US counties by natural change, July to June
Harris County had the highest natural change, July to June of 3144 counties in 2022, at 30,833. Pinellas County had the lowest, at -6,361. The median was -54 and the figure for the United States was 224,026. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Map of counties, 2022
Top 40 counties, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2022 | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 30,833 | +18% |
| 2 | Los Angeles County Estimated | 21,658 | +285.4% |
| 3 | Dallas County Estimated | 16,509 | +17.7% |
| 4 | Kings County Estimated | 15,962 | +8.4% |
| 5 | San Diego County Estimated | 12,497 | +27.5% |
| 6 | Tarrant County Estimated | 10,794 | +25.6% |
| 7 | Travis County Estimated | 9,035 | +16.1% |
| 8 | Utah County Estimated | 8,578 | -1.2% |
| 9 | Santa Clara County Estimated | 8,348 | +18.9% |
| 10 | King County Estimated | 8,098 | -4.9% |
| 11 | San Bernardino County Estimated | 8,036 | +81.3% |
| 12 | Bexar County Estimated | 8,027 | +28.3% |
| 13 | Maricopa County Estimated | 7,886 | +63.6% |
| 14 | Queens County Estimated | 7,880 | +18.9% |
| 15 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 7,751 | +55.9% |
| 16 | Orange County Estimated | 7,541 | +100.9% |
| 17 | Mecklenburg County Estimated | 7,376 | +12% |
| 18 | Salt Lake County Estimated | 6,787 | -2.5% |
| 19 | Fairfax County Estimated | 6,653 | +3.5% |
| 20 | Collin County Estimated | 6,445 | +20% |
| 21 | Wake County Estimated | 6,149 | +7.7% |
| 22 | Riverside County Estimated | 6,143 | +111% |
| 23 | Denton County Estimated | 6,072 | +28% |
| 24 | Bronx County Estimated | 6,013 | +7.3% |
| 25 | Alameda County Estimated | 5,943 | +16% |
| 26 | Cook County Estimated | 5,783 | -11.8% |
| 27 | Orange County Estimated | 5,731 | +14.8% |
| 28 | Franklin County Estimated | 5,643 | +5.6% |
| 29 | Gwinnett County Estimated | 5,427 | +24.8% |
| 30 | Montgomery County Estimated | 4,888 | +16.2% |
| 31 | Hudson County Estimated | 4,867 | +8.5% |
| 32 | Fresno County Estimated | 4,857 | +19.3% |
| 33 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 4,625 | +17.3% |
| 34 | DeKalb County Estimated | 4,291 | +7.1% |
| 35 | Hennepin County Estimated | 4,277 | -8% |
| 36 | Kern County Estimated | 4,171 | +7.7% |
| 37 | Sacramento County Estimated | 4,147 | +2.4% |
| 38 | El Paso County Estimated | 4,143 | +118.3% |
| 39 | Marion County Estimated | 4,027 | +15.7% |
| 40 | Williamson County Estimated | 4,016 | +22.9% |
| 41 | Fulton County Estimated | 3,985 | +17% |
| 42 | Rockland County Estimated | 3,872 | +12.4% |
| 43 | Prince William County Estimated | 3,816 | +8.8% |
| 44 | Middlesex County Estimated | 3,802 | +4% |
| 45 | Miami-Dade County Estimated | 3,759 | +558.3% |
| 46 | Davidson County Estimated | 3,741 | +30.3% |
| 47 | Essex County Estimated | 3,404 | +31.7% |
| 48 | Denver County Estimated | 3,357 | -15.2% |
| 49 | Prince George's County Estimated | 3,344 | +7% |
| 50 | Cobb County Estimated | 3,334 | +10.9% |
| 51 | Philadelphia County Estimated | 3,303 | +48.3% |
| 52 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 3,219 | +9% |
| 53 | Snohomish County Estimated | 3,214 | -1.7% |
| 54 | San Joaquin County Estimated | 3,207 | +47.6% |
| 55 | Douglas County Estimated | 3,196 | +10.9% |
| 56 | Suffolk County Estimated | 3,032 | -0.7% |
| 57 | Loudoun County Estimated | 2,984 | -2.4% |
| 57 | New York County Estimated | 2,984 | +35.5% |
| 59 | Bell County Estimated | 2,945 | +3.4% |
| 60 | District of Columbia Estimated | 2,928 | +8.7% |
| 61 | Montgomery County Estimated | 2,832 | +4.3% |
| 62 | Contra Costa County Estimated | 2,756 | +2.7% |
| 63 | Monterey County Estimated | 2,745 | +35.8% |
| 64 | Arapahoe County Estimated | 2,652 | -8.4% |
| 65 | San Mateo County Estimated | 2,632 | +17.8% |
| 66 | Tulare County Estimated | 2,619 | +9% |
| 67 | El Paso County Estimated | 2,615 | -14.4% |
| 68 | Webb County Estimated | 2,556 | +47.4% |
| 69 | Davis County Estimated | 2,511 | -2% |
| 70 | DuPage County Estimated | 2,505 | +11.4% |
| 71 | Nassau County Estimated | 2,500 | +45.3% |
| 72 | Pierce County Estimated | 2,455 | -25.8% |
| 73 | Union County Estimated | 2,443 | +34.3% |
| 74 | Broward County Estimated | 2,394 | +141.1% |
| 75 | Kent County Estimated | 2,368 | +2.1% |
| 75 | Westchester County Estimated | 2,368 | +33% |
| 77 | Cameron County Estimated | 2,358 | +135.6% |
| 78 | Orange County Estimated | 2,314 | +8.5% |
| 79 | Clark County Estimated | 2,265 | -10.2% |
| 80 | Adams County Estimated | 2,245 | -4.3% |
| 81 | Onslow County Estimated | 2,232 | +4.3% |
| 82 | Santa Barbara County Estimated | 2,186 | +34.2% |
| 83 | Passaic County Estimated | 2,185 | +25.4% |
| 84 | Middlesex County Estimated | 2,164 | +47.6% |
| 85 | Suffolk County Estimated | 2,087 | +70.8% |
| 86 | Weld County Estimated | 2,065 | -3.7% |
| 87 | Ventura County Estimated | 2,046 | +110.7% |
| 88 | Milwaukee County Estimated | 2,020 | -6.5% |
| 89 | Honolulu County Estimated | 2,007 | -21.4% |
| 90 | Stanislaus County Estimated | 2,005 | +67.2% |
| 91 | Ocean County Estimated | 1,978 | +31.8% |
| 92 | Anne Arundel County Estimated | 1,925 | +12.6% |
| 93 | Polk County Estimated | 1,875 | -7.1% |
| 94 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,862 | -6.3% |
| 95 | Washington County Estimated | 1,833 | -8.1% |
| 96 | Bergen County Estimated | 1,828 | +38.4% |
| 97 | Montgomery County Estimated | 1,824 | +12.7% |
| 98 | Durham County Estimated | 1,815 | +9.4% |
| 99 | Dakota County Estimated | 1,810 | +9.9% |
| 100 | Oklahoma County Estimated | 1,787 | +10.5% |
| 101 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,755 | +2.2% |
| 102 | Douglas County Estimated | 1,713 | +6.7% |
| 103 | Dane County Estimated | 1,689 | +1.9% |
| 104 | Rutherford County Estimated | 1,661 | +29.9% |
| 105 | Western Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 1,606 | +42.1% |
| 106 | Merced County Estimated | 1,586 | +11.4% |
| 107 | Ramsey County Estimated | 1,543 | -3% |
| 108 | Hamilton County Estimated | 1,523 | +5.7% |
| 109 | Arlington County Estimated | 1,484 | +15% |
| 110 | Midland County Estimated | 1,478 | +3.9% |
| 111 | Kane County Estimated | 1,452 | -8.1% |
| 112 | Brazoria County Estimated | 1,446 | +2.9% |
| 113 | Benton County Estimated | 1,442 | +32.5% |
| 114 | Osceola County Estimated | 1,438 | +19.6% |
| 115 | Hays County Estimated | 1,425 | +8.6% |
| 116 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,421 | +17.1% |
| 117 | Shelby County Estimated | 1,420 | +12.4% |
| 118 | Lake County Estimated | 1,390 | +2.7% |
| 119 | Duval County Estimated | 1,350 | -21.1% |
| 120 | Cache County Estimated | 1,316 | -5.5% |
| 121 | Weber County Estimated | 1,314 | -3.4% |
| 122 | Charleston County Estimated | 1,303 | +46.7% |
| 123 | Anoka County Estimated | 1,302 | -0.8% |
| 124 | Hamilton County Estimated | 1,298 | +57.3% |
| 125 | Ector County Estimated | 1,253 | +23.9% |
| 126 | Alexandria city Estimated | 1,237 | -13.3% |
| 127 | Will County Estimated | 1,191 | -5.8% |
| 128 | Howard County Estimated | 1,187 | -5.5% |
| 129 | Allen County Estimated | 1,166 | +4% |
| 130 | Chester County Estimated | 1,159 | +36.7% |
| 131 | Washington County Estimated | 1,155 | +6.2% |
| 132 | Minnehaha County Estimated | 1,147 | +33.2% |
| 133 | Imperial County Estimated | 1,079 | +232% |
| 134 | Kaufman County Estimated | 1,065 | +48.1% |
| 135 | Anchorage Municipality Estimated | 1,035 | -32.5% |
| 136 | Lancaster County Estimated | 1,025 | -7.4% |
| 137 | Essex County Estimated | 1,005 | +27.5% |
| 137 | Lancaster County Estimated | 1,005 | -10.9% |
| 139 | Cass County Estimated | 1,004 | -8.2% |
| 140 | Virginia Beach city Estimated | 997 | -30.4% |
| 141 | Canyon County Estimated | 991 | -16.8% |
| 142 | Greater Bridgeport Planning Region Estimated | 980 | +36.1% |
| 143 | San Francisco County Estimated | 976 | +13.9% |
| 144 | Lafayette Parish Estimated | 969 | +3.5% |
| 145 | Sarpy County Estimated | 962 | -12.1% |
| 146 | Ellis County Estimated | 961 | +43.2% |
| 147 | Clark County Estimated | 953 | -9.1% |
| 148 | Solano County Estimated | 941 | -9.1% |
| 149 | Norfolk County Estimated | 931 | +4.8% |
| 150 | Franklin County Estimated | 904 | +2% |
| 151 | Madison County Estimated | 899 | +2.5% |
| 152 | Chesterfield County Estimated | 883 | +20% |
| 153 | Kings County Estimated | 879 | -8.6% |
| 153 | Richmond County Estimated | 879 | +39.5% |
| 155 | Liberty County Estimated | 876 | +15.4% |
| 156 | Yuma County Estimated | 867 | +123.5% |
| 157 | Providence County Estimated | 865 | +93.5% |
| 158 | Frederick County Estimated | 861 | -9.3% |
| 159 | Clayton County Estimated | 853 | -16.6% |
| 160 | Tulsa County Estimated | 840 | -28% |
| 161 | Yakima County Estimated | 823 | -17% |
| 162 | Wright County Estimated | 801 | +5.1% |
| 163 | Stafford County Estimated | 784 | +0.5% |
| 164 | Berkeley County Estimated | 782 | +15.2% |
| 164 | Lubbock County Estimated | 782 | +98% |
| 166 | Dallas County Estimated | 780 | +8% |
| 167 | Elkhart County Estimated | 770 | +7.4% |
| 168 | Delaware County Estimated | 762 | +440.4% |
| 169 | Forsyth County Estimated | 759 | +28.2% |
| 170 | Sedgwick County Estimated | 758 | +29.4% |
| 171 | Fairbanks North Star Borough Estimated | 757 | -5% |
| 172 | Fayette County Estimated | 755 | +0.4% |
| 172 | Norfolk city Estimated | 755 | +13.5% |
| 174 | Scott County Estimated | 747 | -7.7% |
| 175 | Ada County Estimated | 742 | -25.9% |
| 175 | Johnson County Estimated | 742 | +0.1% |
| 177 | Stearns County Estimated | 734 | +33.5% |
| 178 | Jefferson County Estimated | 716 | -8.8% |
| 179 | Canadian County Estimated | 713 | +46.1% |
| 180 | Mercer County Estimated | 709 | +31.1% |
| 181 | Morris County Estimated | 708 | +47.5% |
| 182 | Kendall County Estimated | 698 | +0.3% |
| 183 | Bonneville County Estimated | 690 | +5.3% |
| 184 | Camden County Estimated | 684 | +117.8% |
| 185 | Washington County Estimated | 682 | -0.3% |
| 186 | Washtenaw County Estimated | 680 | +46.6% |
| 187 | Hall County Estimated | 675 | +61.5% |
| 188 | Johnston County Estimated | 661 | +8.2% |
| 189 | Williamson County Estimated | 660 | +27.4% |
| 190 | Greenville County Estimated | 650 | +9.6% |
| 191 | Multnomah County Estimated | 649 | -2.1% |
| 192 | Richmond city Estimated | 642 | +23% |
| 193 | Christian County Estimated | 635 | +5.5% |
| 194 | Geary County Estimated | 626 | -19.1% |
| 195 | Cabarrus County Estimated | 622 | -2.4% |
| 196 | Wyandotte County Estimated | 620 | -12.6% |
| 197 | New Castle County Estimated | 617 | +193.8% |
| 198 | Clay County Estimated | 604 | -8.1% |
| 199 | Chesapeake city Estimated | 596 | +1.4% |
| 200 | Somerset County Estimated | 591 | +38.1% |
| 201 | Madera County Estimated | 586 | -6.8% |
| 202 | Worcester County Estimated | 585 | -28.9% |
| 203 | Delaware County Estimated | 583 | +6% |
| 204 | East Baton Rouge Parish Estimated | 582 | -13.8% |
| 204 | Olmsted County Estimated | 582 | -17.3% |
| 206 | Ascension Parish Estimated | 581 | -16% |
| 207 | St. Charles County Estimated | 572 | +158.8% |
| 208 | Henry County Estimated | 571 | -0.3% |
| 209 | Newport News city Estimated | 566 | -7.5% |
| 210 | Richland County Estimated | 550 | -14.1% |
| 211 | Starr County Estimated | 543 | +136.1% |
| 212 | Benton County Estimated | 536 | -19.9% |
| 212 | Brown County Estimated | 536 | -4.6% |
| 214 | Boone County Estimated | 535 | -1.8% |
| 215 | Tooele County Estimated | 531 | -9.5% |
| 216 | Carver County Estimated | 525 | +4.4% |
| 217 | Tippecanoe County Estimated | 523 | +3.4% |
| 218 | McHenry County Estimated | 517 | +31.2% |
| 219 | Gallatin County Estimated | 515 | -5.9% |
| 220 | Warren County Estimated | 507 | +5.4% |
| 221 | Cherokee County Estimated | 503 | +26.4% |
| 222 | Rockwall County Estimated | 495 | +36.4% |
| 223 | Paulding County Estimated | 489 | +2.5% |
| 224 | Union County Estimated | 488 | -2.8% |
| 225 | Ward County Estimated | 486 | +57.3% |
| 226 | Champaign County Estimated | 483 | +4.1% |
| 227 | Hendricks County Estimated | 474 | +76.9% |
| 227 | Ottawa County Estimated | 474 | -17.9% |
| 229 | Yuba County Estimated | 466 | +33.5% |
| 230 | Lee County Estimated | 465 | +24% |
| 231 | Chatham County Estimated | 464 | +17.5% |
| 232 | Hoke County Estimated | 460 | +17.9% |
| 233 | Douglas County Estimated | 458 | +32.8% |
| 234 | McLennan County Estimated | 457 | +77.8% |
| 235 | Columbia County Estimated | 454 | +22.7% |
| 236 | Sherburne County Estimated | 438 | +13.5% |
| 237 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 436 | +43.9% |
| 238 | Lincoln County Estimated | 433 | +7.7% |
| 239 | Oakland County Estimated | 432 | +420.5% |
| 240 | Pulaski County Estimated | 429 | +88.2% |
| 241 | Maverick County Estimated | 426 | +321.8% |
| 242 | Boone County Estimated | 424 | -18.5% |
| 242 | Harnett County Estimated | 424 | -13.3% |
| 244 | Dorchester County Estimated | 422 | +15.9% |
| 245 | St. Mary's County Estimated | 420 | +25.4% |
| 246 | San Benito County Estimated | 415 | +30.5% |
| 247 | Montgomery County Estimated | 412 | +165.8% |
| 248 | Holmes County Estimated | 411 | +9.6% |
| 249 | Yolo County Estimated | 410 | +1% |
| 250 | Charles County Estimated | 409 | +7.1% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated births minus deaths of residents from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. A negative value means more deaths than births.
Equals births_july_june minus deaths_july_june for the same place and year. Not a calendar-year figure.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (US counties by natural change, July to June, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by natural change, July to June, 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-july-june/us-counties?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. US counties by natural change, July to June, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-july-june/us-counties?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by natural change, July to June, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-july-june/us-counties?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_counties_by_natural_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by natural change, July to June, 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-july-june/us-counties?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by natural change, July to June, 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-july-june/us-counties?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-july-june/us-counties?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US counties by natural change, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_july_june","level":"province","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_july_june&level=province&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest natural change, July to June?
Harris County, with 30,833 in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest natural change, July to June?
Pinellas County, with -6,361 in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: natural change (births minus deaths), July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.