US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)
Darby, PA had the highest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate) of 3214 cities in 2023, at 20.1%. Holmen, WI had the lowest, at 0%. The median was 4.8% and the figure for the United States was 5.2%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2023 (%) | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darby, PA | 20.1 | +6.1 pts |
| 2 | California City, CA | 18.5 | +1.6 pts |
| 3 | Calexico, CA | 18.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 4 | East Cleveland, OH | 17.7 | -1.6 pts |
| 5 | Chester, PA | 17.6 | +1.7 pts |
| 6 | Flint, MI | 17.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 7 | Clearlake, CA | 16.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 8 | Lindsay, CA | 15.8 | -1.3 pts |
| 9 | Brawley, CA | 15.5 | -2.7 pts |
| 10 | Coolidge, AZ | 15.3 | -3.7 pts |
| 11 | Crowley, LA | 15.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 12 | East St. Louis, IL | 15.3 | +2.2 pts |
| 13 | Lake Station, IN | 14.9 | -3.4 pts |
| 14 | Boone, NC | 14.8 | -1.8 pts |
| 15 | Bogalusa, LA | 14.8 | +3.2 pts |
| 16 | Hazel Crest, IL | 14.7 | +1 pts |
| 17 | College Park, GA | 14.7 | +1.7 pts |
| 18 | Selma, AL | 14.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 19 | Galena Park, TX | 14.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 20 | Nogales, AZ | 14.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 21 | Detroit, MI | 14.2 | -0.5 pts |
| 22 | Camden, NJ | 14.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 22 | Riverdale, IL | 14.1 | -2.2 pts |
| 24 | Exeter, CA | 14 | +0.4 pts |
| 25 | Baker, LA | 14 | +1.4 pts |
| 26 | New Castle, PA | 13.8 | -1.7 pts |
| 27 | West Memphis, AR | 13.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 28 | Oxford, OH | 13.5 | +2.6 pts |
| 29 | Eastpointe, MI | 13.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 30 | Kinston, NC | 13.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 31 | Arcata, CA | 13.2 | -0.6 pts |
| 31 | Roma, TX | 13.2 | -0.7 pts |
| 33 | Gary, IN | 13 | -0.6 pts |
| 34 | Harvey, IL | 12.9 | -1.7 pts |
| 35 | Coalinga, CA | 12.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 36 | Inkster, MI | 12.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 36 | Port Townsend, WA | 12.8 | -0.9 pts |
| 38 | Perth Amboy, NJ | 12.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 39 | Cheney, WA | 12.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 40 | Chicago Heights, IL | 12.7 | -1.1 pts |
| 41 | Atlantic City, NJ | 12.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 42 | Burlington, NJ | 12.5 | +2.8 pts |
| 42 | Newman, CA | 12.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 44 | Talladega, AL | 12.5 | -1.8 pts |
| 45 | Belle Glade, FL | 12.4 | -0.1 pts |
| 45 | Reedley, CA | 12.4 | +1 pts |
| 47 | Selma, CA | 12.3 | +2 pts |
| 48 | Ashtabula, OH | 12.3 | -1.3 pts |
| 49 | Merced, CA | 12.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 50 | Monroe, GA | 12.2 | +1 pts |
| 51 | Reading, PA | 12.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 52 | Macomb, IL | 12.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 53 | Richton Park, IL | 12 | -0.3 pts |
| 54 | Conneaut, OH | 12 | -0 pts |
| 55 | Youngstown, OH | 11.9 | -1.3 pts |
| 56 | Madera, CA | 11.9 | -0.9 pts |
| 57 | Arvin, CA | 11.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 58 | Bullhead City, AZ | 11.8 | +1.8 pts |
| 59 | Moss Point, MS | 11.8 | +2 pts |
| 60 | Bay City, TX | 11.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 61 | Orangeburg, SC | 11.8 | -0.7 pts |
| 62 | Hamtramck, MI | 11.7 | -0 pts |
| 63 | Blue Island, IL | 11.7 | -2.7 pts |
| 64 | Mendota, CA | 11.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 65 | Robstown, TX | 11.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 66 | Adelanto, CA | 11.6 | +0.2 pts |
| 67 | Victorville, CA | 11.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 68 | Albany, GA | 11.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 69 | Saginaw, MI | 11.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 70 | Cleveland, OH | 11.5 | -0.4 pts |
| 71 | Corcoran, CA | 11.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 72 | Rio Vista, CA | 11.4 | -2 pts |
| 73 | Delano, CA | 11.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 74 | Douglas, AZ | 11.4 | -0.6 pts |
| 74 | Petersburg, VA | 11.4 | 0 pts |
| 76 | Worth, IL | 11.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 77 | Passaic, NJ | 11.4 | -0.5 pts |
| 78 | Gaffney, SC | 11.3 | +1.9 pts |
| 79 | Maple Heights, OH | 11.3 | +2.9 pts |
| 80 | Niles, MI | 11.2 | -0.9 pts |
| 81 | Blytheville, AR | 11.2 | -2.4 pts |
| 82 | Richmond Heights, OH | 11.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 83 | Atwater, CA | 11 | -0 pts |
| 83 | York, PA | 11 | -1 pts |
| 85 | Blackfoot, ID | 10.9 | +2.1 pts |
| 86 | Dinuba, CA | 10.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 86 | Dolton, IL | 10.9 | -1.8 pts |
| 88 | Newark, NJ | 10.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 89 | Jackson, MI | 10.8 | -0 pts |
| 89 | San Luis, AZ | 10.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 91 | Livingston, CA | 10.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 92 | West Park, FL | 10.7 | +2.1 pts |
| 93 | Monroe, LA | 10.7 | -0 pts |
| 94 | Lemoore, CA | 10.7 | -0.4 pts |
| 94 | Raymondville, TX | 10.7 | -1.9 pts |
| 96 | Matteson, IL | 10.6 | -1.8 pts |
| 96 | Pontiac, MI | 10.6 | +1.1 pts |
| 98 | Centralia, IL | 10.6 | -1.8 pts |
| 98 | Red Bluff, CA | 10.6 | +1.9 pts |
| 100 | Forrest City, AR | 10.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 101 | DeKalb, IL | 10.6 | -0.1 pts |
| 102 | Hartford, CT | 10.6 | -0.1 pts |
| 103 | Killeen, TX | 10.6 | -0.3 pts |
| 103 | New Carrollton, MD | 10.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 105 | Prichard, AL | 10.5 | -0 pts |
| 106 | Parlier, CA | 10.5 | +3.6 pts |
| 106 | Rancho Mirage, CA | 10.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 108 | Klamath Falls, OR | 10.5 | +2.3 pts |
| 109 | Trenton, NJ | 10.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 110 | Jesup, GA | 10.5 | +4.2 pts |
| 111 | Portsmouth, OH | 10.4 | -1 pts |
| 112 | Kent, OH | 10.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 113 | Ceres, CA | 10.4 | -0.1 pts |
| 113 | Salisbury, MD | 10.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 115 | Markham, IL | 10.4 | -3.6 pts |
| 116 | Coachella, CA | 10.4 | -1.5 pts |
| 117 | Vermillion, SD | 10.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 118 | Barstow, CA | 10.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 119 | East Orange, NJ | 10.3 | -1.3 pts |
| 119 | Lincoln Park, NJ | 10.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 121 | Laurinburg, NC | 10.3 | -0.9 pts |
| 121 | Opelousas, LA | 10.3 | -0.7 pts |
| 123 | Fulton, NY | 10.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 123 | Ridgefield Park, NJ | 10.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 125 | Sunnyside, WA | 10.2 | +1.3 pts |
| 126 | Johnson City, NY | 10.2 | -1 pts |
| 126 | Paterson, NJ | 10.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 128 | Clarksdale, MS | 10.2 | -2.4 pts |
| 129 | Greenville, MS | 10.2 | -1.3 pts |
| 130 | West Chicago, IL | 10.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 131 | Peru, IN | 10.2 | +3.8 pts |
| 132 | Calabasas, CA | 10.2 | +0.7 pts |
| 133 | McKeesport, PA | 10.1 | +2.3 pts |
| 134 | Horizon City, TX | 10.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 134 | Jennings, MO | 10.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 136 | Center Point, AL | 10.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 136 | South Holland, IL | 10.1 | -4 pts |
| 138 | Bainbridge, GA | 10.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 139 | Central Falls, RI | 10 | +1.7 pts |
| 140 | Zebulon, NC | 10 | +1 pts |
| 141 | Okmulgee, OK | 10 | +0.8 pts |
| 142 | New Iberia, LA | 10 | +1 pts |
| 143 | Fulton, MO | 9.9 | -0.6 pts |
| 144 | Oak Park, MI | 9.9 | -0 pts |
| 145 | El Centro, CA | 9.9 | -0.3 pts |
| 146 | Radcliff, KY | 9.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 146 | Rio Grande City, TX | 9.9 | +1 pts |
| 148 | Whitehall, OH | 9.9 | -0.8 pts |
| 149 | Binghamton, NY | 9.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 149 | Gulfport, MS | 9.8 | -1.6 pts |
| 151 | Sandusky, OH | 9.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 152 | Lansing, IL | 9.8 | -1.2 pts |
| 153 | Lynwood, CA | 9.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 154 | Dayton, OH | 9.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 154 | Fort Pierce, FL | 9.7 | -0.7 pts |
| 154 | Newport, RI | 9.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 157 | Niagara Falls, NY | 9.7 | +0.7 pts |
| 158 | Lebanon, PA | 9.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 159 | Avon Park, FL | 9.7 | -2.1 pts |
| 159 | Hesperia, CA | 9.7 | -0.1 pts |
| 161 | Wayne, MI | 9.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 162 | Somers Point, NJ | 9.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 162 | Warrensville Heights, OH | 9.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 164 | North Plainfield, NJ | 9.6 | -0 pts |
| 165 | Statesboro, GA | 9.6 | -1.7 pts |
| 166 | Conyers, GA | 9.6 | -1 pts |
| 166 | Huntington Park, CA | 9.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 168 | Pine Bluff, AR | 9.6 | -0.3 pts |
| 169 | Reidsville, NC | 9.5 | -0.5 pts |
| 170 | Pascagoula, MS | 9.5 | -2.5 pts |
| 171 | Hempstead, NY | 9.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 171 | Orange, TX | 9.5 | +0.7 pts |
| 173 | Oakdale, CA | 9.5 | +0.9 pts |
| 174 | Elmira, NY | 9.4 | -0.4 pts |
| 175 | Calumet City, IL | 9.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 175 | Kinnelon, NJ | 9.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 177 | Jackson, MS | 9.4 | +0.1 pts |
| 177 | Wilkinsburg, PA | 9.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 179 | Artesia, CA | 9.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 180 | Harrisburg, PA | 9.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 181 | Troy, NY | 9.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 182 | Hopewell, VA | 9.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 183 | Cahokia Heights, IL | 9.3 | -2 pts |
| 183 | Muskegon, MI | 9.3 | -1.1 pts |
| 185 | Columbus, MS | 9.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 185 | South Houston, TX | 9.3 | +0.1 pts |
| 187 | McFarland, CA | 9.3 | +2.9 pts |
| 187 | Plainfield, NJ | 9.3 | -1 pts |
| 189 | Carbondale, IL | 9.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 189 | Port Huron, MI | 9.3 | 0 pts |
| 191 | Hallandale Beach, FL | 9.3 | -0 pts |
| 192 | Mount Pleasant, MI | 9.3 | -0.2 pts |
| 192 | Waterbury, CT | 9.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 194 | Alamo, TX | 9.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 194 | Sanger, CA | 9.2 | +1 pts |
| 196 | Mineral Wells, TX | 9.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 197 | Circleville, OH | 9.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 198 | Chowchilla, CA | 9.2 | -0.9 pts |
| 199 | Rincon, GA | 9.2 | +3.3 pts |
| 200 | Clarkston, GA | 9.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 200 | Clute, TX | 9.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 200 | El Cajon, CA | 9.2 | +1 pts |
| 203 | Porterville, CA | 9.1 | -0.9 pts |
| 204 | Garfield Heights, OH | 9.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 204 | Ozark, AL | 9.1 | -1 pts |
| 206 | Butler, PA | 9.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 207 | Baton Rouge, LA | 9.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 208 | Lathrop, CA | 9 | +0.1 pts |
| 209 | Greenville, NC | 9 | +0.3 pts |
| 209 | Huntsville, TX | 9 | +0.1 pts |
| 209 | Los Banos, CA | 9 | +1.2 pts |
| 212 | Hanford, CA | 9 | +0.8 pts |
| 213 | Locust Grove, GA | 9 | +0.5 pts |
| 213 | Lodi, CA | 9 | -0.5 pts |
| 213 | Springfield, OH | 9 | -0.1 pts |
| 216 | Gonzales, LA | 9 | +0.1 pts |
| 217 | Sharon, PA | 9 | +1.6 pts |
| 218 | Amherst Town, MA | 9 | -0.3 pts |
| 218 | Hinesville, GA | 9 | +0.3 pts |
| 218 | Wallington, NJ | 9 | +1.4 pts |
| 221 | Marion, OH | 9 | +0.3 pts |
| 221 | Vernal, UT | 9 | +0.1 pts |
| 223 | Baytown, TX | 9 | -0.2 pts |
| 224 | Decatur, IL | 8.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 224 | Dublin, GA | 8.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 226 | Lawndale, CA | 8.9 | +0.7 pts |
| 226 | South River, NJ | 8.9 | -1.4 pts |
| 228 | Gadsden, AL | 8.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 229 | Hazelwood, MO | 8.9 | -0.7 pts |
| 229 | Lima, OH | 8.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 229 | Tehachapi, CA | 8.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 232 | Leesburg, FL | 8.9 | -1.5 pts |
| 232 | Woodbury, NY | 8.9 | +2.4 pts |
| 234 | Shreveport, LA | 8.9 | -0.3 pts |
| 235 | Beach Park, IL | 8.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 235 | Bridgeport, CT | 8.9 | -0.7 pts |
| 237 | Crossville, TN | 8.9 | -1.7 pts |
| 237 | Cudahy, CA | 8.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 237 | Danville, IL | 8.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 237 | Schenectady, NY | 8.9 | -0.5 pts |
| 237 | Warren, OH | 8.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 242 | Avenal, CA | 8.9 | -3.2 pts |
| 243 | Nacogdoches, TX | 8.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 244 | Allentown, PA | 8.8 | -0.4 pts |
| 244 | Alpena, MI | 8.8 | -0.1 pts |
| 244 | Cocoa Beach, FL | 8.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 244 | Romulus, MI | 8.8 | -1 pts |
| 244 | San Jacinto, CA | 8.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 249 | Apple Valley, CA | 8.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 250 | Chelsea, MA | 8.8 | -0.1 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Unemployed civilians aged 16 and over as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
An average over five years of survey responses, so it moves slowly. The official monthly and annual rates for states and counties are unemployment_rate, from BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 5 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2023 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2023) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2023. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2023. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2023. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2023.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2023 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2023 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_unemployment_2023,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2023}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2023. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2023
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2023
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2023.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2023/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2023-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"unemployment_rate_acs","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=unemployment_rate_acs&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Darby, PA, with 20.1% in 2023, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Holmen, WI, with 0% in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 cities have no value for 2023 and are not ranked.
Unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate): other rankings
- Cities in Montana
- Cities in Maryland
- Cities in Wisconsin
- Counties in Washington
- Counties in Vermont
- Counties in Utah