Data / Rankings / Crude birth rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by birth rate

Siedlecki had the highest birth rate of 70 areas in 2013, at 12.7 per 1,000 inhabitants. Wałbrzyski had the lowest, at 8 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was 9.7 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest12.7Siedlecki
Lowest8Wałbrzyski
Median9.670 areas
Poland9.7History

Top 40 areas, 2013

CSVChart (SVG)

SiedleckiSiedlecki: 12.7 per 1,000 inhabitants12.7GdańskiGdański: 12.5 per 1,000 inhabitants12.5NowosądeckiNowosądecki: 11.8 per 1,000 inhabitants11.8PoznańskiPoznański: 11.6 per 1,000 inhabitants11.6LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 11.2 per 1,000 inhabitants11.2ChojnickiChojnicki: 11 per 1,000 inhabitants11TyskiTyski: 11 per 1,000 inhabitants11Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 10.8 per 1,000 inhabitants10.8ŚwieckiŚwiecki: 10.7 per 1,000 inhabitants10.7NowotarskiNowotarski: 10.6 per 1,000 inhabitants10.6KrakowskiKrakowski: 10.5 per 1,000 inhabitants10.5RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 10.5 per 1,000 inhabitants10.5Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 10.4 per 1,000 inhabitants10.4OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 10.4 per 1,000 inhabitants10.4StarogardzkiStarogardzki: 10.4 per 1,000 inhabitants10.4KaliskiKaliski: 10.3 per 1,000 inhabitants10.3PilskiPilski: 10.3 per 1,000 inhabitants10.3GrudziądzkiGrudziądzki: 10.2 per 1,000 inhabitants10.2SłupskiSłupski: 10.2 per 1,000 inhabitants10.2BielskiBielski: 10.1 per 1,000 inhabitants10.1KonińskiKoniński: 10.1 per 1,000 inhabitants10.1CiechanowskiCiechanowski: 9.9 per 1,000 inhabitants9.9ElbląskiElbląski: 9.9 per 1,000 inhabitants9.9GorzowskiGorzowski: 9.9 per 1,000 inhabitants9.9RybnickiRybnicki: 9.9 per 1,000 inhabitants9.9TarnowskiTarnowski: 9.9 per 1,000 inhabitants9.9WrocławskiWrocławski: 9.9 per 1,000 inhabitants9.9KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 9.8 per 1,000 inhabitants9.8Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 9.8 per 1,000 inhabitants9.8RadomskiRadomski: 9.8 per 1,000 inhabitants9.8Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 9.7 per 1,000 inhabitants9.7OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 9.7 per 1,000 inhabitants9.7BialskiBialski: 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants9.6InowrocławskiInowrocławski: 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants9.6LubelskiLubelski: 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants9.6SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants9.6EłckiEłcki: 9.5 per 1,000 inhabitants9.5PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 9.5 per 1,000 inhabitants9.5PłockiPłocki: 9.5 per 1,000 inhabitants9.5SieradzkiSieradzki: 9.5 per 1,000 inhabitants9.5
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2013
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2012
1Siedlecki12.7n/a
2Gdański12.5-0.8 pts
3Nowosądecki11.8-0.4 pts
4Poznański11.6-0.6 pts
5Leszczyński11.2-0.3 pts
6Chojnicki11-0.6 pts
6Tyski11-0.1 pts
8Miasto Warszawa10.8-0.2 pts
9Świecki10.7-0.4 pts
10Nowotarski10.6-0.4 pts
11Krakowski10.5-0.3 pts
11Rzeszowski10.5n/a
13Miasto Poznań10.4-0.2 pts
13Ostrołęcki10.4n/a
13Starogardzki10.4-1 pts
16Kaliski10.30 pts
16Pilski10.3-0.5 pts
18Grudziądzki10.2-0.6 pts
18Słupski10.2-0.2 pts
20Bielski10.1-0.4 pts
20Koniński10.1-0.7 pts
22Ciechanowski9.9n/a
22Elbląski9.9-0.5 pts
22Gorzowski9.9-0.6 pts
22Rybnicki9.9-0.5 pts
22Tarnowski9.9-0.4 pts
22Wrocławski9.9-0.6 pts
28Krośnieński9.8n/a
28Miasto Kraków9.80 pts
28Radomski9.8n/a
31Miasto Wrocław9.7-0.1 pts
31Oświęcimski9.7-0.3 pts
33Bialski9.6n/a
33Inowrocławski9.6-0.4 pts
33Lubelski9.6n/a
33Szczeciński9.6+0.1 pts
37Ełcki9.5-0.5 pts
37Piotrkowski9.5n/a
37Płocki9.5n/a
37Sieradzki9.5n/a
37Skierniewicki9.5n/a
37Szczecinecko-pyrzycki9.5-0.4 pts
37Zielonogórski9.5-0.6 pts
44Przemyski9.4n/a
45Białostocki9.3n/a
45Bydgosko-toruński9.3-0.4 pts
45Katowicki9.3-0.1 pts
45Legnicko-głogowski9.3-0.7 pts
45Olsztyński9.3-0.5 pts
45Suwalski9.3n/a
45Trójmiejski9.3-0.2 pts
52Bytomski9.2-0.5 pts
52Gliwicki9.2-0.4 pts
52Puławski9.2n/a
52Tarnobrzeski9.2n/a
56Włocławski9-0.3 pts
57Koszaliński8.9-0.6 pts
58Łódzki8.8n/a
58Opolski8.8-0.4 pts
60Łomżyński8.7n/a
61Chełmsko-zamojski8.6n/a
61Częstochowski8.6-0.2 pts
61Kielecki8.6n/a
64Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski8.4n/a
65Miasto Szczecin8.3-0.4 pts
65Sosnowiecki8.3-0.6 pts
67Nyski8.2-1 pts
68Jeleniogórski8.1-0.7 pts
69Miasto Łódź8n/a
69Wałbrzyski8-0.5 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births per 1,000 residents during the year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. 3 areas with data in other periods have no value for 2013 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Crude birth rate per 1,000 average residents by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by birth rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"crude_birth_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=crude_birth_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest birth rate?

Siedlecki, with 12.7 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2013, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest birth rate?

Wałbrzyski, with 8 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2013.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Crude birth rate per 1,000 average residents by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08. 3 areas have no value for 2013 and are not ranked.

Crude birth rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings