Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate

Hamburg had the highest natural change rate of 38 regions in 2016, at 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitants. Chemnitz had the lowest, at -6.4 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -1.8 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Germany was -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest2.3Hamburg
Lowest-6.4Chemnitz
Median-1.838 regions
Germany-1.4History

All regions, 2016

Hamburg: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsHamburg2.3Berlin: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBerlin2Oberbayern: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsOberbayern1.7Darmstadt: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsDarmstadt0.6Stuttgart: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsStuttgart0.6Tübingen: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTübingen0.4Freiburg: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsFreiburg-0.1Schwaben: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSchwaben-0.1Köln: -0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKöln-0.4Mittelfranken: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsMittelfranken-0.6Karlsruhe: -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsKarlsruhe-0.7Bremen: -0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsBremen-0.9Detmold: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsDetmold-1.2Weser-Ems: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWeser-Ems-1.2Rheinhessen-Pfalz: -1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRheinhessen-Pfalz-1.3Münster: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMünster-1.4Leipzig: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeipzig-1.5Niederbayern: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsNiederbayern-1.7Unterfranken: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsUnterfranken-1.7Oberpfalz: -1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsOberpfalz-1.8Gießen: -1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGießen-1.9Trier: -1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrier-1.9Düsseldorf: -2 per 1,000 inhabitantsDüsseldorf-2Hannover: -2.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsHannover-2.2Lüneburg: -2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsLüneburg-2.8Dresden: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsDresden-2.9Schleswig-Holstein: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsSchleswig-Holstein-2.9Arnsberg: -3 per 1,000 inhabitantsArnsberg-3Braunschweig: -3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBraunschweig-3Kassel: -3.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKassel-3.1Koblenz: -3.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoblenz-3.2Oberfranken: -3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsOberfranken-3.7Brandenburg: -4 per 1,000 inhabitantsBrandenburg-4Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: -4.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMecklenburg-Vorpommern-4.3Thüringen: -4.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsThüringen-4.5Saarland: -4.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSaarland-4.7Sachsen-Anhalt: -6 per 1,000 inhabitantsSachsen-Anhalt-6Chemnitz: -6.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsChemnitz-6.4Hamburg: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsHamburg2.3Berlin: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBerlin2Oberbayern: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsOberbayern1.7Darmstadt: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsDarmstadt0.6Stuttgart: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsStuttgart0.6Tübingen: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTübingen0.4Freiburg: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsFreiburg-0.1Schwaben: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSchwaben-0.1Köln: -0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKöln-0.4Mittelfranken: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsMittelfranken-0.6Karlsruhe: -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsKarlsruhe-0.7Bremen: -0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsBremen-0.9Detmold: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsDetmold-1.2Weser-Ems: -1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWeser-Ems-1.2Rheinhessen-Pfalz: -1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRheinhessen-Pfalz-1.3Münster: -1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMünster-1.4Leipzig: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeipzig-1.5Niederbayern: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsNiederbayern-1.7Unterfranken: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsUnterfranken-1.7Oberpfalz: -1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsOberpfalz-1.8Gießen: -1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGießen-1.9Trier: -1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrier-1.9Düsseldorf: -2 per 1,000 inhabitantsDüsseldorf-2Hannover: -2.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsHannover-2.2Lüneburg: -2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsLüneburg-2.8Dresden: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsDresden-2.9Schleswig-Holstein: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsSchleswig-Holstein-2.9Arnsberg: -3 per 1,000 inhabitantsArnsberg-3Braunschweig: -3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBraunschweig-3Kassel: -3.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKassel-3.1Koblenz: -3.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoblenz-3.2Oberfranken: -3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsOberfranken-3.7Brandenburg: -4 per 1,000 inhabitantsBrandenburg-4Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: -4.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMecklenburg-Vorpommern-4.3Thüringen: -4.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsThüringen-4.5Saarland: -4.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSaarland-4.7Sachsen-Anhalt: -6 per 1,000 inhabitantsSachsen-Anhalt-6Chemnitz: -6.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsChemnitz-6.4
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankRegions2016
per 1,000 inhabitants
Change on 2015
1Hamburg2.3+1.1 pts
2Berlin2+0.9 pts
3Oberbayern1.7+0.8 pts
4Darmstadt0.6+1 pts
4Stuttgart0.6+0.8 pts
6Tübingen0.4+0.9 pts
7Freiburg-0.1+1 pts
7Schwaben-0.1+1.1 pts
9Köln-0.4+0.8 pts
10Mittelfranken-0.6+1.2 pts
11Karlsruhe-0.7+0.6 pts
12Bremen-0.9+1.1 pts
13Detmold-1.2+0.6 pts
13Weser-Ems-1.2+0.9 pts
15Rheinhessen-Pfalz-1.3+0.9 pts
16Münster-1.4+0.7 pts
17Leipzig-1.5+0.7 pts
18Niederbayern-1.7+0.9 pts
18Unterfranken-1.7+1 pts
20Oberpfalz-1.8+0.7 pts
21Gießen-1.9+1 pts
21Trier-1.9+0.9 pts
23Düsseldorf-2+1.1 pts
24Hannover-2.2+1.5 pts
25Lüneburg-2.8+0.6 pts
26Dresden-2.9+0.7 pts
26Schleswig-Holstein-2.9+0.7 pts
28Arnsberg-3+0.9 pts
28Braunschweig-3+1.1 pts
30Kassel-3.1+1.1 pts
31Koblenz-3.2+0.7 pts
32Oberfranken-3.7+1.1 pts
33Brandenburg-4+0.7 pts
34Mecklenburg-Vorpommern-4.3+0.1 pts
35Thüringen-4.5+0.5 pts
36Saarland-4.7+1.3 pts
37Sachsen-Anhalt-6+0.7 pts
38Chemnitz-6.4+0.5 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the regions are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate, 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate, 2016. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/germany-regions?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate, 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/germany-regions?period=2016.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate, 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/germany-regions?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_regions_of_germany_nuts_2016,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate, 2016}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/germany-regions?period=2016. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): Regions of Germany (NUTS 2) by natural change rate, 2016
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/germany-regions?period=2016
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/germany-regions?period=2016.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  - 
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Regions of Germany by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"region","within":"Germany","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=region&within=Germany&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which region has the highest natural change rate?

Hamburg, with 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which region has the lowest natural change rate?

Chemnitz, with -6.4 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural change rate: other rankings

Regions of Germany (NUTS 2): more rankings