Data / Rankings / Population aged 0 to 14 / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14

Gdański had the highest population aged 0 to 14 of 73 areas in 2015, at 19.4%. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at 11.9%. The median was 15.2% and the figure for Poland was 15%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest19.4Gdański
Lowest11.9Miasto Łódź
Median15.273 areas
Poland15History

Top 40 areas, 2015

Gdański: 19.4 %Gdański19.4Nowosądecki: 18.4 %Nowosądecki18.4Poznański: 18 %Poznański18Chojnicki: 17.8 %Chojnicki17.8Warszawski wschodni: 17.7 %Warszawski wschodni17.7Nowotarski: 17.2 %Nowotarski17.2Warszawski zachodni: 17.2 %Warszawski zachodni17.2Starogardzki: 17 %Starogardzki17Krakowski: 16.8 %Krakowski16.8Leszczyński: 16.8 %Leszczyński16.8Świecki: 16.6 %Świecki16.6Ostrołęcki: 16.4 %Ostrołęcki16.4Pilski: 16.4 %Pilski16.4Siedlecki: 16.3 %Siedlecki16.3Grudziądzki: 16.2 %Grudziądzki16.2Wrocławski: 16 %Wrocławski16Elbląski: 15.9 %Elbląski15.9Ełcki: 15.9 %Ełcki15.9Koniński: 15.9 %Koniński15.9Rzeszowski: 15.9 %Rzeszowski15.9Słupski: 15.9 %Słupski15.9Tyski: 15.8 %Tyski15.8Żyrardowski: 15.8 %Żyrardowski15.8Kaliski: 15.7 %Kaliski15.7Tarnowski: 15.7 %Tarnowski15.7Bialski: 15.6 %Bialski15.6Ciechanowski: 15.5 %Ciechanowski15.5Bielski: 15.4 %Bielski15.4Gorzowski: 15.4 %Gorzowski15.4Krośnieński: 15.4 %Krośnieński15.4Radomski: 15.3 %Radomski15.3Inowrocławski: 15.2 %Inowrocławski15.2Piotrkowski: 15.2 %Piotrkowski15.2Przemyski: 15.2 %Przemyski15.2Puławski: 15.2 %Puławski15.2Suwalski: 15.2 %Suwalski15.2Szczecinecko-pyrzycki: 15.2 %Szczecinecko-pyrzycki15.2Szczeciński: 15.2 %Szczeciński15.2Olsztyński: 15.1 %Olsztyński15.1Tarnobrzeski: 15.1 %Tarnobrzeski15.1Gdański: 19.4 %Gdański19.4Nowosądecki: 18.4 %Nowosądecki18.4Poznański: 18 %Poznański18Chojnicki: 17.8 %Chojnicki17.8Warszawski wschodni: 17.7 %Warszawski wschodni17.7Nowotarski: 17.2 %Nowotarski17.2Warszawski zachodni: 17.2 %Warszawski zachodni17.2Starogardzki: 17 %Starogardzki17Krakowski: 16.8 %Krakowski16.8Leszczyński: 16.8 %Leszczyński16.8Świecki: 16.6 %Świecki16.6Ostrołęcki: 16.4 %Ostrołęcki16.4Pilski: 16.4 %Pilski16.4Siedlecki: 16.3 %Siedlecki16.3Grudziądzki: 16.2 %Grudziądzki16.2Wrocławski: 16 %Wrocławski16Elbląski: 15.9 %Elbląski15.9Ełcki: 15.9 %Ełcki15.9Koniński: 15.9 %Koniński15.9Rzeszowski: 15.9 %Rzeszowski15.9Słupski: 15.9 %Słupski15.9Tyski: 15.8 %Tyski15.8Żyrardowski: 15.8 %Żyrardowski15.8Kaliski: 15.7 %Kaliski15.7Tarnowski: 15.7 %Tarnowski15.7Bialski: 15.6 %Bialski15.6Ciechanowski: 15.5 %Ciechanowski15.5Bielski: 15.4 %Bielski15.4Gorzowski: 15.4 %Gorzowski15.4Krośnieński: 15.4 %Krośnieński15.4Radomski: 15.3 %Radomski15.3Inowrocławski: 15.2 %Inowrocławski15.2Piotrkowski: 15.2 %Piotrkowski15.2Przemyski: 15.2 %Przemyski15.2Puławski: 15.2 %Puławski15.2Suwalski: 15.2 %Suwalski15.2Szczecinecko-pyrzycki: 15.2 %Szczecinecko-pyrzycki15.2Szczeciński: 15.2 %Szczeciński15.2Olsztyński: 15.1 %Olsztyński15.1Tarnobrzeski: 15.1 %Tarnobrzeski15.1
%. Source: Eurostat, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2015 (%)Change on 2014
1Gdański19.40 pts
2Nowosądecki18.4-0.2 pts
3Poznański180 pts
4Chojnicki17.8-0.1 pts
5Warszawski wschodni17.7+0.1 pts
6Nowotarski17.2-0.2 pts
6Warszawski zachodni17.2+0.2 pts
8Starogardzki17-0.1 pts
9Krakowski16.80 pts
9Leszczyński16.80 pts
11Świecki16.6-0.1 pts
12Ostrołęcki16.4-0.1 pts
12Pilski16.4-0.1 pts
14Siedlecki16.30 pts
15Grudziądzki16.2-0.1 pts
16Wrocławski16+0.1 pts
17Elbląski15.9-0.1 pts
17Ełcki15.9-0.1 pts
17Koniński15.90 pts
17Rzeszowski15.9-0.1 pts
17Słupski15.9-0.1 pts
22Tyski15.8+0.2 pts
22Żyrardowski15.8+0.1 pts
24Kaliski15.7-0.1 pts
24Tarnowski15.7-0.2 pts
26Bialski15.6-0.1 pts
27Ciechanowski15.5-0.2 pts
28Bielski15.40 pts
28Gorzowski15.4-0.1 pts
28Krośnieński15.4-0.2 pts
31Radomski15.3-0.1 pts
32Inowrocławski15.2-0.1 pts
32Piotrkowski15.2-0.1 pts
32Przemyski15.2-0.2 pts
32Puławski15.2-0.1 pts
32Suwalski15.2-0.2 pts
32Szczecinecko-pyrzycki15.2-0.1 pts
32Szczeciński15.2-0.1 pts
39Olsztyński15.10 pts
39Tarnobrzeski15.1-0.3 pts
39Zielonogórski15.10 pts
42Płocki15-0.1 pts
42Rybnicki150 pts
44Legnicko-głogowski14.90 pts
44Sieradzki14.9-0.1 pts
46Lubelski14.80 pts
46Oświęcimski14.8-0.1 pts
48Włocławski14.7-0.1 pts
49Bydgosko-toruński14.50 pts
49Koszaliński14.5-0.1 pts
49Skierniewicki14.50 pts
52Łódzki14.4+0.1 pts
52Łomżyński14.4-0.2 pts
54Białostocki14.30 pts
54Miasto Warszawa14.3+0.3 pts
56Chełmsko-zamojski14.2-0.2 pts
57Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski14.1-0.2 pts
58Bytomski13.90 pts
58Nyski13.9-0.1 pts
60Kielecki13.8-0.1 pts
61Jeleniogórski13.7-0.1 pts
62Gliwicki13.6+0.1 pts
63Częstochowski13.50 pts
63Trójmiejski13.5+0.2 pts
65Miasto Kraków13.4+0.2 pts
65Miasto Poznań13.4+0.2 pts
65Opolski13.40 pts
68Katowicki13.3+0.1 pts
69Miasto Wrocław13.1+0.4 pts
69Wałbrzyski13.10 pts
71Miasto Szczecin12.9+0.1 pts
72Sosnowiecki12.8+0.1 pts
73Miasto Łódź11.9+0.1 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 0 to 14 as a percentage of total population.

More on how it is measured
  • Eurostat figures for the EU, its countries and NUTS regions refer to 1 January; Statistics Finland figures for Finnish municipalities refer to 31 December; World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14, 2015. Eurostat, European Commission, 10 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-0-14/poland-provinces?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-0-14/poland-provinces?period=2015.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-0-14/poland-provinces?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2015,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo\_r\_pjanind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14, 2015}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-0-14/poland-provinces?period=2015. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo\_r\_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14, 2015
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/10
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-0-14/poland-provinces?period=2015
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/population-0-14/poland-provinces?period=2015.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by population aged 0 to 14 using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_0_14_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_0_14_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest population aged 0 to 14?

Gdański, with 19.4% in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest population aged 0 to 14?

Miasto Łódź, with 11.9% in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, proportion of population aged 0 to 14 (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Population aged 0 to 14: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings