NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration including statistical adjustment

Prato had the highest net migration including statistical adjustment of 107 areas in 2020, at 9,311. Napoli had the lowest, at -42,833. The median was 17 and the figure for Italy was -69,850. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest9,311Prato

Lowest-42,833Napoli

Median17107 areas

Italy-69,850History

Top 40 areas, 2020

persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2020 persons	Change on 2019
1	Prato	9,311	+665.1%
2	Firenze	9,247	+624.1%
3	Brescia	7,700	+118%
4	Verona	7,411	+100.9%
5	Genova	7,150	+261.1%
6	Torino	6,091	+67.6%
7	Latina	5,389	+2,327.5%
8	Bari	4,608	+305.5%
9	Lucca	4,378	+205.3%
10	Monza e della Brianza	4,262	-3.6%
11	Bergamo	3,972	+38.1%
12	Catania	3,876	+217.3%
13	Vicenza	3,298	+953.7%
14	Rimini	3,020	+113.1%
15	Padova	2,999	+22.2%
16	Perugia	2,645	+184.7%
17	Como	2,643	+53.6%
18	Bolzano-Bozen	2,524	+62.7%
19	Gorizia	2,340	+304.8%
20	Pisa	2,324	+26%
21	Mantova	2,201	+148.7%
22	Imperia	1,929	+83.2%
23	Pordenone	1,758	+128%
24	Lodi	1,720	+81.6%
25	Trieste	1,545	+72%
26	Ravenna	1,505	+5.3%
27	Pavia	1,280	-36.2%
28	Rovigo	1,232	+5,766.7%
29	Viterbo	1,179	+1,058.5%
30	Varese	1,034	-62.4%
31	Lecco	1,015	+116.4%
32	Ferrara	995	-40%
33	Savona	974	+92.5%
34	Cagliari	715	n/a
35	Novara	711	-18.3%
36	La Spezia	597	-34.7%
37	Taranto	531	+123.4%
38	Siena	491	-41.3%
39	Pistoia	419	-75.9%
40	Bologna	417	-95%
41	Piacenza	386	-75.7%
42	Cremona	269	-78.4%
43	Treviso	208	-85%
44	Venezia	197	-88.3%
45	Massa-Carrara	192	-51.4%
46	Ragusa	111	-80.9%
47	Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste	93	+236.8%
48	Modena	67	-97.5%
49	Ancona	57	-91.6%
50	Rieti	52	+165.8%
51	Verbano-Cusio-Ossola	49	-64.2%
52	Reggio nell’Emilia	29	-97.6%
53	Cuneo	25	-98.5%
54	Belluno	17	-94.8%
55	Grosseto	-12	-101.5%
56	Livorno	-177	-114.2%
57	Asti	-181	-202.8%
58	Sondrio	-277	-157.7%
59	Forlì-Cesena	-318	-119%
60	Pesaro e Urbino	-404	-712.1%
61	Arezzo	-422	-167.5%
62	Vercelli	-631	-338.1%
63	Pescara	-753	-520.7%
64	Trento	-781	-130.8%
65	Fermo	-868	-1,145.8%
66	Isernia	-998	-176.5%
67	Teramo	-1,035	-1,089.7%
68	Oristano	-1,133	n/a
69	Caltanissetta	-1,136	+54.6%
70	Trapani	-1,141	+1.6%
71	Chieti	-1,192	-1,154.9%
72	Biella	-1,198	-534.1%
73	Matera	-1,274	-136.8%
74	Macerata	-1,324	-100%
75	Ascoli Piceno	-1,362	-3,305%
76	Udine	-1,377	-464.3%
77	Foggia	-1,381	+52.6%
78	Brindisi	-1,382	-46.2%
79	Enna	-1,405	+1.1%
80	Terni	-1,581	-988.2%
81	Siracusa	-1,632	-104.5%
82	Lecce	-1,893	-76.6%
83	Parma	-1,933	-148.3%
84	Vibo Valentia	-1,977	-64.9%
85	L’Aquila	-2,159	-170.9%
86	Nuoro	-2,228	n/a
87	Frosinone	-2,286	-82.9%
88	Alessandria	-2,362	-387.3%
89	Barletta-Andria-Trani	-2,464	-100.8%
90	Campobasso	-2,888	-145.4%
91	Sud Sardegna	-3,342	n/a
92	Potenza	-3,662	-86.9%
93	Catanzaro	-3,672	-122.8%
94	Benevento	-4,015	-128.4%
95	Crotone	-4,088	-51.3%
96	Avellino	-4,874	-160.2%
97	Sassari	-5,042	n/a
98	Roma	-5,224	-396%
99	Agrigento	-5,355	-101.8%
100	Reggio Calabria	-5,381	-29.7%
101	Milano	-5,507	-124.7%
102	Messina	-6,493	-269.8%
103	Palermo	-10,347	-60.3%
104	Caserta	-10,384	-644.4%
105	Cosenza	-11,333	-346%
106	Salerno	-11,921	-315.5%
107	Napoli	-42,833	-226.4%

Other periods

About this ranking

Population change during the year minus natural change (live births minus deaths), including statistical adjustment. A negative value means the population fell by more than natural change explains (Eurostat demographic balance).

Eurostat calculates this as a residual, not by counting immigrants and emigrants, so it also absorbs census revisions and other statistical adjustments. For the EU it reflects migration to and from countries outside the EU. net_migration (World Bank, UN estimate) uses a different method, so the two series differ.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Prato, with 9,311 in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Napoli, with -42,833 in 2020.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.