Municipalities in Palencia province by registered unemployment

Name: Municipalities in Palencia province by registered unemployment, September 2021
Creator: Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal
License: Spanish public sector information reuse (Ley 37/2007, attribution required)

Palencia had the highest registered unemployment of 191 municipalities in September 2021, at 4,907. Villodre had the lowest, at 0. The median was 4 and the figure for Palencia province was 8,774. Source: the Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal.

Highest4,907Palencia

Lowest0Villodre

Median4191 municipalities

Palencia province8,774History

Top 40 municipalities, September 2021

CSV Chart (SVG)

persons. Source: SEPE. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	September 2021 persons	Change on September 2020
1	Palencia	4,907	-6.7%
2	Guardo	435	-12.3%
3	Venta de Baños	430	-8.5%
4	Aguilar de Campoo	366	-15.1%
5	Villamuriel de Cerrato	361	-1.6%
6	Saldaña	153	-11%
7	Dueñas	143	-8.3%
8	Paredes de Nava	108	-7.7%
9	Grijota	97	-23.6%
10	Herrera de Pisuerga	96	-20.7%
11	Villalobón	88	-17%
12	Cervera de Pisuerga	84	-24.3%
13	Carrión de los Condes	78	-32.8%
14	Torquemada	68	-10.5%
15	Magaz de Pisuerga	67	-2.9%
16	Velilla del Río Carrión	62	-20.5%
17	Barruelo de Santullán	60	-24.1%
18	Monzón de Campos	56	+24.4%
19	Osorno la Mayor	47	-25.4%
20	Alar del Rey	45	-6.3%
21	Baltanás	43	0%
22	Tariego de Cerrato	40	+5.3%
23	Villarramiel	39	-2.5%
24	Santibáñez de la Peña	36	-20%
25	Becerril de Campos	27	-32.5%
25	Villada	27	-6.9%
27	Frómista	24	-29.4%
28	Astudillo	23	+9.5%
28	Pomar de Valdivia	23	0%
28	Villaumbrales	23	-20.7%
31	Fuentes de Valdepero	21	+10.5%
32	Santervás de la Vega	19	+5.6%
33	Cisneros	18	+20%
33	La Pernía	18	+100%
35	Ampudia	16	+45.5%
35	Calzada de los Molinos	16	0%
37	Poza de la Vega	15	+50%
37	San Cebrián de Campos	15	+7.1%
37	Villaluenga de la Vega	15	-21.1%
40	Prádanos de Ojeda	14	0%
40	Villota del Páramo	14	-12.5%
42	Brañosera	13	-23.5%
42	Buenavista de Valdavia	13	-31.6%
42	Salinas de Pisuerga	13	+30%
45	Mazariegos	12	+71.4%
46	Castrejón de la Peña	11	0%
46	Cervatos de la Cueza	11	+10%
46	Fuentes de Nava	11	-31.3%
46	Pedrosa de la Vega	11	-26.7%
50	Bustillo de la Vega	9	0%
50	Dehesa de Montejo	9	+12.5%
50	Fresno del Río	9	+12.5%
50	Husillos	9	0%
50	Lantadilla	9	+125%
50	Palenzuela	9	-10%
50	Villasarracino	9	+12.5%
50	Villaviudas	9	-25%
58	Castromocho	8	+14.3%
58	Cevico de la Torre	8	0%
58	Melgar de Yuso	8	-27.3%
58	Quintana del Puente	8	-33.3%
58	Revenga de Campos	8	0%
63	Boadilla de Rioseco	7	-12.5%
63	Piña de Campos	7	+75%
63	Quintanilla de Onsoña	7	-22.2%
63	Sotobañado y Priorato	7	-22.2%
63	Villalba de Guardo	7	-36.4%
63	Villamartín de Campos	7	-30%
63	Villaturde	7	-22.2%
70	Herrera de Valdecañas	6	+20%
70	Mantinos	6	+50%
70	Villaherreros	6	+100%
73	Autillo de Campos	5	0%
73	Berzosilla	5	+25%
73	Boadilla del Camino	5	0%
73	Castrillo de Don Juan	5	-37.5%
73	Congosto de Valdavia	5	0%
73	Frechilla	5	-37.5%
73	Población de Campos	5	-44.4%
73	Población de Cerrato	5	0%
73	Renedo de la Vega	5	+25%
73	Ribas de Campos	5	+66.7%
73	Soto de Cerrato	5	-16.7%
73	Tabanera de Cerrato	5	0%
73	Villameriel	5	+25%
73	Villamoronta	5	-28.6%
73	Villerías de Campos	5	+66.7%
73	Villoldo	5	-44.4%
89	Autilla del Pino	4	+33.3%
89	Castrillo de Villavega	4	0%
89	Loma de Ucieza	4	-20%
89	Moratinos	4	0%
89	Olmos de Ojeda	4	+33.3%
89	Osornillo	4	+100%
89	Páramo de Boedo	4	+33.3%
89	Pino del Río	4	-33.3%
89	San Cebrián de Mudá	4	-20%
89	Triollo	4	+33.3%
89	Valle de Cerrato	4	-20%
89	Villalcázar de Sirga	4	-33.3%
89	Villanuño de Valdavia	4	-20%
102	Abia de las Torres	3	+200%
102	Alba de Cerrato	3	-25%
102	Amayuelas de Arriba	3	n/a
102	Amusco	3	-78.6%
102	Antigüedad	3	-25%
102	Báscones de Ojeda	3	-40%
102	Calahorra de Boedo	3	-25%
102	Cobos de Cerrato	3	-25%
102	Cordovilla la Real	3	0%
102	Cubillas de Cerrato	3	-40%
102	Dehesa de Romanos	3	+200%
102	Espinosa de Villagonzalo	3	0%
102	Hornillos de Cerrato	3	0%
102	Itero de la Vega	3	-25%
102	La Vid de Ojeda	3	+50%
102	Meneses de Campos	3	n/a
102	Pedraza de Campos	3	0%
102	Reinoso de Cerrato	3	0%
102	Torremormojón	3	+50%
102	Valle del Retortillo	3	-25%
102	Villahán	3	+50%
102	Villarrabé	3	-25%
102	Villasila de Valdavia	3	n/a
125	Ayuela	2	0%
125	Capillas	2	-33.3%
125	Castil de Vela	2	0%
125	Castrillo de Onielo	2	+100%
125	La Serna	2	0%
125	Lagartos	2	+100%
125	Marcilla de Campos	2	0%
125	Polentinos	2	+100%
125	Respenda de la Peña	2	0%
125	Revilla de Collazos	2	0%
125	Santa Cecilia del Alcor	2	0%
125	Santa Cruz de Boedo	2	0%
125	Santibáñez de Ecla	2	n/a
125	Santoyo	2	-33.3%
125	Valde-Ucieza	2	0%
125	Valderrábano	2	+100%
125	Vertavillo	2	+100%
125	Villacidaler	2	+100%
125	Villamediana	2	-33.3%
125	Villaprovedo	2	0%
125	Villarmentero de Campos	2	+100%
125	Villodrigo	2	-33.3%
125	Villovieco	2	0%
148	Baquerín de Campos	1	n/a
148	Bárcena de Campos	1	-50%
148	Belmonte de Campos	1	0%
148	Bustillo del Páramo de Carrión	1	-50%
148	Cevico Navero	1	-66.7%
148	Collazos de Boedo	1	0%
148	Espinosa de Cerrato	1	-50%
148	Hérmedes de Cerrato	1	n/a
148	Hontoria de Cerrato	1	-50%
148	Manquillos	1	0%
148	Perales	1	n/a
148	Riberos de la Cueza	1	0%
148	San Mamés de Campos	1	n/a
148	San Román de la Cuba	1	0%
148	Támara de Campos	1	0%
148	Villaconancio	1	0%
164	Abarca de Campos	0	-100%
164	Arconada	0	-100%
164	Boada de Campos	0	n/a
164	Cardeñosa de Volpejera	0	n/a
164	Guaza de Campos	0	n/a
164	La Puebla de Valdavia	0	-100%
164	Ledigos	0	-100%
164	Lomas	0	n/a
164	Mazuecos de Valdeginate	0	-100%
164	Micieces de Ojeda	0	-100%
164	Mudá	0	-100%
164	Nogal de las Huertas	0	n/a
164	Olea de Boedo	0	-100%
164	Payo de Ojeda	0	n/a
164	Población de Arroyo	0	n/a
164	Pozo de Urama	0	n/a
164	Requena de Campos	0	-100%
164	San Cristóbal de Boedo	0	n/a
164	Tabanera de Valdavia	0	-100%
164	Valbuena de Pisuerga	0	n/a
164	Valdeolmillos	0	-100%
164	Villabasta de Valdavia	0	n/a
164	Villaeles de Valdavia	0	n/a
164	Villalaco	0	n/a
164	Villalcón	0	n/a
164	Villamuera de la Cueza	0	n/a
164	Villanueva del Rebollar	0	n/a
164	Villodre	0	n/a

Other periods

About this ranking

Job seekers registered as unemployed at public employment offices on the last working day of the month.

Administrative count, available down to municipality. Not the survey-based unemployment rate.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal (SEPE). Paro registrado por municipios. https://sede.sepe.gob.es/es/portaltrabaja/resources/sede/datos_abiertos/datos/Paro_por_municipios_2021_csv.csv. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Palencia province by registered unemployment using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"registered_unemployment","level":"municipality","within":"Palencia","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=registered_unemployment&level=municipality&within=Palencia&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest registered unemployment?

Palencia, with 4,907 in September 2021, according to the Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal.

Which municipality has the lowest registered unemployment?

Villodre, with 0 in September 2021.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal, Paro registrado por municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-08.