US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)
East Cleveland, OH had the highest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate) of 3214 cities in 2022, at 19.3%. Hobart, WI had the lowest, at 0.2%. The median was 4.9% and the figure for the United States was 5.3%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | East Cleveland, OH | 19.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 2 | Coolidge, AZ | 19 | +4.8 pts |
| 3 | Lake Station, IN | 18.2 | +1.3 pts |
| 4 | Brawley, CA | 18.2 | -2.6 pts |
| 5 | Calexico, CA | 18.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 6 | Flint, MI | 17.6 | -1 pts |
| 7 | Lindsay, CA | 17.1 | -3.4 pts |
| 8 | California City, CA | 16.8 | -1.2 pts |
| 9 | Clearlake, CA | 16.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 10 | Boone, NC | 16.6 | -0.1 pts |
| 11 | Riverdale, IL | 16.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 12 | Chester, PA | 15.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 13 | New Castle, PA | 15.6 | +1.8 pts |
| 14 | Crowley, LA | 14.8 | -2.6 pts |
| 15 | Detroit, MI | 14.7 | -0.6 pts |
| 16 | Harvey, IL | 14.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 17 | Camden, NJ | 14.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 18 | Blue Island, IL | 14.4 | +2.1 pts |
| 19 | Galena Park, TX | 14.3 | +2.3 pts |
| 20 | Talladega, AL | 14.3 | +2.3 pts |
| 21 | South Holland, IL | 14.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 22 | Markham, IL | 14 | -2.8 pts |
| 23 | Darby, PA | 14 | +0.7 pts |
| 23 | Roma, TX | 14 | +3.8 pts |
| 25 | Arcata, CA | 13.9 | -0.7 pts |
| 26 | Chicago Heights, IL | 13.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 27 | Port Townsend, WA | 13.7 | +2.2 pts |
| 28 | Hazel Crest, IL | 13.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 29 | Exeter, CA | 13.6 | -4.4 pts |
| 29 | Kinston, NC | 13.6 | -1.2 pts |
| 31 | Blytheville, AR | 13.6 | +0.6 pts |
| 32 | Ashtabula, OH | 13.6 | +2.1 pts |
| 33 | Gary, IN | 13.6 | +0.8 pts |
| 34 | Rio Vista, CA | 13.4 | -1.4 pts |
| 35 | West Memphis, AR | 13.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 36 | Youngstown, OH | 13.2 | -1 pts |
| 37 | Nogales, AZ | 13.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 38 | Atlantic City, NJ | 13.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 39 | East St. Louis, IL | 13.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 40 | Cheney, WA | 13 | +1 pts |
| 41 | College Park, GA | 13 | +1.1 pts |
| 42 | Selma, AL | 12.9 | +1.3 pts |
| 43 | Madera, CA | 12.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 44 | Kerman, CA | 12.8 | +1.8 pts |
| 45 | Dolton, IL | 12.7 | -3.5 pts |
| 45 | Sebring, FL | 12.7 | +1 pts |
| 47 | Baker, LA | 12.6 | +3.9 pts |
| 48 | Clarksdale, MS | 12.6 | +1.8 pts |
| 49 | Merced, CA | 12.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 50 | Raymondville, TX | 12.6 | +2.5 pts |
| 51 | Matteson, IL | 12.5 | +2.7 pts |
| 51 | Orangeburg, SC | 12.5 | -0.5 pts |
| 53 | Belle Glade, FL | 12.5 | -1.5 pts |
| 54 | Centralia, IL | 12.4 | -0.4 pts |
| 55 | Richton Park, IL | 12.3 | -3 pts |
| 56 | Eastpointe, MI | 12.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 57 | Niles, MI | 12.1 | +2.8 pts |
| 58 | Avenal, CA | 12 | -0.8 pts |
| 59 | Conneaut, OH | 12 | +1 pts |
| 60 | Pascagoula, MS | 12 | -1.3 pts |
| 61 | Douglas, AZ | 12 | -1.5 pts |
| 61 | York, PA | 12 | +0.4 pts |
| 63 | Cleveland, OH | 11.9 | -0.5 pts |
| 64 | Coachella, CA | 11.9 | -3 pts |
| 65 | Passaic, NJ | 11.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 66 | Coalinga, CA | 11.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 67 | Hamtramck, MI | 11.7 | -1.6 pts |
| 68 | Avon Park, FL | 11.7 | -2 pts |
| 69 | Inkster, MI | 11.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 69 | Saginaw, MI | 11.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 71 | Bogalusa, LA | 11.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 72 | East Orange, NJ | 11.6 | -0.2 pts |
| 73 | Greenville, MS | 11.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 74 | Portsmouth, OH | 11.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 75 | Adelanto, CA | 11.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 75 | Gulfport, MS | 11.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 75 | Newman, CA | 11.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 78 | Mendota, CA | 11.4 | -0.4 pts |
| 78 | Natchitoches, LA | 11.4 | -6.3 pts |
| 78 | Reedley, CA | 11.4 | -1.1 pts |
| 81 | Reading, PA | 11.4 | -0.5 pts |
| 82 | Perth Amboy, NJ | 11.3 | +1.6 pts |
| 82 | Petersburg, VA | 11.3 | -0.8 pts |
| 84 | Cahokia Heights, IL | 11.3 | |
| 85 | Macomb, IL | 11.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 86 | Statesboro, GA | 11.3 | -1.5 pts |
| 87 | Johnson City, NY | 11.3 | -1.1 pts |
| 88 | Corcoran, CA | 11.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 89 | Melvindale, MI | 11.2 | -1.3 pts |
| 90 | Laurinburg, NC | 11.2 | -1 pts |
| 91 | Monroe, GA | 11.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 92 | Bay City, TX | 11.1 | +1 pts |
| 93 | Arvin, CA | 11.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 94 | Atwater, CA | 11 | -0.7 pts |
| 95 | Lemoore, CA | 11 | +1.1 pts |
| 96 | Opelousas, LA | 11 | +1.2 pts |
| 97 | Dinuba, CA | 11 | +0.9 pts |
| 98 | Lansing, IL | 10.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 99 | New Carrollton, MD | 10.9 | -0.6 pts |
| 100 | Oxford, OH | 10.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 101 | Killeen, TX | 10.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 102 | Jackson, MI | 10.9 | +0.5 pts |
| 103 | Worth, IL | 10.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 104 | Bessemer, AL | 10.8 | -2.1 pts |
| 104 | Lincoln Park, NJ | 10.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 106 | Newark, NJ | 10.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 107 | Monroe, LA | 10.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 108 | Kent, OH | 10.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 109 | DeKalb, IL | 10.7 | -0.7 pts |
| 109 | Imperial, CA | 10.7 | +3.1 pts |
| 111 | Oswego, NY | 10.7 | -0 pts |
| 112 | Whitehall, OH | 10.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 113 | Hartford, CT | 10.6 | -0.9 pts |
| 114 | Crossville, TN | 10.6 | -0.8 pts |
| 115 | Rancho Mirage, CA | 10.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 116 | Conyers, GA | 10.5 | +0.9 pts |
| 117 | Fulton, MO | 10.5 | -1.3 pts |
| 117 | Prichard, AL | 10.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 119 | Ceres, CA | 10.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 119 | Liberty Hill, TX | 10.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 121 | Paterson, NJ | 10.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 122 | West Chicago, IL | 10.4 | +0.1 pts |
| 123 | Fort Pierce, FL | 10.4 | +2.4 pts |
| 124 | Gautier, MS | 10.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 124 | Leesburg, FL | 10.4 | +1.4 pts |
| 126 | Lawrence, MA | 10.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 127 | Muskegon, MI | 10.4 | +0.1 pts |
| 128 | Ridgefield Park, NJ | 10.3 | +1.7 pts |
| 129 | Robstown, TX | 10.3 | -1.5 pts |
| 129 | Selma, CA | 10.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 129 | South River, NJ | 10.3 | -1.3 pts |
| 132 | Albany, GA | 10.3 | -0.2 pts |
| 133 | Plainfield, NJ | 10.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 133 | Victorville, CA | 10.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 135 | El Centro, CA | 10.2 | -2.2 pts |
| 135 | Trenton, NJ | 10.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 137 | Richmond Heights, OH | 10.2 | +2 pts |
| 138 | Jennings, MO | 10.2 | +1.8 pts |
| 138 | San Luis, AZ | 10.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 138 | Warrensville Heights, OH | 10.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 141 | Chowchilla, CA | 10.1 | +2.4 pts |
| 142 | Palatka, FL | 10.1 | -3.1 pts |
| 143 | Binghamton, NY | 10.1 | -1.2 pts |
| 144 | Ozark, AL | 10.1 | -1.4 pts |
| 145 | Eureka, CA | 10.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 146 | Huntington Park, CA | 10.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 146 | Livingston, CA | 10.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 146 | Porterville, CA | 10.1 | -2.3 pts |
| 149 | Newport, RI | 10.1 | +1 pts |
| 149 | Reidsville, NC | 10.1 | +0.7 pts |
| 151 | Horizon City, TX | 10 | +0.8 pts |
| 151 | Lebanon, PA | 10 | -0.3 pts |
| 153 | Bullhead City, AZ | 10 | +0.9 pts |
| 154 | Vermillion, SD | 10 | +2.4 pts |
| 155 | Dayton, OH | 10 | -0.3 pts |
| 156 | Center Point, AL | 10 | -0.5 pts |
| 157 | Ansonia, CT | 10 | +0.3 pts |
| 158 | Oak Park, MI | 9.9 | +2.3 pts |
| 159 | Salisbury, MD | 9.9 | -0.7 pts |
| 160 | Morgantown, WV | 9.9 | -0.8 pts |
| 160 | Moss Point, MS | 9.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 162 | Columbus, MS | 9.9 | -1.5 pts |
| 162 | Delano, CA | 9.9 | -1.2 pts |
| 164 | Elmira, NY | 9.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 165 | Romulus, MI | 9.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 166 | Garfield Heights, OH | 9.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 166 | Pine Bluff, AR | 9.8 | -1.7 pts |
| 166 | Waterbury, CT | 9.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 169 | Farmersville, CA | 9.8 | -1.8 pts |
| 170 | Hesperia, CA | 9.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 171 | Burlington, NJ | 9.7 | -0.4 pts |
| 172 | Wasilla, AK | 9.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 173 | Troy, NY | 9.7 | +1.1 pts |
| 174 | Sebastian, FL | 9.7 | +1.8 pts |
| 175 | Lynwood, CA | 9.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 176 | Airway Heights, WA | 9.6 | +3.2 pts |
| 177 | Carbondale, IL | 9.6 | -0.9 pts |
| 178 | North Plainfield, NJ | 9.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 179 | Hazelwood, MO | 9.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 180 | Fountain Inn, SC | 9.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 181 | Hemet, CA | 9.6 | -1.1 pts |
| 181 | Pottsville, PA | 9.6 | +0.2 pts |
| 183 | Bridgeport, CT | 9.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 184 | North Chicago, IL | 9.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 185 | Pontiac, MI | 9.5 | -1.1 pts |
| 186 | Lodi, CA | 9.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 187 | Bainbridge, GA | 9.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 188 | Portales, NM | 9.5 | -0.5 pts |
| 189 | Mount Pleasant, MI | 9.5 | -0.7 pts |
| 190 | Calabasas, CA | 9.5 | -0.5 pts |
| 191 | Marion, IN | 9.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 192 | Gaffney, SC | 9.4 | -3 pts |
| 192 | Sandusky, OH | 9.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 192 | Watsonville, CA | 9.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 195 | Alamo, TX | 9.4 | -0.5 pts |
| 195 | Butler, PA | 9.4 | -1 pts |
| 197 | Schenectady, NY | 9.4 | -0.6 pts |
| 198 | Jackson, MS | 9.3 | -1.4 pts |
| 199 | Irondale, AL | 9.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 199 | Lantana, FL | 9.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 199 | Pleasantville, NJ | 9.3 | -2.5 pts |
| 202 | Amherst Town, MA | 9.3 | -0.7 pts |
| 203 | Hallandale Beach, FL | 9.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 203 | Madisonville, KY | 9.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 205 | Alton, TX | 9.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 205 | Circleville, OH | 9.3 | +1.1 pts |
| 205 | Forrest City, AR | 9.3 | +1.2 pts |
| 205 | Lawrenceburg, TN | 9.3 | -2 pts |
| 209 | Rialto, CA | 9.3 | -0.8 pts |
| 210 | Grand Terrace, CA | 9.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 210 | Port Huron, MI | 9.3 | +0.8 pts |
| 212 | South Houston, TX | 9.2 | -0 pts |
| 213 | Cudahy, CA | 9.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 213 | Danville, IL | 9.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 215 | Allentown, PA | 9.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 215 | Bay St. Louis, MS | 9.2 | -1.3 pts |
| 217 | Coshocton, OH | 9.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 217 | Greeneville, TN | 9.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 217 | Shreveport, LA | 9.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 217 | Southbridge Town, MA | 9.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 217 | Wayne, MI | 9.2 | -2 pts |
| 222 | Peekskill, NY | 9.2 | +2.3 pts |
| 223 | Amsterdam, NY | 9.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 223 | Okmulgee, OK | 9.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 223 | Pleasant Hill, IA | 9.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 223 | Ridgecrest, CA | 9.2 | +1.5 pts |
| 227 | Apple Valley, CA | 9.2 | -1 pts |
| 227 | Morro Bay, CA | 9.2 | -0.6 pts |
| 227 | Riviera Beach, FL | 9.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 227 | Somers Point, NJ | 9.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 231 | Baytown, TX | 9.2 | -1.2 pts |
| 232 | Barstow, CA | 9.1 | -2 pts |
| 232 | St. Marys, PA | 9.1 | +1.2 pts |
| 234 | Brunswick, GA | 9.1 | +2.1 pts |
| 234 | Radcliff, KY | 9.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 236 | Martinsburg, WV | 9.1 | -1.4 pts |
| 237 | Springfield, OH | 9.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 238 | Calumet City, IL | 9.1 | -2.9 pts |
| 238 | Cumberland, MD | 9.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 240 | Jamestown, NY | 9.1 | +1 pts |
| 240 | Niagara Falls, NY | 9.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 242 | Artesia, CA | 9.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 243 | Streator, IL | 9.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 244 | Canton, OH | 9 | -1 pts |
| 244 | Dania Beach, FL | 9 | +0.6 pts |
| 244 | Fresno, CA | 9 | -0.3 pts |
| 244 | Fulton, NY | 9 | +1.3 pts |
| 244 | Jackson, TN | 9 | +0.5 pts |
| 249 | Lauderdale Lakes, FL | 9 | +1.3 pts |
| 250 | Rockford, IL | 9 | -0.5 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Unemployed civilians aged 16 and over as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
An average over five years of survey responses, so it moves slowly. The official monthly and annual rates for states and counties are unemployment_rate, from BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 5 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_unemployment_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployment-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"unemployment_rate_acs","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=unemployment_rate_acs&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
East Cleveland, OH, with 19.3% in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Hobart, WI, with 0.2% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force aged 16 and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 cities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.
Unemployment rate (US five-year survey estimate): other rankings
- Cities in Montana
- Cities in Maryland
- Cities in Wisconsin
- Counties in Washington
- Counties in Vermont
- Counties in Utah