NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration including statistical adjustment

Roma had the highest net migration including statistical adjustment of 107 areas in 2016, at 22,674. Napoli had the lowest, at -8,002. The median was 179 and the figure for Italy was 44,845. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest22,674Roma

Lowest-8,002Napoli

Median179107 areas

Italy44,845History

Top 40 areas, 2016

persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2016 persons	Change on 2015
1	Roma	22,674	-12.1%
2	Milano	16,856	-5.6%
3	Bologna	8,316	+16.6%
4	Firenze	3,977	+0.3%
5	Parma	2,943	-30.4%
6	Monza e della Brianza	2,418	+66%
7	Genova	2,168	+2,107.4%
8	Pisa	2,035	+744.4%
9	Venezia	2,005	+119.4%
10	Bolzano-Bozen	2,004	+56.8%
11	Pavia	1,997	+5.4%
12	Rimini	1,907	+90.9%
13	Torino	1,840	+39.6%
14	Trieste	1,819	+66.7%
15	Modena	1,793	+40.1%
16	Ravenna	1,636	+16.4%
17	Prato	1,545	+26.6%
18	Como	1,314	+163.9%
19	Varese	1,211	+7.2%
20	Alessandria	1,197	+155.2%
21	Treviso	1,168	+195.7%
22	Piacenza	1,085	+178.9%
23	Sassari	1,084	-6.3%
23	Trento	1,084	-29.6%
25	Bergamo	1,067	+261.2%
26	Pistoia	1,034	+127.8%
27	Verona	1,001	+36.6%
28	La Spezia	942	-2.1%
29	Livorno	915	+81.2%
30	Reggio nell’Emilia	841	-25.2%
31	Forlì-Cesena	801	+15,920%
32	Imperia	792	+274.8%
33	Padova	732	+88.7%
34	Savona	687	+202.6%
35	Udine	677	+577%
36	Cuneo	644	+33.9%
37	Grosseto	631	+118.3%
38	Latina	602	-62%
39	Crotone	598	+864.5%
40	Lecco	549	+174.1%
41	Terni	541	+139.4%
42	Novara	460	+7,566.7%
43	Cremona	445	+133%
44	Asti	428	+191.3%
45	Lucca	427	+155.5%
46	Mantova	368	+134.5%
47	Ragusa	328	-41.5%
48	Verbano-Cusio-Ossola	326	+207.5%
49	Biella	302	+916.2%
50	Pesaro e Urbino	295	+149.5%
51	Ascoli Piceno	279	+581%
52	Perugia	258	+268.6%
53	Gorizia	180	+20%
54	Arezzo	179	+159.5%
55	Vercelli	177	+521.4%
56	Teramo	168	+167.2%
57	Cagliari	100	+132.6%
58	Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste	70	+116.5%
59	Belluno	53	+307.7%
60	Sondrio	51	-1.9%
61	Pescara	21	+116.7%
62	Siena	19	-91.8%
63	Rieti	-4	-101.6%
64	Campobasso	-20	-106.2%
65	Fermo	-44	+72%
66	Lodi	-105	+60.4%
67	Isernia	-115	-1,537.5%
68	Oristano	-143	-1.4%
69	Benevento	-160	+54.9%
70	Nuoro	-207	+74.3%
71	Massa-Carrara	-232	+61.6%
72	Ferrara	-235	-176.5%
73	L’Aquila	-255	+55.7%
74	Macerata	-275	+38.1%
75	Viterbo	-343	-691.4%
76	Ancona	-397	-405.4%
77	Rovigo	-428	+26.8%
78	Pordenone	-476	+17.1%
79	Matera	-489	-93.3%
80	Catanzaro	-536	-25.2%
81	Potenza	-807	-0.4%
82	Trapani	-813	-405.6%
83	Chieti	-826	-78.4%
84	Sud Sardegna	-871	+9%
85	Vibo Valentia	-935	-93.2%
86	Caserta	-1,007	-9.2%
87	Salerno	-1,089	-10.2%
88	Frosinone	-1,102	-21.4%
89	Avellino	-1,211	+29.4%
90	Enna	-1,274	-32.4%
91	Brindisi	-1,455	+16.1%
92	Brescia	-1,486	-11.1%
93	Siracusa	-1,503	-12.6%
94	Lecce	-1,580	-63.6%
95	Reggio Calabria	-1,683	-3.4%
96	Barletta-Andria-Trani	-1,701	-28.9%
97	Caltanissetta	-1,726	-5.4%
98	Vicenza	-1,801	-7.2%
99	Taranto	-2,107	-4%
100	Cosenza	-2,201	+1.6%
101	Messina	-2,755	-1.3%
102	Foggia	-2,901	+10.6%
103	Agrigento	-3,048	-33%
104	Palermo	-3,416	-1.1%
105	Bari	-3,510	-52.9%
106	Catania	-3,945	-54.3%
107	Napoli	-8,002	-109.7%

Other periods

About this ranking

Population change during the year minus natural change (live births minus deaths), including statistical adjustment. A negative value means the population fell by more than natural change explains (Eurostat demographic balance).

Eurostat calculates this as a residual, not by counting immigrants and emigrants, so it also absorbs census revisions and other statistical adjustments. For the EU it reflects migration to and from countries outside the EU. net_migration (World Bank, UN estimate) uses a different method, so the two series differ.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Roma, with 22,674 in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Napoli, with -8,002 in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.