Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index

Name: Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index, 2015
Creator: Instituto Nacional de Estadística
License: INE reuse terms (attribution required)

Brañosera had the highest gini index of 123 municipalities in 2015, at 39.8 index. Soto de Cerrato had the lowest, at 22.5 index. The median was 28.7 index and the figure for Palencia province was 30.3 index. Source: the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Highest39.8Brañosera

Lowest22.5Soto de Cerrato

Median28.7123 municipalities

Palencia province30.3History

Top 40 municipalities, 2015

CSV Chart (SVG)

index. Source: INE. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	2015 index
1	Brañosera	39.8
2	Loma de Ucieza	35.6
3	Villahán	35.1
4	Prádanos de Ojeda	34.3
5	Salinas de Pisuerga	34
5	Villarramiel	34
7	Lantadilla	33.9
8	Valle del Retortillo	33.3
9	Valde-Ucieza	33.1
10	Villaluenga de la Vega	32.5
11	Husillos	32.4
12	Castrillo de Don Juan	32.3
13	Fuentes de Nava	32.2
13	La Puebla de Valdavia	32.2
13	Saldaña	32.2
16	Villalba de Guardo	32.1
16	Villamartín de Campos	32.1
18	Herrera de Pisuerga	32
19	Santa Cecilia del Alcor	31.9
20	Villodrigo	31.7
21	Alar del Rey	31.6
21	Castromocho	31.6
23	Monzón de Campos	31.4
23	Quintana del Puente	31.4
25	Poza de la Vega	31.3
26	Mantinos	31.2
26	Palencia	31.2
28	Carrión de los Condes	31.1
28	Meneses de Campos	31.1
30	Quintanilla de Onsoña	31
31	San Cebrián de Mudá	30.8
32	Pedrosa de la Vega	30.7
33	Boadilla de Rioseco	30.6
33	Cervera de Pisuerga	30.6
33	San Cebrián de Campos	30.6
33	Vertavillo	30.6
37	Espinosa de Villagonzalo	30.2
37	Villamoronta	30.2
39	Torquemada	30.1
40	Antigüedad	30
41	Osorno la Mayor	29.9
41	Palenzuela	29.9
41	Paredes de Nava	29.9
44	Itero de la Vega	29.8
44	Pomar de Valdivia	29.8
44	Villoldo	29.8
47	Castrillo de Villavega	29.7
47	Mazuecos de Valdeginate	29.7
49	Guardo	29.6
50	Amusco	29.5
50	Calzada de los Molinos	29.5
50	Santervás de la Vega	29.5
53	Abia de las Torres	29.4
53	Piña de Campos	29.4
55	Magaz de Pisuerga	29.3
55	Población de Campos	29.3
57	Cervatos de la Cueza	29.2
57	Espinosa de Cerrato	29.2
57	Revenga de Campos	29.2
60	Congosto de Valdavia	29
61	Herrera de Valdecañas	28.8
62	Barruelo de Santullán	28.7
63	Ampudia	28.6
63	Velilla del Río Carrión	28.6
65	Aguilar de Campoo	28.4
65	Renedo de la Vega	28.4
67	Villaherreros	28.3
68	Fuentes de Valdepero	28.2
68	Respenda de la Peña	28.2
70	Villasarracino	28.1
71	Tariego de Cerrato	28
71	Villamediana	28
71	Villaturde	28
74	Astudillo	27.9
74	Buenavista de Valdavia	27.9
74	Villalcázar de Sirga	27.9
77	Boadilla del Camino	27.8
77	Grijota	27.8
77	Pino del Río	27.8
77	Población de Cerrato	27.8
81	Fresno del Río	27.7
82	Collazos de Boedo	27.4
82	Frechilla	27.4
84	Hontoria de Cerrato	27.3
84	La Vid de Ojeda	27.3
86	Bustillo de la Vega	27.2
86	Mazariegos	27.2
86	Villada	27.2
89	Cobos de Cerrato	27.1
89	Villalobón	27.1
91	Villota del Páramo	27
92	Cevico Navero	26.9
92	Hornillos de Cerrato	26.9
94	Melgar de Yuso	26.8
95	Baltanás	26.7
95	Santoyo	26.7
95	Sotobañado y Priorato	26.7
95	Villamuriel de Cerrato	26.7
99	Castrejón de la Peña	26.6
100	Olmos de Ojeda	26.5
100	Santibáñez de la Peña	26.5
100	Venta de Baños	26.5
103	Frómista	26.4
103	Villaumbrales	26.4
105	La Serna	26.3
106	Becerril de Campos	26.2
107	La Pernía	26.1
107	Ribas de Campos	26.1
109	Castrillo de Onielo	26
109	Cisneros	26
109	Villameriel	26
112	Villarrabé	25.9
113	Tabanera de Cerrato	25.8
114	Autilla del Pino	25.6
114	Autillo de Campos	25.6
114	Dueñas	25.6
117	Lagartos	25.5
118	Báscones de Ojeda	24.8
119	Villaviudas	24.5
120	Dehesa de Montejo	24.4
121	Cordovilla la Real	24.2
122	Cevico de la Torre	23.4
123	Soto de Cerrato	22.5

Other periods

About this ranking

Income inequality on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 is perfect equality.

Eurostat, equivalised disposable income after social transfers (EU-SILC), for the EU and its countries. For other countries use gini_index_world_bank, which is measured on a different basis.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 3 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for 2015 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=37708. Retrieved 2026-10-07.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Palencia province by gini index using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gini_index","level":"municipality","within":"Palencia","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gini_index&level=municipality&within=Palencia&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest gini index?

Brañosera, with 39.8 index in 2015, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

Which municipality has the lowest gini index?

Soto de Cerrato, with 22.5 index in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Atlas de distribución de renta de los hogares: índice de Gini, municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-07. 3 municipalities have no value for 2015 and are not ranked.