Data / Rankings / Net migration rate including statistical adjustment / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment

Poznański had the highest net migration rate including statistical adjustment of 73 areas in 2014, at 8 per 1,000 inhabitants. Szczecinecko-pyrzycki had the lowest, at -4 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest8Poznański
Lowest-4Szczecinecko-pyrzycki
Median-1.573 areas
Poland-0.3History

Top 40 areas, 2014

Poznański: 8 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański8Warszawski zachodni: 7.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni7.8Gdański: 6.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański6.5Warszawski wschodni: 6.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni6.2Miasto Warszawa: 5.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa5.8Wrocławski: 5.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski5.5Łódzki: 4.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsŁódzki4.2Miasto Wrocław: 4.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław4.2Krakowski: 4.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski4.1Miasto Kraków: 3.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków3.4Rzeszowski: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.6Trójmiejski: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski0.9Bydgosko-toruński: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.6Szczeciński: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.5Białostocki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.3Bielski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.3Miasto Szczecin: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Szczecin0.2Żyrardowski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsŻyrardowski0.1Tyski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski0Nowotarski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski-0.5Tarnowski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski-0.5Częstochowski: -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsCzęstochowski-0.7Tarnobrzeski: -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski-0.7Leszczyński: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński-0.8Gorzowski: -0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-0.9Kaliski: -1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-1.1Piotrkowski: -1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPiotrkowski-1.1Ełcki: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki-1.2Krośnieński: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-1.2Sieradzki: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsSieradzki-1.2Nowosądecki: -1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki-1.3Oświęcimski: -1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-1.3Lubelski: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski-1.4Koniński: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-1.5Płocki: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsPłocki-1.5Słupski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski-1.5Zielonogórski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-1.5Bytomski: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBytomski-1.6Rybnicki: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki-1.6Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSandomiersko-jędrzejowski-1.7Poznański: 8 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański8Warszawski zachodni: 7.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni7.8Gdański: 6.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański6.5Warszawski wschodni: 6.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni6.2Miasto Warszawa: 5.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa5.8Wrocławski: 5.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski5.5Łódzki: 4.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsŁódzki4.2Miasto Wrocław: 4.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław4.2Krakowski: 4.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski4.1Miasto Kraków: 3.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków3.4Rzeszowski: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.6Trójmiejski: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski0.9Bydgosko-toruński: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.6Szczeciński: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.5Białostocki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.3Bielski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.3Miasto Szczecin: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Szczecin0.2Żyrardowski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsŻyrardowski0.1Tyski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski0Nowotarski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski-0.5Tarnowski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski-0.5Częstochowski: -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsCzęstochowski-0.7Tarnobrzeski: -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski-0.7Leszczyński: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński-0.8Gorzowski: -0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-0.9Kaliski: -1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-1.1Piotrkowski: -1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPiotrkowski-1.1Ełcki: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki-1.2Krośnieński: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-1.2Sieradzki: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsSieradzki-1.2Nowosądecki: -1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki-1.3Oświęcimski: -1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-1.3Lubelski: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski-1.4Koniński: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-1.5Płocki: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsPłocki-1.5Słupski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski-1.5Zielonogórski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-1.5Bytomski: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBytomski-1.6Rybnicki: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki-1.6Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSandomiersko-jędrzejowski-1.7
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2014
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2013
1Poznański8-2 pts
2Warszawski zachodni7.8n/a
3Gdański6.5-0.2 pts
4Warszawski wschodni6.2n/a
5Miasto Warszawa5.8-0.3 pts
6Wrocławski5.5-1 pts
7Łódzki4.20 pts
7Miasto Wrocław4.2+2.2 pts
9Krakowski4.1-0.9 pts
10Miasto Kraków3.4+2.7 pts
11Rzeszowski1.6+0.1 pts
12Trójmiejski0.9-0.1 pts
13Bydgosko-toruński0.6+0.7 pts
14Szczeciński0.5-0.4 pts
15Białostocki0.3-0.2 pts
15Bielski0.3+0.1 pts
17Miasto Szczecin0.2+0.3 pts
18Żyrardowski0.1n/a
19Tyski0+0.9 pts
20Nowotarski-0.5+0.7 pts
20Tarnowski-0.5+0.9 pts
22Częstochowski-0.7+0.5 pts
22Tarnobrzeski-0.7+2.2 pts
24Leszczyński-0.8-0.1 pts
25Gorzowski-0.9+0.3 pts
26Kaliski-1.1+0.4 pts
26Piotrkowski-1.1+0.7 pts
28Ełcki-1.2+0.7 pts
28Krośnieński-1.2+1.8 pts
28Sieradzki-1.2-0.1 pts
31Nowosądecki-1.3+0.1 pts
31Oświęcimski-1.30 pts
33Lubelski-1.4-0.2 pts
34Koniński-1.5+0.9 pts
34Płocki-1.5+1.1 pts
34Słupski-1.5+1.8 pts
34Zielonogórski-1.5+0.5 pts
38Bytomski-1.6+1.8 pts
38Rybnicki-1.6+1.5 pts
40Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-1.7+0.4 pts
41Kielecki-1.8+0.3 pts
41Skierniewicki-1.8+0.6 pts
43Nyski-1.9+1.6 pts
43Sosnowiecki-1.9+1.7 pts
43Starogardzki-1.9+0.9 pts
43Świecki-1.9+0.1 pts
47Ciechanowski-2-0.1 pts
48Grudziądzki-2.2+0.5 pts
48Inowrocławski-2.2+0.7 pts
48Koszaliński-2.2-1.5 pts
48Legnicko-głogowski-2.2-0.3 pts
48Olsztyński-2.2+0.8 pts
48Pilski-2.2+0.5 pts
48Przemyski-2.2+0.5 pts
55Opolski-2.4+2 pts
56Miasto Łódź-2.5+0.1 pts
57Jeleniogórski-2.6+1.1 pts
57Siedlecki-2.6-294.4 pts
59Radomski-2.7-0.2 pts
59Wałbrzyski-2.7+1.6 pts
61Miasto Poznań-2.8+2.1 pts
61Ostrołęcki-2.8+0.2 pts
63Chojnicki-2.9-0.2 pts
64Włocławski-30 pts
65Chełmsko-zamojski-3.1-0.1 pts
66Katowicki-3.2+1.2 pts
67Suwalski-3.4+0.7 pts
68Puławski-3.6+0.3 pts
69Bialski-3.70 pts
69Elbląski-3.70 pts
69Gliwicki-3.7-0.7 pts
72Łomżyński-3.8+1.1 pts
73Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-4+0.1 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Net migration including statistical adjustment during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment).

Comparable across EU countries and regions. Eurostat derives the net figure as a residual of population change, so it includes census revisions and other statistical adjustments.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2014) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2014. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2014. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2014 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2014,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2014}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment, 2014
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-migration-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration rate including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration rate including statistical adjustment?

Poznański, with 8 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2014, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration rate including statistical adjustment?

Szczecinecko-pyrzycki, with -4 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2014.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Net migration rate including statistical adjustment: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings