US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024
Calexico, CA had the highest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate) of 3219 cities in 2024, at 19.5%. Holmen, WI had the lowest, at 0.3%. The median was 4.9% and the figure for the United States was 5.2%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2024 (%) | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calexico, CA | 19.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 2 | California City, CA | 18.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 3 | Darby, PA | 18.5 | -1.6 pts |
| 4 | East Cleveland, OH | 18.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 5 | Lindsay, CA | 17.8 | +2.1 pts |
| 6 | Chester, PA | 17.6 | 0 pts |
| 7 | East St. Louis, IL | 17.3 | +2 pts |
| 8 | College Park, GA | 17 | +2.3 pts |
| 9 | Baker, LA | 16.6 | +2.6 pts |
| 10 | Lake Station, IN | 16.3 | +1.5 pts |
| 11 | Kinston, NC | 16.2 | +2.9 pts |
| 12 | Riverdale, IL | 16.1 | +2 pts |
| 13 | Bogalusa, LA | 15.7 | +0.9 pts |
| 14 | Nogales, AZ | 15.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 15 | Brawley, CA | 15.5 | +0.1 pts |
| 16 | Blue Island, IL | 15.5 | +3.8 pts |
| 17 | Galena Park, TX | 15.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 18 | Flint, MI | 14.8 | -2.7 pts |
| 19 | Clearlake, CA | 14.8 | -2.1 pts |
| 20 | Chicago Heights, IL | 14.6 | +1.9 pts |
| 21 | West Memphis, AR | 14.5 | +1 pts |
| 22 | Atlantic City, NJ | 14.5 | +1.9 pts |
| 23 | Camden, NJ | 14.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 24 | Inkster, MI | 14.4 | +1.6 pts |
| 25 | Oxford, OH | 14.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 26 | Hazel Crest, IL | 14.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 27 | Crowley, LA | 14.3 | -1 pts |
| 28 | Perth Amboy, NJ | 14.3 | +1.5 pts |
| 29 | Coolidge, AZ | 14.1 | -1.2 pts |
| 30 | Arvin, CA | 14 | +2.2 pts |
| 31 | Detroit, MI | 14 | -0.2 pts |
| 32 | Selma, AL | 14 | -0.4 pts |
| 33 | Delano, CA | 13.9 | +2.5 pts |
| 34 | Reading, PA | 13.7 | +1.6 pts |
| 35 | Forrest City, AR | 13.5 | +2.9 pts |
| 36 | Harvey, IL | 13.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 36 | Reedley, CA | 13.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 38 | Selma, CA | 13.3 | +1 pts |
| 39 | Bay City, TX | 13.3 | +1.5 pts |
| 40 | Cheney, WA | 13.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 41 | Hamtramck, MI | 13.1 | +1.3 pts |
| 41 | Lemoore, CA | 13.1 | +2.4 pts |
| 43 | Eastpointe, MI | 12.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 44 | Dolton, IL | 12.8 | +1.9 pts |
| 45 | Avenal, CA | 12.7 | +3.8 pts |
| 46 | Talladega, AL | 12.6 | +0.2 pts |
| 47 | Madera, CA | 12.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 48 | Passaic, NJ | 12.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 49 | Conneaut, OH | 12.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 50 | New Castle, PA | 12.5 | -1.4 pts |
| 51 | Roma, TX | 12.4 | -0.8 pts |
| 52 | Sunnyside, WA | 12.3 | +2.1 pts |
| 53 | Douglas, AZ | 12.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 54 | Atwater, CA | 12.3 | +1.3 pts |
| 55 | Burlington, NJ | 12.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 56 | Moss Point, MS | 12 | +0.2 pts |
| 57 | Boone, NC | 12 | -2.8 pts |
| 58 | Richton Park, IL | 11.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 59 | Arcata, CA | 11.9 | -1.3 pts |
| 60 | Youngstown, OH | 11.9 | -0 pts |
| 61 | Barstow, CA | 11.9 | +1.6 pts |
| 61 | Opelousas, LA | 11.9 | +1.6 pts |
| 63 | Ashtabula, OH | 11.8 | -0.4 pts |
| 64 | Adelanto, CA | 11.8 | +0.2 pts |
| 65 | Orangeburg, SC | 11.8 | 0 pts |
| 66 | Blythe, CA | 11.7 | +3.1 pts |
| 67 | Livingston, CA | 11.7 | +0.9 pts |
| 68 | Monroe, GA | 11.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 69 | Waycross, GA | 11.6 | +5.3 pts |
| 70 | Maple Heights, OH | 11.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 71 | Newark, NJ | 11.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 72 | Bullhead City, AZ | 11.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 73 | McKeesport, PA | 11.5 | +1.4 pts |
| 74 | Mendota, CA | 11.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 75 | South Holland, IL | 11.5 | +1.4 pts |
| 76 | Harrisburg, PA | 11.4 | +2 pts |
| 77 | Coalinga, CA | 11.4 | -1.5 pts |
| 77 | Johnson City, NY | 11.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 79 | Merced, CA | 11.3 | -0.9 pts |
| 80 | Centralia, IL | 11.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 81 | Kent, OH | 11.2 | +0.8 pts |
| 82 | Richmond Heights, OH | 11.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 83 | Albany, GA | 11.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 83 | Wilkinsburg, PA | 11.2 | +1.7 pts |
| 85 | Corcoran, CA | 11.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 85 | Jesup, GA | 11.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 87 | Victorville, CA | 11.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 88 | Laurinburg, NC | 11 | +0.8 pts |
| 89 | Newman, CA | 11 | -1.5 pts |
| 90 | Gary, IN | 11 | -2 pts |
| 91 | Huntsville, TX | 10.9 | +1.9 pts |
| 91 | Matteson, IL | 10.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 93 | Rio Vista, CA | 10.9 | -0.5 pts |
| 94 | Oak Park, MI | 10.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 95 | Niles, MI | 10.8 | -0.4 pts |
| 96 | Cleveland, OH | 10.8 | -0.7 pts |
| 97 | Clarksdale, MS | 10.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 98 | Hartford, CT | 10.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 98 | Paterson, NJ | 10.7 | +0.5 pts |
| 100 | New Iberia, LA | 10.7 | +0.7 pts |
| 100 | York, PA | 10.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 102 | Pleasantville, NJ | 10.7 | +1.9 pts |
| 103 | Snohomish, WA | 10.6 | +2.6 pts |
| 104 | Sweet Home, OR | 10.6 | +2.4 pts |
| 105 | Calumet City, IL | 10.6 | +1.2 pts |
| 106 | Calabasas, CA | 10.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 106 | Chowchilla, CA | 10.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 106 | Dinuba, CA | 10.6 | -0.3 pts |
| 109 | Gaffney, SC | 10.6 | -0.8 pts |
| 109 | Pine Bluff, AR | 10.6 | +1 pts |
| 109 | Port Lavaca, TX | 10.6 | +4.3 pts |
| 112 | Leesburg, FL | 10.5 | +1.6 pts |
| 113 | Somers Point, NJ | 10.5 | +0.9 pts |
| 114 | Kerman, CA | 10.5 | +1.7 pts |
| 115 | Port Townsend, WA | 10.4 | -2.4 pts |
| 116 | Carbondale, IL | 10.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 116 | Hazelwood, MO | 10.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 118 | Macomb, IL | 10.4 | -1.7 pts |
| 119 | Rainbow City, AL | 10.3 | +1.7 pts |
| 120 | Wayne, MI | 10.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 121 | Eureka, CA | 10.3 | +2.6 pts |
| 122 | Binghamton, NY | 10.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 122 | DeKalb, IL | 10.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 124 | Oakdale, CA | 10.2 | +0.7 pts |
| 125 | Baytown, TX | 10.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 126 | Monroe, LA | 10.2 | -0.5 pts |
| 127 | Ceres, CA | 10.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 128 | Carteret, NJ | 10.1 | +1.4 pts |
| 128 | Saginaw, MI | 10.1 | -1.3 pts |
| 130 | Cudahy, CA | 10.1 | +1.3 pts |
| 130 | Lincoln Park, NJ | 10.1 | -0.2 pts |
| 130 | Trenton, NJ | 10.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 133 | Blanchard, OK | 10.1 | +3 pts |
| 133 | Lebanon, PA | 10.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 135 | Pontiac, MI | 10.1 | -0.6 pts |
| 135 | Port Hueneme, CA | 10.1 | +1.8 pts |
| 137 | Porterville, CA | 10.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 138 | Petersburg, VA | 10.1 | -1.3 pts |
| 138 | Prichard, AL | 10.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 140 | Artesia, CA | 10 | +0.6 pts |
| 141 | Parlier, CA | 10 | -0.5 pts |
| 142 | Aberdeen, WA | 10 | +1.4 pts |
| 142 | Cahokia Heights, IL | 10 | +0.7 pts |
| 144 | Elmira, NY | 9.9 | +0.5 pts |
| 145 | Locust Grove, GA | 9.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 146 | North Chicago, IL | 9.9 | +1.2 pts |
| 147 | El Centro, CA | 9.9 | -0 pts |
| 147 | Ridgefield Park, NJ | 9.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 149 | Lynwood, CA | 9.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 150 | Lansing, IL | 9.8 | 0 pts |
| 151 | Bainbridge, GA | 9.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 152 | Belle Glade, FL | 9.7 | -2.7 pts |
| 153 | Killeen, TX | 9.7 | -0.9 pts |
| 154 | Lawndale, CA | 9.7 | +0.7 pts |
| 155 | Niagara Falls, NY | 9.6 | -0.1 pts |
| 156 | Indiana, PA | 9.6 | +1.6 pts |
| 156 | Ukiah, CA | 9.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 156 | West Monroe, LA | 9.6 | +1.2 pts |
| 159 | El Cajon, CA | 9.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 160 | Exeter, CA | 9.6 | -4.5 pts |
| 161 | West Chicago, IL | 9.5 | -0.7 pts |
| 162 | Hanford, CA | 9.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 162 | Huntington Park, CA | 9.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 162 | Linden, NJ | 9.5 | +1 pts |
| 162 | Rincon, GA | 9.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 166 | Fulton, MO | 9.5 | -0.5 pts |
| 167 | Fairview, NJ | 9.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 167 | Rancho Mirage, CA | 9.4 | -1.1 pts |
| 167 | Sharon, PA | 9.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 170 | Henderson, NC | 9.4 | +4.1 pts |
| 171 | Bonham, TX | 9.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 172 | Marion, OH | 9.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 173 | Alamo, TX | 9.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 173 | Union City, NJ | 9.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 173 | Warren, OH | 9.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 173 | Yeadon, PA | 9.4 | +2.8 pts |
| 177 | Springfield, OH | 9.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 178 | Conyers, GA | 9.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 178 | Muskegon, MI | 9.4 | 0 pts |
| 178 | Prineville, OR | 9.4 | +0.9 pts |
| 181 | Hesperia, CA | 9.3 | -0.4 pts |
| 182 | Radcliff, KY | 9.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 183 | Jackson, MS | 9.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 184 | Palatka, FL | 9.3 | +2 pts |
| 185 | Mount Vernon, NY | 9.3 | +2.4 pts |
| 186 | Susanville, CA | 9.3 | +2.4 pts |
| 186 | Waterbury, CT | 9.3 | -0 pts |
| 188 | Baton Rouge, LA | 9.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 188 | Hopewell, VA | 9.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 190 | Marysville, CA | 9.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 190 | Seabrook, TX | 9.2 | +5.9 pts |
| 192 | Hempstead, NY | 9.2 | -0.3 pts |
| 193 | Blytheville, AR | 9.2 | -2 pts |
| 194 | Avon Park, FL | 9.2 | -0.5 pts |
| 195 | Chelsea, MA | 9.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 196 | Country Club Hills, IL | 9.2 | +1.3 pts |
| 196 | East Orange, NJ | 9.2 | -1.1 pts |
| 196 | Los Alamitos, CA | 9.2 | +1.4 pts |
| 199 | Coachella, CA | 9.2 | -1.2 pts |
| 199 | Fort Pierce, FL | 9.2 | -0.6 pts |
| 201 | Troy, NY | 9.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 202 | Sanger, CA | 9.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 203 | Horizon City, TX | 9.1 | -1 pts |
| 203 | Jackson, MI | 9.1 | -1.7 pts |
| 205 | Ozark, AL | 9.1 | -0 pts |
| 205 | Raymondville, TX | 9.1 | -1.5 pts |
| 207 | Ansonia, CT | 9.1 | +1 pts |
| 208 | Michigan City, IN | 9.1 | +2 pts |
| 209 | Gulfport, MS | 9.1 | -0.8 pts |
| 209 | Peru, IN | 9.1 | -1.1 pts |
| 211 | McMinnville, TN | 9 | +4.3 pts |
| 212 | Cocoa Beach, FL | 9 | +0.2 pts |
| 213 | Allentown, PA | 9 | +0.2 pts |
| 213 | LaGrange, GA | 9 | +0.6 pts |
| 213 | Statesboro, GA | 9 | -0.6 pts |
| 216 | Newport, RI | 9 | -0.7 pts |
| 217 | Dayton, OH | 9 | -0.8 pts |
| 217 | Greenville, NC | 9 | -0 pts |
| 217 | Lathrop, CA | 9 | -0 pts |
| 217 | Miami Gardens, FL | 9 | +0.8 pts |
| 221 | Brainerd, MN | 9 | +0.9 pts |
| 221 | Shreveport, LA | 9 | +0.1 pts |
| 223 | Jamestown, NY | 9 | +0.4 pts |
| 224 | Bridgeport, CT | 9 | +0.1 pts |
| 224 | Los Banos, CA | 9 | -0.1 pts |
| 226 | Hanover, PA | 8.9 | +0.7 pts |
| 226 | Lodi, CA | 8.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 228 | DeSoto, TX | 8.9 | +1.4 pts |
| 228 | Ellensburg, WA | 8.9 | +1.3 pts |
| 228 | San Jacinto, CA | 8.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 231 | Jennings, MO | 8.9 | -1.2 pts |
| 231 | Kewanee, IL | 8.9 | +2.5 pts |
| 233 | Plainfield, NJ | 8.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 234 | Fresno, CA | 8.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 234 | West Hollywood, CA | 8.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 236 | Airway Heights, WA | 8.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 236 | Alsip, IL | 8.9 | +1.2 pts |
| 238 | Port Huron, MI | 8.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 239 | North Plainfield, NJ | 8.8 | -0.8 pts |
| 240 | Poughkeepsie, NY | 8.8 | +1 pts |
| 240 | Rexburg, ID | 8.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 242 | Hidalgo, TX | 8.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 242 | Salisbury, MD | 8.8 | -1.6 pts |
| 244 | Mill Valley, CA | 8.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 244 | Whitehall, OH | 8.8 | -1.1 pts |
| 246 | Clovis, NM | 8.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 247 | Schenectady, NY | 8.8 | -0.1 pts |
| 248 | Cambridge, MD | 8.7 | +2 pts |
| 248 | Greenwood, SC | 8.7 | +2.2 pts |
| 248 | Somerset, KY | 8.7 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Unemployed civilians aged 16 and over as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
An average over five years of survey responses, so it moves slowly. The official monthly and annual rates for states and counties are unemployment_rate, from BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_unemployment_2024,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2024
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2024-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"unemployment_rate_acs","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=unemployment_rate_acs&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Calexico, CA, with 19.5% in 2024, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Holmen, WI, with 0.3% in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate): other rankings
- Cities in Montana
- Cities in Maryland
- Cities in Wisconsin
- Counties in Washington
- Counties in Vermont
- Counties in Utah