Data / Rankings / Real GDP growth / Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2) by real GDP growth

Warszawski stołeczny had the highest real GDP growth of 17 regions in 2018, at 9.1%. Mazowiecki regionalny had the lowest, at 3.5%. The median was 5.6% and the figure for Poland was 6.2%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest9.1Warszawski stołeczny
Lowest3.5Mazowiecki regionalny
Median5.617 regions
Poland6.2History

All regions, 2018

CSVChart (SVG)

Warszawski stołecznyWarszawski stołeczny: 9.1 %9.1PodkarpackiePodkarpackie: 7.2 %7.2MałopolskieMałopolskie: 7 %7PomorskiePomorskie: 6.8 %6.8ŚwiętokrzyskieŚwiętokrzyskie: 6.6 %6.6Kujawsko-pomorskieKujawsko-pomorskie: 6.3 %6.3ŚląskieŚląskie: 6.1 %6.1ZachodniopomorskieZachodniopomorskie: 5.8 %5.8PodlaskiePodlaskie: 5.6 %5.6DolnośląskieDolnośląskie: 5.5 %5.5WielkopolskieWielkopolskie: 5.5 %5.5OpolskieOpolskie: 5.2 %5.2ŁódzkieŁódzkie: 5.1 %5.1LubuskieLubuskie: 4.5 %4.5Warmińsko-mazurskieWarmińsko-mazurskie: 3.9 %3.9LubelskieLubelskie: 3.6 %3.6Mazowiecki regionalnyMazowiecki regionalny: 3.5 %3.5
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankRegions2018 (%)Change on 2017
1Warszawski stołeczny Estimated9.1+2.3 pts
2Podkarpackie Estimated7.2+2.4 pts
3Małopolskie Estimated7+0.8 pts
4Pomorskie Estimated6.8+1.9 pts
5Świętokrzyskie Estimated6.6+2.7 pts
6Kujawsko-pomorskie Estimated6.3+2.1 pts
7Śląskie Estimated6.1+1.6 pts
8Zachodniopomorskie Estimated5.8+0.6 pts
9Podlaskie Estimated5.60 pts
10Dolnośląskie Estimated5.5+0.5 pts
10Wielkopolskie Estimated5.50 pts
12Opolskie Estimated5.2+0.5 pts
13Łódzkie Estimated5.1+0.5 pts
14Lubuskie Estimated4.5+0.4 pts
15Warmińsko-mazurskie Estimated3.9-0.1 pts
16Lubelskie Estimated3.6-0.6 pts
17Mazowiecki regionalny Estimated3.5-0.1 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Annual percentage change of GDP in chain-linked volumes, or at constant prices in the World Bank series.

Each value comes from one official source for that place: national statistics offices, Eurostat, for the United States the Bureau of Economic Analysis or, for other countries and the World, the World Bank. Annual values compare one calendar year with the previous one; quarterly values compare a quarter with the same quarter a year earlier. Past values can be revised. United States figures come from BEA tables SAGDP11 for the nation and states and CAGDP11 for counties. Growth in small counties can swing widely from year to year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the regions are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_2gvagr/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Regions of Poland by real GDP growth using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_growth","level":"region","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_growth&level=region&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which region has the highest real GDP growth?

Warszawski stołeczny, with 9.1% in 2018, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which region has the lowest real GDP growth?

Mazowiecki regionalny, with 3.5% in 2018.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Real GDP growth: other rankings

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2): more rankings