NUTS 3 areas of Romania by net migration including statistical adjustment

Ilfov had the highest net migration including statistical adjustment of 42 areas in 2013, at 10,649. Bucureşti had the lowest, at -7,851. The median was -709 and the figure for Romania was -13,887. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest10,649Ilfov
Lowest-7,851Bucureşti
Median-70942 areas
Romania-13,887History

All areas, 2013

Ilfov: 10,649 personsIlfov10,649Iaşi: 5,044 personsIaşi5,044Timiş: 3,261 personsTimiş3,261Cluj: 3,016 personsCluj3,016Constanţa: 316 personsConstanţa316Arad: 305 personsArad305Bihor: 222 personsBihor222Sibiu: 151 personsSibiu151Braşov: 136 personsBraşov136Vaslui: -171 personsVaslui-171Satu Mare: -184 personsSatu Mare-184Covasna: -352 personsCovasna-352Harghita: -396 personsHarghita-396Mureş: -398 personsMureş-398Bistriţa-Năsăud: -411 personsBistriţa-Năsăud-411Dolj: -430 personsDolj-430Vrancea: -576 personsVrancea-576Alba: -589 personsAlba-589Sălaj: -633 personsSălaj-633Maramureş: -647 personsMaramureş-647Gorj: -704 personsGorj-704Suceava: -714 personsSuceava-714Argeş: -723 personsArgeş-723Ialomiţa: -740 personsIalomiţa-740Prahova: -771 personsPrahova-771Vâlcea: -794 personsVâlcea-794Tulcea: -857 personsTulcea-857Dâmboviţa: -922 personsDâmboviţa-922Mehedinţi: -1,005 personsMehedinţi-1,005Călăraşi: -1,076 personsCălăraşi-1,076Neamţ: -1,086 personsNeamţ-1,086Buzău: -1,100 personsBuzău-1,100Caraş-Severin: -1,189 personsCaraş-Severin-1,189Brăila: -1,232 personsBrăila-1,232Galaţi: -1,340 personsGalaţi-1,340Teleorman: -1,408 personsTeleorman-1,408Bacău: -1,495 personsBacău-1,495Botoşani: -1,634 personsBotoşani-1,634Giurgiu: -1,724 personsGiurgiu-1,724Olt: -1,848 personsOlt-1,848Hunedoara: -1,987 personsHunedoara-1,987Bucureşti: -7,851 personsBucureşti-7,851
persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2013
persons
Change on 2012
1Ilfov Estimated10,649-26.7%
2Iaşi Estimated5,044+217.2%
3Timiş Estimated3,261-44.6%
4Cluj Estimated3,016-44.4%
5Constanţa Estimated316-63%
6Arad Estimated305-61.2%
7Bihor Estimated222-69%
8Sibiu Estimated151-91.5%
9Braşov Estimated136-85.1%
10Vaslui Estimated-171+93.8%
11Satu Mare Estimated-184+72%
12Covasna Estimated-352+46.7%
13Harghita Estimated-396-19,700%
14Mureş Estimated-398-223.6%
15Bistriţa-Năsăud Estimated-411+65.2%
16Dolj Estimated-430+61.1%
17Vrancea Estimated-576+56.3%
18Alba Estimated-589+25.3%
19Sălaj Estimated-633+47.9%
20Maramureş Estimated-647+73.4%
21Gorj Estimated-704+61.9%
22Suceava Estimated-714+64.3%
23Argeş Estimated-723+68.9%
24Ialomiţa Estimated-740+44.8%
25Prahova Estimated-771+46.5%
26Vâlcea Estimated-794+50.2%
27Tulcea Estimated-857+2.9%
28Dâmboviţa Estimated-922-77.3%
29Mehedinţi Estimated-1,005+19%
30Călăraşi Estimated-1,076-82.1%
31Neamţ Estimated-1,086+47.3%
32Buzău Estimated-1,100+24.2%
33Caraş-Severin Estimated-1,189+6.7%
34Brăila Estimated-1,232+34.5%
35Galaţi Estimated-1,340+14.8%
36Teleorman Estimated-1,408+26.2%
37Bacău Estimated-1,495+50.8%
38Botoşani Estimated-1,634+47.7%
39Giurgiu Estimated-1,724-168.7%
40Olt Estimated-1,848+30.7%
41Hunedoara Estimated-1,987+21.5%
42Bucureşti Estimated-7,851+12.1%

Other periods

About this ranking

Population change during the year minus natural change (live births minus deaths), including statistical adjustment. A negative value means the population fell by more than natural change explains (Eurostat demographic balance).

Eurostat calculates this as a residual, not by counting immigrants and emigrants, so it also absorbs census revisions and other statistical adjustments. For the EU it reflects migration to and from countries outside the EU. net_migration (World Bank, UN estimate) uses a different method, so the two series differ.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Romania by net migration including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment","level":"province","within":"Romania","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment&level=province&within=Romania&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Ilfov, with 10,649 in 2013, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration including statistical adjustment?

Bucureşti, with -7,851 in 2013.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Net migration including statistical adjustment: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Romania: more rankings