NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2014, at 186%. Agrigento had the lowest, at 52%. The median was 89% and the figure for Italy was 98%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2014
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2014 (%) | Change on 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 186 | -4 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 157 | -4 pts |
| 3 | Bologna | 138 | -2 pts |
| 4 | Roma | 135 | -5 pts |
| 5 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 131 | -6 pts |
| 6 | Firenze | 129 | -1 pts |
| 7 | Modena | 128 | 0 pts |
| 8 | Trento | 127 | -6 pts |
| 9 | Parma | 126 | -2 pts |
| 10 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 117 | -2 pts |
| 11 | Genova | 116 | +1 pts |
| 12 | Brescia | 113 | -2 pts |
| 12 | Padova | 113 | -2 pts |
| 12 | Trieste | 113 | 0 pts |
| 12 | Verona | 113 | -3 pts |
| 12 | Vicenza | 113 | -3 pts |
| 17 | Bergamo | 112 | -2 pts |
| 18 | Siena | 111 | +1 pts |
| 19 | Piacenza | 110 | -1 pts |
| 20 | Belluno | 109 | +1 pts |
| 20 | Ravenna | 109 | -2 pts |
| 20 | Treviso | 109 | 0 pts |
| 23 | Forlì-Cesena | 108 | -2 pts |
| 24 | Cuneo | 106 | -3 pts |
| 24 | Monza e della Brianza | 106 | -3 pts |
| 24 | Sondrio | 106 | 0 pts |
| 27 | Cremona | 105 | -5 pts |
| 27 | Lecco | 105 | -4 pts |
| 27 | Mantova | 105 | -2 pts |
| 27 | Venezia | 105 | -2 pts |
| 31 | La Spezia | 104 | -4 pts |
| 31 | Torino | 104 | -4 pts |
| 31 | Varese | 104 | -2 pts |
| 34 | Prato | 103 | -3 pts |
| 35 | Ancona | 102 | 0 pts |
| 35 | Pisa | 102 | -3 pts |
| 35 | Pordenone | 102 | -5 pts |
| 35 | Rimini | 102 | -3 pts |
| 35 | Udine | 102 | -3 pts |
| 40 | Como | 100 | 0 pts |
| 41 | Arezzo | 98 | -2 pts |
| 42 | Novara | 97 | -2 pts |
| 43 | Lodi | 95 | -1 pts |
| 43 | Lucca | 95 | -2 pts |
| 45 | Alessandria | 94 | -3 pts |
| 45 | Savona | 94 | -5 pts |
| 45 | Vercelli | 94 | -4 pts |
| 48 | Gorizia | 93 | -2 pts |
| 49 | Livorno | 92 | -1 pts |
| 50 | Biella | 91 | -2 pts |
| 50 | Cagliari | 91 | -4 pts |
| 52 | Pesaro e Urbino | 90 | 0 pts |
| 53 | Ferrara | 89 | -3 pts |
| 53 | Rovigo | 89 | 0 pts |
| 55 | Asti | 88 | -2 pts |
| 55 | Pescara | 88 | -3 pts |
| 55 | Pistoia | 88 | -2 pts |
| 58 | Chieti | 87 | -2 pts |
| 58 | L’Aquila | 87 | -3 pts |
| 58 | Macerata | 87 | -1 pts |
| 58 | Massa-Carrara | 87 | 0 pts |
| 58 | Pavia | 87 | +1 pts |
| 58 | Perugia | 87 | -4 pts |
| 64 | Ascoli Piceno | 86 | +1 pts |
| 65 | Fermo | 85 | -3 pts |
| 66 | Grosseto | 84 | -3 pts |
| 67 | Imperia | 83 | -2 pts |
| 67 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 83 | -4 pts |
| 69 | Teramo | 81 | -2 pts |
| 70 | Latina | 78 | -3 pts |
| 71 | Terni | 77 | -4 pts |
| 72 | Viterbo | 76 | -1 pts |
| 73 | Frosinone | 74 | -3 pts |
| 73 | Potenza | 74 | -6 pts |
| 75 | Sassari | 73 | -3 pts |
| 76 | Bari | 72 | -2 pts |
| 77 | Campobasso | 71 | -4 pts |
| 78 | Catanzaro | 70 | -1 pts |
| 78 | Isernia | 70 | 0 pts |
| 80 | Rieti | 69 | -2 pts |
| 81 | Napoli | 65 | -1 pts |
| 81 | Nuoro | 65 | -1 pts |
| 83 | Catania | 64 | -2 pts |
| 83 | Palermo | 64 | -2 pts |
| 83 | Ragusa | 64 | -1 pts |
| 86 | Matera | 63 | -2 pts |
| 86 | Salerno | 63 | -2 pts |
| 86 | Taranto | 63 | +1 pts |
| 89 | Messina | 62 | -2 pts |
| 90 | Avellino | 61 | -4 pts |
| 91 | Brindisi | 60 | -1 pts |
| 91 | Foggia | 60 | -3 pts |
| 91 | Reggio Calabria | 60 | -2 pts |
| 94 | Crotone | 59 | -4 pts |
| 95 | Benevento | 58 | -5 pts |
| 95 | Oristano | 58 | +1 pts |
| 97 | Caserta | 57 | -1 pts |
| 98 | Lecce | 56 | -1 pts |
| 99 | Trapani | 55 | -4 pts |
| 99 | Vibo Valentia | 55 | -1 pts |
| 101 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 54 | -1 pts |
| 101 | Caltanissetta | 54 | -5 pts |
| 101 | Cosenza | 54 | -3 pts |
| 101 | Enna | 54 | 0 pts |
| 101 | Siracusa | 54 | -14 pts |
| 106 | Sud Sardegna | 53 | 0 pts |
| 107 | Agrigento | 52 | -2 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 186% in 2014, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Agrigento, with 52% in 2014.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)