Cities in California by unemployed people
Los Angeles, CA had the highest unemployed people of 281 cities in 2020, at 250,432. Paradise, CA had the lowest, at 161. The median was 2,883. Source: the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Top 40 cities, 2020
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2020 | Change on 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA | 250,432 | +166.4% |
| 2 | San Diego, CA | 63,507 | +188% |
| 3 | San Jose, CA | 44,534 | +200.9% |
| 4 | San Francisco, CA | 44,280 | +241.7% |
| 5 | Long Beach, CA | 29,683 | +164.9% |
| 6 | Fresno, CA | 25,729 | +89% |
| 7 | Sacramento, CA | 23,404 | +157.5% |
| 8 | Oakland, CA | 22,826 | +208.8% |
| 9 | Bakersfield, CA | 20,410 | +111.4% |
| 10 | Anaheim, CA | 17,803 | +247.7% |
| 11 | Stockton, CA | 17,353 | +92.3% |
| 12 | Riverside, CA | 14,036 | +152.4% |
| 13 | Santa Ana, CA | 14,013 | +215.1% |
| 14 | Chula Vista, CA | 12,968 | +195.3% |
| 15 | Glendale, CA | 12,813 | +200.2% |
| 16 | Santa Clarita, CA | 12,750 | +153.5% |
| 17 | San Bernardino, CA | 10,666 | +155.7% |
| 18 | Modesto, CA | 10,531 | +100.4% |
| 19 | Irvine, CA | 10,504 | +151.7% |
| 20 | Moreno Valley, CA | 10,316 | +147.1% |
| 21 | Salinas, CA | 10,289 | +49.4% |
| 22 | Garden Grove, CA | 9,601 | +279.9% |
| 23 | Palmdale, CA | 9,343 | +123.1% |
| 24 | Fontana, CA | 9,325 | +165.1% |
| 25 | Lancaster, CA | 9,275 | +107.2% |
| 26 | Oxnard, CA | 9,240 | +101.7% |
| 27 | Huntington Beach, CA | 9,113 | +196.4% |
| 28 | Pomona, CA | 8,496 | +150.7% |
| 29 | Inglewood, CA | 8,270 | +190.2% |
| 30 | Oceanside, CA | 8,160 | +192.6% |
| 31 | Ontario, CA | 8,111 | +172.8% |
| 32 | Hayward, CA | 8,078 | +214.2% |
| 33 | Burbank, CA | 7,898 | +156.3% |
| 34 | Fremont, CA | 7,845 | +158.5% |
| 35 | Pasadena, CA | 7,543 | +140.3% |
| 36 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 7,456 | +167.7% |
| 37 | Torrance, CA | 7,432 | +157% |
| 38 | Santa Rosa, CA | 7,311 | +187.8% |
| 39 | Corona, CA | 6,984 | +175.1% |
| 40 | Elk Grove, CA | 6,783 | +156.4% |
| 41 | Downey, CA | 6,743 | +177.6% |
| 42 | El Monte, CA | 6,705 | +207.6% |
| 43 | Fullerton, CA | 6,695 | +217.3% |
| 44 | West Covina, CA | 6,471 | +168.3% |
| 45 | Hawthorne, CA | 6,423 | +216.2% |
| 45 | Vallejo, CA | 6,423 | +164.3% |
| 47 | Norwalk, CA | 6,359 | +178.8% |
| 48 | Calexico, CA | 6,254 | -22.8% |
| 49 | Visalia, CA | 6,234 | +94.9% |
| 50 | Daly City, CA | 6,211 | +350.4% |
| 51 | Antioch, CA | 6,170 | +198.5% |
| 52 | Compton, CA | 6,142 | +153.2% |
| 53 | Escondido, CA | 6,087 | +181.5% |
| 54 | Richmond, CA | 5,976 | +210.9% |
| 55 | Victorville, CA | 5,971 | +125.6% |
| 56 | Carson, CA | 5,904 | +153.1% |
| 57 | Orange, CA | 5,748 | +183.9% |
| 58 | Alhambra, CA | 5,652 | +219% |
| 59 | Concord, CA | 5,591 | +197.6% |
| 60 | Simi Valley, CA | 5,547 | +176.4% |
| 61 | El Cajon, CA | 5,520 | +229.9% |
| 62 | South Gate, CA | 5,450 | +167.3% |
| 63 | Santa Monica, CA | 5,433 | +117.6% |
| 64 | Delano, CA | 5,361 | +5% |
| 65 | Roseville, CA | 5,235 | +146.8% |
| 66 | Costa Mesa, CA | 5,201 | +207.4% |
| 67 | Santa Maria, CA | 5,170 | +71.2% |
| 68 | Murrieta, CA | 5,023 | +176.6% |
| 69 | Bellflower, CA | 5,019 | +167.5% |
| 70 | Indio, CA | 5,005 | +131.6% |
| 71 | San Leandro, CA | 4,988 | +232.8% |
| 72 | Westminster, CA | 4,975 | +276.6% |
| 73 | Fairfield, CA | 4,937 | +148.7% |
| 74 | Thousand Oaks, CA | 4,912 | +162.5% |
| 75 | Temecula, CA | 4,907 | +185.3% |
| 76 | Rialto, CA | 4,900 | +140.7% |
| 77 | Whittier, CA | 4,892 | +143.3% |
| 78 | Lakewood, CA | 4,890 | +166.1% |
| 79 | San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA | 4,720 | +171.7% |
| 80 | Clovis, CA | 4,506 | +111.1% |
| 81 | Tracy, CA | 4,458 | +169.5% |
| 82 | Carlsbad, CA | 4,428 | +171.3% |
| 83 | Jurupa Valley, CA | 4,419 | +148.1% |
| 84 | Baldwin Park, CA | 4,418 | +174.1% |
| 85 | Vista, CA | 4,395 | +176.8% |
| 86 | Sunnyvale, CA | 4,389 | +141.3% |
| 87 | Buena Park, CA | 4,329 | +236.6% |
| 88 | Menifee, CA | 4,237 | +154.3% |
| 89 | Monterey Park, CA | 4,204 | +238.8% |
| 90 | Santa Clara, CA | 4,184 | +158.1% |
| 91 | Merced, CA | 4,181 | +81.8% |
| 92 | Chico, CA | 4,158 | +102% |
| 93 | Hesperia, CA | 4,131 | +119% |
| 94 | Gardena, CA | 4,115 | +190% |
| 95 | Berkeley, CA | 4,079 | +126.2% |
| 96 | Hemet, CA | 4,051 | +129.5% |
| 97 | Porterville, CA | 4,022 | +27.6% |
| 98 | Chino, CA | 3,989 | +184.5% |
| 99 | Rosemead, CA | 3,969 | +275.1% |
| 100 | Pittsburg, CA | 3,962 | +206.7% |
| 101 | Citrus Heights, CA | 3,923 | +150.8% |
| 102 | Manteca, CA | 3,881 | +131.1% |
| 103 | Lynwood, CA | 3,876 | +167.1% |
| 104 | Mission Viejo, CA | 3,849 | +174.7% |
| 105 | San Mateo, CA | 3,837 | +199.1% |
| 106 | Watsonville, CA | 3,791 | +35.4% |
| 107 | Napa, CA | 3,777 | +192.6% |
| 108 | Montebello, CA | 3,736 | +161.1% |
| 109 | Pico Rivera, CA | 3,728 | +147.1% |
| 110 | Vacaville, CA | 3,714 | +150.1% |
| 111 | Yuba City, CA | 3,711 | +53% |
| 112 | Redondo Beach, CA | 3,694 | +136.2% |
| 113 | Perris, CA | 3,585 | +139% |
| 114 | Santa Barbara, CA | 3,565 | +204.4% |
| 115 | El Centro, CA | 3,539 | +43.4% |
| 116 | Upland, CA | 3,496 | +181.9% |
| 117 | West Hollywood, CA | 3,488 | +153.1% |
| 118 | San Marcos, CA | 3,475 | +165.5% |
| 118 | Tustin, CA | 3,475 | +200.9% |
| 120 | South San Francisco, CA | 3,473 | +279.6% |
| 121 | Redding, CA | 3,427 | +101.7% |
| 122 | Alameda, CA | 3,420 | +207.8% |
| 123 | Livermore, CA | 3,359 | +179.9% |
| 124 | Milpitas, CA | 3,333 | +179.6% |
| 125 | Lake Forest, CA | 3,331 | +167.1% |
| 126 | Rancho Cordova, CA | 3,324 | +145.5% |
| 127 | Chino Hills, CA | 3,311 | +193.8% |
| 128 | Paramount, CA | 3,288 | +171.3% |
| 129 | Coachella, CA | 3,217 | +59.6% |
| 130 | Lake Elsinore, CA | 3,214 | +162.2% |
| 131 | National City, CA | 3,191 | +211.3% |
| 132 | Madera, CA | 3,125 | +43.1% |
| 133 | Union City, CA | 3,117 | +185.7% |
| 134 | Cathedral City, CA | 3,114 | +214.5% |
| 135 | Lodi, CA | 3,095 | +81.6% |
| 136 | Turlock, CA | 3,076 | +96.9% |
| 137 | Tulare, CA | 3,036 | +78.1% |
| 138 | Covina, CA | 3,015 | +152.7% |
| 139 | Diamond Bar, CA | 2,954 | +165.9% |
| 140 | Newport Beach, CA | 2,926 | +159.4% |
| 141 | Huntington Park, CA | 2,883 | +145.8% |
| 142 | Eastvale, CA | 2,869 | +187.8% |
| 143 | La Mesa, CA | 2,850 | +189.3% |
| 144 | Apple Valley, CA | 2,837 | +109.7% |
| 145 | La Habra, CA | 2,822 | +210.1% |
| 146 | Los Banos, CA | 2,760 | +58.1% |
| 147 | Palm Desert, CA | 2,740 | +166% |
| 148 | Hanford, CA | 2,738 | +59.1% |
| 149 | Azusa, CA | 2,728 | +150.5% |
| 150 | Arcadia, CA | 2,726 | +171% |
| 151 | San Gabriel, CA | 2,709 | +248.2% |
| 152 | Woodland, CA | 2,702 | +67.3% |
| 153 | Redlands, CA | 2,692 | +144.1% |
| 154 | Redwood City, CA | 2,676 | +170.6% |
| 155 | La Mirada, CA | 2,668 | +161.6% |
| 156 | Laguna Niguel, CA | 2,642 | +171.5% |
| 157 | Gilroy, CA | 2,636 | +180.1% |
| 158 | San Ramon, CA | 2,619 | +144.1% |
| 159 | Brentwood, CA | 2,618 | +168.2% |
| 160 | Fountain Valley, CA | 2,604 | +216% |
| 161 | Camarillo, CA | 2,565 | +152.7% |
| 162 | Highland, CA | 2,540 | +161.3% |
| 163 | Cerritos, CA | 2,533 | +170.9% |
| 164 | Glendora, CA | 2,527 | +137.7% |
| 165 | Ceres, CA | 2,510 | +62.2% |
| 166 | Colton, CA | 2,492 | +153% |
| 167 | Palm Springs, CA | 2,485 | +194.8% |
| 168 | Santa Cruz, CA | 2,462 | +128.6% |
| 169 | San Clemente, CA | 2,448 | +187.3% |
| 170 | Pleasanton, CA | 2,446 | +136.1% |
| 171 | Yorba Linda, CA | 2,424 | +165.2% |
| 172 | Rocklin, CA | 2,412 | +131.7% |
| 173 | San Jacinto, CA | 2,405 | +139.8% |
| 174 | Petaluma, CA | 2,352 | +193.3% |
| 175 | Santee, CA | 2,336 | +165.2% |
| 176 | Culver City, CA | 2,324 | +132.2% |
| 177 | Cypress, CA | 2,323 | +209.3% |
| 178 | Folsom, CA | 2,313 | +126.8% |
| 178 | Lawndale, CA | 2,313 | +234.2% |
| 180 | La Puente, CA | 2,293 | +170.4% |
| 181 | Hollister, CA | 2,276 | +96% |
| 182 | Encinitas, CA | 2,270 | +176.2% |
| 183 | West Sacramento, CA | 2,231 | +131.4% |
| 184 | Reedley, CA | 2,217 | +5.3% |
| 185 | Bell Gardens, CA | 2,214 | +179.2% |
| 186 | Temple City, CA | 2,213 | +222.6% |
| 187 | Placentia, CA | 2,208 | +187.5% |
| 188 | Walnut Creek, CA | 2,190 | +140.9% |
| 189 | Aliso Viejo, CA | 2,183 | +179.5% |
| 190 | Dublin, CA | 2,172 | +149.4% |
| 191 | San Bruno, CA | 2,153 | +265.5% |
| 192 | San Rafael, CA | 2,096 | +180.6% |
| 193 | Beaumont, CA | 2,093 | +169.4% |
| 194 | Monrovia, CA | 2,084 | +161.5% |
| 195 | Newark, CA | 2,046 | +199.6% |
| 196 | Mountain View, CA | 2,022 | +110.6% |
| 197 | Yucaipa, CA | 2,019 | +143.8% |
| 198 | Rohnert Park, CA | 2,015 | +209% |
| 199 | Novato, CA | 1,988 | +188.5% |
| 200 | La Quinta, CA | 1,986 | +163% |
| 201 | Stanton, CA | 1,979 | +244.2% |
| 202 | Oakley, CA | 1,974 | +170% |
| 203 | Brea, CA | 1,971 | +202.3% |
| 204 | Desert Hot Springs, CA | 1,968 | +186.5% |
| 205 | Lompoc, CA | 1,932 | +118.3% |
| 206 | Rancho Santa Margarita, CA | 1,925 | +171.1% |
| 207 | Brawley, CA | 1,918 | +31.7% |
| 208 | San Luis Obispo, CA | 1,888 | +200.6% |
| 209 | Bell, CA | 1,841 | +159.3% |
| 210 | Davis, CA | 1,804 | +98.2% |
| 211 | Montclair, CA | 1,796 | +198.8% |
| 212 | Morgan Hill, CA | 1,777 | +172.1% |
| 213 | San Dimas, CA | 1,751 | +131.3% |
| 214 | Pacifica, CA | 1,715 | +232.4% |
| 215 | Beverly Hills, CA | 1,710 | +126.5% |
| 216 | Seaside, CA | 1,697 | +264.9% |
| 217 | Campbell, CA | 1,691 | +168.8% |
| 218 | Adelanto, CA | 1,658 | +104.7% |
| 218 | Wildomar, CA | 1,658 | +154.3% |
| 220 | Santa Paula, CA | 1,647 | +50% |
| 221 | Poway, CA | 1,610 | +147.3% |
| 222 | San Pablo, CA | 1,592 | +224.2% |
| 223 | La Verne, CA | 1,544 | +127.7% |
| 224 | Martinez, CA | 1,543 | +165.6% |
| 225 | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA | 1,503 | +107.9% |
| 226 | Atwater, CA | 1,488 | +67.8% |
| 226 | Walnut, CA | 1,488 | +165.7% |
| 228 | Lincoln, CA | 1,481 | +120.1% |
| 229 | Lemon Grove, CA | 1,472 | +206% |
| 230 | Imperial Beach, CA | 1,466 | +204.8% |
| 231 | Moorpark, CA | 1,439 | +151.6% |
| 232 | Claremont, CA | 1,426 | +98.1% |
| 233 | Dana Point, CA | 1,421 | +192.4% |
| 234 | Banning, CA | 1,410 | +153.1% |
| 235 | Sanger, CA | 1,400 | +41.6% |
| 236 | Cupertino, CA | 1,398 | +92.6% |
| 237 | Suisun City, CA | 1,392 | +156.8% |
| 238 | Wasco, CA | 1,389 | +21.6% |
| 239 | Palo Alto, CA | 1,382 | +88.5% |
| 240 | South Pasadena, CA | 1,351 | +129.4% |
| 241 | East Palo Alto, CA | 1,327 | +252% |
| 242 | Monterey, CA | 1,307 | +225.1% |
| 243 | Pleasant Hill, CA | 1,302 | +166.3% |
| 244 | Maywood, CA | 1,292 | +158.4% |
| 245 | Manhattan Beach, CA | 1,290 | +94.6% |
| 246 | Marina, CA | 1,277 | +220.1% |
| 247 | San Juan Capistrano, CA | 1,273 | +179.8% |
| 248 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA | 1,267 | +180.3% |
| 249 | Laguna Hills, CA | 1,246 | +191.8% |
| 250 | Danville, CA | 1,239 | +123.6% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Residents with no job who were available for work and had looked for work in the previous four weeks, or were waiting to be recalled from a layoff, annual average.
More on how it is measured
- People aged 16 and over by place of residence, from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Active-duty military personnel and people living in institutions are excluded.
United States cities only for now. The survey definition, not a count of benefit claimants. BLS estimates cities by splitting county estimates with Census Bureau employment and population data and unemployment insurance claims, so city figures are less precise than state ones. BLS publishes cities of 25,000 or more, and smaller cities in New England.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 4 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2020 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026). Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average (Cities in California by unemployed people, 2020) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24
MLA 9
Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average, Cities in California by unemployed people, 2020. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 30 Sept. 2026, https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/california-cities?period=2020. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2026. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. Cities in California by unemployed people, 2020. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/california-cities?period=2020.
Harvard
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2026) Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average, Cities in California by unemployed people, 2020 [Dataset]. Available at: https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/california-cities?period=2020 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{bureau_cities_in_california_by_2020,
author = {{U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics}},
title = {{Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average: Cities in California by unemployed people, 2020}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/california-cities?period=2020. Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
TI - Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average: Cities in California by unemployed people, 2020
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
DB - Invokely
UR - https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/california-cities?period=2020
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/unemployed-people/california-cities?period=2020.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. https://download.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/la.data.0.CurrentU20-24. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by unemployed people using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"unemployed_persons","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=unemployed_persons&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10Questions
Which city has the highest unemployed people?
Los Angeles, CA, with 250,432 in 2020, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Which city has the lowest unemployed people?
Paradise, CA, with 161 in 2020.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, cities and towns, not seasonally adjusted: unemployment (measure 04), annual average. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 4 cities have no value for 2020 and are not ranked.