Regions of Poland (NUTS 2) by real GDP growth

Pomorskie had the highest real GDP growth of 17 regions in 2016, at 4.3%. Opolskie had the lowest, at 0.9%. The median was 2.5% and the figure for Poland was 3%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest4.3Pomorskie
Lowest0.9Opolskie
Median2.517 regions
Poland3History

All regions, 2016

CSVChart (SVG)

PomorskiePomorskie: 4.3 %4.3Warszawski stołecznyWarszawski stołeczny: 4 %4Mazowiecki regionalnyMazowiecki regionalny: 3.8 %3.8WielkopolskieWielkopolskie: 3.6 %3.6ŚląskieŚląskie: 3.4 %3.4MałopolskieMałopolskie: 3.2 %3.2PodkarpackiePodkarpackie: 3 %3LubelskieLubelskie: 2.9 %2.9LubuskieLubuskie: 2.5 %2.5DolnośląskieDolnośląskie: 2.2 %2.2Kujawsko-pomorskieKujawsko-pomorskie: 2.2 %2.2ZachodniopomorskieZachodniopomorskie: 2.1 %2.1Warmińsko-mazurskieWarmińsko-mazurskie: 2 %2ŁódzkieŁódzkie: 1.7 %1.7PodlaskiePodlaskie: 1.6 %1.6ŚwiętokrzyskieŚwiętokrzyskie: 1.3 %1.3OpolskieOpolskie: 0.9 %0.9
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankRegions2016 (%)Change on 2015
1Pomorskie Estimated4.3-1.7 pts
2Warszawski stołeczny Estimated4-1.5 pts
3Mazowiecki regionalny Estimated3.8-0.8 pts
4Wielkopolskie Estimated3.6-1.8 pts
5Śląskie Estimated3.4-1.4 pts
6Małopolskie Estimated3.2-2.5 pts
7Podkarpackie Estimated3-1 pts
8Lubelskie Estimated2.9+1.2 pts
9Lubuskie Estimated2.5-0.3 pts
10Dolnośląskie Estimated2.2-1.7 pts
10Kujawsko-pomorskie Estimated2.2-1.6 pts
12Zachodniopomorskie Estimated2.1-1.8 pts
13Warmińsko-mazurskie Estimated2-0.4 pts
14Łódzkie Estimated1.7-1.8 pts
15Podlaskie Estimated1.6-0.3 pts
16Świętokrzyskie Estimated1.3-1.3 pts
17Opolskie Estimated0.9-1.7 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Annual percentage change of GDP in chain-linked volumes, or at constant prices in the World Bank series.

Each value comes from one official source for that place: national statistics offices, Eurostat, for the United States the Bureau of Economic Analysis or, for other countries and the World, the World Bank. Annual values compare one calendar year with the previous one; quarterly values compare a quarter with the same quarter a year earlier. Past values can be revised. United States figures come from BEA tables SAGDP11 for the nation and states and CAGDP11 for counties. Growth in small counties can swing widely from year to year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the regions are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_2gvagr/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Regions of Poland by real GDP growth using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_growth","level":"region","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_growth&level=region&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which region has the highest real GDP growth?

Pomorskie, with 4.3% in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which region has the lowest real GDP growth?

Opolskie, with 0.9% in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP in volume by NUTS 2 region, percentage change on previous year (nama_10r_2gvagr). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Real GDP growth: other rankings

Regions of Poland (NUTS 2): more rankings