US cities by asian population share, 2024
Milpitas, CA had the highest asian population share of 3219 cities in 2024, at 71.5%. Union City, GA had the lowest, at 0%. The median was 2.4% and the figure for the United States was 5.9%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2024 (%) | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milpitas, CA | 71.5 | 0 pts |
| 2 | Cupertino, CA | 70.8 | -0.8 pts |
| 3 | Walnut, CA | 68.8 | +1.7 pts |
| 4 | San Marino, CA | 68.1 | -0.8 pts |
| 5 | Rosemead, CA | 65.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 6 | Monterey Park, CA | 64.4 | -0 pts |
| 7 | Fremont, CA | 63.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 8 | Temple City, CA | 63.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 9 | Diamond Bar, CA | 62.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 10 | Cerritos, CA | 61.7 | 0 pts |
| 11 | San Gabriel, CA | 59.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 12 | Saratoga, CA | 59.5 | 0 pts |
| 13 | Daly City, CA | 59.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 14 | Arcadia, CA | 58.7 | +1.5 pts |
| 15 | Mountain House, CA | 57.3 | +1.7 pts |
| 16 | Union City, CA | 56.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 17 | Dublin, CA | 55 | +1.8 pts |
| 18 | Palisades Park, NJ | 54.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 19 | Foster City, CA | 54.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 20 | La Palma, CA | 54.1 | +2.7 pts |
| 21 | Westminster, CA | 52.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 22 | Honolulu, HI | 51.8 | -0.6 pts |
| 23 | Alhambra, CA | 50.7 | -0.1 pts |
| 24 | Santa Clara, CA | 50.2 | +2.8 pts |
| 25 | San Ramon, CA | 49.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 26 | Sunnyvale, CA | 49.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 27 | Millbrae, CA | 48.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 28 | Newark, CA | 46.3 | +3.6 pts |
| 29 | Irvine, CA | 44.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 30 | Hercules, CA | 44.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 31 | Pleasanton, CA | 43.7 | +2.1 pts |
| 32 | Fort Lee, NJ | 43.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 33 | Artesia, CA | 43.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 34 | Garden Grove, CA | 42.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 35 | Bellevue, WA | 42.7 | +1.8 pts |
| 36 | Newcastle, WA | 42.1 | +2.5 pts |
| 37 | South San Francisco, CA | 41.8 | -0.6 pts |
| 38 | Morrisville, NC | 41 | -0.8 pts |
| 39 | Chino Hills, CA | 40.7 | +0.9 pts |
| 40 | Redmond, WA | 40.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 41 | San Jose, CA | 39.2 | +0.8 pts |
| 42 | Los Altos, CA | 38.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 43 | Edgewater, NJ | 38.7 | -3.4 pts |
| 44 | Sugar Land, TX | 38.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 45 | Cypress, CA | 38.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 46 | Palo Alto, CA | 38.1 | +2 pts |
| 47 | Sammamish, WA | 37.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 48 | Torrance, CA | 37 | -1.2 pts |
| 49 | Fountain Valley, CA | 36.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 50 | Mountain View, CA | 36.3 | +1.8 pts |
| 51 | Secaucus, NJ | 36.1 | +1.6 pts |
| 52 | Tenafly, NJ | 36 | +5 pts |
| 53 | San Leandro, CA | 35.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 54 | South Pasadena, CA | 35 | +2.7 pts |
| 55 | San Francisco, CA | 34.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 56 | New Hyde Park, NY | 34.2 | +4.8 pts |
| 57 | Lathrop, CA | 33.6 | +1.2 pts |
| 58 | Hillsborough, CA | 33.2 | +0.7 pts |
| 59 | American Canyon, CA | 32.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 60 | Murphy, TX | 32.4 | -1 pts |
| 61 | Buena Park, CA | 32.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 62 | Morton Grove, IL | 32 | +0.4 pts |
| 63 | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA | 31.8 | 0 pts |
| 64 | San Bruno, CA | 31.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 65 | Emeryville, CA | 31.4 | +1.8 pts |
| 66 | Albany, CA | 31.2 | +2.4 pts |
| 67 | Elk Grove, CA | 31 | -0.3 pts |
| 68 | La CaƱada Flintridge, CA | 30.8 | -0.2 pts |
| 69 | Eastvale, CA | 30.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 70 | West Covina, CA | 30.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 71 | Belmont, CA | 30.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 72 | Hayward, CA | 30 | +0.9 pts |
| 73 | Coppell, TX | 29.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 74 | River Edge, NJ | 29.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 75 | Buffalo Grove, IL | 29.7 | +1.5 pts |
| 76 | Johns Creek, GA | 29.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 77 | Burlingame, CA | 29.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 78 | Quincy, MA | 29.1 | -0 pts |
| 79 | Alameda, CA | 28.6 | -1.3 pts |
| 80 | El Cerrito, CA | 28.4 | -0.8 pts |
| 81 | Loma Linda, CA | 28.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 82 | Novi, MI | 28.1 | +2.7 pts |
| 83 | Malden, MA | 28.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 84 | Frisco, TX | 28.1 | +1.2 pts |
| 85 | San Mateo, CA | 28 | +1.2 pts |
| 86 | Troy, MI | 27.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 87 | Brea, CA | 27.7 | +1.8 pts |
| 88 | El Monte, CA | 27.4 | -1.8 pts |
| 89 | Lincolnwood, IL | 27.3 | +1 pts |
| 90 | Pinole, CA | 27.2 | +2.9 pts |
| 91 | Carson, CA | 26.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 92 | Stanton, CA | 26.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 93 | Issaquah, WA | 26.6 | -1 pts |
| 94 | Yorba Linda, CA | 26.6 | +1.1 pts |
| 95 | Jersey City, NJ | 26.5 | +1 pts |
| 96 | Renton, WA | 26.5 | +0.7 pts |
| 97 | Tustin, CA | 26.2 | +1.3 pts |
| 98 | Campbell, CA | 25.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 99 | Carteret, NJ | 25.7 | +1.2 pts |
| 100 | Paramus, NJ | 25.7 | +2.2 pts |
| 101 | Gardena, CA | 25.6 | +1.2 pts |
| 102 | Glendale Heights, IL | 25.5 | +1.5 pts |
| 103 | Skokie, IL | 25.4 | -1.6 pts |
| 104 | Hamtramck, MI | 25.3 | -0.4 pts |
| 105 | Hoffman Estates, IL | 25.1 | +1.5 pts |
| 106 | Bergenfield, NJ | 24.7 | -1.7 pts |
| 107 | Vernon Hills, IL | 24.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 108 | Fullerton, CA | 24.6 | +0.2 pts |
| 109 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA | 24.5 | +0.1 pts |
| 110 | Mercer Island, WA | 24.4 | +2.2 pts |
| 111 | Stafford, TX | 24.3 | -2.4 pts |
| 112 | Davis, CA | 24.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 113 | Suwanee, GA | 24 | -3.3 pts |
| 114 | Farmington, MI | 23.9 | +4 pts |
| 115 | Schaumburg, IL | 23.8 | 0 pts |
| 116 | Plano, TX | 23.6 | +1.1 pts |
| 117 | Tukwila, WA | 23.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 118 | Doraville, GA | 23.5 | +2.4 pts |
| 119 | San Carlos, CA | 23.4 | +1.6 pts |
| 120 | Tracy, CA | 23.2 | +1.5 pts |
| 121 | Irving, TX | 23.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 122 | Kent, WA | 23 | +0.7 pts |
| 123 | Laguna Woods, CA | 22.8 | -0.9 pts |
| 124 | Vallejo, CA | 22.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 125 | Signal Hill, CA | 22.6 | -1.9 pts |
| 126 | Bellaire, TX | 22.5 | +2.1 pts |
| 127 | Naperville, IL | 22.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 128 | Braintree Town, MA | 22.2 | +1 pts |
| 129 | Moraga, CA | 22.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 130 | Rockville, MD | 22.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 131 | Duluth, GA | 22.1 | -1.3 pts |
| 132 | Ridgefield, NJ | 22 | -4.3 pts |
| 133 | Lowell, MA | 22 | +1 pts |
| 134 | Harrison, NJ | 22 | -0 pts |
| 135 | Wood-Ridge, NJ | 21.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 136 | Baldwin Park, CA | 21.9 | -0.2 pts |
| 137 | West Lafayette, IN | 21.9 | +1.6 pts |
| 138 | North St. Paul, MN | 21.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 139 | Maplewood, MN | 21.8 | -0.6 pts |
| 140 | Pacifica, CA | 21.7 | +1.2 pts |
| 141 | Livingston, CA | 21.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 142 | Princeton, NJ | 21.5 | +1.9 pts |
| 143 | South Plainfield, NJ | 21.3 | +5.3 pts |
| 144 | La Mirada, CA | 21.2 | -1.7 pts |
| 145 | Danville, CA | 21.2 | +1.5 pts |
| 146 | Highland Park, NJ | 21.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 147 | Allen, TX | 21 | +1.4 pts |
| 148 | Stockton, CA | 20.8 | +0.2 pts |
| 149 | Los Gatos, CA | 20.6 | +1.4 pts |
| 150 | Little Ferry, NJ | 20.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 150 | South El Monte, CA | 20.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 152 | Alpharetta, GA | 20.4 | -0.1 pts |
| 153 | Berkeley, CA | 20.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 154 | Mill Creek, WA | 20.3 | -0.2 pts |
| 154 | Niles, IL | 20.3 | -0 pts |
| 156 | Cary, NC | 20.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 157 | Scarsdale, NY | 20.3 | +1.5 pts |
| 158 | Gaithersburg, MD | 20.3 | +0.8 pts |
| 158 | New Milford, NJ | 20.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 160 | Cambridge, MA | 20.2 | +0.7 pts |
| 161 | Yuba City, CA | 20.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 162 | Brooklyn Park, MN | 20.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 163 | Sacramento, CA | 20.1 | +0.7 pts |
| 164 | Piedmont, CA | 20 | -2.5 pts |
| 165 | Folsom, CA | 19.9 | +0.5 pts |
| 166 | Culver City, CA | 19.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 167 | Bartlett, IL | 19.7 | +1.9 pts |
| 168 | Sachse, TX | 19.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 169 | Lake Forest, CA | 19.7 | -0.7 pts |
| 170 | Valley Stream, NY | 19.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 171 | Maryland Heights, MO | 19.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 172 | Apex, NC | 19.5 | +3 pts |
| 173 | Pittsburg, CA | 19.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 174 | Carol Stream, IL | 19.3 | -0.2 pts |
| 175 | Kirkland, WA | 19.3 | +1.6 pts |
| 176 | Lynnwood, WA | 19.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 177 | Woodinville, WA | 19.2 | +1.6 pts |
| 178 | Bothell, WA | 19.1 | -0 pts |
| 179 | Dublin, OH | 18.9 | -1.2 pts |
| 180 | Missouri City, TX | 18.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 181 | Menlo Park, CA | 18.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 182 | Suisun City, CA | 18.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 183 | Mukilteo, WA | 18.6 | -1.5 pts |
| 184 | Hanover Park, IL | 18.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 185 | Placentia, CA | 18.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 186 | Fairfax, VA | 18.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 187 | Dumont, NJ | 18.3 | -2.6 pts |
| 188 | Chino, CA | 18.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 189 | Redwood City, CA | 18 | +0.2 pts |
| 190 | Anaheim, CA | 18 | -0.4 pts |
| 191 | Metuchen, NJ | 17.9 | +1 pts |
| 192 | Duarte, CA | 17.9 | 0 pts |
| 193 | Fairfield, CA | 17.9 | +0.7 pts |
| 194 | St. Paul, MN | 17.8 | -0 pts |
| 195 | Fulshear, TX | 17.7 | +5.8 pts |
| 196 | Carrollton, TX | 17.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 197 | East Rutherford, NJ | 17.5 | -2.8 pts |
| 198 | Seattle, WA | 17.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 199 | Lisle, IL | 17.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 200 | SeaTac, WA | 17.4 | +1.6 pts |
| 201 | Redondo Beach, CA | 17.4 | -0.4 pts |
| 202 | Newton, MA | 17.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 203 | San Diego, CA | 17.3 | 0 pts |
| 204 | Lomita, CA | 17.2 | +2.5 pts |
| 205 | Los Alamitos, CA | 17.1 | +1.6 pts |
| 205 | Sierra Madre, CA | 17.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 207 | Maywood, NJ | 17.1 | -0.4 pts |
| 208 | Morgan Hill, CA | 17.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 209 | Walnut Creek, CA | 17.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 210 | Livermore, CA | 17.1 | +1 pts |
| 211 | Lakewood, CA | 17 | -0.5 pts |
| 212 | Pasadena, CA | 17 | -0.5 pts |
| 213 | National City, CA | 16.8 | -0 pts |
| 214 | Cedar Park, TX | 16.7 | +2.2 pts |
| 215 | Celina, TX | 16.7 | +4.8 pts |
| 216 | Pleasant Hill, CA | 16.6 | -0.4 pts |
| 217 | Ithaca, NY | 16.5 | +1.5 pts |
| 218 | Aliso Viejo, CA | 16.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 219 | San Dimas, CA | 16.3 | -1.1 pts |
| 220 | Kenmore, WA | 16.2 | +1.5 pts |
| 221 | Glenview, IL | 16.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 222 | Mineola, NY | 16.2 | +1.9 pts |
| 222 | Northbrook, IL | 16.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 224 | Happy Valley, OR | 16.1 | -1.5 pts |
| 225 | Milton, GA | 16.1 | -0.2 pts |
| 226 | Sayreville, NJ | 16.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 227 | Richardson, TX | 16.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 228 | Herndon, VA | 16.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 229 | Laguna Hills, CA | 16 | +0.3 pts |
| 230 | Orinda, CA | 16 | +0.5 pts |
| 231 | Ridgewood, NJ | 15.8 | -0.6 pts |
| 232 | College Park, MD | 15.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 233 | Solon, OH | 15.8 | +2.1 pts |
| 234 | Champaign, IL | 15.8 | +1 pts |
| 235 | Oakland, CA | 15.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 236 | Fife, WA | 15.7 | -0.6 pts |
| 237 | Manteca, CA | 15.6 | +1.7 pts |
| 238 | Monrovia, CA | 15.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 239 | Ann Arbor, MI | 15.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 240 | Southlake, TX | 15.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 241 | Norcross, GA | 15.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 242 | Pearland, TX | 15.5 | -1.4 pts |
| 243 | Maple Valley, WA | 15.5 | +3 pts |
| 244 | Atlantic City, NJ | 15.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 245 | Mount Prospect, IL | 15.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 246 | Brentwood, CA | 15.3 | -1.1 pts |
| 246 | Federal Way, WA | 15.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 246 | Wheeling, IL | 15.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 249 | Burien, WA | 15.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 250 | Lansdale, PA | 15.3 | +2.6 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
People who are not Hispanic or Latino and report Asian as their only race, as a percentage of the total population. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
US federal statistics ask about Hispanic origin and race separately, and Hispanic or Latino people can be of any race. The shares for White, Black and Asian count people who are not Hispanic and report that race alone, so the published shares do not add up to 100 (people of two or more races and other races are not shown). EU and Spanish statistics do not collect race.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by asian population share, 2024) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by asian population share, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by asian population share, 2024. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by asian population share, 2024 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_asian_2024,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by asian population share, 2024}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by asian population share, 2024
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b03002.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by asian population share using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"asian_share","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=asian_share&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest asian population share?
Milpitas, CA, with 71.5% in 2024, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest asian population share?
Union City, GA, with 0% in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Asian population share: other rankings
- Cities in Michigan
- Cities in Oregon
- Cities in Kansas
- Counties in Rhode Island
- Counties in Oklahoma
- Counties in Wyoming
US cities: more rankings
- Population speaking a language other than English at home
- Bachelor's degree or higher, population 25 and over
- Graduate or professional degree, population 25 and over
- School enrolment, children aged 3 and 4
- Civilian labor force
- Housing vacancy rate, all vacant units (US)
- Unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)
- High blood pressure in adults, local model estimate