Data / Rankings / Net migration rate including statistical adjustment / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment

Poznański had the highest net migration rate including statistical adjustment of 73 areas in 2015, at 8.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. Miasto Poznań had the lowest, at -4.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest8.5Poznański
Lowest-4.5Miasto Poznań
Median-1.573 areas
Poland-0.3History

Top 40 areas, 2015

Poznański: 8.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański8.5Warszawski zachodni: 7.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni7.2Warszawski wschodni: 6.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni6.2Wrocławski: 5.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski5.4Gdański: 5.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.3Krakowski: 4.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski4.4Miasto Warszawa: 4.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa4.4Miasto Wrocław: 3.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław3.9Łódzki: 3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsŁódzki3.6Miasto Szczecin: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Szczecin1.8Rzeszowski: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.6Trójmiejski: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski1.4Bydgosko-toruński: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.7Białostocki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.3Bielski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.3Miasto Kraków: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.3Tyski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski0.2Lubelski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0Nowotarski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski-0.1Żyrardowski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsŻyrardowski-0.2Nowosądecki: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki-0.5Tarnobrzeski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski-0.5Sieradzki: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsSieradzki-0.8Tarnowski: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski-0.8Szczeciński: -0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński-0.9Kaliski: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-1Oświęcimski: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-1Częstochowski: -1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsCzęstochowski-1.1Leszczyński: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński-1.2Miasto Łódź: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Łódź-1.2Bytomski: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsBytomski-1.4Ciechanowski: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsCiechanowski-1.4Koniński: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-1.4Krośnieński: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-1.4Olsztyński: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-1.5Świecki: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki-1.5Zielonogórski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-1.5Gorzowski: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-1.6Chojnicki: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki-1.7Kielecki: -1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKielecki-1.8Poznański: 8.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański8.5Warszawski zachodni: 7.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni7.2Warszawski wschodni: 6.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni6.2Wrocławski: 5.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski5.4Gdański: 5.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.3Krakowski: 4.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski4.4Miasto Warszawa: 4.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa4.4Miasto Wrocław: 3.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław3.9Łódzki: 3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsŁódzki3.6Miasto Szczecin: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Szczecin1.8Rzeszowski: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.6Trójmiejski: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski1.4Bydgosko-toruński: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.7Białostocki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.3Bielski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.3Miasto Kraków: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.3Tyski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski0.2Lubelski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0Nowotarski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski-0.1Żyrardowski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsŻyrardowski-0.2Nowosądecki: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki-0.5Tarnobrzeski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski-0.5Sieradzki: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsSieradzki-0.8Tarnowski: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski-0.8Szczeciński: -0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński-0.9Kaliski: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-1Oświęcimski: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-1Częstochowski: -1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsCzęstochowski-1.1Leszczyński: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński-1.2Miasto Łódź: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Łódź-1.2Bytomski: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsBytomski-1.4Ciechanowski: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsCiechanowski-1.4Koniński: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-1.4Krośnieński: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-1.4Olsztyński: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-1.5Świecki: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki-1.5Zielonogórski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-1.5Gorzowski: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-1.6Chojnicki: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki-1.7Kielecki: -1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKielecki-1.8
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2015
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2014
1Poznański8.5+0.5 pts
2Warszawski zachodni7.2-0.6 pts
3Warszawski wschodni6.20 pts
4Wrocławski5.4-0.1 pts
5Gdański5.3-1.2 pts
6Krakowski4.4+0.3 pts
6Miasto Warszawa4.4-1.4 pts
8Miasto Wrocław3.9-0.3 pts
9Łódzki3.6-0.6 pts
10Miasto Szczecin1.8+1.6 pts
11Rzeszowski1.60 pts
12Trójmiejski1.4+0.5 pts
13Bydgosko-toruński0.7+0.1 pts
14Białostocki0.30 pts
14Bielski0.30 pts
14Miasto Kraków0.3-3.1 pts
17Tyski0.2+0.2 pts
18Lubelski0+1.4 pts
19Nowotarski-0.1+0.4 pts
20Żyrardowski-0.2-0.3 pts
21Nowosądecki-0.5+0.8 pts
21Tarnobrzeski-0.5+0.2 pts
23Sieradzki-0.8+0.4 pts
23Tarnowski-0.8-0.3 pts
25Szczeciński-0.9-1.4 pts
26Kaliski-1+0.1 pts
26Oświęcimski-1+0.3 pts
28Częstochowski-1.1-0.4 pts
29Leszczyński-1.2-0.4 pts
29Miasto Łódź-1.2+1.3 pts
31Bytomski-1.4+0.2 pts
31Ciechanowski-1.4+0.6 pts
31Koniński-1.4+0.1 pts
31Krośnieński-1.4-0.2 pts
35Olsztyński-1.5+0.7 pts
35Świecki-1.5+0.4 pts
35Zielonogórski-1.50 pts
38Gorzowski-1.6-0.7 pts
39Chojnicki-1.7+1.2 pts
40Kielecki-1.80 pts
40Piotrkowski-1.8-0.7 pts
40Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-1.8-0.1 pts
40Słupski-1.8-0.3 pts
40Sosnowiecki-1.8+0.1 pts
40Włocławski-1.8+1.2 pts
46Legnicko-głogowski-1.9+0.3 pts
46Opolski-1.9+0.5 pts
46Skierniewicki-1.9-0.1 pts
49Koszaliński-2+0.2 pts
49Rybnicki-2-0.4 pts
51Płocki-2.1-0.6 pts
52Pilski-2.20 pts
52Radomski-2.2+0.5 pts
54Gliwicki-2.3+1.4 pts
54Jeleniogórski-2.3+0.3 pts
56Inowrocławski-2.4-0.2 pts
56Siedlecki-2.4+0.2 pts
56Starogardzki-2.4-0.5 pts
59Ełcki-2.5-1.3 pts
59Przemyski-2.5-0.3 pts
61Katowicki-2.6+0.6 pts
62Elbląski-2.7+1 pts
63Wałbrzyski-2.8-0.1 pts
64Nyski-2.9-1 pts
65Grudziądzki-3.1-0.9 pts
65Suwalski-3.1+0.3 pts
67Bialski-3.2+0.5 pts
67Ostrołęcki-3.2-0.4 pts
69Chełmsko-zamojski-3.3-0.2 pts
69Łomżyński-3.3+0.5 pts
71Puławski-3.4+0.2 pts
72Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-4.4-0.4 pts
73Miasto Poznań-4.5-1.7 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Net migration including statistical adjustment during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment).

Comparable across EU countries and regions. Eurostat derives the net figure as a residual of population change, so it includes census revisions and other statistical adjustments.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2015. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2015,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2015}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2015
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration rate including statistical adjustment?

Poznański, with 8.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration rate including statistical adjustment?

Miasto Poznań, with -4.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Net migration rate including statistical adjustment: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings