Municipalities in Palencia province by registered unemployment

Name: Municipalities in Palencia province by registered unemployment, February 2021
Creator: Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal
License: Spanish public sector information reuse (Ley 37/2007, attribution required)

Palencia had the highest registered unemployment of 191 municipalities in February 2021, at 5,892. Villodre had the lowest, at 0. The median was 5 and the figure for Palencia province was 10,873. Source: the Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal.

Highest5,892Palencia

Lowest0Villodre

Median5191 municipalities

Palencia province10,873History

Top 40 municipalities, February 2021

CSV Chart (SVG)

persons. Source: SEPE. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Municipalities	February 2021 persons	Change on February 2020
1	Palencia	5,892	+18.9%
2	Guardo	548	+18.4%
3	Venta de Baños	509	+25.7%
4	Aguilar de Campoo	469	+18.1%
5	Villamuriel de Cerrato	433	+25.9%
6	Saldaña	213	+36.5%
7	Dueñas	171	+23.9%
8	Grijota	147	+40%
9	Cervera de Pisuerga	137	+9.6%
10	Herrera de Pisuerga	128	+10.3%
11	Paredes de Nava	127	+11.4%
12	Carrión de los Condes	122	+22%
13	Villalobón	102	+14.6%
14	Barruelo de Santullán	90	+4.7%
15	Velilla del Río Carrión	82	-11.8%
16	Torquemada	72	+2.9%
17	Magaz de Pisuerga	71	+31.5%
18	Alar del Rey	63	+23.5%
19	Osorno la Mayor	60	-3.2%
20	Santibáñez de la Peña	56	+43.6%
21	Baltanás	54	+50%
22	Villarramiel	53	+15.2%
23	Monzón de Campos	51	+2%
24	Tariego de Cerrato	44	+12.8%
25	Frómista	41	+7.9%
26	Villada	37	0%
27	Becerril de Campos	35	+6.1%
28	Villaumbrales	33	-2.9%
29	Astudillo	31	+24%
30	Fuentes de Valdepero	30	-3.2%
31	Santervás de la Vega	28	+21.7%
32	Pomar de Valdivia	27	+35%
33	Buenavista de Valdavia	24	+41.2%
33	Villaluenga de la Vega	24	+20%
35	Calzada de los Molinos	23	+35.3%
35	Villota del Páramo	23	+15%
37	Castrejón de la Peña	21	+50%
37	Cisneros	21	+16.7%
37	Fuentes de Nava	21	0%
40	La Pernía	20	+42.9%
41	Brañosera	18	+38.5%
42	Ampudia	17	+21.4%
42	Pedrosa de la Vega	17	+88.9%
42	San Cebrián de Campos	17	0%
45	Quintana del Puente	16	+33.3%
46	Prádanos de Ojeda	15	+87.5%
47	Cervatos de la Cueza	14	+16.7%
47	Melgar de Yuso	14	+27.3%
49	Amusco	13	-18.8%
49	Poza de la Vega	13	+30%
49	Quintanilla de Onsoña	13	+44.4%
49	Villaviudas	13	+62.5%
53	Boadilla del Camino	12	+20%
53	Dehesa de Montejo	12	+33.3%
53	Husillos	12	+20%
53	Lantadilla	12	+50%
53	Palenzuela	12	+71.4%
53	Salinas de Pisuerga	12	-7.7%
53	Villaturde	12	+50%
60	Bustillo de la Vega	11	0%
60	Villalba de Guardo	11	+22.2%
60	Villamartín de Campos	11	+83.3%
60	Villoldo	11	+57.1%
64	Fresno del Río	10	-9.1%
64	Villamoronta	10	+100%
66	Abarca de Campos	9	+200%
66	Mazariegos	9	+28.6%
66	Revenga de Campos	9	+12.5%
66	Sotobañado y Priorato	9	+28.6%
66	Villalcázar de Sirga	9	+80%
71	Boadilla de Rioseco	8	+33.3%
71	Castrillo de Villavega	8	+300%
71	Cevico de la Torre	8	+60%
71	Congosto de Valdavia	8	+33.3%
71	Herrera de Valdecañas	8	+33.3%
71	San Cebrián de Mudá	8	0%
71	Villarrabé	8	+33.3%
71	Villasarracino	8	+33.3%
79	Frechilla	7	+75%
79	Mantinos	7	+16.7%
79	Población de Campos	7	0%
79	Renedo de la Vega	7	+75%
79	Tabanera de Cerrato	7	+133.3%
79	Villerías de Campos	7	+75%
85	Antigüedad	6	0%
85	Autilla del Pino	6	+100%
85	Castrillo de Don Juan	6	-14.3%
85	Castromocho	6	0%
85	Triollo	6	+50%
85	Valle de Cerrato	6	+100%
85	Villameriel	6	+50%
85	Villanuño de Valdavia	6	+100%
93	Alba de Cerrato	5	+66.7%
93	Autillo de Campos	5	+25%
93	Cobos de Cerrato	5	0%
93	Cubillas de Cerrato	5	+150%
93	Olmos de Ojeda	5	0%
93	Piña de Campos	5	+66.7%
93	Pino del Río	5	-16.7%
93	Población de Cerrato	5	0%
93	Soto de Cerrato	5	-54.5%
93	Valle del Retortillo	5	+150%
103	Ayuela	4	+33.3%
103	Calahorra de Boedo	4	+300%
103	Cordovilla la Real	4	+33.3%
103	Hornillos de Cerrato	4	n/a
103	Loma de Ucieza	4	-33.3%
103	Marcilla de Campos	4	0%
103	Pedraza de Campos	4	+33.3%
103	Revilla de Collazos	4	+100%
103	Villaherreros	4	0%
103	Villovieco	4	+33.3%
113	Abia de las Torres	3	+50%
113	Báscones de Ojeda	3	+50%
113	Berzosilla	3	0%
113	Capillas	3	-40%
113	Cevico Navero	3	+50%
113	Espinosa de Cerrato	3	+200%
113	Espinosa de Villagonzalo	3	-40%
113	La Vid de Ojeda	3	-25%
113	Manquillos	3	+200%
113	Moratinos	3	+50%
113	Páramo de Boedo	3	+50%
113	Polentinos	3	n/a
113	Respenda de la Peña	3	-25%
113	Ribas de Campos	3	0%
113	Santa Cecilia del Alcor	3	+200%
113	Santoyo	3	0%
113	Támara de Campos	3	0%
113	Valde-Ucieza	3	0%
113	Vertavillo	3	+50%
113	Villaprovedo	3	+50%
113	Villodrigo	3	n/a
134	Bárcena de Campos	2	-33.3%
134	Castil de Vela	2	+100%
134	Hontoria de Cerrato	2	-66.7%
134	Itero de la Vega	2	-50%
134	Lagartos	2	-33.3%
134	Mazuecos de Valdeginate	2	+100%
134	Meneses de Campos	2	0%
134	Osornillo	2	0%
134	Población de Arroyo	2	+100%
134	Reinoso de Cerrato	2	0%
134	Santa Cruz de Boedo	2	-33.3%
134	Santibáñez de Ecla	2	n/a
134	Torremormojón	2	n/a
134	Villacidaler	2	n/a
134	Villahán	2	-33.3%
134	Villalcón	2	n/a
134	Villamediana	2	-60%
134	Villasila de Valdavia	2	n/a
152	Amayuelas de Arriba	1	n/a
152	Arconada	1	n/a
152	Baquerín de Campos	1	0%
152	Bustillo del Páramo de Carrión	1	n/a
152	Castrillo de Onielo	1	-50%
152	Collazos de Boedo	1	n/a
152	Dehesa de Romanos	1	0%
152	Hérmedes de Cerrato	1	-50%
152	La Puebla de Valdavia	1	-50%
152	La Serna	1	-66.7%
152	Micieces de Ojeda	1	n/a
152	Mudá	1	-66.7%
152	Olea de Boedo	1	n/a
152	Perales	1	n/a
152	Riberos de la Cueza	1	0%
152	San Mamés de Campos	1	0%
152	San Román de la Cuba	1	0%
152	Tabanera de Valdavia	1	n/a
152	Valbuena de Pisuerga	1	n/a
152	Valdeolmillos	1	-50%
152	Valderrábano	1	-50%
152	Villaconancio	1	n/a
152	Villalaco	1	n/a
152	Villarmentero de Campos	1	n/a
176	Belmonte de Campos	0	n/a
176	Boada de Campos	0	n/a
176	Cardeñosa de Volpejera	0	n/a
176	Guaza de Campos	0	n/a
176	Ledigos	0	-100%
176	Lomas	0	n/a
176	Nogal de las Huertas	0	n/a
176	Payo de Ojeda	0	-100%
176	Pozo de Urama	0	-100%
176	Requena de Campos	0	n/a
176	San Cristóbal de Boedo	0	n/a
176	Villabasta de Valdavia	0	n/a
176	Villaeles de Valdavia	0	n/a
176	Villamuera de la Cueza	0	-100%
176	Villanueva del Rebollar	0	n/a
176	Villodre	0	n/a

Other periods

About this ranking

Job seekers registered as unemployed at public employment offices on the last working day of the month.

Administrative count, available down to municipality. Not the survey-based unemployment rate.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal (SEPE). Paro registrado por municipios. https://sede.sepe.gob.es/es/portaltrabaja/resources/sede/datos_abiertos/datos/Paro_por_municipios_2021_csv.csv. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank Municipalities in Palencia province by registered unemployment using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"registered_unemployment","level":"municipality","within":"Palencia","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=registered_unemployment&level=municipality&within=Palencia&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which municipality has the highest registered unemployment?

Palencia, with 5,892 in February 2021, according to the Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal.

Which municipality has the lowest registered unemployment?

Villodre, with 0 in February 2021.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal, Paro registrado por municipios. Retrieved 2026-10-08.