NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration rate including statistical adjustment

Parma had the highest net migration rate including statistical adjustment of 107 areas in 2015, at 9.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. Caltanissetta had the lowest, at -6.1 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Italy was 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest9.5Parma

Lowest-6.1Caltanissetta

Median-0.2107 areas

Italy0.5History

Top 40 areas, 2015

per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2015 per 1,000 inhabitants	Change on 2014
1	Parma	9.5	+3.1 pts
2	Bologna	7.1	+1.1 pts
3	Roma	6.1	+0.5 pts
4	Milano	5.6	-1.6 pts
5	Prato	4.8	+8.1 pts
6	Trieste	4.7	+0.1 pts
7	La Spezia	4.4	+1.9 pts
8	Firenze	3.9	-0.7 pts
9	Ravenna	3.6	+2.5 pts
10	Pavia	3.5	-0.7 pts
11	Rimini	3	-0.7 pts
12	Trento	2.9	+0.5 pts
13	Latina	2.8	-0.2 pts
14	Bolzano-Bozen	2.5	+0.2 pts
15	Sassari	2.4	+0.3 pts
16	Reggio nell’Emilia	2.1	+3.8 pts
17	Modena	1.8	-1 pts
17	Ragusa	1.8	+1.9 pts
19	Monza e della Brianza	1.7	-0.1 pts
20	Pistoia	1.6	-1.4 pts
20	Rieti	1.6	+0.4 pts
22	Livorno	1.5	+0.5 pts
23	Campobasso	1.4	+2.3 pts
23	Piacenza	1.4	+0.2 pts
25	Grosseto	1.3	0 pts
25	Varese	1.3	-0.3 pts
27	Alessandria	1.1	-0.9 pts
27	Gorizia	1.1	-2 pts
27	Venezia	1.1	-1.2 pts
30	Terni	1	+0.2 pts
31	Ferrara	0.9	-2.5 pts
31	Siena	0.9	+0.2 pts
33	Como	0.8	-1.6 pts
33	Cuneo	0.8	-1.1 pts
33	Savona	0.8	-0.3 pts
33	Verona	0.8	-0.7 pts
37	Verbano-Cusio-Ossola	0.7	+0.3 pts
38	Pisa	0.6	-3 pts
38	Torino	0.6	+2.5 pts
38	Trapani	0.6	+0.1 pts
41	Cremona	0.5	-0.3 pts
42	Crotone	0.4	+0.9 pts
42	Padova	0.4	-1.5 pts
44	Ancona	0.3	+0.1 pts
44	Sondrio	0.3	+1 pts
46	Udine	0.2	-0.6 pts
46	Viterbo	0.2	-1.8 pts
48	Belluno	0.1	+2.2 pts
48	Cagliari	0.1	-0.6 pts
48	Isernia	0.1	-0.5 pts
51	Forlì-Cesena	0	-0.3 pts
51	Novara	0	0 pts
53	Genova	-0.1	+2.2 pts
54	Biella	-0.2	0 pts
54	Perugia	-0.2	+1.5 pts
54	Vercelli	-0.2	+0.5 pts
57	Ascoli Piceno	-0.3	-0.7 pts
58	Pescara	-0.4	-1.1 pts
59	Bergamo	-0.6	-0.6 pts
60	Teramo	-0.8	-1.5 pts
61	Arezzo	-0.9	-1.8 pts
61	Fermo	-0.9	-2.8 pts
61	Oristano	-0.9	+0.3 pts
61	Salerno	-0.9	-1 pts
65	Caserta	-1	-0.3 pts
66	Brescia	-1.1	-0.9 pts
67	Catanzaro	-1.2	+1.1 pts
67	Chieti	-1.2	-0.4 pts
67	Lecce	-1.2	+1.2 pts
67	Lodi	-1.2	-1.4 pts
67	Napoli	-1.2	+0.4 pts
72	Benevento	-1.3	+1.3 pts
72	Matera	-1.3	-0.9 pts
74	Macerata	-1.4	-3.1 pts
74	Treviso	-1.4	-0.1 pts
76	Pesaro e Urbino	-1.7	-1.1 pts
77	Bari	-1.8	+0.2 pts
77	Pordenone	-1.8	+0.4 pts
79	Frosinone	-1.9	-0.5 pts
79	L’Aquila	-1.9	-0.8 pts
79	Vicenza	-1.9	-0.8 pts
82	Lucca	-2	-2 pts
83	Imperia	-2.1	-2.7 pts
84	Asti	-2.2	-1.2 pts
84	Lecco	-2.2	-0.9 pts
84	Potenza	-2.2	-0.4 pts
87	Catania	-2.3	-0.8 pts
88	Rovigo	-2.4	-1.1 pts
89	Mantova	-2.6	-2.9 pts
90	Palermo	-2.7	-1.8 pts
90	Sud Sardegna	-2.7	-0.7 pts
92	Reggio Calabria	-3	-1.3 pts
92	Vibo Valentia	-3	+1.5 pts
94	Massa-Carrara	-3.1	-2.2 pts
95	Cosenza	-3.2	-1.6 pts
96	Siracusa	-3.3	-1 pts
96	Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste	-3.3	-2.5 pts
98	Barletta-Andria-Trani	-3.4	-2.3 pts
99	Taranto	-3.5	-0.2 pts
100	Nuoro	-3.8	-2.3 pts
101	Avellino	-4	-0.4 pts
102	Messina	-4.3	-0.8 pts
103	Brindisi	-4.4	-1 pts
104	Agrigento	-5.2	-1.8 pts
104	Foggia	-5.2	-0.9 pts
106	Enna	-5.7	-0.6 pts
107	Caltanissetta	-6.1	-4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Net migration including statistical adjustment during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment).

Comparable across EU countries and regions. Eurostat derives the net figure as a residual of population change, so it includes census revisions and other statistical adjustments.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by net migration rate including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment_rate","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment_rate&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest net migration rate including statistical adjustment?

Parma, with 9.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest net migration rate including statistical adjustment?

Caltanissetta, with -6.1 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.