US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Houston, TX had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 3005 cities in 2016, at 4,169. Zion, IL had the lowest, at 0. The median was 35. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2016
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2016 | Change on 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston, TX Estimated | 4,169 | -18.4% |
| 2 | Austin, TX Estimated | 3,705 | +30.2% |
| 3 | Fort Worth, TX Estimated | 3,459 | +1.3% |
| 4 | Oklahoma City, OK Estimated | 2,899 | -7.7% |
| 5 | Jacksonville, FL Estimated | 2,678 | +14% |
| 6 | Phoenix, AZ Estimated | 2,479 | +9.4% |
| 7 | Henderson, NV Estimated | 2,223 | +31.1% |
| 8 | McKinney, TX Estimated | 2,208 | +5.6% |
| 9 | Frisco, TX Estimated | 2,204 | -3.3% |
| 10 | San Antonio, TX Estimated | 2,152 | -2.9% |
| 11 | Mesa, AZ Estimated | 2,113 | +21% |
| 12 | El Paso, TX Estimated | 2,014 | -11.7% |
| 13 | Denver, CO Estimated | 1,887 | +2.2% |
| 14 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 1,796 | -2.1% |
| 15 | Durham, NC Estimated | 1,647 | +14.4% |
| 16 | Dallas, TX Estimated | 1,640 | +12.7% |
| 17 | Peoria, AZ Estimated | 1,636 | +3% |
| 18 | Gilbert, AZ Estimated | 1,601 | -12% |
| 19 | Leander, TX Estimated | 1,551 | +31.7% |
| 20 | Buckeye, AZ Estimated | 1,521 | +37.5% |
| 21 | Meridian, ID Estimated | 1,481 | +40.2% |
| 22 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 1,461 | +9.6% |
| 23 | Las Vegas, NV Estimated | 1,454 | -12.5% |
| 24 | Cape Coral, FL Estimated | 1,443 | +32.4% |
| 25 | Omaha, NE Estimated | 1,427 | -4.7% |
| 26 | Raleigh, NC Estimated | 1,412 | +11.6% |
| 27 | Aurora, CO Estimated | 1,344 | +36.3% |
| 28 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,338 | -3.8% |
| 29 | Murfreesboro, TN Estimated | 1,264 | +16.6% |
| 30 | Chandler, AZ Estimated | 1,202 | +4.5% |
| 31 | Pearland, TX Estimated | 1,201 | -13.3% |
| 32 | Lubbock, TX Estimated | 1,193 | +34.2% |
| 33 | Port St. Lucie, FL Estimated | 1,114 | +42.3% |
| 34 | Corpus Christi, TX Estimated | 1,113 | +3.3% |
| 35 | Queen Creek, AZ Estimated | 1,096 | +11% |
| 36 | Huntsville, AL Estimated | 1,091 | +6.9% |
| 37 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 1,086 | +27.5% |
| 38 | New Braunfels, TX Estimated | 1,084 | +16.7% |
| 39 | Little Elm, TX Estimated | 1,081 | -1.9% |
| 40 | Reno, NV Estimated | 1,059 | +0.3% |
| 40 | Sioux Falls, SD Estimated | 1,059 | +43.5% |
| 42 | Cary, NC Estimated | 1,042 | -0.4% |
| 43 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 1,017 | +132.2% |
| 44 | Bend, OR Estimated | 1,014 | +12.8% |
| 45 | Ankeny, IA Estimated | 1,012 | +13.7% |
| 46 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 1,005 | +19.1% |
| 47 | Goodyear, AZ Estimated | 994 | -16.8% |
| 48 | Chesapeake, VA Estimated | 977 | -10.9% |
| 49 | Apex, NC Estimated | 959 | +40.4% |
| 49 | Mount Pleasant, SC Estimated | 959 | +2% |
| 51 | League City, TX Estimated | 955 | -15.9% |
| 52 | Laredo, TX Estimated | 945 | -8.4% |
| 53 | Tampa, FL Estimated | 934 | -10.7% |
| 54 | Lincoln, NE Estimated | 928 | +3.7% |
| 55 | Herriman, UT Estimated | 923 | +10% |
| 56 | Albuquerque, NM Estimated | 913 | -6.2% |
| 57 | Philadelphia, PA Estimated | 904 | +10% |
| 58 | Fort Myers, FL Estimated | 897 | -0.9% |
| 59 | Bluffton, SC Estimated | 891 | +10% |
| 60 | North Port, FL Estimated | 890 | +4.6% |
| 61 | St. Cloud, FL Estimated | 886 | +19.7% |
| 62 | Franklin, TN Estimated | 878 | +25.1% |
| 63 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 862 | -10.9% |
| 64 | Arvada, CO Estimated | 856 | +16.9% |
| 65 | Atlanta, GA Estimated | 855 | +12.5% |
| 65 | South Jordan, UT Estimated | 855 | +13.8% |
| 67 | Fulshear, TX Estimated | 845 | +7.9% |
| 68 | Thornton, CO Estimated | 832 | +64.8% |
| 69 | Portland, OR Estimated | 831 | -5.2% |
| 70 | Kansas City, MO Estimated | 825 | +6.3% |
| 71 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 823 | -37.9% |
| 72 | Seattle, WA Estimated | 797 | -1.6% |
| 73 | St. George, UT Estimated | 796 | +8.2% |
| 74 | North Las Vegas, NV Estimated | 794 | +26% |
| 75 | Clarksville, TN Estimated | 788 | +14.5% |
| 76 | Castle Rock, CO Estimated | 775 | -5.3% |
| 77 | Virginia Beach, VA Estimated | 768 | +10.3% |
| 78 | Saratoga Springs, UT Estimated | 752 | +120.5% |
| 79 | College Station, TX Estimated | 735 | -14.5% |
| 80 | Orlando, FL Estimated | 730 | -14.1% |
| 81 | Anchorage, AK Estimated | 719 | +11% |
| 82 | Tucson, AZ Estimated | 713 | +99.2% |
| 83 | Spring Hill, TN Estimated | 708 | +31.8% |
| 84 | Eagle Mountain, UT Estimated | 701 | +48.8% |
| 85 | Westfield, IN Estimated | 699 | +22.8% |
| 86 | Rio Rancho, NM Estimated | 698 | -1.8% |
| 87 | Charleston, SC Estimated | 692 | +6.3% |
| 87 | Killeen, TX Estimated | 692 | -15% |
| 89 | Holly Springs, NC Estimated | 690 | +5% |
| 90 | Georgetown, TX Estimated | 683 | -46.1% |
| 91 | Boise City, ID Estimated | 682 | +1% |
| 92 | Fort Mill, SC Estimated | 680 | +23.9% |
| 93 | Prosper, TX Estimated | 673 | +2.1% |
| 94 | Lexington, KY Estimated | 670 | +6.5% |
| 95 | Wentzville, MO Estimated | 667 | +8.3% |
| 96 | Columbus, OH Estimated | 649 | -11% |
| 97 | Midland, TX Estimated | 632 | -17% |
| 98 | Amarillo, TX Estimated | 625 | +24.5% |
| 98 | Irving, TX Estimated | 625 | +16% |
| 100 | Wichita, KS Estimated | 624 | +9.9% |
| 101 | Conroe, TX Estimated | 618 | -4.6% |
| 102 | Lehi, UT Estimated | 616 | +15.6% |
| 103 | Chicago, IL Estimated | 613 | +21.9% |
| 103 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 613 | +11.1% |
| 105 | Fuquay-Varina, NC Estimated | 612 | -15.9% |
| 106 | Celina, TX Estimated | 608 | +350.4% |
| 107 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 606 | +14.6% |
| 108 | Marana, AZ Estimated | 596 | -5.8% |
| 109 | Bentonville, AR Estimated | 594 | +22.7% |
| 110 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 593 | +20% |
| 111 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 585 | +29.4% |
| 112 | Chattanooga, TN Estimated | 577 | +26.5% |
| 112 | Vineyard, UT Estimated | 577 | +184.2% |
| 114 | Kyle, TX Estimated | 576 | +10.1% |
| 115 | Denton, TX Estimated | 569 | -25.2% |
| 116 | Brownsville, TX Estimated | 568 | +9.4% |
| 116 | Columbia, MO Estimated | 568 | +10.1% |
| 118 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 565 | +38.5% |
| 119 | Olathe, KS Estimated | 562 | +12.9% |
| 120 | New York, NY Estimated | 561 | +19.6% |
| 120 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 561 | +47.6% |
| 122 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 559 | +15% |
| 123 | Doral, FL Estimated | 558 | -1.8% |
| 124 | Waukee, IA Estimated | 556 | +50.7% |
| 125 | Temple, TX Estimated | 553 | +22.9% |
| 126 | Gallatin, TN Estimated | 551 | +31.8% |
| 127 | Greensboro, NC Estimated | 549 | -5.3% |
| 128 | Palm Coast, FL Estimated | 538 | +51.5% |
| 129 | Caldwell, ID Estimated | 537 | +20.9% |
| 130 | Cedar Park, TX Estimated | 535 | +21.9% |
| 131 | Scottsdale, AZ Estimated | 534 | -1.1% |
| 132 | Fishers, IN Estimated | 527 | +4.8% |
| 133 | Billings, MT Estimated | 525 | -18.1% |
| 134 | Maricopa, AZ Estimated | 524 | +62.7% |
| 135 | Broomfield, CO Estimated | 523 | +29.8% |
| 135 | Surprise, AZ Estimated | 523 | -2.6% |
| 137 | Greer, SC Estimated | 521 | +79% |
| 138 | North Charleston, SC Estimated | 515 | +6.6% |
| 139 | Clayton, NC Estimated | 514 | +48.6% |
| 140 | Lake Forest, CA Estimated | 513 | +76.3% |
| 141 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 512 | +67.9% |
| 142 | Wake Forest, NC Estimated | 510 | -5.6% |
| 143 | Bluffdale, UT Estimated | 509 | +105.2% |
| 144 | Auburn, AL Estimated | 497 | +3.1% |
| 145 | Eagle, ID Estimated | 493 | +12.3% |
| 146 | Gastonia, NC Estimated | 492 | +35.5% |
| 146 | Nampa, ID Estimated | 492 | +37.8% |
| 148 | Plano, TX Estimated | 491 | +6.7% |
| 149 | Madison, AL Estimated | 490 | +5.2% |
| 149 | Sparks, NV Estimated | 490 | -26% |
| 151 | Fort Collins, CO Estimated | 488 | -4.7% |
| 152 | Clermont, FL Estimated | 484 | +50.3% |
| 153 | Fayetteville, AR Estimated | 481 | +27.2% |
| 154 | Leland, NC Estimated | 480 | +11.9% |
| 154 | Noblesville, IN Estimated | 480 | -5.5% |
| 156 | Fargo, ND Estimated | 474 | -9.9% |
| 156 | Hayward, CA Estimated | 474 | +57.5% |
| 156 | Midlothian, TX Estimated | 474 | +14.5% |
| 159 | Prescott Valley, AZ Estimated | 472 | +13.2% |
| 160 | Pflugerville, TX Estimated | 466 | +9.1% |
| 161 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 458 | +0.4% |
| 162 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 455 | -31.6% |
| 163 | Lakeville, MN Estimated | 454 | +9.7% |
| 164 | Round Rock, TX Estimated | 453 | +24.1% |
| 164 | Winston-Salem, NC Estimated | 453 | -17.2% |
| 166 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 450 | -7.2% |
| 166 | McAllen, TX Estimated | 450 | -12.6% |
| 166 | Scranton, PA Estimated | 450 | +8.7% |
| 169 | Yuma, AZ Estimated | 449 | +17.2% |
| 170 | Broken Arrow, OK Estimated | 448 | +6.2% |
| 170 | Odessa, TX Estimated | 448 | -4.3% |
| 170 | Ontario, CA Estimated | 448 | +54% |
| 173 | Allen, TX Estimated | 447 | -4.1% |
| 174 | Parkland, FL Estimated | 444 | +3.3% |
| 175 | Commerce City, CO Estimated | 442 | +47.8% |
| 176 | Gainesville, GA Estimated | 441 | +8.1% |
| 177 | Tulsa, OK Estimated | 436 | +26.7% |
| 178 | Erie, CO Estimated | 434 | +1.2% |
| 179 | Winter Haven, FL Estimated | 433 | +22.3% |
| 180 | Jonesboro, AR Estimated | 430 | +49.3% |
| 181 | Overland Park, KS Estimated | 429 | +10.9% |
| 181 | Palm Bay, FL Estimated | 429 | +32.8% |
| 181 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 429 | +33.2% |
| 184 | Mount Juliet, TN Estimated | 428 | +44.6% |
| 185 | Manvel, TX Estimated | 427 | +27.1% |
| 186 | Valdosta, GA Estimated | 424 | +532.8% |
| 186 | Waxahachie, TX Estimated | 424 | +22.2% |
| 188 | Carmel, IN Estimated | 423 | +53.8% |
| 189 | Las Cruces, NM Estimated | 418 | +12.4% |
| 190 | Edinburg, TX Estimated | 414 | +14% |
| 190 | Fremont, CA Estimated | 414 | +101% |
| 190 | Wylie, TX Estimated | 414 | -20.8% |
| 193 | Rogers, AR Estimated | 411 | +4.1% |
| 194 | Winter Garden, FL Estimated | 410 | -23.6% |
| 195 | West Fargo, ND Estimated | 409 | -14.1% |
| 196 | Waco, TX Estimated | 408 | +7.7% |
| 197 | Centerton, AR Estimated | 405 | +45.7% |
| 198 | St. Petersburg, FL Estimated | 404 | +34.7% |
| 199 | Rochester, MN Estimated | 403 | +12.3% |
| 200 | Flower Mound, TX Estimated | 397 | -13.7% |
| 201 | Myrtle Beach, SC Estimated | 395 | -0.8% |
| 201 | Suffolk, VA Estimated | 395 | +9.1% |
| 203 | Edmond, OK Estimated | 394 | -25.7% |
| 203 | Rosenberg, TX Estimated | 394 | +5.9% |
| 205 | Bryan, TX Estimated | 392 | +44.6% |
| 205 | Grand Prairie, TX Estimated | 392 | -17.1% |
| 205 | Loveland, CO Estimated | 392 | -15.5% |
| 208 | Lewisville, TX Estimated | 390 | +17.5% |
| 208 | Washington, UT Estimated | 390 | +4.6% |
| 210 | Hialeah, FL Estimated | 388 | +417.3% |
| 211 | Pasco, WA Estimated | 387 | +26.9% |
| 212 | West Jordan, UT Estimated | 385 | +4.1% |
| 213 | O'Fallon, MO Estimated | 383 | +1.3% |
| 214 | Bonita Springs, FL Estimated | 382 | -25.2% |
| 215 | Groveland, FL Estimated | 378 | +24.3% |
| 215 | Kissimmee, FL Estimated | 378 | +10.9% |
| 215 | Norfolk, VA Estimated | 378 | -6.7% |
| 218 | Cibolo, TX Estimated | 377 | -8.5% |
| 219 | Apopka, FL Estimated | 373 | +17.3% |
| 219 | Bozeman, MT Estimated | 373 | +30% |
| 219 | Hoover, AL Estimated | 373 | +4.2% |
| 222 | Conway, SC Estimated | 372 | +51.2% |
| 222 | Kuna, ID Estimated | 372 | +82.4% |
| 224 | Chino, CA Estimated | 370 | -6.6% |
| 224 | Lake Stevens, WA Estimated | 370 | +92.7% |
| 224 | Manor, TX Estimated | 370 | +61.6% |
| 224 | Mansfield, TX Estimated | 370 | +15.6% |
| 224 | Smyrna, TN Estimated | 370 | +55.5% |
| 229 | Homestead, FL Estimated | 369 | -11.7% |
| 229 | Spokane, WA Estimated | 369 | +9.2% |
| 231 | Hutto, TX Estimated | 367 | +18.8% |
| 232 | Hurricane, UT Estimated | 366 | +52.5% |
| 232 | Venice, FL Estimated | 366 | +161.4% |
| 234 | Bismarck, ND Estimated | 365 | -1.6% |
| 235 | DeLand, FL Estimated | 363 | +4.6% |
| 235 | Norman, OK Estimated | 363 | -23.9% |
| 237 | Katy, TX Estimated | 362 | +6.5% |
| 238 | Lake Charles, LA Estimated | 358 | +39.8% |
| 239 | Tigard, OR Estimated | 356 | +339.5% |
| 240 | Avondale, AZ Estimated | 355 | +188.6% |
| 241 | Buda, TX Estimated | 354 | -11.1% |
| 242 | Fate, TX Estimated | 353 | +63.4% |
| 243 | San Marcos, TX Estimated | 352 | +27.1% |
| 244 | Fairhope, AL Estimated | 348 | +14.9% |
| 245 | Papillion, NE Estimated | 346 | +33.1% |
| 246 | Newnan, GA Estimated | 345 | +2.7% |
| 247 | Burleson, TX Estimated | 340 | -15.2% |
| 247 | Madison, WI Estimated | 340 | +13.3% |
| 247 | Southaven, MS Estimated | 340 | +19.3% |
| 250 | Medford, OR Estimated | 339 | +39.5% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 82 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2016 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2016. U.S. Census Bureau, 1 May 2017, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2016.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2017) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_single_2016,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2016}},
year = {2017},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2016. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South\%20Region/so2016a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2016
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/05/01
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2016
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2016.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2016a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Houston, TX, with 4,169 in 2016, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Zion, IL, with 0 in 2016.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 82 cities have no value for 2016 and are not ranked.
Single-family housing units authorized by building permits: other rankings
US cities: more rankings
- Rent-burdened renter households (rent 30 percent or more of income)
- Average household size
- Homeownership rate (US, housing units)
- Median gross rent (monthly)
- Residents who moved from another county in the past year
- Bachelor's degree or higher, population 25 and over
- Graduate or professional degree, population 25 and over
- Foreign-born population share