NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change, 2024
Bolzano-Bozen had the highest natural population change of 107 areas in 2024, at -15. Roma had the lowest, at -18,612. The median was -2,006 and the figure for Italy was -283,165. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2024 | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolzano-Bozen | -15 | -111.4% |
| 2 | Crotone | -490 | +11.4% |
| 3 | Vibo Valentia | -524 | +24.5% |
| 4 | Ragusa | -637 | +27% |
| 5 | Isernia | -696 | +0.3% |
| 6 | Lodi | -749 | +5.7% |
| 7 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | -790 | -20.6% |
| 8 | Enna | -845 | +17.9% |
| 9 | Gorizia | -851 | +1.6% |
| 10 | Matera | -914 | +13.6% |
| 11 | Sondrio | -935 | -4.9% |
| 12 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | -951 | +5.2% |
| 13 | Fermo | -1,136 | +2% |
| 14 | Rieti | -1,153 | +10.1% |
| 15 | Caltanissetta | -1,157 | +6.2% |
| 16 | Prato | -1,221 | -19.7% |
| 17 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | -1,248 | +7.3% |
| 18 | Ascoli Piceno | -1,322 | -5.3% |
| 19 | Oristano | -1,383 | -0.4% |
| 20 | Lecco | -1,393 | +3% |
| 21 | Vercelli | -1,399 | +5.6% |
| 22 | Pordenone | -1,463 | -7.7% |
| 23 | Trento | -1,473 | -7.5% |
| 24 | Asti | -1,482 | +10.1% |
| 25 | Belluno | -1,493 | -3.8% |
| 26 | Piacenza | -1,528 | +6.6% |
| 27 | Nuoro | -1,535 | -4.3% |
| 28 | Massa-Carrara | -1,556 | +11.6% |
| 29 | Catanzaro | -1,595 | +2.6% |
| 30 | Campobasso | -1,643 | -2.9% |
| 31 | Teramo | -1,648 | -3% |
| 32 | Benevento | -1,658 | +0.8% |
| 33 | La Spezia | -1,669 | +2.3% |
| 34 | Rimini | -1,672 | -7.9% |
| 35 | Caserta | -1,680 | +8% |
| 36 | Biella | -1,688 | -4% |
| 37 | Imperia | -1,694 | +11.5% |
| 38 | L’Aquila | -1,695 | +16.6% |
| 39 | Siena | -1,719 | +0.8% |
| 40 | Pescara | -1,799 | +0.9% |
| 41 | Rovigo | -1,806 | -2.6% |
| 42 | Agrigento | -1,841 | +21.3% |
| 43 | Terni | -1,849 | +8.7% |
| 44 | Pistoia | -1,890 | -2% |
| 45 | Reggio nell’Emilia | -1,911 | -0.4% |
| 46 | Cremona | -1,943 | -2.3% |
| 47 | Grosseto | -1,948 | -4.7% |
| 48 | Parma | -1,962 | -8% |
| 49 | Siracusa | -1,973 | -5.7% |
| 50 | Reggio Calabria | -1,975 | +8.1% |
| 51 | Novara | -1,978 | -3.5% |
| 52 | Brindisi | -1,979 | +13.4% |
| 53 | Macerata | -2,004 | -9.6% |
| 54 | Trieste | -2,006 | -0.4% |
| 55 | Pesaro e Urbino | -2,009 | -3.2% |
| 56 | Forlì-Cesena | -2,048 | -4.1% |
| 57 | Arezzo | -2,078 | +5.6% |
| 58 | Pisa | -2,229 | -3.3% |
| 59 | Mantova | -2,231 | +3.3% |
| 60 | Potenza | -2,240 | +9.6% |
| 61 | Avellino | -2,247 | +0.5% |
| 62 | Trapani | -2,303 | -3.3% |
| 63 | Chieti | -2,372 | +15.4% |
| 64 | Latina | -2,415 | -5.9% |
| 65 | Viterbo | -2,428 | -9.1% |
| 66 | Como | -2,458 | -0.7% |
| 67 | Cagliari | -2,470 | +3.3% |
| 68 | Ravenna | -2,500 | +1.2% |
| 69 | Livorno | -2,542 | -0.2% |
| 70 | Savona | -2,547 | +3.6% |
| 71 | Catania | -2,618 | +19.2% |
| 72 | Foggia | -2,648 | -14.2% |
| 73 | Vicenza | -2,664 | +3.4% |
| 74 | Modena | -2,764 | +9.3% |
| 75 | Frosinone | -2,787 | +8.5% |
| 75 | Lucca | -2,787 | +1.5% |
| 77 | Ancona | -2,816 | -2.4% |
| 78 | Verona | -2,861 | +9.6% |
| 79 | Taranto | -2,920 | +0.7% |
| 80 | Sud Sardegna | -2,966 | +3.1% |
| 81 | Treviso | -3,007 | -0.6% |
| 82 | Cuneo | -3,018 | -0.5% |
| 82 | Monza e della Brianza | -3,018 | -8.5% |
| 84 | Ferrara | -3,026 | -4.4% |
| 85 | Sassari | -3,113 | -1.7% |
| 86 | Bergamo | -3,321 | +3.5% |
| 87 | Udine | -3,452 | -1.4% |
| 88 | Cosenza | -3,558 | +2.8% |
| 89 | Messina | -3,683 | +5.8% |
| 90 | Brescia | -3,739 | -8.5% |
| 91 | Alessandria | -3,792 | +1.5% |
| 92 | Pavia | -3,859 | +2.6% |
| 93 | Padova | -3,872 | +1% |
| 94 | Perugia | -4,012 | +0.1% |
| 95 | Palermo | -4,033 | +11.9% |
| 96 | Varese | -4,046 | +1.5% |
| 97 | Salerno | -4,115 | +6.1% |
| 98 | Bari | -4,447 | +0.7% |
| 99 | Lecce | -4,736 | +1.5% |
| 100 | Venezia | -4,802 | -4.2% |
| 101 | Bologna | -5,185 | +3.1% |
| 102 | Firenze | -5,721 | -5.4% |
| 103 | Napoli | -5,736 | +1.8% |
| 104 | Genova | -6,782 | +3.1% |
| 105 | Milano | -10,425 | +4.2% |
| 106 | Torino | -13,543 | +4% |
| 107 | Roma | -18,612 | +11.8% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Live births minus deaths during the year. A negative value means more deaths than births (Eurostat).
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by natural population change using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest natural population change?
Bolzano-Bozen, with -15 in 2024, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest natural population change?
Roma, with -18,612 in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Natural population change: other rankings
- NUTS 3 areas of Latvia
- NUTS 3 areas of Ireland
- NUTS 3 areas of Croatia
- Regions of Bulgaria (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Romania (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Portugal (NUTS 2)