Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index

Name: Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index, 2019
Creator: Instituto Nacional de Estadística
License: INE reuse terms (attribution required)

Brañosera had the highest gini index of 115 municipalities in 2019, at 38 index. Lagartos had the lowest, at 21.5 index. The median was 27.8 index and the figure for Palencia province was 28.2 index. Source: the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Highest38Brañosera

Lowest21.5Lagartos

Median27.8115 municipalities

Palencia province28.2History

Top 40 municipalities, 2019

CSV Chart (SVG)

index. Source: INE. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	2019 index	Change on 2018
1	Brañosera	38	+2.8
2	Meneses de Campos	37.9	+4
3	Quintana del Puente	36.5	+5.1
3	Valle del Retortillo	36.5	+2.1
5	Boadilla de Rioseco	34.1	+7.1
6	Loma de Ucieza	31.9	-2.2
7	Lantadilla	31.8	+0.7
8	Abia de las Torres	31.7	+1.6
9	Espinosa de Cerrato	31.4	-0.7
9	Sotobañado y Priorato	31.4	+1.5
11	Fuentes de Nava	31.2	-1.9
11	Villaturde	31.2	+1.4
13	Itero de la Vega	31.1	+2.1
14	Población de Cerrato	31	+3.1
15	Cervatos de la Cueza	30.9	+0.6
16	Población de Campos	30.8	-1.1
17	Bustillo de la Vega	30.5	+0.7
18	Villameriel	30.4	+3.7
19	Villarramiel	30.3	-0.5
20	Castrillo de Villavega	30.2	+4.9
21	Villaluenga de la Vega	30.1	-1.5
22	Espinosa de Villagonzalo	30	+2.2
23	Villamoronta	29.8	+3.9
24	Alar del Rey	29.6	-0.1
24	Herrera de Pisuerga	29.6	-0.1
24	Piña de Campos	29.6	+0.3
24	Poza de la Vega	29.6	+0.3
24	Vertavillo	29.6	-4.3
29	Antigüedad	29.5	+0.4
29	Frechilla	29.5	-0.4
29	Olmos de Ojeda	29.5	+0.5
29	Saldaña	29.5	-0.7
33	Monzón de Campos	29.4	-1.3
33	Revenga de Campos	29.4	+0.7
35	Pedrosa de la Vega	29.2	+0.7
36	Amusco	29.1	+1.7
36	La Pernía	29.1	+0.3
36	Palencia	29.1	-0.5
39	Cisneros	28.8	+2.4
40	Castromocho	28.7	+3
40	Hontoria de Cerrato	28.7	+1.1
42	Autillo de Campos	28.6	-0.2
42	Castrillo de Don Juan	28.6	+0.3
42	Osorno la Mayor	28.6	+1.4
42	Villaherreros	28.6	+2.2
46	Tabanera de Cerrato	28.5	-3.6
47	Paredes de Nava	28.4	-0.1
48	Carrión de los Condes	28.3	-0.4
48	Melgar de Yuso	28.3	-0.9
48	Santa Cecilia del Alcor	28.3	-1.8
48	Villodrigo	28.3	-1.3
52	Torquemada	28.2	0
53	Soto de Cerrato	28.1	+3
54	Cervera de Pisuerga	28	-0.1
54	Herrera de Valdecañas	28	+2.5
56	Villalcázar de Sirga	27.9	-0.7
57	Husillos	27.8	-0.6
57	Santervás de la Vega	27.8	-2.2
57	Santoyo	27.8	+0.5
60	Cobos de Cerrato	27.6	+2.1
61	Quintanilla de Onsoña	27.5	-2
62	Buenavista de Valdavia	27.4	-0.7
62	Fresno del Río	27.4	+1.9
62	Grijota	27.4	+0.7
62	Pino del Río	27.4	+0.1
62	San Cebrián de Campos	27.4	+1.5
67	Barruelo de Santullán	27.3	+0.4
67	Prádanos de Ojeda	27.3	-2.6
67	Villoldo	27.3	-2
70	Villalba de Guardo	27.2	-0.8
71	Velilla del Río Carrión	27.1	-0.8
72	Villamediana	26.9	-0.4
73	Villaviudas	26.8	-0.6
74	Astudillo	26.7	+0.2
75	Salinas de Pisuerga	26.6	-4.8
75	Villamartín de Campos	26.6	-2.3
77	Báscones de Ojeda	26.4	+1.7
78	Villada	26.2	-1.1
79	Ampudia	26	+0.4
79	Guardo	26	-1.4
79	Villota del Páramo	26	+0.9
82	Aguilar de Campoo	25.9	-0.9
82	Renedo de la Vega	25.9	-3.4
84	Boadilla del Camino	25.8	-4.2
84	Villalobón	25.8	+0.6
86	Becerril de Campos	25.7	-1.2
86	Mantinos	25.7	+0.7
88	Baltanás	25.6	-0.7
88	Pomar de Valdivia	25.6	-0.2
90	Magaz de Pisuerga	25.5	-2
91	Frómista	25.3	-2.2
92	Cevico de la Torre	25.2	-0.6
92	Villasarracino	25.2	+0.6
94	Tariego de Cerrato	25.1	0
95	Cevico Navero	25	+1.2
96	Villaumbrales	24.9	+1.5
97	Villarrabé	24.8	+1.1
98	Calzada de los Molinos	24.7	-1.1
98	Congosto de Valdavia	24.7	-3.7
98	Cordovilla la Real	24.7	-3.7
98	Villamuriel de Cerrato	24.7	-0.1
102	Respenda de la Peña	24.6	-1.3
103	Venta de Baños	24.4	-0.3
104	Autilla del Pino	24.2	-2.4
104	Fuentes de Valdepero	24.2	-0.9
106	Palenzuela	24	-0.3
107	Castrejón de la Peña	23.6	+2.2
108	Dueñas	23.5	-0.3
108	Mazariegos	23.5	-0.2
108	Ribas de Campos	23.5	-2
108	San Cebrián de Mudá	23.5	-4.9
112	Santibáñez de la Peña	23.4	-1.5
113	Hornillos de Cerrato	22.6	-6
114	Dehesa de Montejo	22.2	+1.7
115	Lagartos	21.5	-3.1

Other periods

About this ranking

Income inequality on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 is perfect equality.

Eurostat, equivalised disposable income after social transfers (EU-SILC), for the EU and its countries. For other countries use gini_index_world_bank, which is measured on a different basis.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 11 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for 2019 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=37708. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gini_index","level":"municipality","within":"Palencia","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gini_index&level=municipality&within=Palencia&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest gini index?

Brañosera, with 38 index in 2019, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Which municipality has the lowest gini index?

Lagartos, with 21.5 index in 2019.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-07. 11 municipalities have no value for 2019 and are not ranked.