US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate)
Jackson, WY had the highest labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate) of 3214 cities in 2022, at 88.8%. Florence, AZ had the lowest, at 20.6%. The median was 64.8% and the figure for the United States was 63.5%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson, WY | 88.8 | +2.7 pts |
| 2 | Harrisburg, SD | 88.5 | +1 pts |
| 3 | Northlake, TX | 83.5 | +0.9 pts |
| 4 | Whitestown, IN | 83.4 | -1 pts |
| 5 | Vineyard, UT | 82.5 | +2.2 pts |
| 6 | Big Lake, MN | 81.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 7 | Lavon, TX | 81.4 | 0 pts |
| 8 | Snoqualmie, WA | 81.2 | -0.6 pts |
| 9 | Addison, TX | 80.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 10 | Ferndale, MI | 80.8 | -0.9 pts |
| 11 | West Fargo, ND | 80.1 | -1 pts |
| 12 | Hoboken, NJ | 80 | -1 pts |
| 13 | Plano, IL | 80 | +3.2 pts |
| 14 | Waukee, IA | 79.4 | -0.9 pts |
| 15 | Port Wentworth, GA | 79.4 | -1.5 pts |
| 16 | Farmington, MN | 79.3 | +1 pts |
| 17 | Brandon, SD | 79.3 | -0.4 pts |
| 18 | Herndon, VA | 79.2 | -0 pts |
| 19 | Somerville, MA | 79.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 20 | Frederick, CO | 79 | -0.5 pts |
| 21 | Gardner, KS | 78.9 | -0.6 pts |
| 22 | The Colony, TX | 78.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 23 | North Liberty, IA | 78.6 | -2 pts |
| 24 | Wixom, MI | 78.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 25 | St. Michael, MN | 78.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 26 | Smyrna, GA | 78.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 27 | Alexandria, VA | 78 | -0.3 pts |
| 28 | West Hollywood, CA | 78 | -1.2 pts |
| 28 | Woods Cross, UT | 78 | -1 pts |
| 30 | Phoenixville, PA | 77.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 31 | Rifle, CO | 77.9 | -0.3 pts |
| 32 | Patchogue, NY | 77.9 | +1 pts |
| 33 | Severance, CO | 77.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 34 | Harrison, OH | 77.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 35 | Belgrade, MT | 77.6 | -1.3 pts |
| 36 | Box Elder, SD | 77.5 | +1.7 pts |
| 37 | Brookhaven, GA | 77.5 | -1 pts |
| 38 | Emeryville, CA | 77.3 | -0.5 pts |
| 39 | Hutto, TX | 77.3 | -0.4 pts |
| 40 | Bluffdale, UT | 77.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 41 | Minooka, IL | 77.1 | -2.1 pts |
| 42 | Farmers Branch, TX | 77.1 | +2.3 pts |
| 43 | Windsor, WI | 77.1 | 0 pts |
| 44 | Knightdale, NC | 77 | -0.8 pts |
| 45 | Suwanee, GA | 77 | +0.3 pts |
| 46 | Centerton, AR | 77 | +1.6 pts |
| 47 | Jacksonville, NC | 76.9 | -1.5 pts |
| 48 | Grapevine, TX | 76.9 | -0.2 pts |
| 49 | Leesburg, VA | 76.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 50 | Williston, ND | 76.8 | -1.4 pts |
| 51 | Laurel, MD | 76.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 52 | Manassas Park, VA | 76.7 | -1.1 pts |
| 53 | Johnstown, CO | 76.6 | -1.3 pts |
| 54 | Hailey, ID | 76.5 | +2.1 pts |
| 55 | Savage, MN | 76.5 | -1.3 pts |
| 56 | Parker, CO | 76.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 57 | Erie, CO | 76.4 | +1.5 pts |
| 58 | Leander, TX | 76.3 | +1.4 pts |
| 59 | Hyattsville, MD | 76.3 | -2.5 pts |
| 60 | Ankeny, IA | 76.2 | -1.8 pts |
| 60 | Grain Valley, MO | 76.2 | +1 pts |
| 62 | El Segundo, CA | 76.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 63 | La Vista, NE | 76.1 | -0.8 pts |
| 64 | Berkley, MI | 76.1 | -0.2 pts |
| 65 | Chamblee, GA | 76.1 | -1.8 pts |
| 65 | West Jordan, UT | 76.1 | -0 pts |
| 67 | Dayton, MN | 76 | -0.2 pts |
| 67 | Euless, TX | 76 | +0.9 pts |
| 67 | Indian Trail, NC | 76 | +0.9 pts |
| 70 | Broussard, LA | 76 | +0.2 pts |
| 71 | Eagle Mountain, UT | 76 | 0 pts |
| 72 | Manor, TX | 76 | +0.5 pts |
| 72 | North Chicago, IL | 76 | -0.2 pts |
| 74 | Roselle Park, NJ | 76 | +2.5 pts |
| 75 | Grimes, IA | 75.9 | -0.4 pts |
| 76 | Herriman, UT | 75.9 | -0.1 pts |
| 76 | Lewisville, TX | 75.9 | -0.6 pts |
| 78 | West Point, UT | 75.9 | +1 pts |
| 79 | Pflugerville, TX | 75.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 80 | Mission, KS | 75.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 81 | Lindenhurst, IL | 75.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 82 | West Haven, UT | 75.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 83 | St. Louis Park, MN | 75.8 | -0.4 pts |
| 84 | Oakland Park, FL | 75.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 85 | Montgomery, IL | 75.7 | -1.1 pts |
| 86 | Otsego, MN | 75.7 | -0.1 pts |
| 87 | Westwood, NJ | 75.7 | +2.3 pts |
| 88 | Royse City, TX | 75.7 | +4.1 pts |
| 89 | Huntertown, IN | 75.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 90 | Spring Hill, KS | 75.6 | +2.1 pts |
| 91 | Lafayette, CO | 75.6 | -0.1 pts |
| 92 | Royal Oak, MI | 75.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 93 | Selma, TX | 75.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 94 | Calera, AL | 75.4 | -1.6 pts |
| 95 | Champlin, MN | 75.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 96 | Nolensville, TN | 75.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 97 | Aliso Viejo, CA | 75.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 97 | Kearney, MO | 75.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 99 | Maitland, FL | 75.3 | +1.1 pts |
| 99 | Midvale, UT | 75.3 | -0.7 pts |
| 101 | Woodstock, GA | 75.3 | -0.3 pts |
| 102 | Cary, IL | 75.3 | -2.5 pts |
| 103 | Avon, IN | 75.2 | -1.7 pts |
| 104 | Fairburn, GA | 75.1 | +3.6 pts |
| 105 | Lake in the Hills, IL | 75.1 | -0.7 pts |
| 106 | Little Elm, TX | 75.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 107 | Chaska, MN | 75.1 | -0.8 pts |
| 107 | Glenwood Springs, CO | 75.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 107 | Lakeville, MN | 75.1 | -1.5 pts |
| 110 | Havelock, NC | 75.1 | -2 pts |
| 111 | Carpentersville, IL | 75.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 112 | Sussex, WI | 75 | -0.2 pts |
| 113 | Forney, TX | 75 | +1.7 pts |
| 114 | Morristown, NJ | 75 | -0.5 pts |
| 115 | Fate, TX | 75 | +0.7 pts |
| 116 | Fargo, ND | 74.9 | -0.6 pts |
| 117 | Prior Lake, MN | 74.9 | -0.8 pts |
| 117 | Roanoke, TX | 74.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 119 | Austin, TX | 74.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 120 | Hugo, MN | 74.8 | -0.4 pts |
| 121 | Pickerington, OH | 74.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 122 | Algonquin, IL | 74.8 | -0.1 pts |
| 123 | Heber, UT | 74.8 | -2.3 pts |
| 123 | Independence, KY | 74.8 | -1.5 pts |
| 125 | East Bethel, MN | 74.8 | +1 pts |
| 126 | Wylie, TX | 74.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 127 | Zachary, LA | 74.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 128 | Lakewood, OH | 74.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 129 | Pooler, GA | 74.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 130 | Flowery Branch, GA | 74.7 | -2.6 pts |
| 130 | Richmond Hill, GA | 74.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 132 | Stafford, TX | 74.7 | +1.2 pts |
| 133 | Shakopee, MN | 74.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 134 | Norwalk, IA | 74.6 | -1.5 pts |
| 134 | Sanger, TX | 74.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 136 | Morrisville, NC | 74.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 137 | Rosemount, MN | 74.6 | -2.6 pts |
| 138 | Fife, WA | 74.6 | -0.6 pts |
| 139 | Round Lake, IL | 74.5 | -0.1 pts |
| 140 | Eagan, MN | 74.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 141 | Bound Brook, NJ | 74.5 | 0 pts |
| 141 | Wood-Ridge, NJ | 74.5 | +3 pts |
| 143 | Mineola, NY | 74.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 144 | Englewood, CO | 74.5 | -0.6 pts |
| 145 | Grandview, WA | 74.5 | -1.3 pts |
| 145 | McCordsville, IN | 74.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 145 | South Burlington, VT | 74.5 | +1.9 pts |
| 148 | Syracuse, UT | 74.4 | -0.4 pts |
| 149 | Warrenville, IL | 74.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 150 | Hilliard, OH | 74.4 | -1.1 pts |
| 151 | Lehi, UT | 74.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 152 | Greenville, WI | 74.4 | |
| 153 | La Vergne, TN | 74.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 154 | Rancho Santa Margarita, CA | 74.3 | +1.4 pts |
| 154 | Verona, WI | 74.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 156 | Thornton, CO | 74.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 157 | Lake Zurich, IL | 74.3 | +0.1 pts |
| 158 | Firestone, CO | 74.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 158 | Sioux Falls, SD | 74.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 160 | North Lauderdale, FL | 74.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 161 | Hopatcong, NJ | 74.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 162 | West Des Moines, IA | 74.1 | -0 pts |
| 163 | Wauconda, IL | 74.1 | -0.6 pts |
| 164 | Carrollton, TX | 74.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 165 | Clive, IA | 74 | +0.3 pts |
| 166 | Youngsville, LA | 74 | -0.6 pts |
| 167 | Denver, CO | 74 | +0.3 pts |
| 168 | Superior, CO | 73.9 | -1.2 pts |
| 169 | Seattle, WA | 73.9 | -0.3 pts |
| 170 | Kearns, UT | 73.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 170 | North Salt Lake, UT | 73.9 | -0.6 pts |
| 172 | Lenexa, KS | 73.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 172 | Ridgefield Park, NJ | 73.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 174 | Coppell, TX | 73.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 175 | Pompton Lakes, NJ | 73.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 176 | Rolling Meadows, IL | 73.8 | +2.5 pts |
| 176 | Victoria, MN | 73.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 178 | Manhattan, IL | 73.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 179 | Falls Church, VA | 73.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 180 | Arlington, TN | 73.7 | +1.6 pts |
| 181 | Apex, NC | 73.7 | -0.2 pts |
| 181 | Magna, UT | 73.7 | -0.4 pts |
| 181 | Pike Road, AL | 73.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 184 | Greenbelt, MD | 73.7 | -2.2 pts |
| 185 | Santaquin, UT | 73.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 186 | Norcross, GA | 73.7 | -0.6 pts |
| 187 | Somerville, NJ | 73.6 | +3.5 pts |
| 187 | Yorkville, IL | 73.6 | -0.9 pts |
| 189 | Holly Springs, NC | 73.6 | -0.7 pts |
| 190 | Woodbury, MN | 73.6 | -0.3 pts |
| 191 | Molalla, OR | 73.6 | +1.7 pts |
| 191 | Olathe, KS | 73.6 | -1.2 pts |
| 193 | Harrison, WI | 73.6 | -1.3 pts |
| 194 | Maple Grove, MN | 73.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 194 | Robbinsdale, MN | 73.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 194 | Sauk Rapids, MN | 73.5 | -1 pts |
| 197 | Cottage Grove, MN | 73.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 198 | Castle Rock, CO | 73.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 198 | Smyrna, TN | 73.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 200 | Minneapolis, MN | 73.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 201 | Commerce City, CO | 73.5 | -0.7 pts |
| 202 | Logan, UT | 73.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 203 | Kyle, TX | 73.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 204 | Forest Lake, MN | 73.4 | -1.1 pts |
| 205 | Ramsey, MN | 73.4 | -1.5 pts |
| 206 | Red Oak, TX | 73.4 | -0.2 pts |
| 207 | Lawrence, IN | 73.4 | +2.2 pts |
| 207 | Mounds View, MN | 73.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 207 | South Salt Lake, UT | 73.4 | +3 pts |
| 210 | Brooklyn Park, MN | 73.3 | -0.7 pts |
| 211 | Issaquah, WA | 73.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 212 | Webster, TX | 73.3 | -3.7 pts |
| 213 | Grayslake, IL | 73.3 | -0.1 pts |
| 214 | South Elgin, IL | 73.3 | -1.3 pts |
| 215 | Round Lake Beach, IL | 73.3 | -0.8 pts |
| 216 | Monticello, MN | 73.2 | +1.9 pts |
| 217 | Dardenne Prairie, MO | 73.2 | +1.6 pts |
| 218 | Missoula, MT | 73.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 219 | Gaithersburg, MD | 73.2 | -0.1 pts |
| 219 | Glenpool, OK | 73.2 | -1 pts |
| 221 | Costa Mesa, CA | 73.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 221 | Hays, KS | 73.2 | +1.6 pts |
| 223 | Edgewater, NJ | 73.1 | -0.5 pts |
| 223 | Round Rock, TX | 73.1 | -1.1 pts |
| 223 | Waconia, MN | 73.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 226 | Noblesville, IN | 73.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 227 | South St. Paul, MN | 73.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 228 | Woodridge, IL | 73.1 | -1.5 pts |
| 229 | Lone Tree, CO | 73.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 230 | Mandan, ND | 73.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 231 | Lockport, IL | 73.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 231 | Minot, ND | 73.1 | -0.8 pts |
| 231 | Mountain View, CA | 73.1 | -1 pts |
| 234 | Fishers, IN | 73 | -0.2 pts |
| 234 | Princeton, TX | 73 | -0.9 pts |
| 236 | North Plainfield, NJ | 73 | -1.3 pts |
| 237 | Troutdale, OR | 73 | -1.7 pts |
| 238 | O'Fallon, MO | 73 | -0.2 pts |
| 238 | Salt Lake City, UT | 73 | +0.3 pts |
| 238 | Westminster, CO | 73 | +0.4 pts |
| 241 | Layton, UT | 73 | +0.3 pts |
| 242 | New Carrollton, MD | 73 | -0.1 pts |
| 243 | Fairview Park, OH | 73 | +0.8 pts |
| 243 | New Richmond, WI | 73 | -1.5 pts |
| 245 | Midlothian, TX | 73 | +0.4 pts |
| 245 | Sartell, MN | 73 | -0.3 pts |
| 247 | Plainfield, IL | 73 | -0.8 pts |
| 248 | Takoma Park, MD | 72.9 | -1.8 pts |
| 249 | Andrews, TX | 72.9 | +2.5 pts |
| 249 | Watauga, TX | 72.9 | +0.2 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
People aged 16 and over in the labor force (employed, unemployed or in the Armed Forces) as a percentage of all people aged 16 and over, including people in group quarters. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
The Census Bureau definition used in its data profiles. It differs from the BLS labor_force_participation_rate, which counts the civilian noninstitutional population only.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 5 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/labor-force-participation-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/labor-force-participation-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/labor-force-participation-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_labor_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/labor-force-participation-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/labor-force-participation-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/labor-force-participation-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b23025.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"labor_force_participation_rate_acs","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=labor_force_participation_rate_acs&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Jackson, WY, with 88.8% in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Florence, AZ, with 20.6% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B23025: population 16 years and over in the labor force as a percentage of the population 16 years and over, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 cities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.
Labor force participation rate (US five-year survey estimate): other rankings
- Cities in Montana
- Cities in North Dakota
- Cities in Connecticut
- Counties in Nebraska
- Counties in New Hampshire
- Counties in Alaska