US counties by net domestic migration, July to June
Maricopa County had the highest net domestic migration, July to June of 3144 counties in 2021, at 43,570. Los Angeles County had the lowest, at -195,168. The median was 55. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2021
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2021 | Change on 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maricopa County Estimated | 43,570 | -32.3% |
| 2 | Collin County Estimated | 32,100 | +14.4% |
| 3 | Lee County Estimated | 28,248 | +52.5% |
| 4 | Polk County Estimated | 27,123 | +48% |
| 5 | Williamson County Estimated | 26,658 | +22.5% |
| 6 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 25,954 | +41.1% |
| 7 | Riverside County Estimated | 25,856 | +65.2% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 24,595 | +1.6% |
| 9 | Montgomery County Estimated | 23,146 | +51.2% |
| 10 | Pasco County Estimated | 22,540 | +26% |
| 11 | Pinal County Estimated | 19,670 | +9.4% |
| 12 | Hampshire County Estimated | 18,410 | +11,678.6% |
| 13 | Sarasota County Estimated | 17,789 | +50.7% |
| 14 | St. Johns County Estimated | 17,477 | +27.7% |
| 15 | Horry County Estimated | 15,130 | +26.7% |
| 16 | Volusia County Estimated | 14,935 | +52.8% |
| 17 | St. Lucie County Estimated | 14,692 | +54.8% |
| 18 | Wake County Estimated | 14,398 | +35.4% |
| 19 | Ada County Estimated | 14,277 | +30.7% |
| 20 | Manatee County Estimated | 14,134 | +55.3% |
| 21 | Clark County Estimated | 14,129 | -50.4% |
| 22 | Utah County Estimated | 13,601 | +133.2% |
| 23 | Brevard County Estimated | 13,323 | +34.9% |
| 24 | Lake County Estimated | 12,540 | +29.6% |
| 25 | Comal County Estimated | 12,096 | +49.9% |
| 26 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 11,734 | +1.5% |
| 27 | Marion County Estimated | 11,372 | +21% |
| 28 | Hays County Estimated | 11,259 | +19.9% |
| 29 | Sussex County Estimated | 11,069 | +54.3% |
| 30 | Collier County Estimated | 11,062 | +67.2% |
| 31 | Kaufman County Estimated | 11,006 | +84.1% |
| 32 | Osceola County Estimated | 10,447 | +53.5% |
| 33 | Canyon County Estimated | 10,033 | +82.4% |
| 34 | Charlotte County Estimated | 9,864 | +40.7% |
| 35 | Ocean County Estimated | 9,696 | +75.4% |
| 36 | Washington County Estimated | 9,671 | +53.1% |
| 37 | Johnston County Estimated | 9,284 | +63.5% |
| 38 | Palm Beach County Estimated | 8,778 | +53.6% |
| 39 | Ellis County Estimated | 8,612 | +37.2% |
| 40 | Suffolk County Estimated | 8,582 | +234.6% |
| 41 | Brunswick County Estimated | 7,989 | +16.2% |
| 42 | Yavapai County Estimated | 7,910 | +39.5% |
| 43 | Douglas County Estimated | 7,893 | +13.9% |
| 44 | Kootenai County Estimated | 7,746 | +56.6% |
| 45 | Parker County Estimated | 7,708 | +63% |
| 46 | Rockwall County Estimated | 7,444 | +64.6% |
| 47 | Sumter County Estimated | 7,284 | +2.8% |
| 48 | Hernando County Estimated | 7,225 | +22.2% |
| 49 | Placer County Estimated | 7,118 | +77.2% |
| 50 | Forsyth County Estimated | 7,117 | +42.5% |
| 51 | Baldwin County Estimated | 7,039 | +18.9% |
| 52 | Frederick County Estimated | 6,661 | +108.5% |
| 52 | Johnson County Estimated | 6,661 | +121.5% |
| 54 | Hamilton County Estimated | 6,624 | +58.7% |
| 55 | Spartanburg County Estimated | 6,522 | +23.3% |
| 56 | Montgomery County Estimated | 6,482 | +154.3% |
| 57 | Rutherford County Estimated | 6,479 | +27.5% |
| 58 | Citrus County Estimated | 6,390 | +35.8% |
| 59 | Canadian County Estimated | 6,382 | +65.6% |
| 60 | Benton County Estimated | 6,336 | -6.3% |
| 61 | Weld County Estimated | 6,256 | -8.4% |
| 62 | Barnstable County Estimated | 6,242 | +291.8% |
| 63 | Washoe County Estimated | 6,227 | +76.4% |
| 64 | Flagler County Estimated | 6,218 | +72.1% |
| 65 | Bexar County Estimated | 6,170 | -42.8% |
| 66 | Cherokee County Estimated | 6,133 | +29.4% |
| 67 | Capitol Planning Region Estimated | 6,119 | |
| 68 | Northampton County Estimated | 6,104 | +1,554.2% |
| 69 | Williamson County Estimated | 6,080 | +3.8% |
| 70 | Deschutes County Estimated | 6,012 | +42% |
| 71 | Greenville County Estimated | 6,009 | +23.9% |
| 72 | Mohave County Estimated | 5,925 | +11.3% |
| 73 | Knox County Estimated | 5,843 | +17.3% |
| 74 | Madison County Estimated | 5,819 | -2.8% |
| 75 | Clark County Estimated | 5,810 | -1.7% |
| 76 | Lexington County Estimated | 5,652 | +48.8% |
| 77 | Cumberland County Estimated | 5,603 | +136.7% |
| 78 | Delaware County Estimated | 5,560 | +99.3% |
| 79 | Pinellas County Estimated | 5,463 | -12% |
| 80 | Bay County Estimated | 5,443 | +307.2% |
| 81 | Bell County Estimated | 5,442 | +121% |
| 82 | Pima County Estimated | 5,280 | -51% |
| 83 | Santa Rosa County Estimated | 5,170 | +15.6% |
| 84 | Montgomery County Estimated | 5,074 | +107.5% |
| 85 | Orange County Estimated | 5,056 | +1,680.3% |
| 86 | Indian River County Estimated | 4,959 | +30% |
| 87 | St. Tammany Parish Estimated | 4,885 | +188.7% |
| 88 | Liberty County Estimated | 4,843 | +82.6% |
| 89 | York County Estimated | 4,831 | -30% |
| 90 | Chester County Estimated | 4,753 | +1,002.8% |
| 91 | Iredell County Estimated | 4,649 | +26.3% |
| 92 | Berkeley County Estimated | 4,617 | -18.6% |
| 93 | Chesterfield County Estimated | 4,494 | +30.1% |
| 94 | Beaufort County Estimated | 4,450 | +60.5% |
| 95 | Lancaster County Estimated | 4,303 | +58.3% |
| 96 | San Joaquin County Estimated | 4,145 | +67.6% |
| 97 | Union County Estimated | 4,138 | +9.6% |
| 98 | Walton County Estimated | 4,110 | +70% |
| 99 | Tuscaloosa County Estimated | 4,068 | +17,787% |
| 100 | Flathead County Estimated | 4,067 | +120.8% |
| 101 | New Hanover County Estimated | 4,060 | +69.8% |
| 102 | Bastrop County Estimated | 4,039 | +54.8% |
| 103 | Clay County Estimated | 3,981 | +59.4% |
| 104 | Grayson County Estimated | 3,971 | +98.3% |
| 105 | Monroe County Estimated | 3,962 | +577.9% |
| 106 | Nassau County Estimated | 3,944 | +43.7% |
| 107 | Hendricks County Estimated | 3,872 | +38.2% |
| 108 | Cabarrus County Estimated | 3,865 | -10.5% |
| 109 | Brazoria County Estimated | 3,831 | +5% |
| 110 | Paulding County Estimated | 3,794 | +12.3% |
| 111 | Jackson County Estimated | 3,675 | +23.7% |
| 112 | South Central Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 3,670 | |
| 113 | Washington County Estimated | 3,652 | +80.1% |
| 114 | Anderson County Estimated | 3,635 | +74.5% |
| 115 | Plymouth County Estimated | 3,595 | +285.3% |
| 116 | Rockingham County Estimated | 3,588 | +133% |
| 117 | Butler County Estimated | 3,575 | +221.8% |
| 118 | Berkeley County Estimated | 3,566 | +63.7% |
| 119 | Spokane County Estimated | 3,547 | -30.2% |
| 120 | St. Charles County Estimated | 3,457 | +5.7% |
| 121 | Galveston County Estimated | 3,424 | +31.8% |
| 122 | Hunt County Estimated | 3,386 | +208.7% |
| 123 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 3,380 | +12.5% |
| 124 | Washington County Estimated | 3,374 | +72.2% |
| 125 | Highlands County Estimated | 3,357 | +126.1% |
| 126 | Merced County Estimated | 3,329 | +749.2% |
| 127 | Wilson County Estimated | 3,323 | +3% |
| 128 | Charleston County Estimated | 3,298 | -15.4% |
| 129 | York County Estimated | 3,293 | +147.2% |
| 130 | Limestone County Estimated | 3,285 | +10.3% |
| 131 | Maury County Estimated | 3,277 | +22.8% |
| 132 | Cass County Estimated | 3,224 | +1,121.2% |
| 133 | Monmouth County Estimated | 3,208 | +410.9% |
| 134 | Coweta County Estimated | 3,180 | +75% |
| 135 | Sumner County Estimated | 3,166 | -15% |
| 136 | Wise County Estimated | 3,141 | +187.9% |
| 137 | Hall County Estimated | 3,125 | +114.2% |
| 138 | Warren County Estimated | 3,112 | +47.8% |
| 139 | Gaston County Estimated | 3,098 | +60.6% |
| 140 | Shelby County Estimated | 3,091 | +10.8% |
| 141 | Smith County Estimated | 3,079 | +39.5% |
| 142 | Matanuska-Susitna Borough Estimated | 3,055 | +235% |
| 143 | Spotsylvania County Estimated | 3,038 | +107.1% |
| 144 | Moore County Estimated | 3,034 | +36.5% |
| 145 | Lincoln County Estimated | 2,989 | +94.7% |
| 146 | Tooele County Estimated | 2,950 | +65.3% |
| 147 | Wagoner County Estimated | 2,948 | +112.5% |
| 148 | Gallatin County Estimated | 2,944 | +76.9% |
| 149 | Kent County Estimated | 2,941 | +68.4% |
| 150 | Walton County Estimated | 2,917 | +55.3% |
| 151 | Dallas County Estimated | 2,913 | +22% |
| 152 | Livingston Parish Estimated | 2,896 | +78.5% |
| 153 | Stafford County Estimated | 2,883 | +43.4% |
| 154 | Buncombe County Estimated | 2,870 | +71.2% |
| 155 | Ulster County Estimated | 2,799 | +25,545.5% |
| 156 | Martin County Estimated | 2,795 | +53.7% |
| 157 | Bristol County Estimated | 2,775 | +178.3% |
| 158 | Hood County Estimated | 2,770 | +42.1% |
| 159 | Franklin County Estimated | 2,761 | +38.2% |
| 160 | Lane County Estimated | 2,758 | +87.6% |
| 161 | Bonneville County Estimated | 2,739 | +42.1% |
| 161 | El Dorado County Estimated | 2,739 | +3,988.1% |
| 163 | Otsego County Estimated | 2,737 | +692.4% |
| 164 | Hawaii County Estimated | 2,730 | +189.5% |
| 165 | Henry County Estimated | 2,619 | -27.5% |
| 166 | Pender County Estimated | 2,613 | +58% |
| 167 | Wright County Estimated | 2,603 | +193.5% |
| 168 | Blount County Estimated | 2,587 | +63.8% |
| 169 | Iron County Estimated | 2,585 | +139.8% |
| 170 | Randall County Estimated | 2,568 | +54% |
| 171 | Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region Estimated | 2,555 | |
| 172 | Barrow County Estimated | 2,537 | +64.4% |
| 173 | Kendall County Estimated | 2,492 | +111.4% |
| 174 | Houston County Estimated | 2,491 | +21.1% |
| 175 | York County Estimated | 2,486 | +286.6% |
| 176 | Naugatuck Valley Planning Region Estimated | 2,481 | |
| 177 | DeSoto County Estimated | 2,472 | +6.1% |
| 178 | Forsyth County Estimated | 2,447 | +241.8% |
| 179 | Bonner County Estimated | 2,441 | +116% |
| 180 | Cache County Estimated | 2,412 | +5,381.8% |
| 181 | Newton County Estimated | 2,385 | +137.1% |
| 182 | Sandoval County Estimated | 2,360 | +39.3% |
| 183 | Aiken County Estimated | 2,348 | +47.4% |
| 184 | Western Connecticut Planning Region Estimated | 2,346 | |
| 185 | Columbia County Estimated | 2,342 | -6.8% |
| 186 | Benton County Estimated | 2,293 | +115.9% |
| 187 | Gloucester County Estimated | 2,267 | +50.2% |
| 188 | Adams County Estimated | 2,260 | +1,339.5% |
| 188 | Christian County Estimated | 2,260 | +62.8% |
| 190 | Lewis County Estimated | 2,249 | +48.7% |
| 191 | Burlington County Estimated | 2,237 | +698.9% |
| 192 | Larimer County Estimated | 2,220 | -1.6% |
| 193 | Yellowstone County Estimated | 2,217 | +68.1% |
| 194 | Sullivan County Estimated | 2,203 | +136.6% |
| 195 | Worcester County Estimated | 2,199 | +180.1% |
| 196 | Pennington County Estimated | 2,169 | +135% |
| 197 | Cumberland County Estimated | 2,157 | +40.9% |
| 198 | McLennan County Estimated | 2,148 | +58.3% |
| 199 | Nye County Estimated | 2,132 | +27.5% |
| 200 | Lee County Estimated | 2,127 | +96.6% |
| 201 | Weber County Estimated | 2,120 | +96.8% |
| 202 | Lubbock County Estimated | 2,119 | -8.8% |
| 203 | Frederick County Estimated | 2,115 | +46.8% |
| 204 | Guilford County Estimated | 2,104 | +304.6% |
| 205 | Davidson County Estimated | 2,096 | +84.8% |
| 206 | Saratoga County Estimated | 2,084 | +151.1% |
| 207 | Alamance County Estimated | 2,071 | -0.3% |
| 208 | Madera County Estimated | 2,048 | +468.9% |
| 209 | Waller County Estimated | 2,043 | +11.6% |
| 210 | Lincoln County Estimated | 2,011 | +65% |
| 211 | Henderson County Estimated | 1,990 | +54.7% |
| 212 | Loudon County Estimated | 1,982 | +93.6% |
| 212 | Ravalli County Estimated | 1,982 | +105% |
| 214 | Burnet County Estimated | 1,952 | +35.1% |
| 215 | San Benito County Estimated | 1,928 | +119.6% |
| 216 | Twin Falls County Estimated | 1,923 | +111.8% |
| 217 | Kendall County Estimated | 1,907 | +123.3% |
| 218 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,898 | +15.2% |
| 219 | Bucks County Estimated | 1,896 | +629.2% |
| 220 | Greene County Estimated | 1,894 | +100.2% |
| 221 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 1,890 | +127.4% |
| 222 | Kern County Estimated | 1,877 | +160.1% |
| 223 | Walker County Estimated | 1,876 | +301.7% |
| 224 | Union County Estimated | 1,875 | +201% |
| 225 | Sussex County Estimated | 1,867 | +436.4% |
| 226 | Carroll County Estimated | 1,866 | +162.4% |
| 227 | Cullman County Estimated | 1,860 | +79.4% |
| 228 | Harford County Estimated | 1,850 | +132.4% |
| 229 | Polk County Estimated | 1,846 | +697.4% |
| 230 | Mesa County Estimated | 1,844 | +61.6% |
| 231 | Lyon County Estimated | 1,827 | +96.7% |
| 232 | Hanover County Estimated | 1,823 | +146.7% |
| 233 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,821 | +61% |
| 234 | Lafayette County Estimated | 1,803 | +3,997.7% |
| 235 | Bryan County Estimated | 1,799 | +130.3% |
| 236 | Wood County Estimated | 1,798 | +78.2% |
| 237 | Androscoggin County Estimated | 1,795 | +18,050% |
| 238 | Pike County Estimated | 1,777 | +355.6% |
| 238 | Schenectady County Estimated | 1,777 | +380.3% |
| 240 | McClain County Estimated | 1,746 | +100.2% |
| 241 | Chatham County Estimated | 1,736 | +10.8% |
| 242 | Loudoun County Estimated | 1,735 | -45.9% |
| 243 | Nevada County Estimated | 1,730 | +623.8% |
| 244 | Polk County Estimated | 1,726 | -6.1% |
| 245 | Cass County Estimated | 1,725 | +71.8% |
| 246 | Boone County Estimated | 1,714 | +52% |
| 247 | Lincoln County Estimated | 1,709 | +119.9% |
| 248 | Hancock County Estimated | 1,707 | +33.3% |
| 249 | Penobscot County Estimated | 1,706 | +1,955.4% |
| 250 | Albany County Estimated | 1,702 | +217.6% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into an area from elsewhere in the same country minus moves out to the rest of the country, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: states and counties. Canada: provinces and territories, net interprovincial migration (Statistics Canada). United Kingdom: local authorities, counting moves between any two UK local authorities, including across the borders of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (ONS internal migration). A negative value means more people left than arrived.
Sums to zero, or close to it, for each country as a whole, so there is no national value.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2021) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2021. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2021. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2021. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2021.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2021 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2021 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_counties_by_net_2021,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2021}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2021. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2021
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2021
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2021.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US counties by net domestic migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_domestic_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_domestic_migration_july_june&level=province&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest net domestic migration, July to June?
Maricopa County, with 43,570 in 2021, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net domestic migration, July to June?
Los Angeles County, with -195,168 in 2021.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Net domestic migration, July to June: other rankings
US counties: more rankings
- High school graduate or higher, population 25 and over
- Natural change, July to June
- Population aged 18 to 64
- Crude death rate, July to June
- Housing vacancy rate, all vacant units (US)
- Housing units authorized by building permits
- Coronary heart disease in adults, local model estimate
- Uninsured rate, under 19 (US, ACS)