NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2016, at 190%. Sud Sardegna had the lowest, at 51%. The median was 90% and the figure for Italy was 99%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2016
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2016 (%) | Change on 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 190 | +5 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 157 | +2 pts |
| 3 | Bologna | 138 | +2 pts |
| 4 | Roma | 135 | +5 pts |
| 5 | Modena | 132 | +6 pts |
| 6 | Firenze | 128 | +2 pts |
| 7 | Parma | 126 | +2 pts |
| 7 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 126 | -2 pts |
| 9 | Trento | 124 | +1 pts |
| 10 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 120 | +3 pts |
| 11 | Genova | 118 | +3 pts |
| 12 | Verona | 116 | +4 pts |
| 13 | Brescia | 115 | +3 pts |
| 13 | Padova | 115 | +3 pts |
| 13 | Vicenza | 115 | +2 pts |
| 16 | Bergamo | 113 | +3 pts |
| 16 | Trieste | 113 | +1 pts |
| 18 | Siena | 112 | +4 pts |
| 18 | Treviso | 112 | +4 pts |
| 20 | Belluno | 111 | +4 pts |
| 21 | Forlì-Cesena | 110 | +2 pts |
| 21 | Ravenna | 110 | +3 pts |
| 23 | Piacenza | 109 | +1 pts |
| 24 | Cuneo | 107 | +3 pts |
| 24 | Mantova | 107 | +2 pts |
| 24 | Monza e della Brianza | 107 | +2 pts |
| 24 | Torino | 107 | +4 pts |
| 24 | Venezia | 107 | +2 pts |
| 29 | Cremona | 106 | +4 pts |
| 29 | Lecco | 106 | +1 pts |
| 29 | Prato | 106 | +3 pts |
| 32 | Pordenone | 105 | +2 pts |
| 33 | La Spezia | 104 | +2 pts |
| 33 | Pisa | 104 | +3 pts |
| 35 | Varese | 103 | -1 pts |
| 36 | Rimini | 102 | +3 pts |
| 36 | Udine | 102 | 0 pts |
| 38 | Ancona | 101 | +1 pts |
| 38 | Novara | 101 | +3 pts |
| 38 | Sondrio | 101 | +1 pts |
| 41 | Como | 98 | 0 pts |
| 42 | Cagliari | 96 | +1 pts |
| 43 | Alessandria | 95 | +1 pts |
| 43 | Lucca | 95 | +2 pts |
| 45 | Gorizia | 94 | +3 pts |
| 45 | Savona | 94 | +1 pts |
| 47 | Lodi | 93 | +4 pts |
| 47 | Vercelli | 93 | +1 pts |
| 49 | Arezzo | 92 | -2 pts |
| 49 | Ferrara | 92 | +3 pts |
| 49 | Livorno | 92 | +1 pts |
| 52 | Biella | 91 | 0 pts |
| 52 | Pesaro e Urbino | 91 | +2 pts |
| 54 | Pistoia | 90 | +3 pts |
| 55 | Chieti | 88 | +1 pts |
| 56 | Asti | 87 | +1 pts |
| 56 | Perugia | 87 | 0 pts |
| 56 | Rovigo | 87 | 0 pts |
| 59 | Fermo | 86 | +3 pts |
| 59 | Macerata | 86 | +2 pts |
| 59 | Massa-Carrara | 86 | +2 pts |
| 62 | Grosseto | 85 | +1 pts |
| 62 | Pescara | 85 | 0 pts |
| 64 | L’Aquila | 84 | 0 pts |
| 65 | Ascoli Piceno | 83 | +1 pts |
| 65 | Pavia | 83 | -2 pts |
| 67 | Imperia | 82 | +1 pts |
| 67 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 82 | +1 pts |
| 69 | Teramo | 81 | +1 pts |
| 70 | Potenza | 79 | 0 pts |
| 71 | Terni | 78 | 0 pts |
| 72 | Latina | 77 | 0 pts |
| 73 | Frosinone | 76 | +2 pts |
| 74 | Bari | 74 | +2 pts |
| 75 | Viterbo | 73 | 0 pts |
| 76 | Campobasso | 72 | +1 pts |
| 77 | Catanzaro | 69 | +3 pts |
| 77 | Isernia | 69 | -1 pts |
| 77 | Sassari | 69 | -2 pts |
| 80 | Napoli | 66 | +1 pts |
| 81 | Siracusa | 65 | +2 pts |
| 82 | Palermo | 64 | 0 pts |
| 82 | Rieti | 64 | -1 pts |
| 84 | Avellino | 63 | -1 pts |
| 84 | Catania | 63 | +1 pts |
| 84 | Matera | 63 | 0 pts |
| 84 | Salerno | 63 | 0 pts |
| 88 | Nuoro | 62 | -2 pts |
| 88 | Taranto | 62 | +3 pts |
| 90 | Foggia | 61 | +1 pts |
| 90 | Messina | 61 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Brindisi | 60 | -1 pts |
| 92 | Ragusa | 60 | 0 pts |
| 94 | Reggio Calabria | 59 | -1 pts |
| 95 | Caserta | 58 | +2 pts |
| 95 | Crotone | 58 | +1 pts |
| 97 | Benevento | 57 | -1 pts |
| 97 | Oristano | 57 | 0 pts |
| 99 | Lecce | 56 | 0 pts |
| 99 | Trapani | 56 | +1 pts |
| 99 | Vibo Valentia | 56 | +1 pts |
| 102 | Cosenza | 55 | +1 pts |
| 103 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 54 | +1 pts |
| 104 | Caltanissetta | 52 | 0 pts |
| 105 | Agrigento | 51 | -1 pts |
| 105 | Enna | 51 | 0 pts |
| 105 | Sud Sardegna | 51 | -3 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 190% in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Sud Sardegna, with 51% in 2016.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)