US counties by net domestic migration, July to June
Maricopa County had the highest net domestic migration, July to June of 3135 counties in 2015, at 39,284. Los Angeles County had the lowest, at -65,200. The median was -35. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2015
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2015 | Change on 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maricopa County Estimated | 39,284 | +17.6% |
| 2 | Clark County Estimated | 25,828 | +28.9% |
| 3 | Lee County Estimated | 18,836 | +29% |
| 4 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 17,946 | -9.5% |
| 5 | Harris County Estimated | 17,702 | -20.4% |
| 6 | Collin County Estimated | 16,814 | +9.5% |
| 7 | Denton County Estimated | 16,614 | +10.9% |
| 8 | Palm Beach County Estimated | 15,505 | +20.5% |
| 9 | Bexar County Estimated | 15,501 | +0.5% |
| 10 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 15,413 | +15.6% |
| 11 | Tarrant County Estimated | 13,985 | +48.9% |
| 12 | Williamson County Estimated | 13,538 | +10.5% |
| 13 | Wake County Estimated | 13,241 | +9.6% |
| 14 | Montgomery County Estimated | 13,135 | -1.9% |
| 15 | Riverside County Estimated | 11,844 | -1.4% |
| 16 | Pinellas County Estimated | 11,404 | +37.2% |
| 17 | Pasco County Estimated | 11,386 | +29.2% |
| 18 | Orange County Estimated | 11,268 | +37.1% |
| 19 | Denver County Estimated | 10,820 | +39.1% |
| 20 | Horry County Estimated | 10,818 | +32.5% |
| 21 | Brevard County Estimated | 10,768 | +99.3% |
| 22 | Volusia County Estimated | 10,661 | +57.1% |
| 23 | Manatee County Estimated | 10,516 | +30.7% |
| 24 | Polk County Estimated | 10,413 | +33.9% |
| 25 | Sarasota County Estimated | 9,748 | +27.2% |
| 26 | Lake County Estimated | 9,664 | +38.3% |
| 27 | Mecklenburg County Estimated | 9,330 | +41.8% |
| 28 | Travis County Estimated | 9,169 | -24.6% |
| 29 | St. Johns County Estimated | 7,863 | +2.6% |
| 30 | Hays County Estimated | 7,687 | +10.4% |
| 31 | Larimer County Estimated | 7,398 | +29.9% |
| 32 | Pinal County Estimated | 7,389 | +14.3% |
| 33 | King County Estimated | 7,076 | +37.5% |
| 34 | Charleston County Estimated | 6,922 | +26.4% |
| 35 | Forsyth County Estimated | 6,739 | -2.8% |
| 36 | Rutherford County Estimated | 6,506 | +34.8% |
| 37 | St. Lucie County Estimated | 6,366 | +67% |
| 38 | Collier County Estimated | 6,222 | +3.1% |
| 39 | Gwinnett County Estimated | 6,198 | -16.8% |
| 40 | Weld County Estimated | 6,186 | +33.2% |
| 41 | Clark County Estimated | 6,073 | +41.5% |
| 42 | Sumter County Estimated | 5,838 | -5% |
| 43 | Greenville County Estimated | 5,768 | +14.7% |
| 44 | Charlotte County Estimated | 5,517 | +25.6% |
| 45 | Galveston County Estimated | 5,492 | +21.1% |
| 46 | Clackamas County Estimated | 5,444 | +13.3% |
| 47 | Contra Costa County Estimated | 5,429 | -15.8% |
| 48 | Loudoun County Estimated | 5,254 | -10.2% |
| 49 | Multnomah County Estimated | 5,221 | +11.6% |
| 50 | Duval County Estimated | 5,135 | +88.3% |
| 51 | York County Estimated | 5,070 | +11.3% |
| 52 | Osceola County Estimated | 5,032 | +6.5% |
| 53 | Marion County Estimated | 4,996 | +33.9% |
| 54 | Adams County Estimated | 4,981 | +2.5% |
| 55 | Washington County Estimated | 4,888 | +276% |
| 56 | Snohomish County Estimated | 4,851 | -15% |
| 57 | Comal County Estimated | 4,840 | +22.3% |
| 58 | Williamson County Estimated | 4,619 | -2.7% |
| 59 | Douglas County Estimated | 4,561 | -12.4% |
| 60 | Kitsap County Estimated | 4,535 | +4,149.1% |
| 61 | Arapahoe County Estimated | 4,504 | +22.1% |
| 62 | Sacramento County Estimated | 4,479 | +10.9% |
| 63 | Sussex County Estimated | 4,448 | +15.3% |
| 64 | Brazoria County Estimated | 4,394 | -0.7% |
| 65 | Benton County Estimated | 4,321 | +57.8% |
| 66 | Deschutes County Estimated | 4,295 | +16.3% |
| 67 | San Joaquin County Estimated | 4,287 | +18.8% |
| 68 | Brunswick County Estimated | 4,070 | +15.7% |
| 69 | Washoe County Estimated | 3,986 | +16.4% |
| 70 | Jefferson County Estimated | 3,937 | -10.4% |
| 71 | Yavapai County Estimated | 3,921 | -4.4% |
| 72 | Ada County Estimated | 3,829 | -39.3% |
| 73 | Brazos County Estimated | 3,771 | +176.7% |
| 74 | Seminole County Estimated | 3,701 | +25.4% |
| 75 | Pierce County Estimated | 3,700 | -13.4% |
| 76 | Cabarrus County Estimated | 3,681 | +14.1% |
| 77 | El Paso County Estimated | 3,638 | +201.4% |
| 78 | Columbia County Estimated | 3,575 | +92.1% |
| 79 | Beaufort County Estimated | 3,541 | +11.9% |
| 80 | Boulder County Estimated | 3,504 | +345.2% |
| 81 | Tulsa County Estimated | 3,493 | +64.9% |
| 82 | Indian River County Estimated | 3,488 | +21.6% |
| 83 | Cherokee County Estimated | 3,470 | -14.7% |
| 84 | Spokane County Estimated | 3,465 | +80.6% |
| 85 | Baldwin County Estimated | 3,437 | -11% |
| 86 | Cobb County Estimated | 3,417 | -24.9% |
| 87 | Hernando County Estimated | 3,326 | +43.7% |
| 88 | Lane County Estimated | 3,297 | +90.4% |
| 89 | Johnston County Estimated | 3,287 | +43.1% |
| 90 | District of Columbia Estimated | 3,266 | +79.7% |
| 91 | Midland County Estimated | 3,163 | +51% |
| 92 | Union County Estimated | 3,117 | -27.9% |
| 93 | Marion County Estimated | 3,053 | +172.3% |
| 94 | Parker County Estimated | 3,038 | +63.4% |
| 95 | Orleans Parish Estimated | 2,995 | +7.5% |
| 96 | Dorchester County Estimated | 2,986 | +41.2% |
| 97 | Citrus County Estimated | 2,949 | +119.3% |
| 98 | Ellis County Estimated | 2,943 | +37.5% |
| 98 | Hamilton County Estimated | 2,943 | +5.9% |
| 100 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 2,924 | +1.6% |
| 101 | New Hanover County Estimated | 2,923 | +26% |
| 102 | Lexington County Estimated | 2,918 | +7.3% |
| 103 | Clay County Estimated | 2,898 | +39.6% |
| 104 | Canadian County Estimated | 2,892 | +17.9% |
| 104 | Martin County Estimated | 2,892 | +17.8% |
| 106 | Santa Rosa County Estimated | 2,887 | +77.2% |
| 107 | Ector County Estimated | 2,886 | +9.3% |
| 108 | St. Charles County Estimated | 2,858 | -6% |
| 109 | Alameda County Estimated | 2,857 | -54.6% |
| 110 | Berkeley County Estimated | 2,846 | +12.4% |
| 111 | Spartanburg County Estimated | 2,841 | +54.2% |
| 112 | Wilson County Estimated | 2,840 | +6.4% |
| 113 | Fulton County Estimated | 2,793 | +134.7% |
| 114 | Flagler County Estimated | 2,750 | +18.6% |
| 115 | St. Tammany Parish Estimated | 2,732 | +19.7% |
| 116 | Placer County Estimated | 2,657 | +0.4% |
| 117 | Williams County Estimated | 2,627 | +25.8% |
| 118 | Broomfield County Estimated | 2,625 | +128.1% |
| 119 | Gallatin County Estimated | 2,611 | +48% |
| 120 | Buncombe County Estimated | 2,584 | +30.3% |
| 121 | Richland County Estimated | 2,566 | +201.2% |
| 122 | Lancaster County Estimated | 2,559 | +3.7% |
| 123 | Clayton County Estimated | 2,557 | +620.8% |
| 124 | Canyon County Estimated | 2,551 | +22.1% |
| 125 | Rockwall County Estimated | 2,543 | +42.9% |
| 126 | Washington County Estimated | 2,533 | -15.6% |
| 127 | Kaufman County Estimated | 2,473 | +32.6% |
| 128 | Kootenai County Estimated | 2,407 | +12.4% |
| 129 | Iredell County Estimated | 2,365 | +61.3% |
| 130 | Henry County Estimated | 2,355 | +43.3% |
| 131 | Franklin County Estimated | 2,343 | -29.3% |
| 132 | Whatcom County Estimated | 2,340 | +166.8% |
| 133 | Delaware County Estimated | 2,337 | -6.3% |
| 134 | Mohave County Estimated | 2,301 | +99.7% |
| 135 | Sumner County Estimated | 2,261 | -15.9% |
| 136 | Cleveland County Estimated | 2,257 | +219.5% |
| 137 | Jackson County Estimated | 2,229 | +12.3% |
| 138 | Washington County Estimated | 2,199 | +38.1% |
| 139 | Bay County Estimated | 2,111 | -24.9% |
| 140 | Coweta County Estimated | 2,082 | +53.1% |
| 141 | Paulding County Estimated | 2,079 | +210.8% |
| 142 | Benton County Estimated | 2,065 | +256% |
| 143 | Polk County Estimated | 2,048 | -36.2% |
| 144 | Clarke County Estimated | 2,029 | +237.4% |
| 145 | Bastrop County Estimated | 1,972 | +32.1% |
| 146 | Matanuska-Susitna Borough Estimated | 1,930 | +49% |
| 147 | Utah County Estimated | 1,918 | +322.8% |
| 148 | Gaston County Estimated | 1,896 | +87.9% |
| 149 | Hamilton County Estimated | 1,870 | +192.2% |
| 150 | Henderson County Estimated | 1,847 | +15% |
| 151 | Oklahoma County Estimated | 1,837 | -42.4% |
| 152 | Richmond city Estimated | 1,831 | +20.2% |
| 153 | Burleigh County Estimated | 1,825 | +34.8% |
| 154 | Knox County Estimated | 1,823 | -16.7% |
| 155 | Cass County Estimated | 1,803 | -0.7% |
| 155 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,803 | +15% |
| 157 | Dallas County Estimated | 1,787 | +8% |
| 158 | Maury County Estimated | 1,777 | +22.7% |
| 159 | Guilford County Estimated | 1,700 | -21.6% |
| 160 | Nassau County Estimated | 1,684 | +102.9% |
| 161 | Durham County Estimated | 1,680 | -31.3% |
| 162 | Grayson County Estimated | 1,670 | +95.1% |
| 163 | Lubbock County Estimated | 1,666 | -32.9% |
| 164 | Walton County Estimated | 1,652 | -5.1% |
| 165 | Hall County Estimated | 1,648 | +13.7% |
| 166 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,614 | +34.6% |
| 167 | Davis County Estimated | 1,608 | -22.1% |
| 168 | Highlands County Estimated | 1,607 | +141.7% |
| 169 | McKenzie County Estimated | 1,597 | +5.1% |
| 170 | Lafayette Parish Estimated | 1,580 | -24% |
| 171 | Chatham County Estimated | 1,576 | +10.6% |
| 172 | Anderson County Estimated | 1,570 | +10.5% |
| 173 | DeSoto County Estimated | 1,556 | +2.3% |
| 174 | Barrow County Estimated | 1,529 | +34.1% |
| 175 | Davidson County Estimated | 1,519 | -9.4% |
| 176 | Hood County Estimated | 1,516 | +62.5% |
| 177 | Madison County Estimated | 1,508 | +14.6% |
| 178 | Shelby County Estimated | 1,502 | +43.9% |
| 179 | Kendall County Estimated | 1,491 | +28.4% |
| 180 | Josephine County Estimated | 1,465 | +151.3% |
| 181 | Okaloosa County Estimated | 1,442 | +224% |
| 181 | Thurston County Estimated | 1,442 | +13% |
| 183 | Pueblo County Estimated | 1,437 | +4,855.2% |
| 184 | Pender County Estimated | 1,416 | +40.9% |
| 185 | Solano County Estimated | 1,409 | -37.5% |
| 186 | Waller County Estimated | 1,407 | +44.3% |
| 187 | Smith County Estimated | 1,405 | -14.6% |
| 188 | Dane County Estimated | 1,403 | -12.5% |
| 189 | Warren County Estimated | 1,382 | +53.6% |
| 190 | Alamance County Estimated | 1,379 | +45.2% |
| 191 | San Luis Obispo County Estimated | 1,372 | -29.1% |
| 192 | San Francisco County Estimated | 1,367 | +81.5% |
| 193 | Warren County Estimated | 1,357 | +93.3% |
| 194 | Sarpy County Estimated | 1,346 | +66.8% |
| 195 | Forsyth County Estimated | 1,287 | -38.1% |
| 196 | Alachua County Estimated | 1,272 | +55.3% |
| 197 | Douglas County Estimated | 1,271 | +17.3% |
| 198 | Chatham County Estimated | 1,264 | -46.9% |
| 199 | Effingham County Estimated | 1,262 | +117.6% |
| 200 | Ottawa County Estimated | 1,241 | -17.1% |
| 201 | El Dorado County Estimated | 1,228 | -6.8% |
| 201 | Hanover County Estimated | 1,228 | +126.6% |
| 203 | Saline County Estimated | 1,206 | +3.3% |
| 204 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,187 | +55.8% |
| 205 | Livingston County Estimated | 1,181 | +35.9% |
| 206 | Hendricks County Estimated | 1,179 | -12.9% |
| 207 | Livingston Parish Estimated | 1,158 | +68.1% |
| 208 | Moore County Estimated | 1,151 | -17.1% |
| 209 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,146 | -28.6% |
| 210 | Stark County Estimated | 1,140 | -30.4% |
| 211 | Boone County Estimated | 1,137 | +16.4% |
| 211 | Liberty County Estimated | 1,137 | +44.8% |
| 213 | Lee County Estimated | 1,121 | -24.6% |
| 214 | Flathead County Estimated | 1,119 | -14.8% |
| 215 | Polk County Estimated | 1,115 | +40.1% |
| 216 | Skagit County Estimated | 1,100 | +5.2% |
| 217 | Berkeley County Estimated | 1,092 | -10.3% |
| 218 | Cowlitz County Estimated | 1,089 | +323.7% |
| 219 | Blount County Estimated | 1,087 | +8.6% |
| 220 | Lincoln County Estimated | 1,074 | +267.8% |
| 221 | Madison County Estimated | 1,067 | +23.8% |
| 222 | Ascension Parish Estimated | 1,063 | -33.7% |
| 222 | Hawaii County Estimated | 1,063 | -5.8% |
| 224 | Sandoval County Estimated | 1,056 | +255.6% |
| 225 | Yolo County Estimated | 1,052 | +420.7% |
| 226 | Ocean County Estimated | 1,046 | +3.6% |
| 227 | Jackson County Estimated | 1,040 | +98.1% |
| 228 | Harrison County Estimated | 1,029 | +13.1% |
| 229 | Linn County Estimated | 1,023 | +143% |
| 230 | Aiken County Estimated | 1,018 | +333.2% |
| 231 | Fayette County Estimated | 1,005 | +209% |
| 232 | Calcasieu Parish Estimated | 1,001 | +315.4% |
| 233 | Santa Cruz County Estimated | 996 | +65.7% |
| 234 | Craighead County Estimated | 974 | +169.1% |
| 235 | Clallam County Estimated | 962 | +71.2% |
| 236 | Tangipahoa Parish Estimated | 957 | +46.1% |
| 237 | Glynn County Estimated | 946 | +139.5% |
| 238 | Wasatch County Estimated | 934 | +10.1% |
| 239 | Newton County Estimated | 933 | +12.1% |
| 240 | Cumberland County Estimated | 921 | +8.4% |
| 241 | Stanislaus County Estimated | 882 | +75.7% |
| 242 | Howard County Estimated | 871 | +2,461.8% |
| 243 | Wilson County Estimated | 864 | +18.8% |
| 244 | Missoula County Estimated | 851 | +109.6% |
| 245 | Burnet County Estimated | 837 | +131.2% |
| 245 | Wise County Estimated | 837 | +115.2% |
| 247 | Christian County Estimated | 835 | +1% |
| 248 | Lincoln County Estimated | 817 | -22.6% |
| 249 | Greene County Estimated | 816 | +63.5% |
| 250 | Randall County Estimated | 815 | -20.3% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into an area from elsewhere in the same country minus moves out to the rest of the country, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: states and counties. Canada: provinces and territories, net interprovincial migration (Statistics Canada). United Kingdom: local authorities, counting moves between any two UK local authorities, including across the borders of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (ONS internal migration). A negative value means more people left than arrived.
Sums to zero, or close to it, for each country as a whole, so there is no national value.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. 9 counties with data in other periods have no value for 2015 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2015.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_counties_by_net_2015,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2015}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2015. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2015
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2015
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2015.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US counties by net domestic migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_domestic_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_domestic_migration_july_june&level=province&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest net domestic migration, July to June?
Maricopa County, with 39,284 in 2015, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net domestic migration, July to June?
Los Angeles County, with -65,200 in 2015.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 9 counties have no value for 2015 and are not ranked.
Net domestic migration, July to June: other rankings
US counties: more rankings
- High school graduate or higher, population 25 and over
- Natural change, July to June
- Population aged 18 to 64
- Crude death rate, July to June
- Housing vacancy rate, all vacant units (US)
- Housing units authorized by building permits
- Coronary heart disease in adults, local model estimate
- Uninsured rate, under 19 (US, ACS)