NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change

Napoli had the highest natural population change of 107 areas in 2016, at 1,552. Torino had the lowest, at -7,864. The median was -1,184 and the figure for Italy was -141,823. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest1,552Napoli
Lowest-7,864Torino
Median-1,184107 areas
Italy-141,823History

Top 40 areas, 2016

Napoli: 1,552 personsNapoli1,552Bolzano-Bozen: 1,198 personsBolzano-Bozen1,198Caserta: 199 personsCaserta199Barletta-Andria-Trani: 100 personsBarletta-Andria-Trani100Crotone: 52 personsCrotone52Bergamo: -174 personsBergamo-174Catania: -174 personsCatania-174Ragusa: -176 personsRagusa-176Lodi: -208 personsLodi-208Monza e della Brianza: -273 personsMonza e della Brianza-273Trento: -317 personsTrento-317Vibo Valentia: -320 personsVibo Valentia-320Latina: -337 personsLatina-337Prato: -339 personsPrato-339Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste: -423 personsValle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste-423Sondrio: -437 personsSondrio-437Isernia: -457 personsIsernia-457Brescia: -493 personsBrescia-493Catanzaro: -493 personsCatanzaro-493Matera: -530 personsMatera-530Pordenone: -573 personsPordenone-573Caltanissetta: -595 personsCaltanissetta-595Lecco: -617 personsLecco-617Rimini: -643 personsRimini-643Enna: -703 personsEnna-703Fermo: -723 personsFermo-723Pescara: -723 personsPescara-723Treviso: -734 personsTreviso-734Siracusa: -737 personsSiracusa-737Cagliari: -746 personsCagliari-746Teramo: -807 personsTeramo-807Como: -820 personsComo-820Foggia: -838 personsFoggia-838Gorizia: -859 personsGorizia-859Oristano: -869 personsOristano-869Verbano-Cusio-Ossola: -874 personsVerbano-Cusio-Ossola-874Nuoro: -905 personsNuoro-905Ascoli Piceno: -909 personsAscoli Piceno-909Reggio Calabria: -914 personsReggio Calabria-914Verona: -982 personsVerona-982
persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2016
persons
Change on 2015
1Napoli1,552+1,606.8%
2Bolzano-Bozen1,198+22.2%
3Caserta199-15.3%
4Barletta-Andria-Trani100+146.9%
5Crotone52+213%
6Bergamo-174+74.4%
6Catania-174+31.5%
8Ragusa-176+54%
9Lodi-208+44.2%
10Monza e della Brianza-273+31.8%
11Trento-317-47.4%
12Vibo Valentia-320+14.9%
13Latina-337+22.5%
14Prato-339+16.9%
15Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste-423+18.3%
16Sondrio-437+1.1%
17Isernia-457-6.8%
18Brescia-493+29.6%
18Catanzaro-493+31.3%
20Matera-530+15.5%
21Pordenone-573+15%
22Caltanissetta-595-1.7%
23Lecco-617-1.3%
24Rimini-643+2.4%
25Enna-703-2.3%
26Fermo-723+12.2%
26Pescara-723+27.3%
28Treviso-734+27.5%
29Siracusa-737+13.9%
30Cagliari-746-5.1%
31Teramo-807+26.5%
32Como-820+9.6%
33Foggia-838+17.4%
34Gorizia-859-4.8%
35Oristano-869+10.1%
36Verbano-Cusio-Ossola-874+17.1%
37Nuoro-905+1.1%
38Ascoli Piceno-909+9.9%
39Reggio Calabria-914+12.8%
40Verona-982+13.3%
41Rieti-990-15.7%
42Bari-999+31.9%
43Reggio nell’Emilia-1,005-27.7%
44Vicenza-1,014+9.4%
45Campobasso-1,034+18.9%
46Brindisi-1,071+17.1%
47Pesaro e Urbino-1,129+3.5%
48Benevento-1,143+20.1%
49Belluno-1,158+6%
50Taranto-1,162-9.1%
51Trapani-1,168+25.3%
52Agrigento-1,172+19.2%
53Forlì-Cesena-1,181+5.1%
54Pistoia-1,184-6.8%
55Vercelli-1,195+4.5%
56Mantova-1,204+13.9%
57Novara-1,217+8.4%
58Macerata-1,240+11%
59Parma-1,252+7.6%
60Pisa-1,255+17.4%
61Palermo-1,257-12.4%
62Massa-Carrara-1,270+15.6%
63L’Aquila-1,294-3.6%
64La Spezia-1,310+21.1%
65Piacenza-1,335+7.7%
66Viterbo-1,336+20.4%
67Grosseto-1,354+9.7%
68Siena-1,368+6.7%
69Biella-1,381+6.4%
70Asti-1,384+6.7%
71Arezzo-1,391+15.4%
72Imperia-1,414+6.1%
73Avellino-1,442+20.9%
74Terni-1,446+9.6%
75Modena-1,487-11.3%
76Frosinone-1,494+8.5%
77Rovigo-1,518+0.9%
78Cremona-1,520-5.8%
79Sassari-1,535-31.2%
80Cosenza-1,556+10.9%
81Sud Sardegna-1,561+7.3%
82Varese-1,632+6.4%
83Chieti-1,648+7.7%
84Potenza-1,656+0.5%
85Ravenna-1,708+6.9%
86Trieste-1,736+11.7%
87Padova-1,770-10.8%
88Salerno-1,826+31.6%
89Ancona-1,839+3.6%
90Livorno-1,905+5.6%
91Cuneo-1,960+14.4%
92Lucca-1,983+12.5%
93Savona-2,098+7.4%
94Messina-2,366+18.8%
95Udine-2,431+12%
96Lecce-2,444+15.6%
97Perugia-2,453+8.1%
98Milano-2,601+31%
99Ferrara-2,681+7.4%
100Pavia-2,734+4.4%
101Venezia-2,829+5.1%
102Alessandria-3,377+5.1%
103Bologna-3,507+16.7%
104Firenze-3,512+20.6%
105Roma-5,086+8.4%
106Genova-6,130+10.9%
107Torino-7,864+9.9%

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year. A negative value means more deaths than births (Eurostat).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2016. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2016.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2016,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2016}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2016. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2016
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2016
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/italy-provinces?period=2016.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  - 
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural population change?

Napoli, with 1,552 in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural population change?

Torino, with -7,864 in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural population change: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Italy: more rankings