US cities by unemployed people, 2025
New York, NY had the highest unemployed people of 1706 cities in 2025, at 230,144. Essex Junction, VT had the lowest, at 141. The median was 1,028. Source: the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Top 40 cities, 2025
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2025 | Change on 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York, NY | 230,144 | +5.9% |
| 2 | Los Angeles, CA | 120,792 | -2.1% |
| 3 | Chicago, IL | 73,793 | -9.8% |
| 4 | Houston, TX | 55,047 | +1.3% |
| 5 | Philadelphia, PA | 41,837 | +12.9% |
| 6 | Phoenix, AZ | 35,142 | +18.6% |
| 7 | San Diego, CA | 33,789 | +8% |
| 8 | San Antonio, TX | 29,423 | +4.1% |
| 9 | Dallas, TX | 29,262 | -1.2% |
| 10 | Detroit, MI | 26,437 | +9.1% |
| 11 | San Jose, CA | 23,738 | +2.7% |
| 12 | Columbus, OH | 23,021 | +7.4% |
| 13 | Austin, TX | 22,134 | -1.4% |
| 14 | Fort Worth, TX | 21,377 | +1.2% |
| 15 | Seattle, WA | 21,253 | +6.1% |
| 16 | San Francisco, CA | 20,742 | +3.3% |
| 17 | Charlotte, NC | 20,719 | +5.6% |
| 18 | Jacksonville, FL | 20,603 | +15.9% |
| 19 | Portland, OR | 19,621 | +22.7% |
| 20 | Las Vegas, NV | 19,439 | +2% |
| 21 | Denver, CO | 18,762 | -2.4% |
| 22 | Boston, MA | 17,909 | +14.7% |
| 23 | Indianapolis, IN | 17,695 | -7.3% |
| 24 | Fresno, CA | 17,254 | +6.5% |
| 25 | Baltimore, MD | 14,783 | +23.1% |
| 26 | Memphis, TN | 14,375 | +5.4% |
| 27 | El Paso, TX | 14,095 | +6% |
| 28 | Sacramento, CA | 13,896 | +8.9% |
| 29 | Long Beach, CA | 13,340 | -2.4% |
| 30 | Bakersfield, CA | 12,966 | +6.4% |
| 31 | Oklahoma City, OK | 12,374 | +8% |
| 32 | Tucson, AZ | 11,974 | +20.6% |
| 33 | Milwaukee, WI | 11,923 | +4.4% |
| 34 | Oakland, CA | 11,826 | +5.6% |
| 35 | Kansas City, MO | 11,622 | +9.5% |
| 36 | Albuquerque, NM | 11,412 | +5% |
| 37 | Newark, NJ | 10,874 | +10.6% |
| 38 | Atlanta, GA | 10,835 | -1.6% |
| 39 | Stockton, CA | 10,770 | +5.3% |
| 40 | Colorado Springs, CO | 10,628 | -0.5% |
| 41 | Mesa, AZ | 10,288 | +16% |
| 42 | Raleigh, NC | 9,705 | +2.2% |
| 43 | Henderson, NV | 9,471 | +0.1% |
| 44 | Minneapolis, MN | 9,350 | +26.8% |
| 45 | Aurora, CO | 9,199 | -0.9% |
| 46 | Omaha, NE | 9,093 | +10.3% |
| 47 | Arlington, TX | 8,859 | -1% |
| 48 | Wichita, KS | 8,771 | +6.3% |
| 49 | Tampa, FL | 8,767 | +14.3% |
| 50 | North Las Vegas, NV | 8,648 | -0.5% |
| 51 | Jersey City, NJ | 8,434 | +7.8% |
| 52 | Toledo, OH | 8,348 | -4.1% |
| 53 | New Orleans, LA | 8,344 | -2% |
| 54 | Riverside, CA | 8,227 | +7% |
| 55 | Salinas, CA | 8,180 | +9.4% |
| 56 | Cleveland, OH | 8,149 | +8.6% |
| 57 | Cincinnati, OH | 8,040 | +9.3% |
| 58 | Anaheim, CA | 7,528 | +6.6% |
| 59 | Tulsa, OK | 7,423 | +4.4% |
| 60 | Virginia Beach, VA | 7,353 | +12.3% |
| 61 | St. Louis, MO | 7,142 | +10.2% |
| 62 | Irvine, CA | 6,897 | +5.3% |
| 63 | Brownsville, TX | 6,836 | +47.9% |
| 64 | Modesto, CA | 6,814 | +4.4% |
| 65 | Lexington, KY | 6,764 | -4.8% |
| 66 | Chula Vista, CA | 6,676 | +10% |
| 67 | Santa Ana, CA | 6,670 | +9% |
| 68 | Orlando, FL | 6,640 | +13.8% |
| 69 | Greensboro, NC | 6,625 | +4.4% |
| 70 | Reno, NV | 6,606 | -3.6% |
| 71 | Plano, TX | 6,551 | +1.5% |
| 72 | Corpus Christi, TX | 6,494 | +2.2% |
| 73 | Paterson, NJ | 6,471 | +8.6% |
| 74 | Santa Clarita, CA | 6,321 | -3.2% |
| 75 | St. Paul, MN | 6,312 | +24.2% |
| 76 | Miami, FL | 6,310 | +9% |
| 77 | Tacoma, WA | 6,281 | +10% |
| 78 | San Bernardino, CA | 6,230 | +8.4% |
| 79 | Buffalo, NY | 6,104 | +5% |
| 80 | Moreno Valley, CA | 5,986 | +7.6% |
| 81 | Pittsburgh, PA | 5,894 | +16% |
| 82 | Anchorage, AK | 5,851 | +2.6% |
| 83 | Grand Rapids, MI | 5,827 | +10.3% |
| 84 | Chandler, AZ | 5,768 | +17.7% |
| 85 | Durham, NC | 5,707 | +7.9% |
| 86 | Providence, RI | 5,600 | +6.7% |
| 87 | Oxnard, CA | 5,569 | +5.4% |
| 88 | Fontana, CA | 5,526 | +7.6% |
| 89 | Glendale, CA | 5,455 | -3.7% |
| 90 | Glendale, AZ | 5,419 | +19.3% |
| 91 | Calexico, CA | 5,389 | +5% |
| 92 | St. Petersburg, FL | 5,373 | +14.3% |
| 93 | Irving, TX | 5,368 | +0.2% |
| 94 | Laredo, TX | 5,347 | +12.2% |
| 95 | Gilbert, AZ | 5,294 | +15.3% |
| 96 | Garland, TX | 5,293 | +3.2% |
| 97 | Fremont, CA | 5,290 | +4.1% |
| 98 | Yuma, AZ | 5,219 | +15.4% |
| 99 | Delano, CA | 5,192 | +3.7% |
| 100 | Akron, OH | 5,163 | +10% |
| 101 | Worcester, MA | 5,147 | +13.1% |
| 102 | Lancaster, CA | 5,132 | -4.3% |
| 103 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 5,081 | +17.9% |
| 104 | Des Moines, IA | 5,039 | +16.4% |
| 105 | Lubbock, TX | 5,010 | +1.3% |
| 106 | Tallahassee, FL | 5,006 | +20.6% |
| 107 | Lincoln, NE | 4,996 | +17.3% |
| 108 | Palmdale, CA | 4,977 | -2.5% |
| 109 | Rochester, NY | 4,959 | +6.2% |
| 110 | Winston-Salem, NC | 4,952 | +5.3% |
| 111 | Fort Wayne, IN | 4,945 | -8.5% |
| 112 | Baton Rouge, LA | 4,888 | -1.2% |
| 113 | Richmond, VA | 4,853 | +12.5% |
| 114 | Spokane, WA | 4,827 | -0.5% |
| 115 | Frisco, TX | 4,809 | +0.7% |
| 116 | McKinney, TX | 4,800 | +2.3% |
| 117 | Springfield, MA | 4,756 | +10.1% |
| 118 | Scottsdale, AZ | 4,703 | +13.3% |
| 119 | Salem, OR | 4,674 | +19.6% |
| 120 | Salt Lake City, UT | 4,651 | +9.9% |
| 121 | Ontario, CA | 4,644 | +5.8% |
| 122 | Flint, MI | 4,629 | +13.2% |
| 123 | Vancouver, WA | 4,606 | +4.6% |
| 124 | Boise City, ID | 4,582 | +2.9% |
| 125 | Grand Prairie, TX | 4,565 | -0.7% |
| 126 | Elizabeth, NJ | 4,559 | +14.4% |
| 127 | Cape Coral, FL | 4,521 | +21.3% |
| 128 | Tempe, AZ | 4,515 | +19.6% |
| 129 | Aurora, IL | 4,495 | -6.4% |
| 130 | Eugene, OR | 4,452 | +19.5% |
| 131 | Joliet, IL | 4,422 | -8.4% |
| 132 | Little Rock, AR | 4,382 | +17.5% |
| 133 | Yonkers, NY | 4,341 | +4.2% |
| 134 | Visalia, CA | 4,322 | +5.7% |
| 135 | Warren, MI | 4,313 | +8.5% |
| 136 | Pomona, CA | 4,298 | +0.5% |
| 137 | Huntington Beach, CA | 4,296 | +7.2% |
| 138 | Madison, WI | 4,287 | +6.8% |
| 139 | San Luis, AZ | 4,261 | +14.3% |
| 140 | Pasadena, CA | 4,246 | +1.8% |
| 141 | Norfolk, VA | 4,235 | +13.5% |
| 142 | Porterville, CA | 4,229 | +4.4% |
| 143 | Overland Park, KS | 4,196 | +9.6% |
| 144 | Chesapeake, VA | 4,179 | +13.1% |
| 145 | Bridgeport, CT | 4,177 | +20.2% |
| 146 | Santa Rosa, CA | 4,141 | +8.9% |
| 147 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 4,128 | +7.4% |
| 148 | Elk Grove, CA | 4,126 | +7.5% |
| 149 | Fayetteville, NC | 4,057 | +5.5% |
| 150 | Oceanside, CA | 4,048 | +7.7% |
| 151 | Hayward, CA | 4,019 | +4.7% |
| 152 | Victorville, CA | 4,012 | +2.5% |
| 153 | Burbank, CA | 3,995 | -6.7% |
| 154 | Lansing, MI | 3,966 | +9.2% |
| 155 | Rockford, IL | 3,933 | -4.5% |
| 156 | Peoria, AZ | 3,867 | +19.5% |
| 157 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 3,861 | +13.6% |
| 158 | Garden Grove, CA | 3,821 | +11% |
| 159 | Corona, CA | 3,810 | +7.1% |
| 160 | Kansas City, KS | 3,807 | +17.8% |
| 161 | Gainesville, FL | 3,773 | +22% |
| 162 | Fort Collins, CO | 3,745 | -1.7% |
| 163 | Denton, TX | 3,713 | +4.2% |
| 164 | Kent, WA | 3,709 | +7.6% |
| 165 | Lakewood, CO | 3,682 | -3.5% |
| 166 | Santa Maria, CA | 3,662 | +9.2% |
| 167 | Pasadena, TX | 3,626 | +2.8% |
| 168 | Dayton, OH | 3,609 | +10.4% |
| 169 | Chattanooga, TN | 3,606 | +10.5% |
| 170 | Torrance, CA | 3,572 | -0.6% |
| 171 | Shreveport, LA | 3,561 | -2.5% |
| 172 | Hartford, CT | 3,544 | +20.7% |
| 173 | Mobile, AL | 3,532 | -1.5% |
| 174 | Bellevue, WA | 3,523 | +5.3% |
| 175 | Newport News, VA | 3,518 | +13.5% |
| 176 | Sterling Heights, MI | 3,505 | +8.5% |
| 177 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 3,498 | +18.5% |
| 178 | McAllen, TX | 3,459 | +7.1% |
| 179 | Springfield, MO | 3,457 | +11.7% |
| 180 | Columbia, SC | 3,453 | +9.9% |
| 181 | Roseville, CA | 3,430 | +9.2% |
| 182 | Thornton, CO | 3,424 | -0.5% |
| 183 | Vallejo, CA | 3,421 | +6.7% |
| 184 | Killeen, TX | 3,411 | +4.8% |
| 185 | Columbus, GA | 3,402 | +2.4% |
| 186 | Inglewood, CA | 3,383 | -1.2% |
| 187 | Mesquite, TX | 3,374 | +1.6% |
| 188 | Elgin, IL | 3,360 | -7.6% |
| 189 | Knoxville, TN | 3,354 | +5.2% |
| 190 | Birmingham, AL | 3,329 | -2.1% |
| 190 | Merced, CA | 3,329 | +5.3% |
| 192 | New Haven, CT | 3,286 | +22.2% |
| 193 | Antioch, CA | 3,276 | +6.3% |
| 194 | Amarillo, TX | 3,269 | +2% |
| 194 | Waterbury, CT | 3,269 | +20.9% |
| 196 | Lowell, MA | 3,263 | +13.3% |
| 197 | Hillsboro, OR | 3,257 | +38% |
| 198 | Charleston, SC | 3,256 | +9.6% |
| 199 | Escondido, CA | 3,244 | +7.6% |
| 200 | Sunnyvale, CA | 3,229 | +4.9% |
| 201 | Allentown, PA | 3,204 | +23.7% |
| 202 | Trenton, NJ | 3,178 | +9.7% |
| 203 | New Bedford, MA | 3,174 | +10.1% |
| 204 | Cary, NC | 3,147 | +4.2% |
| 205 | Naperville, IL | 3,145 | -10.7% |
| 206 | Clarksville, TN | 3,129 | +9.8% |
| 207 | Gresham, OR | 3,128 | +26.9% |
| 208 | Huntsville, AL | 3,126 | -1.6% |
| 208 | Surprise, AZ | 3,126 | +18.2% |
| 210 | Alexandria, VA | 3,109 | +26.5% |
| 211 | Watsonville, CA | 3,105 | +15% |
| 212 | Hialeah, FL | 3,092 | +7.3% |
| 213 | Hollywood, FL | 3,086 | +17.6% |
| 214 | Clovis, CA | 3,070 | +10% |
| 215 | Fullerton, CA | 3,058 | +8.1% |
| 216 | Santa Monica, CA | 3,056 | -7.1% |
| 217 | Fairfield, CA | 3,044 | +8% |
| 218 | Brockton, MA | 3,043 | +16.2% |
| 219 | El Centro, CA | 3,040 | +5.2% |
| 220 | Downey, CA | 3,029 | -1.2% |
| 221 | Carrollton, TX | 3,024 | +1.2% |
| 222 | Lewisville, TX | 3,016 | -0.4% |
| 223 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 3,012 | +11.8% |
| 224 | Camden, NJ | 2,995 | +9.3% |
| 225 | Orange, CA | 2,988 | +7.2% |
| 226 | Murfreesboro, TN | 2,987 | +9.6% |
| 227 | Simi Valley, CA | 2,983 | +8% |
| 228 | Fall River, MA | 2,980 | +15.1% |
| 229 | West Valley City, UT | 2,977 | +13.3% |
| 230 | Everett, WA | 2,956 | +8.6% |
| 231 | Olathe, KS | 2,939 | +11.2% |
| 232 | Syracuse, NY | 2,936 | +4.6% |
| 233 | Waco, TX | 2,930 | +4.7% |
| 234 | Richmond, CA | 2,925 | +9.1% |
| 235 | Lawrence, MA | 2,921 | +10.2% |
| 236 | Santa Clara, CA | 2,913 | +3.4% |
| 237 | Montgomery, AL | 2,910 | -2.8% |
| 237 | Yuba City, CA | 2,910 | +5.4% |
| 239 | East Orange, NJ | 2,898 | +10.8% |
| 240 | Palm Bay, FL | 2,897 | +20.5% |
| 241 | Berkeley, CA | 2,890 | +8.6% |
| 242 | West Covina, CA | 2,876 | 0% |
| 243 | Coral Springs, FL | 2,874 | +18.4% |
| 244 | Stamford, CT | 2,871 | +20.8% |
| 245 | Rialto, CA | 2,870 | +6.5% |
| 246 | Indio, CA | 2,854 | +5.9% |
| 247 | Renton, WA | 2,853 | +6.8% |
| 248 | Beaumont, TX | 2,848 | +1.4% |
| 249 | Concord, CA | 2,839 | +5.1% |
| 250 | Independence, MO | 2,837 | +9.8% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Residents with no job who were available for work and had looked for work in the previous four weeks, or were waiting to be recalled from a layoff, annual average.
More on how it is measured
- People aged 16 and over by place of residence, from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Active-duty military personnel and people living in institutions are excluded.
United States cities only for now. The survey definition, not a count of benefit claimants. BLS estimates cities by splitting county estimates with Census Bureau employment and population data and unemployment insurance claims, so city figures are less precise than state ones. BLS publishes cities of 25,000 or more, and smaller cities in New England.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026). Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average (US cities by unemployed people, 2025) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29
MLA 9
Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average, US cities by unemployed people, 2025. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 30 Sept. 2026, https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/us-cities. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2026. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. US cities by unemployed people, 2025. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/us-cities.
Harvard
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2026) Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average, US cities by unemployed people, 2025 [Dataset]. Available at: https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/us-cities (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{bureau_us_cities_by_unemployed_2025,
author = {{U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics}},
title = {{Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average: US cities by unemployed people, 2025}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/us-cities. Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
TI - Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average: US cities by unemployed people, 2025
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
DB - Invokely
UR - https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/us-cities
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/us-cities.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU25-29. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by unemployed people using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"unemployed_persons","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=unemployed_persons&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10Questions
Which city has the highest unemployed people?
New York, NY, with 230,144 in 2025, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Which city has the lowest unemployed people?
Essex Junction, VT, with 141 in 2025.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. Retrieved 2026-10-12.