NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms
Trójmiejski had the highest guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms of 73 areas in 2021, at 2.11 million. Łódzki had the lowest, at 2,090. The median was 33,510 and the figure for Poland was 15.03 million. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2021
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2021 | Change on 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trójmiejski | 2,108,397 | +19.8% |
| 2 | Miasto Warszawa | 1,553,742 | +17.3% |
| 3 | Miasto Kraków | 1,375,494 | +11.1% |
| 4 | Nowotarski | 1,318,050 | -0.9% |
| 5 | Szczeciński | 1,233,415 | +19.4% |
| 6 | Koszaliński | 839,518 | +9.2% |
| 7 | Miasto Wrocław | 808,901 | +17.4% |
| 8 | Jeleniogórski | 659,358 | +3.5% |
| 9 | Gdański | 657,917 | +9.9% |
| 10 | Miasto Poznań | 358,596 | +24.4% |
| 11 | Bielski | 345,014 | +12% |
| 12 | Wałbrzyski | 306,522 | +24.1% |
| 13 | Olsztyński | 277,061 | +17.4% |
| 14 | Słupski | 266,741 | +16.1% |
| 15 | Bydgosko-toruński | 239,522 | +26.7% |
| 16 | Ełcki | 214,476 | +10.6% |
| 17 | Krośnieński | 204,285 | +6.3% |
| 18 | Miasto Łódź | 202,287 | +55.3% |
| 19 | Miasto Szczecin | 179,364 | +27.8% |
| 20 | Katowicki | 140,943 | +33% |
| 21 | Nowosądecki | 131,195 | -3.9% |
| 22 | Lubelski | 121,074 | +27.5% |
| 23 | Białostocki | 109,813 | +17.6% |
| 24 | Oświęcimski | 102,977 | +78.5% |
| 25 | Elbląski | 99,692 | +23.8% |
| 26 | Suwalski | 79,265 | +28.8% |
| 27 | Kielecki | 77,340 | +25% |
| 28 | Zielonogórski | 67,306 | +31.7% |
| 29 | Krakowski | 53,901 | +69.6% |
| 30 | Chojnicki | 45,856 | +37.2% |
| 31 | Rzeszowski | 44,460 | +26.5% |
| 32 | Łomżyński | 43,283 | +6.5% |
| 33 | Puławski | 42,790 | +23.9% |
| 34 | Chełmsko-zamojski | 38,202 | +43.2% |
| 35 | Częstochowski | 38,024 | +32.6% |
| 36 | Gliwicki | 36,832 | +49.8% |
| 37 | Gorzowski | 33,510 | +25.8% |
| 38 | Koniński | 33,127 | +51.5% |
| 39 | Opolski | 32,814 | +33.2% |
| 40 | Starogardzki | 31,692 | +37.7% |
| 41 | Szczecinecko-pyrzycki | 29,174 | +32.9% |
| 42 | Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski | 27,580 | +24.6% |
| 43 | Warszawski wschodni | 24,555 | +22.9% |
| 44 | Pilski | 23,018 | +42.3% |
| 45 | Warszawski zachodni | 22,966 | +34.7% |
| 46 | Przemyski | 22,497 | +44% |
| 47 | Leszczyński | 22,092 | +54.9% |
| 48 | Legnicko-głogowski | 19,163 | +40.2% |
| 49 | Bytomski | 18,888 | +30.5% |
| 50 | Kaliski | 16,148 | +67.5% |
| 51 | Wrocławski | 15,355 | +75.9% |
| 52 | Grudziądzki | 15,272 | +28.4% |
| 53 | Bialski | 15,069 | +33% |
| 54 | Rybnicki | 14,932 | +72.3% |
| 55 | Płocki | 13,210 | +62.2% |
| 56 | Siedlecki | 13,148 | +62.9% |
| 57 | Radomski | 13,130 | +35.4% |
| 58 | Sosnowiecki | 13,007 | +29.4% |
| 59 | Poznański | 12,661 | +31.1% |
| 60 | Żyrardowski | 12,563 | +74.5% |
| 61 | Tyski | 12,100 | +27.6% |
| 62 | Nyski | 12,058 | +42% |
| 63 | Sieradzki | 11,579 | +18.9% |
| 64 | Tarnowski | 10,966 | +29.2% |
| 65 | Tarnobrzeski | 10,822 | +48.9% |
| 66 | Włocławski | 9,868 | +14.1% |
| 67 | Inowrocławski | 9,271 | +34.1% |
| 68 | Świecki | 9,219 | +55.5% |
| 69 | Ciechanowski | 7,814 | +52% |
| 70 | Ostrołęcki | 5,903 | +39.9% |
| 71 | Piotrkowski | 5,750 | +29.2% |
| 72 | Skierniewicki | 5,739 | +186.4% |
| 73 | Łódzki | 2,090 | +45.4% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Nights spent by guests, residents of the country and visitors from abroad together, in short-stay accommodation (NACE Rev. 2 group 55.2: holiday flats, houses and rooms) booked through Airbnb, Booking or Expedia, from booking data the platforms share with Eurostat. Every guest counts: a family of four staying three nights is 12 guest nights.
Official statistics compiled by Eurostat from data the platforms transmit under agreements with the European Commission, published only as totals across platforms. Data start in 2018. Tripadvisor also reported until 2024; Eurostat found no break when it left. Hotels listed on the platforms are not included. Do not add these nights to tourist_nights: national accommodation surveys already count some of the same rentals. Eurostat withholds NUTS 3 values where few bookings would reveal individual hosts.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms, 2021) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table
MLA 9
Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms, 2021. Eurostat, European Commission, 22 Sept. 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/short-stay-platform-guest-nights/poland-provinces?period=2021. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms, 2021. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/short-stay-platform-guest-nights/poland-provinces?period=2021.
Harvard
Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms, 2021 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/short-stay-platform-guest-nights/poland-provinces?period=2021 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2021,
author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
title = {{Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour\_ce\_oan3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms, 2021}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/short-stay-platform-guest-nights/poland-provinces?period=2021. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour\_ce\_oan3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour\_ce\_oan3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - Eurostat, European Commission
TI - Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms, 2021
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
PB - Eurostat, European Commission
DB - Invokely
UR - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/short-stay-platform-guest-nights/poland-provinces?period=2021
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/short-stay-platform-guest-nights/poland-provinces?period=2021.
N1 - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tour_ce_oan3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"short_stay_platform_guest_nights","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=short_stay_platform_guest_nights&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms?
Trójmiejski, with 2.11 million in 2021, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest guest nights in short-stay rentals booked through online platforms?
Łódzki, with 2,090 in 2021.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Guest nights spent at short-stay accommodation offered via online platforms by NUTS 3 region, residents and non-residents (tour_ce_oan3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.