US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate)
New Square, NY had the highest poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate) of 3214 cities in 2022, at 64.2%. Snoqualmie, WA had the lowest, at 0.3%. The median was 11.3% and the figure for the United States was 12.5%. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Square, NY | 64.2 | +3.6 pts |
| 2 | Boone, NC | 55.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 3 | Oxford, OH | 46.3 | +1.5 pts |
| 4 | Blacksburg, VA | 45.1 | -0.1 pts |
| 5 | Kiryas Joel, NY | 43.3 | +2.8 pts |
| 6 | Athens, OH | 43 | -0.1 pts |
| 7 | State College, PA | 42.1 | -1.3 pts |
| 8 | Monroe, GA | 41.8 | +8 pts |
| 9 | Crowley, LA | 41.6 | -0.7 pts |
| 10 | Cahokia Heights, IL | 41.2 | |
| 11 | Clarksdale, MS | 40.7 | -0.9 pts |
| 12 | Milledgeville, GA | 39.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 13 | East Cleveland, OH | 39.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 14 | Rexburg, ID | 39.4 | +6.1 pts |
| 15 | West Lafayette, IN | 39.2 | +1.7 pts |
| 16 | Opelousas, LA | 39 | +1.8 pts |
| 17 | Donna, TX | 38 | -5.1 pts |
| 18 | Natchitoches, LA | 38 | +0.6 pts |
| 19 | Carbondale, IL | 37.9 | -2.6 pts |
| 20 | Hamtramck, MI | 37.8 | -5.3 pts |
| 21 | Statesboro, GA | 37.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 22 | Ruston, LA | 36.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 23 | Clemson, SC | 36 | -0.4 pts |
| 24 | Dublin, GA | 35.5 | +1.7 pts |
| 25 | Portsmouth, OH | 35.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 26 | Forrest City, AR | 35.3 | +2.3 pts |
| 27 | Monroe, LA | 35.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 28 | Inkster, MI | 35.1 | -2.7 pts |
| 29 | Warren, OH | 35.1 | +0.5 pts |
| 30 | Carthage, MO | 34.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 31 | Youngstown, OH | 34.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 32 | Arcata, CA | 34.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 33 | Hammond, LA | 34.5 | -2.5 pts |
| 33 | Saginaw, MI | 34.5 | -1.1 pts |
| 35 | Mount Pleasant, MI | 34.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 36 | Minden, LA | 34.4 | +2.9 pts |
| 37 | Morgantown, WV | 34.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 38 | East Lansing, MI | 34.3 | -1.2 pts |
| 39 | Orangeburg, SC | 34 | +1.9 pts |
| 40 | Lindsay, CA | 33.9 | +4.4 pts |
| 41 | Laurinburg, NC | 33.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 42 | Darby, PA | 33.8 | +6.1 pts |
| 43 | Radford, VA | 33.8 | -1.6 pts |
| 44 | Waycross, GA | 33.8 | -0.5 pts |
| 45 | West Plains, MO | 33.8 | -0.3 pts |
| 46 | Cedartown, GA | 33.8 | -5.7 pts |
| 47 | Roma, TX | 33.7 | -1.2 pts |
| 48 | Flint, MI | 33.3 | -2.2 pts |
| 49 | Cheney, WA | 33.3 | -0.9 pts |
| 50 | Melvindale, MI | 33.2 | +5.2 pts |
| 51 | Kingsville, TX | 33.1 | +1.8 pts |
| 52 | Raymondville, TX | 33.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 53 | Ithaca, NY | 33.1 | -1.4 pts |
| 54 | Johnstown, PA | 32.9 | -0.8 pts |
| 55 | Bridgeton, NJ | 32.7 | -2.3 pts |
| 56 | Mendota, CA | 32.7 | -4.7 pts |
| 57 | Ashtabula, OH | 32.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 58 | Natchez, MS | 32.7 | -0.5 pts |
| 59 | Florida City, FL | 32.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 60 | Laurel, MS | 32.6 | -1.2 pts |
| 61 | Belle Glade, FL | 32.5 | -2.1 pts |
| 62 | Whitewater, WI | 32.5 | -1.1 pts |
| 63 | Meridian, MS | 32.4 | +2.1 pts |
| 64 | Atlantic City, NJ | 32.4 | -4.6 pts |
| 65 | Pullman, WA | 32.4 | -1.3 pts |
| 66 | Greenville, MS | 32.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 67 | Gary, IN | 32.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 68 | Carrollton, GA | 32.2 | -0.8 pts |
| 69 | Bessemer, AL | 32 | +3.3 pts |
| 70 | McComb, MS | 32 | -3.5 pts |
| 71 | Hattiesburg, MS | 32 | -0 pts |
| 72 | Bloomsburg, PA | 32 | +3.9 pts |
| 73 | New Brunswick, NJ | 31.9 | -3.4 pts |
| 74 | Binghamton, NY | 31.7 | -0.3 pts |
| 75 | Abbeville, LA | 31.7 | +1 pts |
| 76 | Mount Airy, NC | 31.7 | +2.4 pts |
| 77 | Camden, NJ | 31.6 | -2 pts |
| 78 | Prichard, AL | 31.6 | +1.5 pts |
| 79 | East St. Louis, IL | 31.6 | +2.3 pts |
| 80 | Stillwater, OK | 31.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 81 | Detroit, MI | 31.5 | -0.3 pts |
| 82 | San Luis Obispo, CA | 31.5 | +1.9 pts |
| 83 | Canton, MS | 31.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 83 | Riverdale, IL | 31.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 85 | Brookhaven, MS | 31.2 | +4.8 pts |
| 86 | Las Vegas, NM | 31.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 87 | Cleveland, OH | 31.2 | -0.2 pts |
| 88 | Bloomington, IN | 31.1 | -1.2 pts |
| 89 | Nacogdoches, TX | 30.9 | +0.5 pts |
| 90 | Brunswick, GA | 30.8 | -2 pts |
| 91 | Bowling Green, OH | 30.8 | -0.1 pts |
| 92 | Starkville, MS | 30.7 | +1.9 pts |
| 93 | New Iberia, LA | 30.4 | +2.7 pts |
| 94 | Galena Park, TX | 30.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 94 | Muncie, IN | 30.4 | +0.1 pts |
| 96 | Pharr, TX | 30.4 | -2.1 pts |
| 96 | Robstown, TX | 30.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 98 | Canton, OH | 30.2 | -0 pts |
| 99 | Cambridge, OH | 30.2 | -0.9 pts |
| 100 | Rio Grande City, TX | 30 | +0.6 pts |
| 101 | Kirksville, MO | 29.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 102 | San Benito, TX | 29.8 | -2.2 pts |
| 103 | Reidsville, NC | 29.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 104 | Bogalusa, LA | 29.6 | -2.6 pts |
| 105 | Jennings, MO | 29.6 | +0.4 pts |
| 106 | Albany, GA | 29.6 | +1.1 pts |
| 106 | Syracuse, NY | 29.6 | -0.5 pts |
| 108 | Selma, AL | 29.5 | +0.1 pts |
| 109 | Endicott, NY | 29.5 | +2.8 pts |
| 110 | Pittsburg, KS | 29.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 111 | Lumberton, NC | 29.4 | -1.7 pts |
| 112 | Mercedes, TX | 29.2 | +2.2 pts |
| 113 | Somerset, KY | 29.1 | -1.4 pts |
| 114 | Douglas, AZ | 29.1 | +4.3 pts |
| 115 | Fort Pierce, FL | 29.1 | +1.9 pts |
| 116 | Gainesville, FL | 29 | +0.5 pts |
| 117 | Palatka, FL | 29 | -4.2 pts |
| 118 | Clarkston, GA | 28.9 | +3 pts |
| 119 | McKeesport, PA | 28.9 | +1.5 pts |
| 120 | Pascagoula, MS | 28.9 | +4.4 pts |
| 120 | Talladega, AL | 28.9 | +2.1 pts |
| 122 | Huntington, WV | 28.8 | -1.4 pts |
| 123 | Uvalde, TX | 28.8 | +7.8 pts |
| 124 | Arvin, CA | 28.7 | +0.8 pts |
| 125 | Kankakee, IL | 28.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 126 | Sebring, FL | 28.6 | +1.9 pts |
| 127 | Reading, PA | 28.6 | -0.7 pts |
| 128 | Bay City, TX | 28.6 | +5.3 pts |
| 129 | Martin, TN | 28.5 | -0.7 pts |
| 130 | San Elizario, TX | 28.5 | -4.8 pts |
| 131 | College Station, TX | 28.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 132 | Cleveland, MS | 28.4 | -1.4 pts |
| 133 | Valdosta, GA | 28.4 | -2.7 pts |
| 134 | Chester, PA | 28.3 | -0.2 pts |
| 135 | West Monroe, LA | 28.3 | -0.6 pts |
| 136 | Harrisburg, PA | 28.3 | +0.1 pts |
| 137 | Jamestown, NY | 28.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 137 | Kinston, NC | 28.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 139 | Utica, NY | 28.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 140 | Marion, IN | 28.1 | -0.4 pts |
| 141 | Oxford, MS | 28.1 | -1 pts |
| 142 | Alton, TX | 28.1 | -2.5 pts |
| 143 | Morganton, NC | 28 | +1 pts |
| 144 | Opa-locka, FL | 28 | -7.4 pts |
| 145 | Rochester, NY | 27.9 | -1.4 pts |
| 146 | Steubenville, OH | 27.9 | +2.4 pts |
| 147 | Dinuba, CA | 27.8 | -4.1 pts |
| 148 | College Park, MD | 27.8 | +2.5 pts |
| 148 | Smithfield, NC | 27.8 | -2.2 pts |
| 150 | Nogales, AZ | 27.8 | -2 pts |
| 151 | Alice, TX | 27.7 | +3.8 pts |
| 152 | Troy, AL | 27.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 153 | Madera, CA | 27.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 154 | Macomb, IL | 27.7 | +1 pts |
| 155 | Urbana, IL | 27.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 156 | Elmira, NY | 27.7 | +2.2 pts |
| 156 | San Marcos, TX | 27.7 | -2.9 pts |
| 158 | Corcoran, CA | 27.6 | 0 pts |
| 159 | Jacksonville, AL | 27.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 160 | Dayton, OH | 27.5 | -1 pts |
| 161 | Lorain, OH | 27.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 162 | Lawrenceburg, TN | 27.4 | -0.7 pts |
| 163 | Parlier, CA | 27.4 | -2.8 pts |
| 164 | Ypsilanti, MI | 27.3 | -1.6 pts |
| 165 | Harrisonburg, VA | 27.2 | +1.4 pts |
| 166 | Picayune, MS | 27.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 167 | Buffalo, NY | 27.2 | -0.4 pts |
| 168 | Americus, GA | 27.1 | -1.6 pts |
| 169 | Huntsville, TX | 27.1 | -1 pts |
| 170 | Athens, GA | 27.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 171 | Greenwood, MS | 27.1 | -3 pts |
| 172 | Bainbridge, GA | 27.1 | +7.1 pts |
| 173 | East Chicago, IN | 27 | -0.8 pts |
| 174 | Poplar Bluff, MO | 27 | -0.1 pts |
| 175 | Grenada, MS | 26.9 | -3.3 pts |
| 176 | Hidalgo, TX | 26.9 | -2.7 pts |
| 177 | Hartford, CT | 26.9 | -1.6 pts |
| 178 | Ames, IA | 26.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 178 | Branson, MO | 26.8 | +4.4 pts |
| 178 | Kalamazoo, MI | 26.8 | -1 pts |
| 181 | McFarland, CA | 26.8 | -2.5 pts |
| 182 | Pontiac, MI | 26.7 | -1 pts |
| 183 | Beeville, TX | 26.7 | +2.4 pts |
| 183 | Iowa City, IA | 26.7 | -0.1 pts |
| 185 | Port Arthur, TX | 26.7 | +0.9 pts |
| 186 | Cudahy, CA | 26.7 | -2.4 pts |
| 186 | Newberry, SC | 26.7 | +4.1 pts |
| 188 | Vidalia, GA | 26.6 | +3.8 pts |
| 189 | Bowling Green, KY | 26.6 | +1.1 pts |
| 190 | Gulfport, MS | 26.6 | +1 pts |
| 191 | DeKalb, IL | 26.6 | -0.2 pts |
| 192 | Henderson, NC | 26.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 193 | Charleston, IL | 26.5 | -0.2 pts |
| 194 | Shelton, WA | 26.5 | +2 pts |
| 195 | Newburgh, NY | 26.5 | +5.1 pts |
| 196 | Manhattan, KS | 26.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 197 | Palmview, TX | 26.4 | +4 pts |
| 197 | Terre Haute, IN | 26.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 199 | Corvallis, OR | 26.4 | +0.8 pts |
| 200 | New Castle, PA | 26.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 201 | Davis, CA | 26.4 | -0 pts |
| 202 | Vermillion, SD | 26.2 | +1 pts |
| 203 | Trenton, NJ | 26.2 | -1.5 pts |
| 204 | Kings Mountain, NC | 26.1 | +5.4 pts |
| 205 | Birmingham, AL | 26.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 206 | Brownsville, TX | 26.1 | -0.4 pts |
| 207 | Holyoke, MA | 26 | -0.5 pts |
| 208 | Maryville, MO | 26 | -4.5 pts |
| 209 | Platteville, WI | 26 | +0.4 pts |
| 210 | Harlingen, TX | 26 | -0.7 pts |
| 210 | Kissimmee, FL | 26 | +1.4 pts |
| 212 | Elk City, OK | 25.9 | +1.9 pts |
| 213 | Jackson, MS | 25.9 | -0.2 pts |
| 214 | Edinburg, TX | 25.7 | +2.5 pts |
| 214 | Morristown, TN | 25.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 216 | Hazleton, PA | 25.7 | +2.1 pts |
| 217 | Alexandria, LA | 25.7 | -1.4 pts |
| 218 | Spartanburg, SC | 25.7 | +1.7 pts |
| 219 | Kent, OH | 25.6 | +2.1 pts |
| 219 | Vicksburg, MS | 25.6 | -2.3 pts |
| 221 | Peru, IN | 25.5 | +2.6 pts |
| 222 | Phenix City, AL | 25.5 | -0.9 pts |
| 223 | Oswego, NY | 25.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 224 | LaGrange, GA | 25.4 | -0.3 pts |
| 224 | Williamsport, PA | 25.4 | +1 pts |
| 226 | Danville, IL | 25.4 | -3.1 pts |
| 227 | Griffin, GA | 25.4 | -0.5 pts |
| 228 | Eufaula, AL | 25.3 | -4.4 pts |
| 229 | Springfield, MA | 25.3 | -1 pts |
| 230 | Gallup, NM | 25.3 | -2.8 pts |
| 231 | Danville, VA | 25.3 | +2.2 pts |
| 232 | Murray, KY | 25.3 | +2.4 pts |
| 232 | New Haven, CT | 25.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 232 | Spring Valley, NY | 25.3 | +1 pts |
| 235 | Greenville, NC | 25.2 | -1 pts |
| 235 | Paris, TN | 25.2 | -2 pts |
| 237 | Gretna, LA | 25.2 | +2 pts |
| 237 | Zanesville, OH | 25.2 | -1.5 pts |
| 239 | Merced, CA | 25.2 | -1.4 pts |
| 240 | Anderson, SC | 25.1 | +3.9 pts |
| 241 | Gadsden, AL | 25.1 | -2.1 pts |
| 242 | Macon, GA | 25.1 | -0.2 pts |
| 242 | Niagara Falls, NY | 25.1 | +1.2 pts |
| 244 | Elon, NC | 25 | +0.5 pts |
| 244 | Mansfield, OH | 25 | -0.3 pts |
| 246 | Moultrie, GA | 25 | +0.2 pts |
| 247 | Provo, UT | 24.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 247 | San Luis, AZ | 24.9 | -0.2 pts |
| 249 | Dunkirk, NY | 24.9 | -1.8 pts |
| 249 | Pine Bluff, AR | 24.9 | +1.1 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
People with income in the past 12 months below the official US poverty thresholds, as a percentage of people whose poverty status is determined. United States: American Community Survey five-year estimate, where the period shown is the last year of the five-year span.
The headline single-year rate for states and counties is poverty_rate (SAIPE). Poverty status is not determined for people in institutions, military group quarters or college dormitories, or for unrelated children under 15. Absolute thresholds set by the US government, so not comparable with the EU at_risk_of_poverty_rate.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 5 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more) (US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat
MLA 9
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/poverty-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/poverty-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more), US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/poverty-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_us_cities_by_poverty_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/poverty-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary\_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more): US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate), 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/01/29
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/poverty-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/poverty-rate-acs/us-cities?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2022/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/acsdt5y2022-b17001.dat. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank US cities by poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"poverty_rate_acs","level":"municipality","within":"United States","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=poverty_rate_acs&level=municipality&within=United%20States&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
New Square, NY, with 64.2% in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate)?
Snoqualmie, WA, with 0.3% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, table B17001: population with income in the past 12 months below the poverty level as a percentage of the population for whom poverty status is determined, calculated with stored inputs, US cities (incorporated places of 10,000 or more). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 5 cities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.
Poverty rate (US five-year survey estimate): other rankings
- Cities in North Dakota
- Cities in California
- Cities in Arkansas
- Counties in Florida
- Counties in Wisconsin
- Counties in Oklahoma