NUTS 3 areas of Poland by nights spent in tourist accommodation

Koszaliński had the highest nights spent in tourist accommodation of 73 areas in 2023, at 8.9 million. Ciechanowski had the lowest, at 123,450. The median was 545,709 and the figure for Poland was 92.8 million. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest8,896,012Koszaliński
Lowest123,450Ciechanowski
Median545,70973 areas
Poland92,797,861History

Top 40 areas, 2023

CSVChart (SVG)

KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 8,896,012 count8,896,012Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 7,461,291 count7,461,291Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 5,741,775 count5,741,775SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 5,234,260 count5,234,260NowotarskiNowotarski: 4,886,175 count4,886,175JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 4,702,176 count4,702,176TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 4,454,611 count4,454,611BielskiBielski: 3,160,976 count3,160,976GdańskiGdański: 2,834,909 count2,834,909WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 2,776,131 count2,776,131NowosądeckiNowosądecki: 2,450,062 count2,450,062Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 2,224,212 count2,224,212WłocławskiWłocławski: 1,911,356 count1,911,356SłupskiSłupski: 1,876,242 count1,876,242KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 1,816,057 count1,816,057OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 1,756,640 count1,756,640Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 1,395,892 count1,395,892Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 1,313,329 count1,313,329Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 1,054,588 count1,054,588Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 1,021,765 count1,021,765Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 1,017,497 count1,017,497KatowickiKatowicki: 975,244 count975,244InowrocławskiInowrocławski: 930,096 count930,096RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 912,691 count912,691EłckiEłcki: 878,644 count878,644KieleckiKielecki: 878,497 count878,497LubelskiLubelski: 843,835 count843,835KrakowskiKrakowski: 815,004 count815,004Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 790,057 count790,057GorzowskiGorzowski: 722,580 count722,580PuławskiPuławski: 703,877 count703,877Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 667,565 count667,565ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 640,895 count640,895KonińskiKoniński: 601,147 count601,147LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 590,685 count590,685ElbląskiElbląski: 578,027 count578,027OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 545,709 count545,709PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 543,533 count543,533ChojnickiChojnicki: 540,454 count540,454PrzemyskiPrzemyski: 538,950 count538,950
count. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankAreas2023
count
Change on 2022
1Koszaliński8,896,012+5.7%
2Miasto Warszawa7,461,291+2.5%
3Miasto Kraków5,741,775+17.5%
4Szczeciński5,234,260+0.6%
5Nowotarski4,886,175-0%
6Jeleniogórski4,702,176+12.5%
7Trójmiejski4,454,611+5.3%
8Bielski3,160,976+3.8%
9Gdański2,834,909-4.4%
10Wałbrzyski2,776,131+9.1%
11Nowosądecki2,450,062+1%
12Miasto Wrocław2,224,212+3.4%
13Włocławski1,911,356+4.6%
14Słupski1,876,242-2.9%
15Krośnieński1,816,057+9.8%
16Olsztyński1,756,640+6.4%
17Miasto Poznań1,395,892+1.5%
18Bydgosko-toruński1,313,329+7.2%
19Miasto Łódź1,054,588-3.4%
20Miasto Szczecin1,021,765-0.9%
21Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski1,017,497+4.6%
22Katowicki975,244+1.3%
23Inowrocławski930,096+0.9%
24Rzeszowski912,691+5.5%
25Ełcki878,644+7.1%
26Kielecki878,497+0.7%
27Lubelski843,835-4%
28Krakowski815,004+9.3%
29Warszawski zachodni790,057-6.7%
30Gorzowski722,580-5.6%
31Puławski703,877-2.1%
32Warszawski wschodni667,565+3.1%
33Zielonogórski640,895+0.4%
34Koniński601,147+9.9%
35Leszczyński590,685-3.3%
36Elbląski578,027-6.1%
37Oświęcimski545,709+6%
38Piotrkowski543,533-1.1%
39Chojnicki540,454-14.6%
40Przemyski538,950-1.3%
41Chełmsko-zamojski531,164+9.5%
42Sosnowiecki522,832-4.8%
43Wrocławski513,601+28.7%
44Poznański496,083-6%
45Białostocki490,505-0.6%
46Sieradzki465,029-1.4%
47Szczecinecko-pyrzycki457,150-10.5%
48Suwalski446,429-9.1%
49Opolski423,092-5.1%
50Gliwicki418,694-3.5%
51Częstochowski408,270-0.3%
52Siedlecki389,606+2.5%
53Legnicko-głogowski382,740+6.3%
54Bytomski356,204+4.9%
55Tarnobrzeski351,301-1%
56Radomski342,232-8.6%
57Kaliski333,552-13.2%
58Bialski325,725-4.9%
59Grudziądzki308,173+2.1%
60Łódzki305,307+10.7%
61Żyrardowski302,179+10%
62Łomżyński296,019-1%
63Nyski284,562+4.5%
64Starogardzki272,649+2.4%
65Pilski268,630-9.2%
66Rybnicki217,033+5.6%
67Świecki200,888-11.5%
68Tarnowski198,253-11.9%
69Tyski197,914-6%
70Płocki188,029+5.6%
71Skierniewicki159,496-11.6%
72Ostrołęcki137,624-1.3%
73Ciechanowski123,450-28.6%

Other periods

About this ranking

Nights spent at hotels, holiday accommodation, campsites and similar establishments (Eurostat). Comparable across EU countries and regions.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Nights spent at tourist accommodation establishments by NUTS 2 and 3 region (tour_occ_nin2). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_occ_nin2/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by nights spent in tourist accommodation using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"tourist_nights","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=tourist_nights&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest nights spent in tourist accommodation?

Koszaliński, with 8.9 million in 2023, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest nights spent in tourist accommodation?

Ciechanowski, with 123,450 in 2023.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Nights spent at tourist accommodation establishments by NUTS 2 and 3 region (tour_occ_nin2). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Nights spent in tourist accommodation: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings