NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP (euros)
Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP (euros) of 73 areas in 2014, at €52.81 billion. Świecki had the lowest, at €1.54 billion. The median was €4.56 billion and the figure for Poland was €408.71 billion. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2014
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2014 | Change on 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miasto Warszawa | 52,809 | +3% |
| 2 | Miasto Kraków | 12,691 | +4.2% |
| 3 | Miasto Poznań | 11,244 | +2% |
| 4 | Miasto Wrocław | 10,839 | +6.3% |
| 5 | Trójmiejski | 10,732 | -0.4% |
| 6 | Katowicki | 10,622 | +1.5% |
| 7 | Warszawski zachodni | 9,306 | +8.5% |
| 8 | Miasto Łódź | 9,248 | +4.5% |
| 9 | Bydgosko-toruński | 8,400 | +3.9% |
| 10 | Poznański | 8,003 | +7.3% |
| 11 | Bielski | 7,196 | +8.5% |
| 12 | Lubelski | 7,120 | +4.1% |
| 13 | Legnicko-głogowski | 7,108 | +0.8% |
| 14 | Sosnowiecki | 6,959 | +7.1% |
| 15 | Kielecki | 6,605 | +3.8% |
| 16 | Kaliski | 6,284 | +8.2% |
| 17 | Opolski | 6,135 | +6.4% |
| 18 | Piotrkowski | 6,120 | +3.6% |
| 19 | Gliwicki | 6,072 | +6.4% |
| 20 | Wrocławski | 6,015 | +4.9% |
| 21 | Rybnicki | 5,954 | +2.9% |
| 22 | Rzeszowski | 5,803 | +3.9% |
| 23 | Zielonogórski | 5,775 | +5.9% |
| 24 | Warszawski wschodni | 5,724 | +7.8% |
| 25 | Krakowski | 5,523 | +7.6% |
| 26 | Koniński | 5,405 | +4.7% |
| 27 | Olsztyński | 5,387 | +4.3% |
| 28 | Tyski | 5,330 | +1.4% |
| 29 | Leszczyński | 5,320 | +6.3% |
| 30 | Wałbrzyski | 5,293 | +7.8% |
| 31 | Jeleniogórski | 5,200 | +6.4% |
| 32 | Miasto Szczecin | 5,096 | +5.2% |
| 33 | Płocki | 4,927 | +5.8% |
| 34 | Tarnobrzeski | 4,825 | +4.3% |
| 35 | Częstochowski | 4,799 | +6% |
| 36 | Radomski | 4,779 | +6.8% |
| 37 | Białostocki | 4,562 | +3.6% |
| 38 | Oświęcimski | 4,513 | +5.3% |
| 39 | Gdański | 4,406 | +9.2% |
| 40 | Szczeciński | 4,309 | +6.9% |
| 41 | Elbląski | 3,869 | +6.5% |
| 42 | Chełmsko-zamojski | 3,807 | +3% |
| 43 | Starogardzki | 3,710 | +8.1% |
| 44 | Nowosądecki | 3,652 | +9.6% |
| 45 | Siedlecki | 3,645 | +3.7% |
| 46 | Łódzki | 3,519 | +7.4% |
| 47 | Bytomski | 3,473 | +4.5% |
| 48 | Gorzowski | 3,459 | +7% |
| 49 | Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski | 3,434 | +6.1% |
| 50 | Sieradzki | 3,427 | +6.4% |
| 51 | Pilski | 3,367 | +5% |
| 52 | Puławski | 3,303 | +2.5% |
| 53 | Tarnowski | 3,248 | +3.4% |
| 54 | Ostrołęcki | 3,233 | +7.6% |
| 55 | Koszaliński | 3,163 | +4.3% |
| 56 | Krośnieński | 3,150 | +5.9% |
| 57 | Łomżyński | 2,939 | +4.3% |
| 58 | Skierniewicki | 2,937 | +4.3% |
| 59 | Szczecinecko-pyrzycki | 2,874 | +6.8% |
| 60 | Grudziądzki | 2,819 | +4.3% |
| 61 | Ciechanowski | 2,813 | +4.7% |
| 62 | Słupski | 2,721 | +7.2% |
| 63 | Włocławski | 2,689 | +0.6% |
| 64 | Inowrocławski | 2,656 | +4.8% |
| 65 | Żyrardowski | 2,586 | +2.1% |
| 66 | Nyski | 2,511 | +4.2% |
| 67 | Przemyski | 2,269 | +5.1% |
| 68 | Nowotarski | 2,096 | +6.7% |
| 69 | Bialski | 2,034 | +2.9% |
| 70 | Suwalski | 1,926 | +3.9% |
| 71 | Ełcki | 1,843 | +5.5% |
| 72 | Chojnicki | 1,561 | +7.7% |
| 73 | Świecki | 1,545 | +9.2% |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP at current market prices, EUR million.
In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, use gdp_usd.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest GDP (euros)?
Miasto Warszawa, with €52.81 billion in 2014, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP (euros)?
Świecki, with €1.54 billion in 2014.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Gross domestic product (GDP): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)