NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration including statistical adjustment

Milano had the highest net migration including statistical adjustment of 102 areas in 2019, at 22,304. Napoli had the lowest, at -13,124. The median was 432 and the figure for Italy was 39,148. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest22,304Milano

Lowest-13,124Napoli

Median432102 areas

Italy39,148History

Top 40 areas, 2019

persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2019 persons	Change on 2018
1	Milano	22,304	-3.1%
2	Bologna	8,418	-7.7%
3	Monza e della Brianza	4,419	+35%
4	Parma	4,003	+14.2%
5	Verona	3,689	-27.9%
6	Torino	3,634	+24,126.7%
7	Brescia	3,532	-32.2%
8	Bergamo	2,876	+18.4%
9	Varese	2,748	-4.3%
10	Modena	2,635	-59.3%
11	Trento	2,539	+5.1%
12	Padova	2,455	-34.5%
13	Pavia	2,006	-38.4%
14	Genova	1,980	-10.1%
15	Pisa	1,844	+294.9%
16	Roma	1,765	-87.4%
17	Pistoia	1,738	-13.4%
18	Como	1,721	-17.4%
19	Venezia	1,689	-58.3%
20	Forlì-Cesena	1,674	-44.6%
21	Ferrara	1,658	-11.4%
22	Cuneo	1,637	+33.9%
23	Piacenza	1,589	+0.3%
24	Bolzano-Bozen	1,551	-41.6%
25	Lucca	1,434	+157.9%
26	Ravenna	1,429	+65.4%
27	Rimini	1,417	-46.8%
28	Treviso	1,391	-42.5%
29	Firenze	1,277	+502.4%
30	Livorno	1,250	+154.1%
31	Cremona	1,248	-25%
32	Prato	1,217	-39.9%
33	Reggio nell’Emilia	1,195	-34.9%
34	Imperia	1,053	+53.7%
35	Lodi	947	+33.8%
36	Perugia	929	-15.6%
37	La Spezia	914	-22.9%
38	Trieste	898	-52.9%
39	Mantova	885	-54.6%
40	Novara	870	+7.9%
41	Siena	836	+28.2%
42	Alessandria	822	+12.3%
42	Grosseto	822	+30.9%
44	Pordenone	771	-54.2%
45	Ancona	679	-20.5%
46	Arezzo	625	-16.9%
47	Ragusa	580	+192.4%
48	Gorizia	578	-31.8%
49	Savona	506	-9.8%
50	Sondrio	480	+42%
51	Lecco	469	-49.2%
52	Massa-Carrara	395	+370.2%
53	Udine	378	-74.3%
54	Belluno	329	-50.3%
55	Vicenza	313	-71%
56	Biella	276	+62.4%
57	Vercelli	265	n/a
58	Latina	222	+196.1%
59	Pescara	179	-70%
60	Terni	178	-60.6%
61	Asti	176	-26.1%
62	Verbano-Cusio-Ossola	137	-41.9%
63	Chieti	113	+129.9%
64	Fermo	83	-40.7%
65	Pesaro e Urbino	66	-88.7%
66	Rovigo	21	-93.5%
67	Ascoli Piceno	-40	-169%
68	Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste	-68	-623.1%
69	Rieti	-79	+83.2%
70	Teramo	-87	-118.2%
71	Viterbo	-123	-125.3%
72	Isernia	-361	+19.1%
73	Matera	-538	-89.4%
74	Macerata	-662	-3%
75	L’Aquila	-797	-117.2%
76	Siracusa	-798	+52.9%
77	Brindisi	-945	+35.4%
78	Lecce	-1,072	+57.8%
79	Trapani	-1,159	+25.3%
80	Campobasso	-1,177	-126.3%
81	Vibo Valentia	-1,199	-41.9%
82	Barletta-Andria-Trani	-1,227	+24.7%
83	Frosinone	-1,250	-441.1%
84	Caserta	-1,395	-3,870.3%
85	Enna	-1,420	-33.7%
86	Catanzaro	-1,648	+9.1%
87	Messina	-1,756	+37.3%
88	Benevento	-1,758	-95.3%
89	Avellino	-1,873	+20.4%
90	Potenza	-1,959	-25.3%
91	Bari	-2,242	+39.2%
92	Taranto	-2,268	+5.6%
93	Caltanissetta	-2,504	+10%
94	Cosenza	-2,541	-63.3%
95	Agrigento	-2,653	+6.7%
96	Crotone	-2,702	-638.3%
97	Salerno	-2,869	-57.4%
98	Foggia	-2,915	+23.5%
99	Catania	-3,303	+12.6%
100	Reggio Calabria	-4,150	-34.8%
101	Palermo	-6,456	-25.1%
102	Napoli	-13,124	-10.4%

Other periods

About this ranking

Population change during the year minus natural change (live births minus deaths), including statistical adjustment. A negative value means the population fell by more than natural change explains (Eurostat demographic balance).

Eurostat calculates this as a residual, not by counting immigrants and emigrants, so it also absorbs census revisions and other statistical adjustments. For the EU it reflects migration to and from countries outside the EU. net_migration (World Bank, UN estimate) uses a different method, so the two series differ.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. 5 areas with data in other periods have no value for 2019 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Milano, with 22,304 in 2019, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Napoli, with -13,124 in 2019.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 areas have no value for 2019 and are not ranked.