Data / Rankings / Real GDP growth / Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2) by real GDP growth

Opolskie had the highest real GDP growth of 17 regions in 2014, at 5%. Lubelskie had the lowest, at 3%. The median was 4.2% and the figure for Poland was 3.9%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest5Opolskie
Lowest3Lubelskie
Median4.217 regions
Poland3.9History

All regions, 2014

CSVChart (SVG)

OpolskieOpolskie: 5 %5LubuskieLubuskie: 4.8 %4.8Warmińsko-mazurskieWarmińsko-mazurskie: 4.8 %4.8Mazowiecki regionalnyMazowiecki regionalny: 4.7 %4.7WielkopolskieWielkopolskie: 4.6 %4.6ZachodniopomorskieZachodniopomorskie: 4.5 %4.5ŁódzkieŁódzkie: 4.3 %4.3DolnośląskieDolnośląskie: 4.2 %4.2MałopolskieMałopolskie: 4.2 %4.2ŚląskieŚląskie: 3.9 %3.9ŚwiętokrzyskieŚwiętokrzyskie: 3.6 %3.6PomorskiePomorskie: 3.5 %3.5PodlaskiePodlaskie: 3.4 %3.4Warszawski stołecznyWarszawski stołeczny: 3.3 %3.3PodkarpackiePodkarpackie: 3.2 %3.2Kujawsko-pomorskieKujawsko-pomorskie: 3.1 %3.1LubelskieLubelskie: 3 %3
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankRegions2014 (%)Change on 2013
1Opolskie Estimated5+5.3 pts
2Lubuskie Estimated4.8+4.8 pts
2Warmińsko-mazurskie Estimated4.8+4.8 pts
4Mazowiecki regionalny Estimated4.7+5.5 pts
5Wielkopolskie Estimated4.6+3.4 pts
6Zachodniopomorskie Estimated4.5+4.6 pts
7Łódzkie Estimated4.3+4.6 pts
8Dolnośląskie Estimated4.2+4.8 pts
8Małopolskie Estimated4.2+3.8 pts
10Śląskie Estimated3.9+4.1 pts
11Świętokrzyskie Estimated3.6+5.2 pts
12Pomorskie Estimated3.5+3.4 pts
13Podlaskie Estimated3.4+1.4 pts
14Warszawski stołeczny Estimated3.3+0.2 pts
15Podkarpackie Estimated3.2+1.4 pts
16Kujawsko-pomorskie Estimated3.1+2.1 pts
17Lubelskie Estimated3+2 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Annual percentage change of GDP in chain-linked volumes, or at constant prices in the World Bank series.

Each value comes from one official source for that place: national statistics offices, Eurostat, for the United States the Bureau of Economic Analysis or, for other countries and the World, the World Bank. Annual values compare one calendar year with the previous one; quarterly values compare a quarter with the same quarter a year earlier. Past values can be revised. United States figures come from BEA tables SAGDP11 for the nation and states and CAGDP11 for counties. Growth in small counties can swing widely from year to year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the regions are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_2gvagr/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Regions of Poland by real GDP growth using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_growth","level":"region","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_growth&level=region&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which region has the highest real GDP growth?

Opolskie, with 5% in 2014, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which region has the lowest real GDP growth?

Lubelskie, with 3% in 2014.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Real GDP growth: other rankings

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2): more rankings