Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index

Name: Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index, 2022
Creator: Instituto Nacional de Estadística
License: INE reuse terms (attribution required)

Quintana del Puente had the highest gini index of 114 municipalities in 2022, at 37.7 index. Boadilla del Camino had the lowest, at 21.1 index. The median was 27.7 index and the figure for Palencia province was 28.2 index. Source: the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Highest37.7Quintana del Puente

Lowest21.1Boadilla del Camino

Median27.7114 municipalities

Palencia province28.2History

Top 40 municipalities, 2022

CSV Chart (SVG)

index. Source: INE. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	2022 index	Change on 2021
1	Quintana del Puente	37.7	+5.3
2	Espinosa de Cerrato	37.4	+8.7
3	Villalcázar de Sirga	36.6	-0.8
4	Brañosera	34.5	-0.1
4	Itero de la Vega	34.5	+1.5
6	Santervás de la Vega	34.3	+6.2
7	Espinosa de Villagonzalo	33.9	+1.6
8	Valle del Retortillo	33.6	+0.5
9	Piña de Campos	33.4	+6
10	Lantadilla	33.3	+0.6
10	Vertavillo	33.3	+3.7
12	Fuentes de Nava	32.9	+1.7
13	Frechilla	32.8	+1.4
14	Quintanilla de Onsoña	32.6	+4.4
15	Población de Cerrato	32.2	+2.4
16	Castrillo de Don Juan	31.9	+1.8
17	Loma de Ucieza	31.7	+0.8
18	Villaherreros	31.4	+2.6
19	Villamoronta	31.3	+2.5
20	Pedrosa de la Vega	31.2	+3.8
21	Villaluenga de la Vega	31	+1.3
22	Villodrigo	30.9	n/a
23	Autillo de Campos	30.8	-4.9
23	Villarramiel	30.8	+1.1
25	Melgar de Yuso	30.6	+4.5
26	Revenga de Campos	30.4	-4.8
27	Olmos de Ojeda	30.3	0
28	Castromocho	30	+2.2
28	Villaturde	30	+1
30	Antigüedad	29.8	+0.3
30	Husillos	29.8	+0.5
32	Bustillo de la Vega	29.7	+2.9
32	Cervatos de la Cueza	29.7	-0.1
32	Paredes de Nava	29.7	+0.3
35	Abia de las Torres	29.5	+1.6
35	Población de Campos	29.5	-1.9
37	Saldaña	29.3	+0.4
38	Herrera de Pisuerga	29.2	+0.4
38	Villoldo	29.2	+0.5
40	Palencia	29.1	+0.1
41	Palenzuela	28.7	-0.7
42	Amusco	28.6	+1
42	Perales	28.6	n/a
44	Torquemada	28.5	+1.8
45	Astudillo	28.4	+1.1
45	Pino del Río	28.4	+2.1
47	Carrión de los Condes	28.3	+0.5
47	Renedo de la Vega	28.3	+4.1
49	Monzón de Campos	28.2	-2.4
49	Osorno la Mayor	28.2	-0.4
49	Villasarracino	28.2	+6.7
52	Alar del Rey	28	-0.4
52	Poza de la Vega	28	-1
52	Santoyo	28	+1.7
55	Castrillo de Villavega	27.9	+0.2
55	Cervera de Pisuerga	27.9	+1.1
55	San Cebrián de Campos	27.9	+0.2
58	Soto de Cerrato	27.4	-0.2
59	Barruelo de Santullán	27.3	0
59	Collazos de Boedo	27.3	n/a
59	Villameriel	27.3	+0.1
62	Autilla del Pino	27.2	+3.1
62	Prádanos de Ojeda	27.2	-6.3
64	Villamediana	27.1	-1.7
65	Grijota	27	-0.2
66	Sotobañado y Priorato	26.9	-3.4
67	Cisneros	26.8	-0.1
68	Baltanás	26.6	+0.8
69	Becerril de Campos	26.4	+0.4
69	Cevico de la Torre	26.4	-0.8
69	Herrera de Valdecañas	26.4	+2.1
72	Frómista	26.3	+0.3
72	Tabanera de Cerrato	26.3	-0.6
74	La Pernía	26.2	-2.4
74	Villamartín de Campos	26.2	-0.7
76	Lagartos	26.1	+0.8
77	Báscones de Ojeda	25.9	+1.1
77	Cevico Navero	25.9	+0.9
77	Guardo	25.9	+0.2
80	Buenavista de Valdavia	25.8	+0.7
81	Pomar de Valdivia	25.7	+1.3
82	Ampudia	25.6	+0.8
82	Ribas de Campos	25.6	+2.3
84	Aguilar de Campoo	25.5	+0.6
85	Velilla del Río Carrión	25.3	+0.7
86	Cobos de Cerrato	25.2	0
87	Calzada de los Molinos	25.1	+0.4
87	Salinas de Pisuerga	25.1	-2.7
87	Tariego de Cerrato	25.1	-0.1
90	Magaz de Pisuerga	25	-1
90	Villarrabé	25	+2.4
90	Villaviudas	25	-1.1
93	Hontoria de Cerrato	24.9	-6.6
94	Respenda de la Peña	24.7	+0.7
95	Cordovilla la Real	24.6	+1
95	Villalobón	24.6	+0.2
97	Mantinos	24.5	0
98	San Cebrián de Mudá	24.4	+0.6
99	Fresno del Río	24.2	-0.6
99	Venta de Baños	24.2	-0.6
99	Villalba de Guardo	24.2	-0.9
102	Castrejón de la Peña	24	-0.1
102	Villamuriel de Cerrato	24	0
104	Dueñas	23.9	-0.1
104	Villaumbrales	23.9	-2.1
106	Dehesa de Montejo	23.6	+1.2
106	Villada	23.6	-1.6
108	Fuentes de Valdepero	23.5	-1.2
108	Villota del Páramo	23.5	0
110	Congosto de Valdavia	23.3	-2.1
110	Santibáñez de la Peña	23.3	-0.2
112	Mazariegos	23.2	+0.1
113	Hornillos de Cerrato	22.9	-4.8
114	Boadilla del Camino	21.1	-4.9

Other periods

About this ranking

Income inequality on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 is perfect equality.

Eurostat, equivalised disposable income after social transfers (EU-SILC), for the EU and its countries. For other countries use gini_index_world_bank, which is measured on a different basis.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 12 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=37708. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gini_index","level":"municipality","within":"Palencia","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gini_index&level=municipality&within=Palencia&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest gini index?

Quintana del Puente, with 37.7 index in 2022, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Which municipality has the lowest gini index?

Boadilla del Camino, with 21.1 index in 2022.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-07. 12 municipalities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.