US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Houston, TX had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 2994 cities in 2015, at 5,112. Zion, IL had the lowest, at 0. The median was 32. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2015
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2015 | Change on 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston, TX Estimated | 5,112 | -5.3% |
| 2 | Fort Worth, TX Estimated | 3,416 | +9.5% |
| 3 | Oklahoma City, OK Estimated | 3,141 | -5% |
| 4 | Austin, TX Estimated | 2,846 | +1.6% |
| 5 | Jacksonville, FL Estimated | 2,350 | +11.6% |
| 6 | El Paso, TX Estimated | 2,282 | +12.9% |
| 7 | Frisco, TX Estimated | 2,280 | +5.3% |
| 8 | Phoenix, AZ Estimated | 2,265 | +40.9% |
| 9 | San Antonio, TX Estimated | 2,217 | -2.3% |
| 10 | McKinney, TX Estimated | 2,090 | +22.4% |
| 11 | Denver, CO Estimated | 1,847 | +8% |
| 12 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 1,834 | +10% |
| 13 | Gilbert, AZ Estimated | 1,819 | +26.8% |
| 14 | Mesa, AZ Estimated | 1,746 | +73.6% |
| 15 | Henderson, NV Estimated | 1,696 | +34.2% |
| 16 | Las Vegas, NV Estimated | 1,662 | +14.4% |
| 17 | Peoria, AZ Estimated | 1,589 | +53.8% |
| 18 | Omaha, NE Estimated | 1,498 | +14.7% |
| 19 | Dallas, TX Estimated | 1,455 | +23.2% |
| 20 | Durham, NC Estimated | 1,440 | +24.8% |
| 21 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,391 | +8.9% |
| 22 | Pearland, TX Estimated | 1,386 | +29.8% |
| 23 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 1,333 | -14.8% |
| 24 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 1,325 | +86.1% |
| 25 | Georgetown, TX Estimated | 1,267 | +4.9% |
| 26 | Raleigh, NC Estimated | 1,265 | -4% |
| 27 | Goodyear, AZ Estimated | 1,194 | +50.8% |
| 28 | Leander, TX Estimated | 1,178 | +9.2% |
| 29 | Chandler, AZ Estimated | 1,150 | +76.1% |
| 30 | League City, TX Estimated | 1,135 | +14.6% |
| 31 | Buckeye, AZ Estimated | 1,106 | +47.7% |
| 32 | Little Elm, TX Estimated | 1,102 | +23.5% |
| 33 | Chesapeake, VA Estimated | 1,097 | +29.7% |
| 34 | Cape Coral, FL Estimated | 1,090 | +64.4% |
| 35 | Murfreesboro, TN Estimated | 1,084 | +32% |
| 36 | Corpus Christi, TX Estimated | 1,077 | -8.9% |
| 37 | Meridian, ID Estimated | 1,056 | +38.2% |
| 37 | Reno, NV Estimated | 1,056 | +23.1% |
| 39 | Cary, NC Estimated | 1,046 | -7.4% |
| 39 | Tampa, FL Estimated | 1,046 | +46.9% |
| 41 | Laredo, TX Estimated | 1,032 | +8.2% |
| 42 | Huntsville, AL Estimated | 1,021 | +13.8% |
| 43 | Queen Creek, AZ Estimated | 987 | +42.4% |
| 44 | Aurora, CO Estimated | 986 | +18.5% |
| 45 | Albuquerque, NM Estimated | 973 | -12.3% |
| 46 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 967 | +49.9% |
| 47 | Mount Pleasant, SC Estimated | 940 | +27.2% |
| 48 | New Braunfels, TX Estimated | 929 | -11.9% |
| 49 | Fort Myers, FL Estimated | 905 | +26.4% |
| 50 | Bend, OR Estimated | 899 | +13.7% |
| 51 | Lincoln, NE Estimated | 895 | +4.8% |
| 52 | Ankeny, IA Estimated | 890 | -8.6% |
| 53 | Lubbock, TX Estimated | 889 | +0.1% |
| 54 | Portland, OR Estimated | 877 | +10.7% |
| 55 | College Station, TX Estimated | 860 | +19.1% |
| 56 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 852 | +41.1% |
| 57 | North Port, FL Estimated | 851 | +52.8% |
| 58 | Orlando, FL Estimated | 850 | -7.1% |
| 59 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 844 | +31.7% |
| 60 | Herriman, UT Estimated | 839 | +59.8% |
| 61 | Philadelphia, PA Estimated | 822 | +8.7% |
| 62 | Largo, FL Estimated | 820 | +1,763.6% |
| 63 | Castle Rock, CO Estimated | 818 | -0.4% |
| 64 | Killeen, TX Estimated | 814 | -1.8% |
| 65 | Bluffton, SC Estimated | 810 | +38.5% |
| 65 | Seattle, WA Estimated | 810 | -9.8% |
| 67 | Fulshear, TX Estimated | 783 | +32.9% |
| 67 | Port St. Lucie, FL Estimated | 783 | +43.7% |
| 69 | Kansas City, MO Estimated | 776 | +18.3% |
| 70 | Denton, TX Estimated | 761 | +16.2% |
| 70 | Midland, TX Estimated | 761 | -17% |
| 72 | Atlanta, GA Estimated | 760 | +39.4% |
| 73 | South Jordan, UT Estimated | 751 | -6.8% |
| 74 | St. Cloud, FL Estimated | 740 | +33.6% |
| 75 | Sioux Falls, SD Estimated | 738 | -12.4% |
| 76 | St. George, UT Estimated | 736 | -2.3% |
| 77 | Arvada, CO Estimated | 732 | +22.6% |
| 78 | Columbus, OH Estimated | 729 | +0.7% |
| 79 | Fuquay-Varina, NC Estimated | 728 | +45.9% |
| 80 | Rio Rancho, NM Estimated | 711 | -4% |
| 81 | Franklin, TN Estimated | 702 | +47.2% |
| 82 | Virginia Beach, VA Estimated | 696 | +1.2% |
| 83 | Clarksville, TN Estimated | 688 | -19.1% |
| 84 | Apex, NC Estimated | 683 | +18.2% |
| 85 | Boise City, ID Estimated | 675 | +44.5% |
| 86 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 665 | +16.5% |
| 87 | Sparks, NV Estimated | 662 | +79.4% |
| 88 | Prosper, TX Estimated | 659 | +18.3% |
| 89 | Holly Springs, NC Estimated | 657 | +61.8% |
| 90 | Charleston, SC Estimated | 651 | +8.5% |
| 91 | Anchorage, AK Estimated | 648 | +13.3% |
| 91 | Conroe, TX Estimated | 648 | -25.6% |
| 93 | Billings, MT Estimated | 641 | +35.5% |
| 94 | Marana, AZ Estimated | 633 | -0.9% |
| 95 | North Las Vegas, NV Estimated | 630 | +33.8% |
| 96 | Lexington, KY Estimated | 629 | -8.4% |
| 97 | Wentzville, MO Estimated | 616 | +9.2% |
| 98 | Greensboro, NC Estimated | 580 | +39.8% |
| 99 | Schertz, TX Estimated | 575 | +92.3% |
| 100 | Westfield, IN Estimated | 569 | +37.1% |
| 101 | Doral, FL Estimated | 568 | +38.5% |
| 101 | Wichita, KS Estimated | 568 | +3.3% |
| 103 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 552 | +29.3% |
| 104 | Fort Mill, SC Estimated | 549 | +117% |
| 105 | Winston-Salem, NC Estimated | 547 | +6.4% |
| 106 | Scottsdale, AZ Estimated | 540 | +8.2% |
| 106 | Wake Forest, NC Estimated | 540 | +16.4% |
| 108 | Irving, TX Estimated | 539 | +10% |
| 109 | Spring Hill, TN Estimated | 537 | -6% |
| 109 | Surprise, AZ Estimated | 537 | +67.8% |
| 109 | Winter Garden, FL Estimated | 537 | +17.8% |
| 112 | Lehi, UT Estimated | 533 | +17.7% |
| 113 | Edmond, OK Estimated | 530 | -5.5% |
| 114 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 529 | -35.2% |
| 115 | Fargo, ND Estimated | 526 | +39.5% |
| 116 | Kyle, TX Estimated | 523 | +3.6% |
| 116 | Wylie, TX Estimated | 523 | +108.4% |
| 118 | Brownsville, TX Estimated | 519 | -5.5% |
| 119 | Columbia, MO Estimated | 516 | +16.2% |
| 120 | McAllen, TX Estimated | 515 | +25% |
| 121 | Greeley, CO Estimated | 513 | +42.1% |
| 122 | Fort Collins, CO Estimated | 512 | -31% |
| 123 | Bonita Springs, FL Estimated | 511 | -15.5% |
| 124 | Noblesville, IN Estimated | 508 | +14.7% |
| 125 | Thornton, CO Estimated | 505 | +36.5% |
| 126 | Chicago, IL Estimated | 503 | -6.2% |
| 126 | Fishers, IN Estimated | 503 | -10.8% |
| 128 | Amarillo, TX Estimated | 502 | +7% |
| 129 | Olathe, KS Estimated | 498 | +0.8% |
| 130 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 494 | +15.7% |
| 131 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 486 | +2.1% |
| 131 | Morrisville, NC Estimated | 486 | +7.8% |
| 133 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 485 | +6.8% |
| 134 | Bentonville, AR Estimated | 484 | +7.8% |
| 135 | North Charleston, SC Estimated | 483 | +25.1% |
| 136 | Auburn, AL Estimated | 482 | +12.9% |
| 137 | Norman, OK Estimated | 477 | -11.5% |
| 138 | West Fargo, ND Estimated | 476 | -12% |
| 139 | Grand Prairie, TX Estimated | 473 | +20.1% |
| 140 | Eagle Mountain, UT Estimated | 471 | +32.7% |
| 141 | New York, NY Estimated | 469 | -13.3% |
| 142 | Odessa, TX Estimated | 468 | +8.8% |
| 143 | Allen, TX Estimated | 466 | -7.4% |
| 143 | Madison, AL Estimated | 466 | +37.9% |
| 145 | Loveland, CO Estimated | 464 | +49.2% |
| 146 | Flower Mound, TX Estimated | 460 | +29.6% |
| 146 | Plano, TX Estimated | 460 | -12.2% |
| 148 | Chattanooga, TN Estimated | 456 | +30.7% |
| 148 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 456 | +35.7% |
| 150 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 452 | -7.9% |
| 151 | Temple, TX Estimated | 450 | -27.3% |
| 152 | Caldwell, ID Estimated | 444 | +8% |
| 153 | Cedar Park, TX Estimated | 439 | -26.3% |
| 153 | Eagle, ID Estimated | 439 | +10.6% |
| 155 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 438 | +71.1% |
| 156 | Parkland, FL Estimated | 430 | -21.4% |
| 157 | Erie, CO Estimated | 429 | +49.5% |
| 157 | Leland, NC Estimated | 429 | +3.4% |
| 159 | Pflugerville, TX Estimated | 427 | -28.5% |
| 160 | Broken Arrow, OK Estimated | 422 | -13.2% |
| 161 | Gallatin, TN Estimated | 418 | +13.6% |
| 161 | Homestead, FL Estimated | 418 | +69.9% |
| 163 | Gilroy, CA Estimated | 417 | +71.6% |
| 163 | Prescott Valley, AZ Estimated | 417 | +26.7% |
| 165 | Lakeville, MN Estimated | 414 | +19.3% |
| 165 | Midlothian, TX Estimated | 414 | +48.9% |
| 165 | Scranton, PA Estimated | 414 | -76.1% |
| 168 | Cibolo, TX Estimated | 412 | +8.7% |
| 169 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA Estimated | 410 | +60.8% |
| 170 | Gainesville, GA Estimated | 408 | +61.3% |
| 170 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 408 | -16.7% |
| 172 | Norfolk, VA Estimated | 405 | +3.1% |
| 173 | Broomfield, CO Estimated | 403 | -8.2% |
| 173 | Rancho Cordova, CA Estimated | 403 | +142.8% |
| 175 | Burleson, TX Estimated | 401 | -2.9% |
| 176 | Buda, TX Estimated | 398 | -8.9% |
| 176 | Myrtle Beach, SC Estimated | 398 | -10.2% |
| 178 | Chino, CA Estimated | 396 | +33.3% |
| 179 | Rogers, AR Estimated | 395 | +20.4% |
| 180 | Rockwall, TX Estimated | 388 | +45.9% |
| 181 | Overland Park, KS Estimated | 387 | +0.8% |
| 182 | Fairfield, CA Estimated | 383 | +21.2% |
| 182 | Yuma, AZ Estimated | 383 | +27.7% |
| 184 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 380 | +27.9% |
| 185 | Arlington, TX Estimated | 379 | -19.4% |
| 185 | Waco, TX Estimated | 379 | -1.6% |
| 187 | Fayetteville, AR Estimated | 378 | -31.1% |
| 187 | O'Fallon, MO Estimated | 378 | +9.9% |
| 187 | Woodstock, GA Estimated | 378 | +35% |
| 190 | Melissa, TX Estimated | 375 | +52.4% |
| 191 | Washington, UT Estimated | 373 | -5.1% |
| 192 | Las Cruces, NM Estimated | 372 | +29.6% |
| 192 | Rosenberg, TX Estimated | 372 | +50% |
| 194 | Bismarck, ND Estimated | 371 | -35.4% |
| 195 | West Jordan, UT Estimated | 370 | +31.7% |
| 196 | Vacaville, CA Estimated | 369 | +167.4% |
| 196 | Waukee, IA Estimated | 369 | +25.5% |
| 198 | Youngsville, LA Estimated | 368 | +4.2% |
| 199 | Vancouver, WA Estimated | 366 | +93.7% |
| 200 | Round Rock, TX Estimated | 365 | -12.9% |
| 201 | Edinburg, TX Estimated | 363 | +28.7% |
| 201 | Gastonia, NC Estimated | 363 | +54.5% |
| 203 | Suffolk, VA Estimated | 362 | +21.9% |
| 204 | Rochester, MN Estimated | 359 | +2% |
| 205 | Hoover, AL Estimated | 358 | -13.3% |
| 205 | Tucson, AZ Estimated | 358 | -30.8% |
| 207 | Nampa, ID Estimated | 357 | +16.7% |
| 208 | Palm Coast, FL Estimated | 355 | +4.7% |
| 209 | Winter Haven, FL Estimated | 354 | -1.4% |
| 210 | Baton Rouge, LA Estimated | 352 | +51.7% |
| 210 | Wilsonville, OR Estimated | 352 | +45.5% |
| 212 | DeLand, FL Estimated | 347 | +3.6% |
| 212 | Waxahachie, TX Estimated | 347 | +10.5% |
| 214 | Clayton, NC Estimated | 346 | +26.7% |
| 215 | Carrollton, TX Estimated | 345 | -5% |
| 216 | Tulsa, OK Estimated | 344 | -14.4% |
| 217 | Lathrop, CA Estimated | 343 | +98.3% |
| 218 | Kissimmee, FL Estimated | 341 | +25.8% |
| 218 | Saratoga Springs, UT Estimated | 341 | +47% |
| 220 | Katy, TX Estimated | 340 | +85.8% |
| 221 | Jersey City, NJ Estimated | 338 | +71.6% |
| 221 | Spokane, WA Estimated | 338 | +51.6% |
| 223 | Manvel, TX Estimated | 336 | +8.4% |
| 223 | Newnan, GA Estimated | 336 | +6.3% |
| 225 | Livermore, CA Estimated | 334 | +370.4% |
| 226 | Lewisville, TX Estimated | 332 | +83.4% |
| 226 | Little Rock, AR Estimated | 332 | -1.8% |
| 228 | Naperville, IL Estimated | 328 | -12.5% |
| 228 | Savannah, GA Estimated | 328 | -3.8% |
| 230 | Parker, CO Estimated | 325 | -6.6% |
| 231 | Palm Bay, FL Estimated | 323 | +99.4% |
| 232 | Clermont, FL Estimated | 322 | +22.4% |
| 232 | Maricopa, AZ Estimated | 322 | +13.4% |
| 232 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 322 | +6.3% |
| 235 | Mansfield, TX Estimated | 320 | +42.9% |
| 236 | Lawrence, KS Estimated | 319 | +143.5% |
| 237 | Apopka, FL Estimated | 318 | +8.9% |
| 238 | Happy Valley, OR Estimated | 317 | -10.5% |
| 238 | Milton, GA Estimated | 317 | -7.8% |
| 240 | Lebanon, TN Estimated | 314 | +15.4% |
| 241 | Kirkland, WA Estimated | 313 | +29.9% |
| 241 | Lee's Summit, MO Estimated | 313 | -2.5% |
| 243 | Springdale, AR Estimated | 312 | +39.3% |
| 244 | Hutto, TX Estimated | 309 | -28% |
| 245 | Lacey, WA Estimated | 308 | -1.9% |
| 246 | Longmont, CO Estimated | 307 | +46.9% |
| 247 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 305 | +22% |
| 247 | Pasco, WA Estimated | 305 | +39.3% |
| 249 | Groveland, FL Estimated | 304 | -9.8% |
| 250 | Fairhope, AL Estimated | 303 | +13.9% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 93 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2015 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, 30 Sept. 2016, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2016. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2015.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2016) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_single_2015,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015}},
year = {2016},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2015. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South\%20Region/so2015a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/09/30
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2015
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/us-cities?period=2015.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/South%20Region/so2015a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Houston, TX, with 5,112 in 2015, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Zion, IL, with 0 in 2015.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 93 cities have no value for 2015 and are not ranked.
Single-family housing units authorized by building permits: other rankings
US cities: more rankings
- Rent-burdened renter households (rent 30 percent or more of income)
- Average household size
- Homeownership rate (US, housing units)
- Median gross rent (monthly)
- Residents who moved from another county in the past year
- Bachelor's degree or higher, population 25 and over
- Graduate or professional degree, population 25 and over
- Foreign-born population share