Data / Rankings / Real GDP growth / Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2) by real GDP growth

Pomorskie had the highest real GDP growth of 17 regions in 2015, at 6%. Lubelskie had the lowest, at 1.7%. The median was 3.9% and the figure for Poland was 4.4%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest6Pomorskie
Lowest1.7Lubelskie
Median3.917 regions
Poland4.4History

All regions, 2015

CSVChart (SVG)

PomorskiePomorskie: 6 %6MałopolskieMałopolskie: 5.7 %5.7Warszawski stołecznyWarszawski stołeczny: 5.5 %5.5WielkopolskieWielkopolskie: 5.4 %5.4ŚląskieŚląskie: 4.8 %4.8Mazowiecki regionalnyMazowiecki regionalny: 4.6 %4.6PodkarpackiePodkarpackie: 4 %4DolnośląskieDolnośląskie: 3.9 %3.9ZachodniopomorskieZachodniopomorskie: 3.9 %3.9Kujawsko-pomorskieKujawsko-pomorskie: 3.8 %3.8ŁódzkieŁódzkie: 3.5 %3.5LubuskieLubuskie: 2.8 %2.8OpolskieOpolskie: 2.6 %2.6ŚwiętokrzyskieŚwiętokrzyskie: 2.6 %2.6Warmińsko-mazurskieWarmińsko-mazurskie: 2.4 %2.4PodlaskiePodlaskie: 1.9 %1.9LubelskieLubelskie: 1.7 %1.7
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankRegions2015 (%)Change on 2014
1Pomorskie Estimated6+2.5 pts
2Małopolskie Estimated5.7+1.5 pts
3Warszawski stołeczny Estimated5.5+2.2 pts
4Wielkopolskie Estimated5.4+0.8 pts
5Śląskie Estimated4.8+0.9 pts
6Mazowiecki regionalny Estimated4.6-0.1 pts
7Podkarpackie Estimated4+0.8 pts
8Dolnośląskie Estimated3.9-0.3 pts
8Zachodniopomorskie Estimated3.9-0.6 pts
10Kujawsko-pomorskie Estimated3.8+0.7 pts
11Łódzkie Estimated3.5-0.8 pts
12Lubuskie Estimated2.8-2 pts
13Opolskie Estimated2.6-2.4 pts
13Świętokrzyskie Estimated2.6-1 pts
15Warmińsko-mazurskie Estimated2.4-2.4 pts
16Podlaskie Estimated1.9-1.5 pts
17Lubelskie Estimated1.7-1.3 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Annual percentage change of GDP in chain-linked volumes, or at constant prices in the World Bank series.

Each value comes from one official source for that place: national statistics offices, Eurostat, for the United States the Bureau of Economic Analysis or, for other countries and the World, the World Bank. Annual values compare one calendar year with the previous one; quarterly values compare a quarter with the same quarter a year earlier. Past values can be revised. United States figures come from BEA tables SAGDP11 for the nation and states and CAGDP11 for counties. Growth in small counties can swing widely from year to year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the regions are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_2gvagr/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Regions of Poland by real GDP growth using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_growth","level":"region","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_growth&level=region&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which region has the highest real GDP growth?

Pomorskie, with 6% in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which region has the lowest real GDP growth?

Lubelskie, with 1.7% in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Real GDP growth: other rankings

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2): more rankings