | 0 pts |
| 90 | Messina | 60 | -1 pts |
| 90 | Ragusa | 60 | 0 pts |
| 93 | Crotone | 59 | +1 pts |
| 93 | Foggia | 59 | -2 pts |
| 93 | Reggio Calabria | 59 | 0 pts |
| 96 | Oristano | 58 | +1 pts |
| 97 | Benevento | 56 | -1 pts |
| 97 | Caserta | 56 | -2 pts |
| 99 | Lecce | 55 | -1 pts |
| 100 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 54 | 0 pts |
| 100 | Cosenza | 54 | -1 pts |
| 100 | Trapani | 54 | -2 pts |
| 100 | Vibo Valentia | 54 | -2 pts |
| 104 | Agrigento | 51 | 0 pts |
| 104 | Caltanissetta | 51 | -1 pts |
| 104 | Enna | 51 | 0 pts |
| 104 | Sud Sardegna | 51 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 186% in 2017, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Sud Sardegna, with 51% in 2017.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)