NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change

Bolzano-Bozen had the highest natural population change of 107 areas in 2020, at -256. Milano had the lowest, at -18,007. The median was -2,407 and the figure for Italy was -335,425. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest-256Bolzano-Bozen
Lowest-18,007Milano
Median-2,407107 areas
Italy-335,425History

Top 40 areas, 2020

Bolzano-Bozen: -256 personsBolzano-Bozen-256Crotone: -434 personsCrotone-434Vibo Valentia: -545 personsVibo Valentia-545Isernia: -741 personsIsernia-741Ragusa: -802 personsRagusa-802Matera: -939 personsMatera-939Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste: -1,038 personsValle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste-1,038Gorizia: -1,065 personsGorizia-1,065Enna: -1,066 personsEnna-1,066Caltanissetta: -1,107 personsCaltanissetta-1,107Prato: -1,115 personsPrato-1,115Fermo: -1,159 personsFermo-1,159Rieti: -1,214 personsRieti-1,214Catanzaro: -1,233 personsCatanzaro-1,233Barletta-Andria-Trani: -1,246 personsBarletta-Andria-Trani-1,246Sondrio: -1,350 personsSondrio-1,350Caserta: -1,379 personsCaserta-1,379Ascoli Piceno: -1,385 personsAscoli Piceno-1,385Oristano: -1,423 personsOristano-1,423Verbano-Cusio-Ossola: -1,443 personsVerbano-Cusio-Ossola-1,443Nuoro: -1,460 personsNuoro-1,460Benevento: -1,587 personsBenevento-1,587Campobasso: -1,595 personsCampobasso-1,595Belluno: -1,622 personsBelluno-1,622Pordenone: -1,626 personsPordenone-1,626Siracusa: -1,641 personsSiracusa-1,641Pescara: -1,728 personsPescara-1,728Latina: -1,757 personsLatina-1,757Teramo: -1,761 personsTeramo-1,761Lodi: -1,789 personsLodi-1,789Reggio Calabria: -1,795 personsReggio Calabria-1,795Grosseto: -1,832 personsGrosseto-1,832Trapani: -1,838 personsTrapani-1,838L’Aquila: -1,868 personsL’Aquila-1,868Siena: -1,869 personsSiena-1,869Pistoia: -1,871 personsPistoia-1,871Brindisi: -1,907 personsBrindisi-1,907Terni: -1,928 personsTerni-1,928Agrigento: -1,952 personsAgrigento-1,952Massa-Carrara: -2,041 personsMassa-Carrara-2,041
persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2020
persons
Change on 2019
1Bolzano-Bozen-256-132.8%
2Crotone-434-113.8%
3Vibo Valentia-545-17.5%
4Isernia-741-44.7%
5Ragusa-802-47.7%
6Matera-939-26.2%
7Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste-1,038-88.4%
8Gorizia-1,065-15%
9Enna-1,066-34.9%
10Caltanissetta-1,107+3.8%
11Prato-1,115-64.5%
12Fermo-1,159-12.9%
13Rieti-1,214-26.7%
14Catanzaro-1,233-14.9%
15Barletta-Andria-Trani-1,246-148.2%
16Sondrio-1,350-83.7%
17Caserta-1,379-182.6%
18Ascoli Piceno-1,385-26.3%
19Oristano-1,423n/a
20Verbano-Cusio-Ossola-1,443-31.8%
21Nuoro-1,460n/a
22Benevento-1,587-21.3%
23Campobasso-1,595-30.3%
24Belluno-1,622-25.8%
25Pordenone-1,626-79.7%
26Siracusa-1,641-30.4%
27Pescara-1,728-46.2%
28Latina-1,757-95%
29Teramo-1,761-35%
30Lodi-1,789-269.6%
31Reggio Calabria-1,795-31%
32Grosseto-1,832-9.6%
33Trapani-1,838-13.2%
34L’Aquila-1,868-11.3%
35Siena-1,869-10.6%
36Pistoia-1,871-28.7%
37Brindisi-1,907-16.5%
38Terni-1,928-17.7%
39Agrigento-1,952-4.8%
40Massa-Carrara-2,041-32.1%
40Rimini-2,041-74%
42Cagliari-2,067n/a
42Imperia-2,067-25%
44Macerata-2,081-34.7%
45La Spezia-2,128-33.8%
46Viterbo-2,144-16.3%
47Vercelli-2,175-59%
48Rovigo-2,203-28.5%
49Biella-2,248-55.4%
50Arezzo-2,249-24.8%
50Potenza-2,249-7.5%
52Trieste-2,301-23.8%
53Forlì-Cesena-2,346-29.9%
54Lecco-2,407-126.6%
55Catania-2,421-81.6%
56Chieti-2,433-24.9%
57Asti-2,439-46%
58Pisa-2,463-21.8%
59Trento-2,478-196.8%
60Reggio nell’Emilia-2,498-64.6%
61Avellino-2,566-37.4%
62Taranto-2,568-28.7%
63Sud Sardegna-2,589n/a
64Frosinone-2,657-19.9%
65Livorno-2,704-19.6%
66Novara-2,766-66.3%
67Pesaro e Urbino-2,821-64.8%
68Ravenna-2,832-19.4%
69Lucca-2,964-25.2%
70Sassari-3,008n/a
71Cosenza-3,051-19.1%
72Savona-3,054-26.9%
73Mantova-3,059-68.4%
74Piacenza-3,077-116.5%
75Ancona-3,089-29%
76Foggia-3,129-84.2%
77Parma-3,312-102.6%
78Treviso-3,313-62.2%
79Messina-3,414-11.2%
80Ferrara-3,444-28.2%
81Modena-3,490-53.5%
82Salerno-3,492-24.4%
83Vicenza-3,633-85.8%
84Palermo-3,822-77.1%
85Como-3,829-103%
86Perugia-3,849-26.3%
87Cremona-3,935-164.1%
88Udine-3,980-27%
89Lecce-4,042-27.5%
90Padova-4,070-55.2%
91Cuneo-4,340-58.6%
92Monza e della Brianza-4,342-169.5%
93Verona-4,343-140.7%
94Bari-4,655-82.5%
95Napoli-4,832-632.1%
96Venezia-5,481-39.9%
97Alessandria-5,534-44.3%
98Varese-5,817-96.7%
99Pavia-5,855-74.9%
100Bologna-6,310-41.2%
101Firenze-6,333-33.7%
102Brescia-7,428-195.5%
103Bergamo-8,542-347.5%
104Genova-9,732-39.9%
105Roma-16,639-38.7%
106Torino-17,831-57.1%
107Milano-18,007-155.3%

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year. A negative value means more deaths than births (Eurostat).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2020) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2020. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2020. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2020. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2020.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2020 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2020 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2020,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2020}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2020. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2020
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2020
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2020.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  - 
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural population change?

Bolzano-Bozen, with -256 in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural population change?

Milano, with -18,007 in 2020.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural population change: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Italy: more rankings