US cities by employed residents
New York, NY had the highest employed residents of 1706 cities in 2024, at 4.13 million. Paradise, CA had the lowest, at 2,222. The median was 23,263. Source: the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Top 40 cities, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2024 | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York, NY | 4,132,652 | +2.1% |
| 2 | Los Angeles, CA | 1,973,362 | +0.6% |
| 3 | Chicago, IL | 1,414,293 | +1.7% |
| 4 | Houston, TX | 1,160,459 | +1.8% |
| 5 | Phoenix, AZ | 884,299 | +1.4% |
| 6 | Philadelphia, PA | 749,611 | +0.3% |
| 7 | San Antonio, TX | 721,336 | +2.3% |
| 8 | San Diego, CA | 717,199 | +0.8% |
| 9 | Dallas, TX | 683,692 | +0.5% |
| 10 | Austin, TX | 624,646 | +1.3% |
| 11 | San Jose, CA | 511,102 | -0.6% |
| 12 | Fort Worth, TX | 507,014 | +2.9% |
| 13 | Charlotte, NC | 500,087 | +0.5% |
| 14 | Columbus, OH | 489,879 | +1.6% |
| 15 | Seattle, WA | 489,123 | +0.1% |
| 16 | San Francisco, CA | 488,700 | -2.4% |
| 17 | Jacksonville, FL | 478,872 | -0.1% |
| 18 | Indianapolis, IN | 446,601 | +1.1% |
| 19 | Denver, CO | 432,260 | 0% |
| 20 | Boston, MA | 390,264 | +2.4% |
| 21 | Oklahoma City, OK | 368,033 | +2.1% |
| 22 | Portland, OR | 365,717 | -0.3% |
| 23 | Las Vegas, NV | 318,824 | +2.1% |
| 24 | El Paso, TX | 315,609 | +3.5% |
| 25 | Albuquerque, NM | 285,644 | +0.5% |
| 26 | Atlanta, GA | 278,671 | +1.1% |
| 27 | Raleigh, NC | 278,654 | +0.8% |
| 28 | Kansas City, MO | 271,573 | +1.2% |
| 29 | Baltimore, MD | 270,125 | +0.6% |
| 30 | Memphis, TN | 268,699 | -0.4% |
| 31 | Mesa, AZ | 265,578 | +1% |
| 32 | Miami, FL | 258,210 | +1.6% |
| 33 | Milwaukee, WI | 257,509 | -0.5% |
| 34 | Tucson, AZ | 256,394 | -0.4% |
| 35 | Sacramento, CA | 256,392 | +1.3% |
| 36 | Colorado Springs, CO | 253,934 | +0.4% |
| 37 | Omaha, NE | 252,504 | +0.5% |
| 38 | Minneapolis, MN | 244,467 | -0.3% |
| 39 | Detroit, MI | 240,448 | +0.3% |
| 40 | Fresno, CA | 238,441 | +1.5% |
| 41 | Long Beach, CA | 231,393 | -0.4% |
| 42 | Virginia Beach, VA | 228,418 | -0.2% |
| 43 | Oakland, CA | 227,629 | -0.2% |
| 44 | Aurora, CO | 213,243 | +0.3% |
| 45 | Arlington, TX | 210,802 | +1.2% |
| 46 | Tampa, FL | 208,425 | -0.3% |
| 47 | Tulsa, OK | 201,865 | +1.1% |
| 48 | Wichita, KS | 197,921 | +0.6% |
| 49 | Orlando, FL | 182,817 | +0.1% |
| 50 | Bakersfield, CA | 181,176 | +0.6% |
| 51 | Anaheim, CA | 170,891 | +0.5% |
| 52 | Lexington, KY | 169,399 | +1.6% |
| 53 | Jersey City, NJ | 168,424 | +0.8% |
| 54 | Madison, WI | 167,432 | +1.3% |
| 55 | New Orleans, LA | 166,766 | -1.3% |
| 56 | Lincoln, NE | 164,990 | +1% |
| 57 | Durham, NC | 164,614 | +1.6% |
| 58 | Henderson, NV | 163,318 | +3.5% |
| 59 | St. Paul, MN | 161,328 | -0% |
| 60 | Pittsburgh, PA | 160,443 | +1.2% |
| 61 | Chandler, AZ | 159,530 | +0.3% |
| 62 | Plano, TX | 159,000 | -0.3% |
| 63 | Irvine, CA | 157,881 | +1.1% |
| 64 | Cleveland, OH | 157,393 | +1.3% |
| 65 | Cincinnati, OH | 156,610 | +0.3% |
| 66 | Gilbert, AZ | 156,560 | +1.1% |
| 67 | Riverside, CA | 155,896 | +0.7% |
| 68 | Santa Ana, CA | 155,067 | +1.1% |
| 69 | St. Louis, MO | 148,996 | -1.1% |
| 70 | Corpus Christi, TX | 146,145 | +1.5% |
| 71 | St. Petersburg, FL | 145,676 | -0.6% |
| 72 | Reno, NV | 145,572 | +1.2% |
| 73 | Anchorage, AK | 143,527 | +0.3% |
| 74 | Greensboro, NC | 143,234 | +0.5% |
| 75 | Irving, TX | 136,780 | 0% |
| 76 | North Las Vegas, NV | 135,586 | +2.8% |
| 77 | Lubbock, TX | 135,576 | +2.5% |
| 78 | Boise City, ID | 135,304 | +1.2% |
| 79 | Stockton, CA | 134,666 | +0.6% |
| 80 | Scottsdale, AZ | 133,424 | +0.7% |
| 81 | Salt Lake City, UT | 132,785 | +2.3% |
| 82 | Fort Wayne, IN | 131,404 | +0.8% |
| 83 | Newark, NJ | 130,844 | +1.1% |
| 84 | Chula Vista, CA | 128,933 | +1% |
| 85 | Garland, TX | 127,072 | +1.5% |
| 86 | Glendale, AZ | 126,784 | +1.6% |
| 87 | Richmond, VA | 126,145 | +0.3% |
| 88 | Frisco, TX | 123,957 | +3.3% |
| 89 | Chesapeake, VA | 123,128 | 0% |
| 90 | Tacoma, WA | 121,147 | +1.2% |
| 91 | McKinney, TX | 119,250 | +5.1% |
| 92 | Sioux Falls, SD | 117,500 | +2.3% |
| 93 | Huntsville, AL | 117,429 | +2.5% |
| 94 | Hialeah, FL | 117,099 | +1.1% |
| 95 | Buffalo, NY | 117,080 | -1.2% |
| 96 | Toledo, OH | 116,335 | -0.1% |
| 97 | Tempe, AZ | 115,948 | +0.1% |
| 98 | Overland Park, KS | 114,421 | +0.7% |
| 99 | Fremont, CA | 114,266 | -0.9% |
| 100 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 113,767 | +2.7% |
| 101 | Santa Clarita, CA | 113,436 | -0.5% |
| 102 | Des Moines, IA | 112,694 | -0.1% |
| 103 | Winston-Salem, NC | 112,073 | -1% |
| 104 | Tallahassee, FL | 111,694 | +1.1% |
| 105 | Laredo, TX | 109,671 | +2.9% |
| 106 | Spokane, WA | 107,217 | -1% |
| 107 | Yonkers, NY | 106,570 | +0.1% |
| 108 | Grand Rapids, MI | 106,402 | +0.3% |
| 109 | Cape Coral, FL | 106,360 | +1.8% |
| 110 | Worcester, MA | 105,616 | +2.1% |
| 111 | Norfolk, VA | 104,134 | -0.5% |
| 112 | Grand Prairie, TX | 104,086 | +1.7% |
| 113 | Fontana, CA | 103,056 | +1.1% |
| 114 | Baton Rouge, LA | 102,382 | +0.7% |
| 115 | Little Rock, AR | 101,188 | +1.9% |
| 116 | Amarillo, TX | 100,711 | +1.9% |
| 117 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 100,369 | -0.1% |
| 118 | Huntington Beach, CA | 99,844 | -0.1% |
| 119 | Alexandria, VA | 98,852 | +0.6% |
| 120 | Peoria, AZ | 98,404 | +0.5% |
| 121 | Knoxville, TN | 98,106 | +1.4% |
| 122 | Cary, NC | 97,633 | -0.1% |
| 123 | Fort Collins, CO | 97,271 | -0.6% |
| 124 | San Bernardino, CA | 97,042 | +0.5% |
| 125 | Moreno Valley, CA | 96,211 | +0.6% |
| 126 | Providence, RI | 95,907 | +1.1% |
| 127 | Vancouver, WA | 95,854 | -1.2% |
| 128 | Chattanooga, TN | 95,512 | +3.1% |
| 129 | Oxnard, CA | 95,093 | +1.1% |
| 130 | Murfreesboro, TN | 93,853 | +1.5% |
| 131 | Modesto, CA | 93,788 | +0.6% |
| 132 | Aurora, IL | 93,601 | +0.8% |
| 133 | Rochester, NY | 92,537 | -1% |
| 134 | Mobile, AL | 91,442 | +0.7% |
| 135 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 90,808 | +1.1% |
| 136 | Glendale, CA | 90,666 | -0.4% |
| 137 | Birmingham, AL | 90,368 | 0% |
| 138 | Ontario, CA | 90,008 | +1.4% |
| 139 | Denton, TX | 88,707 | +4% |
| 140 | Lakewood, CO | 88,429 | -0.7% |
| 141 | Eugene, OR | 88,357 | +0.7% |
| 142 | Santa Rosa, CA | 88,089 | -0.2% |
| 143 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 87,569 | +0.8% |
| 144 | Akron, OH | 87,253 | +0.2% |
| 145 | Charleston, SC | 86,613 | +1.4% |
| 146 | Salem, OR | 86,568 | +1.5% |
| 147 | Sunnyvale, CA | 86,272 | -0.2% |
| 148 | Newport News, VA | 86,264 | -0.5% |
| 149 | Montgomery, AL | 86,262 | +1.3% |
| 150 | Elk Grove, CA | 84,523 | +1.8% |
| 151 | Hollywood, FL | 84,510 | -0.2% |
| 152 | Oceanside, CA | 84,324 | 0% |
| 153 | Springfield, MO | 83,840 | +0.2% |
| 154 | Bellevue, WA | 82,984 | -0.7% |
| 155 | Garden Grove, CA | 82,623 | +1.3% |
| 156 | Olathe, KS | 81,989 | +1.2% |
| 157 | Brownsville, TX | 81,003 | +1.9% |
| 158 | Corona, CA | 80,678 | +0.7% |
| 159 | Carrollton, TX | 80,636 | +0.8% |
| 160 | Thornton, CO | 80,299 | -0.2% |
| 161 | Miramar, FL | 79,909 | -0.1% |
| 162 | Hayward, CA | 79,887 | -0.5% |
| 163 | Naperville, IL | 79,856 | +2.2% |
| 164 | Stamford, CT | 79,041 | +1.3% |
| 165 | Lewisville, TX | 78,906 | +0.9% |
| 166 | Columbus, GA | 78,900 | -1.6% |
| 167 | Fargo, ND | 78,831 | +1% |
| 168 | Roseville, CA | 78,810 | +2.8% |
| 169 | Round Rock, TX | 78,430 | +4% |
| 170 | Joliet, IL | 77,268 | +1.2% |
| 171 | Surprise, AZ | 76,530 | +5.7% |
| 172 | Fayetteville, NC | 76,261 | -1% |
| 173 | Midland, TX | 76,258 | +4.3% |
| 174 | Mesquite, TX | 76,077 | +0.5% |
| 175 | Salinas, CA | 75,777 | +0.9% |
| 176 | Pasadena, CA | 74,964 | +0.9% |
| 177 | Clarksville, TN | 74,929 | +3.5% |
| 178 | Shreveport, LA | 74,666 | -1.8% |
| 179 | Santa Clara, CA | 74,377 | -0.7% |
| 180 | Bridgeport, CT | 74,367 | +1.3% |
| 181 | Meridian, ID | 74,364 | +3.8% |
| 182 | Kansas City, KS | 73,897 | +1.4% |
| 183 | Coral Springs, FL | 72,745 | +0.7% |
| 184 | Escondido, CA | 72,273 | +0.1% |
| 185 | Savannah, GA | 72,248 | +0.9% |
| 186 | West Valley City, UT | 72,200 | -0.1% |
| 187 | Cambridge, MA | 71,786 | +2.1% |
| 188 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 71,546 | -1.2% |
| 189 | Orange, CA | 70,182 | -0.2% |
| 190 | Paterson, NJ | 70,159 | +0.5% |
| 191 | Gainesville, FL | 70,060 | -1.1% |
| 192 | Kent, WA | 70,054 | -0.9% |
| 193 | Pomona, CA | 69,685 | +0.5% |
| 194 | Torrance, CA | 69,220 | -0.6% |
| 195 | Arvada, CO | 69,120 | -0.9% |
| 196 | Norman, OK | 69,119 | +1.5% |
| 197 | McAllen, TX | 68,754 | +2.3% |
| 198 | Palmdale, CA | 68,705 | -0.2% |
| 199 | Waco, TX | 68,368 | +2% |
| 200 | New Haven, CT | 67,680 | +1.4% |
| 201 | Westminster, CO | 67,368 | -1% |
| 202 | College Station, TX | 67,321 | +3% |
| 203 | Ann Arbor, MI | 67,227 | +0.2% |
| 204 | Rochester, MN | 66,882 | +1.2% |
| 205 | Fullerton, CA | 66,869 | -0.1% |
| 206 | Columbia, SC | 66,793 | +2.2% |
| 207 | Columbia, MO | 66,327 | -0.6% |
| 208 | West Palm Beach, FL | 65,594 | +0.1% |
| 209 | Manchester, NH | 65,437 | +0.1% |
| 210 | Simi Valley, CA | 65,388 | +1.1% |
| 211 | West Jordan, UT | 65,326 | -0.1% |
| 212 | Visalia, CA | 65,321 | +0.4% |
| 213 | Richardson, TX | 65,244 | -0.6% |
| 214 | Lancaster, CA | 65,147 | -0.1% |
| 215 | Elizabeth, NJ | 65,054 | +0.2% |
| 216 | Hampton, VA | 64,881 | -0.1% |
| 217 | Warren, MI | 64,672 | -1.2% |
| 218 | Palm Bay, FL | 64,306 | +2.5% |
| 219 | Springfield, MA | 64,164 | +1.6% |
| 220 | Provo, UT | 64,098 | -0.9% |
| 221 | Pasadena, TX | 64,045 | +0.5% |
| 222 | Pearland, TX | 63,863 | +0.7% |
| 223 | Sterling Heights, MI | 63,689 | -1.1% |
| 224 | North Charleston, SC | 63,499 | +4% |
| 225 | Broken Arrow, OK | 63,230 | +3.4% |
| 226 | Wilmington, NC | 63,138 | +0.2% |
| 227 | Sandy Springs, GA | 62,831 | -1% |
| 228 | Costa Mesa, CA | 62,370 | -0.2% |
| 229 | Hillsboro, OR | 62,100 | +0.6% |
| 230 | Rockford, IL | 61,800 | +0.4% |
| 231 | Concord, CA | 61,650 | -0.4% |
| 232 | Jackson, MS | 61,640 | +0.9% |
| 233 | Odessa, TX | 61,473 | +3.7% |
| 234 | Billings, MT | 61,353 | -0.2% |
| 235 | Lowell, MA | 61,337 | +1.6% |
| 236 | Topeka, KS | 60,952 | -0.1% |
| 237 | Berkeley, CA | 60,865 | +0.1% |
| 238 | Thousand Oaks, CA | 60,804 | +0.8% |
| 239 | Nampa, ID | 60,677 | +2.7% |
| 240 | Killeen, TX | 60,615 | +1.5% |
| 241 | Macon, GA | 60,388 | -1% |
| 242 | Syracuse, NY | 60,377 | -0.4% |
| 243 | Davie, FL | 60,073 | +0.3% |
| 244 | Abilene, TX | 60,056 | +3% |
| 245 | Boulder, CO | 60,044 | -1.3% |
| 246 | Quincy, MA | 59,695 | +2.2% |
| 247 | New Braunfels, TX | 59,450 | +5.5% |
| 248 | Lafayette, LA | 59,336 | -0.3% |
| 249 | League City, TX | 59,330 | +1.4% |
| 250 | Clovis, CA | 59,263 | +2.3% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Residents who did any work for pay or profit in the reference week, or were temporarily absent from a job, annual average.
More on how it is measured
- People aged 16 and over by place of residence, from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Active-duty military personnel and people living in institutions are excluded.
United States cities only for now. Counts people where they live, whatever the place of work, and someone with two jobs counts once. BLS estimates cities by splitting county estimates with Census Bureau employment and population data and unemployment insurance claims, so city figures are less precise than state ones. BLS publishes cities of 25,000 or more, and smaller cities in New England.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026). Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average (US cities by employed residents, 2024) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24
MLA 9
Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average, US cities by employed residents, 2024. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 30 Sept. 2026, https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/us-cities?period=2024. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2026. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. US cities by employed residents, 2024. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/us-cities?period=2024.
Harvard
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2026) Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average, US cities by employed residents, 2024 [Dataset]. Available at: https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/us-cities?period=2024 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{bureau_us_cities_by_employed_2024,
author = {{U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics}},
title = {{Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average: US cities by employed residents, 2024}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/us-cities?period=2024. Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
TI - Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average: US cities by employed residents, 2024
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
DB - Invokely
UR - https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/us-cities?period=2024
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/employed-residents/us-cities?period=2024.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by employed residents using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"employed_residents","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=employed_residents&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest employed residents?
New York, NY, with 4.13 million in 2024, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Which city has the lowest employed residents?
Paradise, CA, with 2,222 in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: employment (measure 05), annual average. Retrieved 2026-10-12.