Municipalities in Cantabria province by registered unemployment rate
Tudanca had the highest registered unemployment rate of 98 municipalities in May 2026, at 15.84%. Tresviso had the lowest, at 0%. The median was 6.88% and the figure for Cantabria province was 7.28%. Source: SEPE and INE.
Top 40 municipalities, May 2026
Full ranking
| Rank | Municipalities | May 2026 (%) | Change on May 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tudanca Estimated | 15.84 | +0.99 pts |
| 2 | San Roque de Riomiera Estimated | 13.3 | +0.86 pts |
| 3 | Lamasón Estimated | 12.8 | +3.2 pts |
| 4 | Saro Estimated | 11.84 | +0.99 pts |
| 5 | Torrelavega Estimated | 9.91 | -0.18 pts |
| 6 | San Pedro del Romeral Estimated | 9.88 | -0.79 pts |
| 7 | Miera Estimated | 9.87 | 0 pts |
| 8 | Ramales de la Victoria Estimated | 9.76 | +0.72 pts |
| 9 | Vega de Pas Estimated | 9.53 | +2.12 pts |
| 10 | Valdeolea Estimated | 9.17 | -1.92 pts |
| 11 | Molledo Estimated | 8.89 | -2.44 pts |
| 12 | Villafufre Estimated | 8.85 | -0.16 pts |
| 13 | Anievas Estimated | 8.81 | -0.63 pts |
| 14 | Valle de Villaverde Estimated | 8.7 | 0 pts |
| 15 | Arredondo Estimated | 8.57 | -2.14 pts |
| 16 | Santiurde de Toranzo Estimated | 8.37 | +1.08 pts |
| 17 | Solórzano Estimated | 8.22 | -0.27 pts |
| 18 | Arenas de Iguña Estimated | 8.18 | +1.06 pts |
| 19 | Valdeprado del Río Estimated | 8.15 | -0.54 pts |
| 20 | Los Corrales de Buelna Estimated | 8.15 | +0.1 pts |
| 21 | Rasines Estimated | 7.97 | -0.65 pts |
| 22 | Santander Estimated | 7.88 | -0.26 pts |
| 23 | Castro-Urdiales Estimated | 7.8 | +0.04 pts |
| 24 | Reinosa Estimated | 7.75 | +0.06 pts |
| 25 | Ruiloba Estimated | 7.74 | -1.43 pts |
| 26 | Las Rozas de Valdearroyo Estimated | 7.64 | -2.55 pts |
| 27 | Castañeda Estimated | 7.55 | +0.69 pts |
| 28 | Udías Estimated | 7.54 | +0.64 pts |
| 29 | Laredo Estimated | 7.52 | -0.26 pts |
| 30 | Bárcena de Pie de Concha Estimated | 7.51 | -2.85 pts |
| 31 | Polaciones Estimated | 7.46 | -2.24 pts |
| 32 | Cartes Estimated | 7.4 | +0.34 pts |
| 33 | Cabuérniga Estimated | 7.36 | +1.93 pts |
| 34 | Ampuero Estimated | 7.35 | -0.17 pts |
| 35 | Miengo Estimated | 7.24 | +0.36 pts |
| 36 | Cieza Estimated | 7.24 | -1.97 pts |
| 37 | Ruente Estimated | 7.23 | -0.15 pts |
| 38 | Voto Estimated | 7.2 | +0.16 pts |
| 39 | Riotuerto Estimated | 7.19 | -1.26 pts |
| 40 | Limpias Estimated | 7.19 | -0.97 pts |
| 41 | Camargo Estimated | 7.12 | -0.19 pts |
| 42 | Valderredible Estimated | 7.11 | +1.21 pts |
| 43 | Hazas de Cesto Estimated | 7.09 | +0.3 pts |
| 44 | San Felices de Buelna Estimated | 7.07 | -0.8 pts |
| 45 | Bárcena de Cicero Estimated | 7.01 | +0.06 pts |
| 46 | Rionansa Estimated | 7 | -1.36 pts |
| 47 | Selaya Estimated | 6.94 | -1.21 pts |
| 48 | Guriezo Estimated | 6.91 | -0.43 pts |
| 49 | El Astillero Estimated | 6.91 | -0.18 pts |
| 50 | Santoña Estimated | 6.84 | -0.56 pts |
| 51 | Bareyo Estimated | 6.8 | +0.22 pts |
| 52 | Corvera de Toranzo Estimated | 6.77 | -0.07 pts |
| 53 | Santa María de Cayón Estimated | 6.75 | +0.11 pts |
| 54 | Campoo de Yuso Estimated | 6.74 | +1.04 pts |
| 55 | Meruelo Estimated | 6.69 | +0.65 pts |
| 56 | Villaescusa Estimated | 6.68 | +0.47 pts |
| 57 | Luena Estimated | 6.67 | -1.16 pts |
| 58 | Polanco Estimated | 6.61 | +0.02 pts |
| 59 | Los Tojos Estimated | 6.6 | +1.89 pts |
| 60 | Cabezón de la Sal Estimated | 6.5 | +0.25 pts |
| 61 | Mazcuerras Estimated | 6.48 | -0.82 pts |
| 62 | Santillana del Mar Estimated | 6.41 | +0.33 pts |
| 63 | Penagos Estimated | 6.38 | +0.27 pts |
| 64 | Reocín Estimated | 6.38 | -0.18 pts |
| 65 | Medio Cudeyo Estimated | 6.29 | +0.06 pts |
| 66 | Marina de Cudeyo Estimated | 6.24 | +0.31 pts |
| 67 | Alfoz de Lloredo Estimated | 6.24 | -0.32 pts |
| 68 | Colindres Estimated | 6.12 | -0.48 pts |
| 69 | Suances Estimated | 6.03 | -0.34 pts |
| 70 | Argoños Estimated | 6 | -0.24 pts |
| 71 | Ruesga Estimated | 5.93 | -1.98 pts |
| 72 | Arnuero Estimated | 5.76 | +0.69 pts |
| 73 | Herrerías Estimated | 5.73 | -1.59 pts |
| 74 | Escalante Estimated | 5.69 | +0.24 pts |
| 75 | Valdáliga Estimated | 5.61 | +1 pts |
| 76 | Cillorigo de Liébana Estimated | 5.56 | -0.23 pts |
| 77 | Val de San Vicente Estimated | 5.55 | +0.41 pts |
| 78 | Santa Cruz de Bezana Estimated | 5.54 | -0.32 pts |
| 79 | Villacarriedo Estimated | 5.52 | -0.3 pts |
| 80 | Liendo Estimated | 5.49 | -0.8 pts |
| 81 | Puente Viesgo Estimated | 5.48 | +0.56 pts |
| 82 | Ribamontán al Monte Estimated | 5.47 | +0.25 pts |
| 83 | Noja Estimated | 5.38 | -0.5 pts |
| 84 | Soba Estimated | 5.3 | -0.64 pts |
| 85 | Piélagos Estimated | 5.14 | -0.4 pts |
| 86 | Ribamontán al Mar Estimated | 5.13 | -0.68 pts |
| 87 | Entrambasaguas Estimated | 5.08 | -0.26 pts |
| 88 | Campoo de Enmedio Estimated | 5.05 | -0.18 pts |
| 89 | Comillas Estimated | 4.98 | +0.41 pts |
| 90 | Cabezón de Liébana Estimated | 4.93 | 0 pts |
| 91 | San Vicente de la Barquera Estimated | 4.83 | -0.66 pts |
| 92 | Liérganes Estimated | 4.5 | -0.82 pts |
| 93 | Potes Estimated | 4.44 | +0.12 pts |
| 94 | Hermandad de Campoo de Suso Estimated | 4.04 | +0.1 pts |
| 95 | Vega de Liébana Estimated | 3.94 | -0.49 pts |
| 96 | Camaleño Estimated | 3.72 | -0.85 pts |
| 97 | Pesaguero Estimated | 3.18 | |
| 98 | Tresviso Estimated | 0 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Registered unemployment divided by resident population aged 16 to 64 of the same year, times 100. Comparable across municipalities, provinces, regions and Spain.
Use this for municipal comparisons. The survey-based rate (unemployment_rate) is only published down to province.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 4 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for May 2026 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Invokely calculation from Paro registrado (SEPE) entre población de 16 a 64 años (Censo anual, INE). https://invokely.ai/docs/methodology#registered_unemployment_rate. Retrieved 2026-10-08.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Municipalities in Cantabria province by registered unemployment rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"registered_unemployment_rate","level":"municipality","within":"Cantabria","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=registered_unemployment_rate&level=municipality&within=Cantabria&limit=10Questions
Which municipality has the highest registered unemployment rate?
Tudanca, with 15.84% in May 2026, according to SEPE and INE.
Which municipality has the lowest registered unemployment rate?
Tresviso, with 0% in May 2026.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Invokely, Paro registrado (SEPE) entre población de 16 a 64 años (Censo anual, INE). Retrieved 2026-10-08. 4 municipalities have no value for May 2026 and are not ranked.
Registered unemployment rate: other rankings
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Municipalities of Spain
- Municipalities in Castile and León
- Municipalities in Catalonia
- Municipalities in Castilla-La Mancha
- Municipalities in Andalusia
- Municipalities in Aragon
- Municipalities in Valencian Community
- Municipalities in Extremadura
- Municipalities in Burgos province