US counties by net domestic migration, July to June
Maricopa County had the highest net domestic migration, July to June of 3135 counties in 2014, at 33,417. Los Angeles County had the lowest, at -59,714. The median was -34. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2014
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2014 | Change on 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maricopa County Estimated | 33,417 | +9.5% |
| 2 | Harris County Estimated | 22,245 | +8.2% |
| 3 | Clark County Estimated | 20,037 | +67.6% |
| 4 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 19,820 | +16.5% |
| 5 | Bexar County Estimated | 15,418 | +13.9% |
| 6 | Collin County Estimated | 15,358 | +51.8% |
| 7 | Denton County Estimated | 14,981 | +24.7% |
| 8 | Lee County Estimated | 14,602 | +12.3% |
| 9 | Montgomery County Estimated | 13,383 | +42.1% |
| 10 | Hillsborough County Estimated | 13,333 | +19.5% |
| 11 | Palm Beach County Estimated | 12,866 | -1.1% |
| 12 | Williamson County Estimated | 12,251 | +32.4% |
| 13 | Travis County Estimated | 12,153 | +28.3% |
| 14 | Wake County Estimated | 12,082 | +12% |
| 15 | Riverside County Estimated | 12,007 | +31.2% |
| 16 | Tarrant County Estimated | 9,393 | -1.5% |
| 17 | Pasco County Estimated | 8,810 | +79.9% |
| 18 | Pinellas County Estimated | 8,314 | +8.7% |
| 19 | Orange County Estimated | 8,221 | +25.1% |
| 20 | Horry County Estimated | 8,164 | +17.2% |
| 21 | Manatee County Estimated | 8,043 | +14.9% |
| 22 | Denver County Estimated | 7,777 | +10.2% |
| 23 | Polk County Estimated | 7,774 | +93.3% |
| 24 | St. Johns County Estimated | 7,667 | +13.9% |
| 25 | Sarasota County Estimated | 7,666 | +46.9% |
| 26 | Gwinnett County Estimated | 7,451 | +18.9% |
| 27 | Lake County Estimated | 6,989 | +70.8% |
| 28 | Hays County Estimated | 6,963 | +17.3% |
| 29 | Forsyth County Estimated | 6,931 | +27.3% |
| 30 | Volusia County Estimated | 6,786 | +48.7% |
| 31 | Mecklenburg County Estimated | 6,578 | -37.7% |
| 32 | Pinal County Estimated | 6,462 | +3,857% |
| 33 | Contra Costa County Estimated | 6,444 | -12.8% |
| 34 | Ada County Estimated | 6,311 | +60.1% |
| 35 | Alameda County Estimated | 6,290 | +10% |
| 36 | Sumter County Estimated | 6,146 | +1.3% |
| 37 | Collier County Estimated | 6,036 | +30.6% |
| 38 | Loudoun County Estimated | 5,852 | -8.4% |
| 39 | Snohomish County Estimated | 5,708 | +1.3% |
| 40 | Larimer County Estimated | 5,695 | +63.6% |
| 41 | Charleston County Estimated | 5,477 | +12.7% |
| 42 | Brevard County Estimated | 5,402 | +39.1% |
| 43 | Douglas County Estimated | 5,207 | +13% |
| 44 | King County Estimated | 5,145 | -51.5% |
| 45 | Greenville County Estimated | 5,029 | +25.3% |
| 46 | Adams County Estimated | 4,860 | +11.6% |
| 47 | Rutherford County Estimated | 4,828 | +17.6% |
| 48 | Clackamas County Estimated | 4,806 | +37.4% |
| 49 | Williamson County Estimated | 4,748 | +7.8% |
| 50 | Osceola County Estimated | 4,723 | +4.3% |
| 51 | Multnomah County Estimated | 4,677 | +473.2% |
| 52 | Weld County Estimated | 4,643 | +28.4% |
| 53 | York County Estimated | 4,554 | +34.9% |
| 54 | Cobb County Estimated | 4,549 | +150.6% |
| 55 | Galveston County Estimated | 4,536 | +30.7% |
| 56 | Brazoria County Estimated | 4,423 | +58% |
| 57 | Charlotte County Estimated | 4,394 | +47.7% |
| 58 | Jefferson County Estimated | 4,392 | +28.8% |
| 59 | Union County Estimated | 4,326 | +46.4% |
| 60 | Clark County Estimated | 4,291 | +66.4% |
| 61 | Pierce County Estimated | 4,271 | +504.5% |
| 62 | Yavapai County Estimated | 4,100 | +28.6% |
| 63 | Cherokee County Estimated | 4,066 | +92.4% |
| 64 | Sacramento County Estimated | 4,040 | +970.7% |
| 65 | Comal County Estimated | 3,957 | +20.2% |
| 66 | Baldwin County Estimated | 3,861 | -7.5% |
| 67 | Sussex County Estimated | 3,858 | +33% |
| 68 | St. Lucie County Estimated | 3,813 | +129% |
| 69 | Marion County Estimated | 3,731 | +71.1% |
| 70 | Deschutes County Estimated | 3,693 | +4.2% |
| 71 | Arapahoe County Estimated | 3,688 | -30.2% |
| 72 | San Joaquin County Estimated | 3,609 | +197.3% |
| 73 | Brunswick County Estimated | 3,517 | +18.5% |
| 74 | Washoe County Estimated | 3,424 | +98.3% |
| 75 | Franklin County Estimated | 3,313 | +13.4% |
| 76 | Cabarrus County Estimated | 3,225 | +61.4% |
| 77 | Polk County Estimated | 3,210 | +6.4% |
| 78 | Oklahoma County Estimated | 3,191 | -38.4% |
| 79 | Beaufort County Estimated | 3,165 | +26.9% |
| 80 | St. Charles County Estimated | 3,039 | +13.9% |
| 81 | Washington County Estimated | 3,001 | +54.4% |
| 82 | Seminole County Estimated | 2,951 | +30.7% |
| 83 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 2,879 | +22.4% |
| 84 | Indian River County Estimated | 2,868 | +58.3% |
| 85 | Sonoma County Estimated | 2,846 | +10.8% |
| 86 | Bay County Estimated | 2,812 | +39.8% |
| 87 | Orleans Parish Estimated | 2,786 | -56% |
| 88 | Hamilton County Estimated | 2,780 | -33.6% |
| 89 | Benton County Estimated | 2,738 | +15.6% |
| 90 | Duval County Estimated | 2,727 | +268.2% |
| 91 | Lexington County Estimated | 2,720 | +33.7% |
| 92 | Sumner County Estimated | 2,690 | +24.8% |
| 93 | Wilson County Estimated | 2,668 | +14.7% |
| 94 | Placer County Estimated | 2,647 | -33.3% |
| 95 | Ector County Estimated | 2,640 | -18.3% |
| 96 | Berkeley County Estimated | 2,533 | -1.9% |
| 97 | Delaware County Estimated | 2,493 | -8.7% |
| 98 | Lubbock County Estimated | 2,483 | +63.4% |
| 99 | Lancaster County Estimated | 2,467 | +108.2% |
| 100 | Broward County Estimated | 2,457 | -12.7% |
| 101 | Martin County Estimated | 2,456 | -5.4% |
| 102 | Canadian County Estimated | 2,453 | -2.5% |
| 103 | Durham County Estimated | 2,446 | +13.6% |
| 104 | Chatham County Estimated | 2,380 | +352.1% |
| 105 | Flagler County Estimated | 2,319 | +41.2% |
| 105 | New Hanover County Estimated | 2,319 | -27% |
| 107 | Hernando County Estimated | 2,315 | +23.2% |
| 108 | Johnston County Estimated | 2,297 | +21.1% |
| 109 | St. Tammany Parish Estimated | 2,283 | +6.6% |
| 110 | Chesterfield County Estimated | 2,279 | +32.9% |
| 111 | Solano County Estimated | 2,253 | +145.7% |
| 112 | Knox County Estimated | 2,188 | +15% |
| 113 | Guilford County Estimated | 2,169 | -3.5% |
| 114 | Kootenai County Estimated | 2,142 | +53.1% |
| 115 | Ellis County Estimated | 2,141 | +62.3% |
| 116 | Tulsa County Estimated | 2,118 | -45.8% |
| 117 | Dorchester County Estimated | 2,115 | +12% |
| 118 | Midland County Estimated | 2,095 | -31.5% |
| 119 | Canyon County Estimated | 2,089 | -33.1% |
| 119 | Williams County Estimated | 2,089 | -16.1% |
| 121 | Forsyth County Estimated | 2,078 | +60.8% |
| 121 | Lafayette Parish Estimated | 2,078 | +1% |
| 123 | Clay County Estimated | 2,076 | +103.3% |
| 124 | Davis County Estimated | 2,064 | +11.4% |
| 125 | Lancaster County Estimated | 2,038 | +136.7% |
| 126 | Macomb County Estimated | 2,026 | -48% |
| 127 | Montgomery County Estimated | 2,002 | +154.6% |
| 128 | Jackson County Estimated | 1,984 | +39.2% |
| 129 | Buncombe County Estimated | 1,983 | -27.7% |
| 130 | San Luis Obispo County Estimated | 1,934 | +87% |
| 131 | Spokane County Estimated | 1,919 | +176.1% |
| 132 | Kaufman County Estimated | 1,865 | +79.7% |
| 133 | Columbia County Estimated | 1,861 | -31.4% |
| 134 | Parker County Estimated | 1,859 | +2,453.2% |
| 135 | Spartanburg County Estimated | 1,842 | +22.1% |
| 136 | District of Columbia Estimated | 1,817 | -69.6% |
| 137 | Cass County Estimated | 1,816 | -44.7% |
| 138 | Rockwall County Estimated | 1,779 | +22.1% |
| 139 | Gallatin County Estimated | 1,764 | +40.9% |
| 140 | Walton County Estimated | 1,741 | -1.6% |
| 141 | Lane County Estimated | 1,732 | +2,693.5% |
| 142 | Davidson County Estimated | 1,677 | -34.3% |
| 143 | Dallas County Estimated | 1,654 | +7.7% |
| 144 | Smith County Estimated | 1,645 | +362.1% |
| 145 | Henry County Estimated | 1,643 | +87.1% |
| 146 | Stark County Estimated | 1,637 | +43.2% |
| 147 | Santa Rosa County Estimated | 1,629 | +11.3% |
| 148 | Plymouth County Estimated | 1,619 | +33% |
| 149 | Henderson County Estimated | 1,606 | +12.5% |
| 149 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,606 | -31% |
| 151 | Dane County Estimated | 1,604 | -14.5% |
| 152 | Ascension Parish Estimated | 1,603 | +22.4% |
| 153 | Washington County Estimated | 1,592 | -26.1% |
| 154 | Johnson County Estimated | 1,568 | +230.8% |
| 155 | Richmond city Estimated | 1,523 | -0.1% |
| 156 | DeSoto County Estimated | 1,521 | +38.9% |
| 157 | McKenzie County Estimated | 1,520 | +29.1% |
| 158 | Ottawa County Estimated | 1,497 | +5.9% |
| 159 | Bastrop County Estimated | 1,493 | +82.1% |
| 160 | Lee County Estimated | 1,486 | -17.2% |
| 161 | Iredell County Estimated | 1,466 | +4.9% |
| 162 | Hall County Estimated | 1,449 | +32.9% |
| 162 | Stafford County Estimated | 1,449 | +15.4% |
| 164 | Maury County Estimated | 1,448 | +20.9% |
| 165 | Chatham County Estimated | 1,425 | +91.5% |
| 166 | Anderson County Estimated | 1,421 | +75.2% |
| 167 | Moore County Estimated | 1,388 | +20.3% |
| 168 | Warren County Estimated | 1,377 | +181.6% |
| 169 | Kent County Estimated | 1,373 | +83.6% |
| 170 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,363 | +57.4% |
| 171 | Coweta County Estimated | 1,360 | -7.5% |
| 172 | Burleigh County Estimated | 1,354 | -34.9% |
| 172 | Hendricks County Estimated | 1,354 | -33.7% |
| 174 | Citrus County Estimated | 1,345 | +31.2% |
| 175 | Limestone County Estimated | 1,339 | +12.5% |
| 176 | Rockingham County Estimated | 1,334 | +112.4% |
| 177 | El Dorado County Estimated | 1,317 | +102.6% |
| 178 | Madison County Estimated | 1,316 | -43.3% |
| 179 | Chesapeake city Estimated | 1,315 | +65.8% |
| 180 | Flathead County Estimated | 1,314 | +32.1% |
| 181 | Washington County Estimated | 1,300 | -20.8% |
| 182 | Matanuska-Susitna Borough Estimated | 1,295 | +1.6% |
| 183 | James City County Estimated | 1,293 | +14.1% |
| 184 | Thurston County Estimated | 1,276 | -26.7% |
| 185 | Butte County Estimated | 1,233 | +121.8% |
| 186 | Berkeley County Estimated | 1,217 | +20.1% |
| 187 | El Paso County Estimated | 1,207 | -50.5% |
| 188 | Cumberland County Estimated | 1,199 | +9.1% |
| 189 | Fulton County Estimated | 1,190 | +154.2% |
| 190 | Saline County Estimated | 1,168 | -20.7% |
| 191 | Kendall County Estimated | 1,161 | -24.6% |
| 192 | Mohave County Estimated | 1,152 | +44.4% |
| 193 | Broomfield County Estimated | 1,151 | +57% |
| 194 | Clay County Estimated | 1,142 | +1.1% |
| 195 | Barrow County Estimated | 1,140 | +116.7% |
| 196 | Hawaii County Estimated | 1,128 | +21.4% |
| 197 | Marion County Estimated | 1,121 | +1,375% |
| 198 | Kent County Estimated | 1,119 | -52% |
| 199 | Walton County Estimated | 1,098 | +55.7% |
| 200 | Carroll County Estimated | 1,093 | +328.6% |
| 201 | Douglas County Estimated | 1,084 | -22.9% |
| 202 | Tom Green County Estimated | 1,083 | +50.8% |
| 203 | York County Estimated | 1,058 | +143.8% |
| 204 | Lincoln County Estimated | 1,056 | +18.3% |
| 205 | Skagit County Estimated | 1,046 | +504.6% |
| 206 | Shelby County Estimated | 1,044 | -42.8% |
| 207 | Bristol County Estimated | 1,036 | +482.3% |
| 208 | Randall County Estimated | 1,022 | +3% |
| 209 | Ocean County Estimated | 1,010 | -3.5% |
| 210 | Gaston County Estimated | 1,009 | +1.4% |
| 211 | Pender County Estimated | 1,005 | +7.4% |
| 212 | Blount County Estimated | 1,001 | +10.2% |
| 213 | Sevier County Estimated | 996 | +19.7% |
| 214 | Coos County Estimated | 980 | +767.3% |
| 215 | Boone County Estimated | 977 | -7.5% |
| 216 | Fairfield County Estimated | 975 | +29.3% |
| 216 | Waller County Estimated | 975 | +28.3% |
| 218 | Strafford County Estimated | 974 | +414.2% |
| 219 | Pickens County Estimated | 971 | +230.7% |
| 220 | Fayette County Estimated | 959 | +74.7% |
| 221 | Alamance County Estimated | 950 | +51% |
| 222 | Carver County Estimated | 942 | -9.5% |
| 223 | Pickens County Estimated | 934 | +1,696.2% |
| 224 | Clark County Estimated | 933 | +95.2% |
| 224 | Hood County Estimated | 933 | +39% |
| 226 | Harrison County Estimated | 910 | -34.2% |
| 227 | Hunt County Estimated | 901 | +376.7% |
| 228 | Warren County Estimated | 900 | +63.3% |
| 229 | Madera County Estimated | 887 | +158% |
| 230 | Bullitt County Estimated | 885 | +14.2% |
| 231 | Whatcom County Estimated | 877 | +165% |
| 232 | Livingston County Estimated | 869 | -8.4% |
| 233 | Lea County Estimated | 865 | -34% |
| 234 | Yellowstone County Estimated | 864 | -42.1% |
| 235 | Madison County Estimated | 862 | -19.7% |
| 236 | Tuscaloosa County Estimated | 860 | -24.5% |
| 237 | Oconee County Estimated | 857 | +97.5% |
| 238 | Grayson County Estimated | 856 | +210.1% |
| 239 | Richland County Estimated | 852 | -16.3% |
| 240 | Cumberland County Estimated | 850 | +3.2% |
| 241 | Wasatch County Estimated | 848 | +2.2% |
| 242 | Marin County Estimated | 847 | -34.6% |
| 243 | Platte County Estimated | 841 | +62% |
| 244 | Scott County Estimated | 833 | +29.8% |
| 245 | Newton County Estimated | 832 | +49.4% |
| 246 | Nassau County Estimated | 830 | -0.4% |
| 247 | Allegan County Estimated | 828 | +935% |
| 248 | Christian County Estimated | 827 | +47.4% |
| 248 | Frederick County Estimated | 827 | -7.4% |
| 250 | Alachua County Estimated | 819 | +175.7% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into an area from elsewhere in the same country minus moves out to the rest of the country, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: states and counties. Canada: provinces and territories, net interprovincial migration (Statistics Canada). United Kingdom: local authorities, counting moves between any two UK local authorities, including across the borders of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (ONS internal migration). A negative value means more people left than arrived.
Sums to zero, or close to it, for each country as a whole, so there is no national value.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. 9 counties with data in other periods have no value for 2014 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2014) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2014. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2014. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2014.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2014 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2014 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_counties_by_net_2014,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2014}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2014. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: US counties by net domestic migration, July to June, 2014
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2014
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-domestic-migration-july-june/us-counties?period=2014.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US counties by net domestic migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_domestic_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_domestic_migration_july_june&level=province&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest net domestic migration, July to June?
Maricopa County, with 33,417 in 2014, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net domestic migration, July to June?
Los Angeles County, with -59,714 in 2014.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net domestic migration, states and counties, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 9 counties have no value for 2014 and are not ranked.
Net domestic migration, July to June: other rankings
US counties: more rankings
- High school graduate or higher, population 25 and over
- Natural change, July to June
- Population aged 18 to 64
- Crude death rate, July to June
- Housing vacancy rate, all vacant units (US)
- Housing units authorized by building permits
- Coronary heart disease in adults, local model estimate
- Uninsured rate, under 19 (US, ACS)