US cities by asian population share
Cupertino, CA had the highest asian population share of 3214 cities in 2022, at 70.1%. Wendell, NC had the lowest, at 0%. The median was 2.3% and the figure for the United States was 5.7%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cupertino, CA | 70.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 2 | Milpitas, CA | 69.5 | +2.4 pts |
| 3 | San Marino, CA | 68.5 | +1.9 pts |
| 4 | Walnut, CA | 65.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 5 | Temple City, CA | 65.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 6 | Monterey Park, CA | 64.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 7 | Rosemead, CA | 63.1 | -1.1 pts |
| 8 | Palisades Park, NJ | 62.1 | +3.7 pts |
| 9 | Fremont, CA | 61.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 10 | Cerritos, CA | 60.1 | +1.9 pts |
| 11 | Diamond Bar, CA | 59.3 | -1.5 pts |
| 12 | San Gabriel, CA | 58.9 | -1.4 pts |
| 13 | Daly City, CA | 58.5 | +1.8 pts |
| 14 | Arcadia, CA | 56.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 15 | Saratoga, CA | 55.5 | +1.8 pts |
| 16 | Union City, CA | 55.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 17 | Foster City, CA | 53 | +1.2 pts |
| 18 | Dublin, CA | 53 | +0.7 pts |
| 19 | Honolulu, HI | 51.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 20 | Alhambra, CA | 51 | +0.5 pts |
| 21 | Westminster, CA | 50.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 22 | Mountain House, CA | 50.1 | +6.4 pts |
| 23 | La Palma, CA | 49.6 | +2.6 pts |
| 24 | Sunnyvale, CA | 49.4 | +1.6 pts |
| 25 | San Ramon, CA | 47.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 26 | Millbrae, CA | 47.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 27 | Santa Clara, CA | 47.1 | +1.3 pts |
| 28 | Irvine, CA | 44.1 | +1.5 pts |
| 29 | Fort Lee, NJ | 43.7 | +2.4 pts |
| 30 | South San Francisco, CA | 42.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 31 | Morrisville, NC | 42.5 | +1.6 pts |
| 32 | Artesia, CA | 41.7 | +3.1 pts |
| 33 | Garden Grove, CA | 41.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 34 | Edgewater, NJ | 41.5 | -1.7 pts |
| 35 | Newark, CA | 41.4 | +2.8 pts |
| 36 | Hercules, CA | 41.3 | -0.9 pts |
| 37 | Pleasanton, CA | 41 | +2 pts |
| 38 | Chino Hills, CA | 39.8 | +1.5 pts |
| 39 | Bellevue, WA | 39.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 40 | Redmond, WA | 38.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 41 | Sugar Land, TX | 38 | 0 pts |
| 42 | San Jose, CA | 37.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 43 | Torrance, CA | 37.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 44 | Fountain Valley, CA | 37.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 45 | Cypress, CA | 37 | -0.9 pts |
| 46 | Newcastle, WA | 36.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 47 | Los Altos, CA | 36.7 | +2.9 pts |
| 48 | Sammamish, WA | 35.7 | +2.4 pts |
| 49 | San Leandro, CA | 34.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 50 | Palo Alto, CA | 34.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 51 | American Canyon, CA | 34.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 52 | San Francisco, CA | 34.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 53 | Murphy, TX | 33.8 | +5.3 pts |
| 54 | Morton Grove, IL | 33.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 55 | Hillsborough, CA | 33.5 | +1.7 pts |
| 56 | Mountain View, CA | 33.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 57 | South Pasadena, CA | 33.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 58 | Secaucus, NJ | 33 | -0.4 pts |
| 59 | Buena Park, CA | 32.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 60 | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA | 32.3 | +1.4 pts |
| 61 | San Bruno, CA | 32.2 | -1.9 pts |
| 62 | Alameda, CA | 31.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 63 | Tenafly, NJ | 31.1 | -1 pts |
| 64 | Coppell, TX | 31.1 | +1 pts |
| 65 | La CaƱada Flintridge, CA | 30.6 | +0.6 pts |
| 66 | Emeryville, CA | 30.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 67 | Elk Grove, CA | 30.1 | +1 pts |
| 68 | River Edge, NJ | 29.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 69 | El Cerrito, CA | 29.7 | +1.1 pts |
| 70 | Ridgefield, NJ | 29.7 | +0.8 pts |
| 71 | Albany, CA | 29.6 | +1 pts |
| 72 | Belmont, CA | 29.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 73 | Hayward, CA | 29.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 74 | El Monte, CA | 29.2 | -0.5 pts |
| 75 | West Covina, CA | 29.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 76 | Quincy, MA | 28.8 | -1.1 pts |
| 77 | New Hyde Park, NY | 28.4 | -3.2 pts |
| 78 | Burlingame, CA | 28 | +0.7 pts |
| 79 | Malden, MA | 27.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 80 | Bergenfield, NJ | 27.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 81 | Eastvale, CA | 27.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 82 | Johns Creek, GA | 27.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 83 | Lathrop, CA | 26.9 | +1.3 pts |
| 84 | San Mateo, CA | 26.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 85 | Stanton, CA | 26.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 86 | Campbell, CA | 26.7 | +1.7 pts |
| 87 | Issaquah, WA | 26.4 | +1 pts |
| 88 | Skokie, IL | 26.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 89 | Renton, WA | 26.1 | +1.9 pts |
| 90 | Hamtramck, MI | 26.1 | +2 pts |
| 91 | Troy, MI | 25.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 92 | Stafford, TX | 25.8 | -2.2 pts |
| 93 | Brea, CA | 25.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 94 | Vernon Hills, IL | 25.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 95 | Buffalo Grove, IL | 25.4 | +1.4 pts |
| 96 | Frisco, TX | 25.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 97 | Jersey City, NJ | 25.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 98 | Loma Linda, CA | 25.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 99 | Novi, MI | 25.3 | +1.9 pts |
| 100 | Tustin, CA | 25.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 101 | East Rutherford, NJ | 25.1 | +9.9 pts |
| 102 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA | 25.1 | +1.8 pts |
| 103 | Carson, CA | 25 | -2.1 pts |
| 104 | Carteret, NJ | 25 | +1.9 pts |
| 105 | Fullerton, CA | 24.9 | +1 pts |
| 106 | Davis, CA | 24.9 | +1.8 pts |
| 107 | Hoffman Estates, IL | 24.6 | -0.9 pts |
| 108 | Schaumburg, IL | 24.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 109 | Tukwila, WA | 24.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 110 | Gardena, CA | 24.2 | -1.1 pts |
| 111 | Suwanee, GA | 23.9 | +3.2 pts |
| 112 | Yorba Linda, CA | 23.9 | +1.9 pts |
| 113 | Pinole, CA | 23.7 | -2.6 pts |
| 114 | Paramus, NJ | 23.7 | -1 pts |
| 115 | Duluth, GA | 23 | -0.7 pts |
| 116 | Lincolnwood, IL | 23 | -2.5 pts |
| 117 | Plano, TX | 22.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 118 | Livingston, CA | 22.6 | +1.6 pts |
| 119 | Laguna Woods, CA | 22.5 | +0.7 pts |
| 120 | Lowell, MA | 22.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 121 | Kent, WA | 22.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 122 | Vallejo, CA | 22.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 123 | Glendale Heights, IL | 22.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 124 | Signal Hill, CA | 22.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 125 | Irving, TX | 22.2 | +0.8 pts |
| 126 | Rockville, MD | 22.2 | +1.9 pts |
| 127 | Baldwin Park, CA | 22.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 128 | Mercer Island, WA | 22 | +0.7 pts |
| 129 | Alpharetta, GA | 21.9 | -0 pts |
| 130 | Highland Park, NJ | 21.8 | +5 pts |
| 131 | La Mirada, CA | 21.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 132 | Piedmont, CA | 21.6 | +1 pts |
| 133 | Moraga, CA | 21.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 134 | Niles, IL | 21.4 | +3.5 pts |
| 135 | Bellaire, TX | 21.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 136 | West Lafayette, IN | 21.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 137 | Pacifica, CA | 21 | +0.5 pts |
| 138 | Little Ferry, NJ | 21 | -2 pts |
| 139 | Naperville, IL | 21 | +0.4 pts |
| 140 | Gaithersburg, MD | 20.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 141 | Doraville, GA | 20.9 | +2.3 pts |
| 142 | Cary, NC | 20.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 143 | Braintree Town, MA | 20.7 | +1 pts |
| 144 | Berkeley, CA | 20.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 145 | Mill Creek, WA | 20.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 146 | Mukilteo, WA | 20.4 | -1 pts |
| 147 | San Carlos, CA | 20.3 | +2 pts |
| 148 | Stockton, CA | 20.3 | -0.2 pts |
| 149 | New Milford, NJ | 20.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 150 | Maplewood, MN | 20.1 | +1.5 pts |
| 151 | Tracy, CA | 19.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 152 | Harrison, NJ | 19.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 153 | Yuba City, CA | 19.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 154 | North St. Paul, MN | 19.6 | +3.1 pts |
| 155 | Hanover Park, IL | 19.4 | +3 pts |
| 156 | Brooklyn Park, MN | 19.3 | -0 pts |
| 156 | Lake Forest, CA | 19.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 158 | Sacramento, CA | 19.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 159 | Cambridge, MA | 19.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 160 | Carol Stream, IL | 19.1 | -1.3 pts |
| 161 | Dublin, OH | 19 | -0.6 pts |
| 162 | Princeton, NJ | 19 | +2.6 pts |
| 163 | Allen, TX | 18.9 | -0.3 pts |
| 164 | Sachse, TX | 18.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 165 | Maryland Heights, MO | 18.7 | +1.8 pts |
| 166 | Farmington, MI | 18.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 167 | Bothell, WA | 18.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 167 | Wood-Ridge, NJ | 18.5 | +2.4 pts |
| 169 | Dumont, NJ | 18.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 170 | Lakewood, CA | 18.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 171 | St. Paul, MN | 18.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 172 | Folsom, CA | 18.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 173 | Danville, CA | 18.1 | +2.6 pts |
| 174 | Duarte, CA | 18 | +1.5 pts |
| 175 | Chino, CA | 18 | +1.8 pts |
| 176 | Happy Valley, OR | 18 | -1.8 pts |
| 177 | Sierra Madre, CA | 18 | +2.1 pts |
| 178 | Lynnwood, WA | 18 | +0.8 pts |
| 179 | Fairfield, CA | 17.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 180 | Lomita, CA | 17.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 181 | Clarkston, GA | 17.7 | -5.4 pts |
| 181 | Pittsburg, CA | 17.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 183 | Culver City, CA | 17.6 | -0.7 pts |
| 184 | Missouri City, TX | 17.6 | -1.1 pts |
| 185 | Pasadena, CA | 17.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 186 | Fairfax, VA | 17.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 187 | Anaheim, CA | 17.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 187 | Scarsdale, NY | 17.4 | +1.7 pts |
| 189 | South El Monte, CA | 17.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 190 | Maywood, NJ | 17.4 | -2.2 pts |
| 191 | Mineola, NY | 17.3 | +3.1 pts |
| 192 | Sayreville, NJ | 17.2 | -0.5 pts |
| 193 | Kirkland, WA | 17.1 | +1.1 pts |
| 194 | Lilburn, GA | 17.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 195 | Dunwoody, GA | 17.1 | -0 pts |
| 195 | San Diego, CA | 17.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 197 | National City, CA | 17 | -0.1 pts |
| 198 | San Pablo, CA | 17 | -0.2 pts |
| 199 | South Plainfield, NJ | 17 | +3.4 pts |
| 200 | Southlake, TX | 17 | -0.4 pts |
| 201 | Lisle, IL | 16.9 | -0.7 pts |
| 202 | Los Gatos, CA | 16.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 203 | Placentia, CA | 16.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 204 | Superior, CO | 16.8 | -0 pts |
| 205 | Laguna Hills, CA | 16.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 205 | Valley Stream, NY | 16.7 | +2.1 pts |
| 207 | Seattle, WA | 16.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 208 | Woodinville, WA | 16.7 | +4.9 pts |
| 209 | Redwood City, CA | 16.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 210 | Fulshear, TX | 16.7 | +3.3 pts |
| 211 | Redondo Beach, CA | 16.6 | +1.5 pts |
| 212 | Pleasant Hill, CA | 16.5 | +2.3 pts |
| 213 | Milton, GA | 16.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 214 | Bartlett, IL | 16.4 | -0.4 pts |
| 215 | Wheeling, IL | 16.4 | -1.1 pts |
| 216 | Menlo Park, CA | 16.4 | +0.1 pts |
| 217 | New Providence, NJ | 16.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 218 | Northbrook, IL | 16.3 | +1.3 pts |
| 219 | Walnut Creek, CA | 16.3 | -1.4 pts |
| 220 | SeaTac, WA | 16.2 | +2.7 pts |
| 221 | Suisun City, CA | 16.2 | -1.9 pts |
| 222 | Ann Arbor, MI | 16.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 223 | Livermore, CA | 16 | +1.4 pts |
| 224 | Morgan Hill, CA | 16 | +0.5 pts |
| 225 | Atlantic City, NJ | 16 | -0.7 pts |
| 226 | Glenview, IL | 16 | +0.7 pts |
| 227 | Aliso Viejo, CA | 16 | +0.5 pts |
| 228 | Fife, WA | 16 | +1.5 pts |
| 229 | Herndon, VA | 15.9 | -0.2 pts |
| 230 | Champaign, IL | 15.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 231 | Auburn Hills, MI | 15.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 232 | Oakland, CA | 15.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 233 | Lansdale, PA | 15.7 | +1.5 pts |
| 233 | Shoreline, WA | 15.7 | +0.1 pts |
| 235 | Pearland, TX | 15.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 236 | San Dimas, CA | 15.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 237 | Ithaca, NY | 15.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 238 | Round Lake, IL | 15.5 | +3.2 pts |
| 239 | Ridgewood, NJ | 15.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 240 | Carrollton, TX | 15.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 240 | Metuchen, NJ | 15.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 242 | Richardson, TX | 15.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 243 | Storm Lake, IA | 15.3 | +0.1 pts |
| 244 | Rutherford, NJ | 15.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 245 | Manhattan Beach, CA | 15.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 246 | Azusa, CA | 15.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 247 | Claremont, CA | 15.1 | -0.2 pts |
| 248 | Chula Vista, CA | 14.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 249 | Rancho Cordova, CA | 14.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 250 | Federal Way, WA | 14.9 | +0.6 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
People who are not Hispanic or Latino and report Asian as their only race, as a percentage of the total population. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
US federal statistics ask about Hispanic origin and race separately, and Hispanic or Latino people can be of any race. The shares for White, Black and Asian count people who are not Hispanic and report that race alone, so the published shares do not add up to 100 (people of two or more races and other races are not shown). EU and Spanish statistics do not collect race.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 5 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by asian population share, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by asian population share, 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by asian population share, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by asian population share, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_asian_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by asian population share, 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by asian population share, 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/asian-population-share/us-cities?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b03002.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by asian population share using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"asian_share","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=asian_share&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest asian population share?
Cupertino, CA, with 70.1% in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest asian population share?
Wendell, NC, with 0% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B03002: Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino, as a percentage of the total population, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 cities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.
Asian population share: other rankings
- Cities in Michigan
- Cities in Oregon
- Cities in Kansas
- Counties in Rhode Island
- Counties in Oklahoma
- Counties in Wyoming
US cities: more rankings
- Population speaking a language other than English at home
- Bachelor's degree or higher, population 25 and over
- Graduate or professional degree, population 25 and over
- School enrolment, children aged 3 and 4
- Civilian labor force
- Housing vacancy rate, all vacant units (US)
- Unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)
- High blood pressure in adults, local model estimate