NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)

Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2016, at 190%. Sud Sardegna had the lowest, at 51%. The median was 90% and the figure for Italy was 99%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest190Milano
Lowest51Sud Sardegna
Median90107 areas
Italy99History

Top 40 areas, 2016

CSVChart (SVG)

MilanoMilano: 190 %190Bolzano-BozenBolzano-Bozen: 157 %157BolognaBologna: 138 %138RomaRoma: 135 %135ModenaModena: 132 %132FirenzeFirenze: 128 %128ParmaParma: 126 %126Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’AosteValle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste: 126 %126TrentoTrento: 124 %124Reggio nell’EmiliaReggio nell’Emilia: 120 %120GenovaGenova: 118 %118VeronaVerona: 116 %116BresciaBrescia: 115 %115PadovaPadova: 115 %115VicenzaVicenza: 115 %115BergamoBergamo: 113 %113TriesteTrieste: 113 %113SienaSiena: 112 %112TrevisoTreviso: 112 %112BellunoBelluno: 111 %111Forlì-CesenaForlì-Cesena: 110 %110RavennaRavenna: 110 %110PiacenzaPiacenza: 109 %109CuneoCuneo: 107 %107MantovaMantova: 107 %107Monza e della BrianzaMonza e della Brianza: 107 %107TorinoTorino: 107 %107VeneziaVenezia: 107 %107CremonaCremona: 106 %106LeccoLecco: 106 %106PratoPrato: 106 %106PordenonePordenone: 105 %105La SpeziaLa Spezia: 104 %104PisaPisa: 104 %104VareseVarese: 103 %103RiminiRimini: 102 %102UdineUdine: 102 %102AnconaAncona: 101 %101NovaraNovara: 101 %101SondrioSondrio: 101 %101
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2016 (%)Change on 2015
1Milano190+5 pts
2Bolzano-Bozen157+2 pts
3Bologna138+2 pts
4Roma135+5 pts
5Modena132+6 pts
6Firenze128+2 pts
7Parma126+2 pts
7Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste126-2 pts
9Trento124+1 pts
10Reggio nell’Emilia120+3 pts
11Genova118+3 pts
12Verona116+4 pts
13Brescia115+3 pts
13Padova115+3 pts
13Vicenza115+2 pts
16Bergamo113+3 pts
16Trieste113+1 pts
18Siena112+4 pts
18Treviso112+4 pts
20Belluno111+4 pts
21Forlì-Cesena110+2 pts
21Ravenna110+3 pts
23Piacenza109+1 pts
24Cuneo107+3 pts
24Mantova107+2 pts
24Monza e della Brianza107+2 pts
24Torino107+4 pts
24Venezia107+2 pts
29Cremona106+4 pts
29Lecco106+1 pts
29Prato106+3 pts
32Pordenone105+2 pts
33La Spezia104+2 pts
33Pisa104+3 pts
35Varese103-1 pts
36Rimini102+3 pts
36Udine1020 pts
38Ancona101+1 pts
38Novara101+3 pts
38Sondrio101+1 pts
41Como980 pts
42Cagliari96+1 pts
43Alessandria95+1 pts
43Lucca95+2 pts
45Gorizia94+3 pts
45Savona94+1 pts
47Lodi93+4 pts
47Vercelli93+1 pts
49Arezzo92-2 pts
49Ferrara92+3 pts
49Livorno92+1 pts
52Biella910 pts
52Pesaro e Urbino91+2 pts
54Pistoia90+3 pts
55Chieti88+1 pts
56Asti87+1 pts
56Perugia870 pts
56Rovigo870 pts
59Fermo86+3 pts
59Macerata86+2 pts
59Massa-Carrara86+2 pts
62Grosseto85+1 pts
62Pescara850 pts
64L’Aquila840 pts
65Ascoli Piceno83+1 pts
65Pavia83-2 pts
67Imperia82+1 pts
67Verbano-Cusio-Ossola82+1 pts
69Teramo81+1 pts
70Potenza790 pts
71Terni780 pts
72Latina770 pts
73Frosinone76+2 pts
74Bari74+2 pts
75Viterbo730 pts
76Campobasso72+1 pts
77Catanzaro69+3 pts
77Isernia69-1 pts
77Sassari69-2 pts
80Napoli66+1 pts
81Siracusa65+2 pts
82Palermo640 pts
82Rieti64-1 pts
84Avellino63-1 pts
84Catania63+1 pts
84Matera630 pts
84Salerno630 pts
88Nuoro62-2 pts
88Taranto62+3 pts
90Foggia61+1 pts
90Messina61+1 pts
92Brindisi60-1 pts
92Ragusa600 pts
94Reggio Calabria59-1 pts
95Caserta58+2 pts
95Crotone58+1 pts
97Benevento57-1 pts
97Oristano570 pts
99Lecce560 pts
99Trapani56+1 pts
99Vibo Valentia56+1 pts
102Cosenza55+1 pts
103Barletta-Andria-Trani54+1 pts
104Caltanissetta520 pts
105Agrigento51-1 pts
105Enna510 pts
105Sud Sardegna51-3 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Milano, with 190% in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Sud Sardegna, with 51% in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Italy: more rankings