NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2020, at 179%. Agrigento had the lowest, at 50%. The median was 83% and the figure for Italy was 93%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2020
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2020 (%) | Change on 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 179 | -1 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 151 | -5 pts |
| 3 | Bologna | 130 | -5 pts |
| 4 | Roma | 124 | -4 pts |
| 5 | Parma | 123 | 0 pts |
| 6 | Modena | 120 | -2 pts |
| 6 | Trento | 120 | -2 pts |
| 8 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 118 | -5 pts |
| 9 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 116 | -2 pts |
| 10 | Firenze | 115 | -21 pts |
| 11 | Vicenza | 111 | -2 pts |
| 12 | Trieste | 110 | -2 pts |
| 13 | Brescia | 109 | -4 pts |
| 13 | Padova | 109 | -3 pts |
| 15 | Bergamo | 108 | -4 pts |
| 15 | Verona | 108 | -3 pts |
| 17 | Piacenza | 107 | 0 pts |
| 17 | Treviso | 107 | -2 pts |
| 19 | Cremona | 106 | +1 pts |
| 19 | Genova | 106 | -9 pts |
| 21 | Cuneo | 105 | 0 pts |
| 22 | Forlì-Cesena | 104 | -2 pts |
| 23 | Mantova | 102 | -1 pts |
| 23 | Monza e della Brianza | 102 | -1 pts |
| 25 | Lecco | 101 | -3 pts |
| 25 | Pordenone | 101 | 0 pts |
| 25 | Ravenna | 101 | -1 pts |
| 28 | La Spezia | 100 | +1 pts |
| 28 | Pisa | 100 | -3 pts |
| 30 | Belluno | 99 | -13 pts |
| 30 | Siena | 99 | -5 pts |
| 30 | Torino | 99 | -5 pts |
| 30 | Udine | 99 | -2 pts |
| 34 | Novara | 97 | -3 pts |
| 35 | Ancona | 95 | -2 pts |
| 35 | Prato | 95 | -10 pts |
| 35 | Sondrio | 95 | -4 pts |
| 38 | Varese | 94 | -4 pts |
| 39 | Venezia | 93 | -11 pts |
| 40 | Vercelli | 92 | +3 pts |
| 41 | Lucca | 91 | -1 pts |
| 41 | Rimini | 91 | -8 pts |
| 43 | Alessandria | 89 | -5 pts |
| 43 | Arezzo | 89 | -5 pts |
| 43 | Como | 89 | -5 pts |
| 43 | Savona | 89 | 0 pts |
| 47 | Gorizia | 88 | -5 pts |
| 47 | Lodi | 88 | -2 pts |
| 49 | Cagliari | 87 | -5 pts |
| 49 | Pesaro e Urbino | 87 | -2 pts |
| 51 | Biella | 84 | -4 pts |
| 51 | Livorno | 84 | -2 pts |
| 51 | Rovigo | 84 | -1 pts |
| 54 | Ascoli Piceno | 83 | 0 pts |
| 54 | Ferrara | 83 | -3 pts |
| 54 | Macerata | 83 | -3 pts |
| 54 | Pistoia | 83 | -2 pts |
| 58 | Asti | 82 | -3 pts |
| 58 | Chieti | 82 | -2 pts |
| 58 | Massa-Carrara | 82 | -1 pts |
| 58 | Perugia | 82 | -3 pts |
| 62 | Grosseto | 81 | +1 pts |
| 63 | L’Aquila | 80 | -2 pts |
| 64 | Pavia | 79 | -3 pts |
| 65 | Pescara | 77 | -2 pts |
| 66 | Imperia | 76 | -2 pts |
| 67 | Latina | 75 | 0 pts |
| 67 | Teramo | 75 | -2 pts |
| 67 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 75 | -5 pts |
| 70 | Fermo | 73 | -7 pts |
| 70 | Terni | 73 | -4 pts |
| 72 | Bari | 71 | -1 pts |
| 72 | Frosinone | 71 | -4 pts |
| 72 | Potenza | 71 | -5 pts |
| 75 | Campobasso | 70 | -2 pts |
| 76 | Rieti | 68 | +3 pts |
| 76 | Viterbo | 68 | -1 pts |
| 78 | Isernia | 67 | 0 pts |
| 78 | Sassari | 67 | -1 pts |
| 80 | Catanzaro | 63 | -1 pts |
| 80 | Matera | 63 | +1 pts |
| 82 | Napoli | 62 | -2 pts |
| 82 | Nuoro | 62 | 0 pts |
| 84 | Palermo | 60 | -1 pts |
| 84 | Salerno | 60 | -1 pts |
| 86 | Catania | 59 | -2 pts |
| 86 | Messina | 59 | 0 pts |
| 86 | Taranto | 59 | +1 pts |
| 89 | Avellino | 58 | -2 pts |
| 89 | Ragusa | 58 | 0 pts |
| 91 | Brindisi | 57 | 0 pts |
| 91 | Reggio Calabria | 57 | 0 pts |
| 91 | Siracusa | 57 | -1 pts |
| 94 | Caserta | 56 | 0 pts |
| 94 | Foggia | 56 | -2 pts |
| 94 | Oristano | 56 | 0 pts |
| 97 | Benevento | 55 | 0 pts |
| 97 | Lecce | 55 | 0 pts |
| 99 | Crotone | 54 | -1 pts |
| 100 | Caltanissetta | 52 | +2 pts |
| 100 | Trapani | 52 | -1 pts |
| 100 | Vibo Valentia | 52 | -2 pts |
| 103 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 51 | -1 pts |
| 103 | Cosenza | 51 | -1 pts |
| 103 | Enna | 51 | +1 pts |
| 103 | Sud Sardegna | 51 | +1 pts |
| 107 | Agrigento | 50 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 179% in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Agrigento, with 50% in 2020.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)