Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index, 2023

Name: Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index, 2023
Creator: Instituto Nacional de Estadística
License: INE reuse terms (attribution required)

Quintana del Puente had the highest gini index of 114 municipalities in 2023, at 41.3 index. Congosto de Valdavia had the lowest, at 20.4 index. The median was 27.8 index and the figure for Palencia province was 27.9 index. Source: the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Highest41.3Quintana del Puente

Lowest20.4Congosto de Valdavia

Median27.8114 municipalities

Palencia province27.9History

Top 40 municipalities, 2023

CSV Chart (SVG)

index. Source: INE. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	2023 index	Change on 2022
1	Quintana del Puente	41.3	+3.6
2	Lantadilla	38.9	+5.6
3	Itero de la Vega	38.7	+4.2
4	Meneses de Campos	35.1	n/a
5	Villaluenga de la Vega	34.1	+3.1
6	Vertavillo	33.9	+0.6
7	Frechilla	33.7	+0.9
8	Piña de Campos	33.5	+0.1
8	Villaturde	33.5	+3.5
10	Espinosa de Cerrato	33.4	-4
10	Valle del Retortillo	33.4	-0.2
12	Boadilla de Rioseco	33.1	n/a
12	Espinosa de Villagonzalo	33.1	-0.8
14	Brañosera	32.8	-1.7
14	Revenga de Campos	32.8	+2.4
16	Fuentes de Nava	32.6	-0.3
17	Santervás de la Vega	32.3	-2
18	Loma de Ucieza	31.9	+0.2
19	Santoyo	31.6	+3.6
20	Melgar de Yuso	31	+0.4
21	Castrillo de Don Juan	30.8	-1.1
21	Villalcázar de Sirga	30.8	-5.8
23	Quintanilla de Onsoña	30.4	-2.2
24	Cobos de Cerrato	30.3	+5.1
25	Lagartos	30.2	+4.1
26	Villasarracino	30	+1.8
27	Villamoronta	29.9	-1.4
28	Osorno la Mayor	29.8	+1.6
28	Paredes de Nava	29.8	+0.1
28	Población de Campos	29.8	+0.3
28	Soto de Cerrato	29.8	+2.4
32	Antigüedad	29.7	-0.1
32	Pedrosa de la Vega	29.7	-1.5
34	Herrera de Pisuerga	29.5	+0.3
34	Prádanos de Ojeda	29.5	+2.3
36	Amusco	29.4	+0.8
37	Bustillo de la Vega	29.3	-0.4
38	Olmos de Ojeda	29.1	-1.2
38	Villamartín de Campos	29.1	+2.9
40	Autillo de Campos	29	-1.8
40	Villarramiel	29	-1.8
42	Villaherreros	28.9	-2.5
42	Villota del Páramo	28.9	+5.4
44	Castrillo de Villavega	28.7	+0.8
44	Palencia	28.7	-0.4
44	Saldaña	28.7	-0.6
47	Abia de las Torres	28.6	-0.9
48	Población de Cerrato	28.4	-3.8
49	San Cebrián de Campos	28.3	+0.4
50	Cervatos de la Cueza	28.2	-1.5
50	Monzón de Campos	28.2	0
52	Alar del Rey	28.1	+0.1
53	Tabanera de Cerrato	28	+1.7
54	Villalba de Guardo	27.9	+3.7
54	Villodrigo	27.9	-3
56	Torquemada	27.8	-0.7
56	Villoldo	27.8	-1.4
58	Astudillo	27.7	-0.7
58	Calzada de los Molinos	27.7	+2.6
60	Hontoria de Cerrato	27.6	+2.7
61	Carrión de los Condes	27.5	-0.8
62	Autilla del Pino	27.4	+0.2
63	Frómista	27.3	+1
63	Herrera de Valdecañas	27.3	+0.9
65	Husillos	27.2	-2.6
66	Villarrabé	26.9	+1.9
67	Cervera de Pisuerga	26.8	-1.1
67	Villaviudas	26.8	+1.8
69	Becerril de Campos	26.6	+0.2
69	Castromocho	26.6	-3.4
69	Cevico de la Torre	26.6	+0.2
69	Grijota	26.6	-0.4
73	Salinas de Pisuerga	26.5	+1.4
74	Ampudia	26.3	+0.7
74	Villameriel	26.3	-1
76	Palenzuela	26.1	-2.6
77	Báscones de Ojeda	25.9	0
78	Aguilar de Campoo	25.8	+0.3
78	Barruelo de Santullán	25.8	-1.5
80	Castrejón de la Peña	25.7	+1.7
80	La Pernía	25.7	-0.5
80	Pino del Río	25.7	-2.7
83	Cevico Navero	25.6	-0.3
83	Cisneros	25.6	-1.2
85	Poza de la Vega	25.5	-2.5
85	Renedo de la Vega	25.5	-2.8
85	Villamediana	25.5	-1.6
88	Baltanás	25.4	-1.2
88	Tariego de Cerrato	25.4	+0.3
90	Guardo	25.2	-0.7
91	Respenda de la Peña	25.1	+0.4
92	Magaz de Pisuerga	24.9	-0.1
92	Villalobón	24.9	+0.3
94	Buenavista de Valdavia	24.7	-1.1
94	San Cebrián de Mudá	24.7	+0.3
94	Villada	24.7	+1.1
97	Dueñas	24.6	+0.7
98	Sotobañado y Priorato	24.5	-2.4
99	Velilla del Río Carrión	24.3	-1
100	Cordovilla la Real	24.1	-0.5
101	Fuentes de Valdepero	23.9	+0.4
101	Venta de Baños	23.9	-0.3
103	Santibáñez de la Peña	23.7	+0.4
104	Villaumbrales	23.6	-0.3
105	Pomar de Valdivia	23.5	-2.2
105	Villamuriel de Cerrato	23.5	-0.5
107	Ribas de Campos	23.4	-2.2
108	Hornillos de Cerrato	22.8	-0.1
109	Mantinos	22.7	-1.8
110	Mazariegos	22.5	-0.7
111	Dehesa de Montejo	22.1	-1.5
112	Fresno del Río	21.9	-2.3
113	Boadilla del Camino	21.1	0
114	Congosto de Valdavia	20.4	-2.9

Other periods

About this ranking

Income inequality on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 is perfect equality.

Eurostat, equivalised disposable income after social transfers (EU-SILC), for the EU and its countries. For other countries use gini_index_world_bank, which is measured on a different basis.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 12 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for 2023 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=37708. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gini_index","level":"municipality","within":"Palencia","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gini_index&level=municipality&within=Palencia&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest gini index?

Quintana del Puente, with 41.3 index in 2023, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Which municipality has the lowest gini index?

Congosto de Valdavia, with 20.4 index in 2023.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-07. 12 municipalities have no value for 2023 and are not ranked.