Municipalities in Cantabria province by registered unemployment rate
San Roque de Riomiera had the highest registered unemployment rate of 101 municipalities in January 2026, at 14.59%. Tresviso had the lowest, at 0%. The median was 7.32% and the figure for Cantabria province was 7.75%. Source: SEPE and INE.
Top 40 municipalities, January 2026
Full ranking
| Rank | Municipalities | January 2026 (%) | Change on January 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Roque de Riomiera Estimated | 14.59 | +1.29 pts |
| 2 | Tudanca Estimated | 12.87 | -1.98 pts |
| 3 | Lamasón Estimated | 12.8 | +1.6 pts |
| 4 | Valdeolea Estimated | 12.15 | +0.43 pts |
| 5 | Saro Estimated | 11.84 | +2.96 pts |
| 6 | Miera Estimated | 10.76 | +1.35 pts |
| 7 | Ramales de la Victoria Estimated | 10.68 | +0.15 pts |
| 8 | Torrelavega Estimated | 10.41 | -0.05 pts |
| 9 | Las Rozas de Valdearroyo Estimated | 10.19 | -3.18 pts |
| 10 | Molledo Estimated | 9.99 | -0.73 pts |
| 11 | Vega de Pas Estimated | 9.75 | +1.48 pts |
| 12 | Polaciones Estimated | 9.7 | +1.49 pts |
| 13 | Ruiloba Estimated | 9.37 | 0 pts |
| 14 | San Pedro del Romeral Estimated | 9.09 | -0.4 pts |
| 15 | Riotuerto Estimated | 9.04 | -0.78 pts |
| 16 | Arredondo Estimated | 8.93 | -3.57 pts |
| 17 | Solórzano Estimated | 8.9 | -0.14 pts |
| 18 | Cieza Estimated | 8.88 | -0.33 pts |
| 19 | Bárcena de Pie de Concha Estimated | 8.81 | -3.63 pts |
| 20 | Anievas Estimated | 8.81 | -1.89 pts |
| 21 | Valdeprado del Río Estimated | 8.7 | +0.54 pts |
| 21 | Valle de Villaverde Estimated | 8.7 | 0 pts |
| 23 | Laredo Estimated | 8.61 | -0.19 pts |
| 24 | Reinosa Estimated | 8.58 | +1.31 pts |
| 25 | Arenas de Iguña Estimated | 8.57 | +1.35 pts |
| 26 | Rionansa Estimated | 8.56 | -0.97 pts |
| 27 | Villafufre Estimated | 8.54 | -1.09 pts |
| 28 | Los Corrales de Buelna Estimated | 8.48 | 0 pts |
| 29 | Santander Estimated | 8.33 | -0.53 pts |
| 30 | Ampuero Estimated | 8.3 | 0 pts |
| 31 | San Felices de Buelna Estimated | 8.27 | +0.73 pts |
| 32 | Castro-Urdiales Estimated | 8.1 | -0.3 pts |
| 33 | Campoo de Yuso Estimated | 8.03 | +2.07 pts |
| 34 | Los Tojos Estimated | 8.02 | +1.42 pts |
| 35 | Santoña Estimated | 7.91 | -1.17 pts |
| 36 | Luena Estimated | 7.83 | -0.87 pts |
| 37 | Rasines Estimated | 7.8 | -1.14 pts |
| 38 | Valderredible Estimated | 7.8 | +0.52 pts |
| 39 | Bárcena de Cicero Estimated | 7.75 | -0.12 pts |
| 40 | Castañeda Estimated | 7.63 | +0.56 pts |
| 41 | Corvera de Toranzo Estimated | 7.62 | +0.14 pts |
| 42 | Miengo Estimated | 7.61 | -0.03 pts |
| 43 | Cabuérniga Estimated | 7.53 | +0.18 pts |
| 44 | Ruente Estimated | 7.53 | -0.15 pts |
| 45 | Limpias Estimated | 7.49 | -1.5 pts |
| 46 | Santiurde de Toranzo Estimated | 7.48 | -0.49 pts |
| 47 | Ruesga Estimated | 7.47 | -0.88 pts |
| 48 | Selaya Estimated | 7.46 | -0.95 pts |
| 49 | Cartes Estimated | 7.42 | -0.73 pts |
| 50 | Voto Estimated | 7.36 | -0.47 pts |
| 51 | Hazas de Cesto Estimated | 7.32 | +0.46 pts |
| 52 | Alfoz de Lloredo Estimated | 7.28 | +0.2 pts |
| 53 | El Astillero Estimated | 7.22 | -0.4 pts |
| 54 | San Miguel de Aguayo Estimated | 7.22 | -6.19 pts |
| 55 | Camargo Estimated | 7.2 | -0.41 pts |
| 56 | Santa María de Cayón Estimated | 7.14 | -0.06 pts |
| 57 | Suances Estimated | 7.1 | -0.02 pts |
| 58 | Villaescusa Estimated | 7.07 | +0.54 pts |
| 59 | Polanco Estimated | 7.07 | +0.05 pts |
| 60 | Noja Estimated | 7.06 | -1.63 pts |
| 61 | Bareyo Estimated | 7.03 | -0.81 pts |
| 62 | Arnuero Estimated | 7.01 | +0.21 pts |
| 63 | Santillana del Mar Estimated | 6.93 | +0.44 pts |
| 64 | Meruelo Estimated | 6.88 | +0.13 pts |
| 65 | Reocín Estimated | 6.83 | -0.4 pts |
| 66 | Colindres Estimated | 6.81 | -0.84 pts |
| 67 | Argoños Estimated | 6.73 | +0.16 pts |
| 68 | Guriezo Estimated | 6.72 | -1.54 pts |
| 69 | Mazcuerras Estimated | 6.71 | -0.52 pts |
| 70 | Cabezón de la Sal Estimated | 6.67 | +0.04 pts |
| 71 | Penagos Estimated | 6.65 | -0.34 pts |
| 72 | Soba Estimated | 6.58 | +0.8 pts |
| 73 | Medio Cudeyo Estimated | 6.47 | -0.46 pts |
| 74 | Liendo Estimated | 6.43 | -0.8 pts |
| 75 | Liérganes Estimated | 6.34 | -0.68 pts |
| 76 | Udías Estimated | 6.26 | -1.77 pts |
| 77 | Peñarrubia Estimated | 6.25 | -2.6 pts |
| 78 | Marina de Cudeyo Estimated | 6.18 | -0.18 pts |
| 79 | San Vicente de la Barquera Estimated | 6.06 | -0.9 pts |
| 80 | Herrerías Estimated | 6.05 | -2.87 pts |
| 81 | Cillorigo de Liébana Estimated | 6.02 | 0 pts |
| 82 | Santa Cruz de Bezana Estimated | 5.93 | +0.1 pts |
| 83 | Entrambasaguas Estimated | 5.89 | -0.29 pts |
| 84 | Comillas Estimated | 5.8 | -0.08 pts |
| 85 | Ribamontán al Monte Estimated | 5.78 | -0.18 pts |
| 86 | Ribamontán al Mar Estimated | 5.64 | -1.15 pts |
| 87 | Piélagos Estimated | 5.5 | -0.29 pts |
| 88 | Valdáliga Estimated | 5.46 | -0.08 pts |
| 89 | Potes Estimated | 5.43 | -0.74 pts |
| 90 | Val de San Vicente Estimated | 5.43 | -0.64 pts |
| 91 | Campoo de Enmedio Estimated | 5.41 | 0 pts |
| 92 | Villacarriedo Estimated | 5.23 | -0.89 pts |
| 93 | Puente Viesgo Estimated | 5.03 | -0.67 pts |
| 94 | Escalante Estimated | 4.98 | -1.66 pts |
| 95 | Vega de Liébana Estimated | 4.93 | +0.99 pts |
| 96 | Pesaguero Estimated | 4.46 | 0 pts |
| 97 | Cabezón de Liébana Estimated | 4.28 | -0.99 pts |
| 98 | Camaleño Estimated | 4.23 | -1.52 pts |
| 99 | Hermandad de Campoo de Suso Estimated | 4.15 | -0.51 pts |
| 100 | Santiurde de Reinosa Estimated | 3.68 | |
| 101 | Tresviso Estimated | 0 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Registered unemployment divided by resident population aged 16 to 64 of the same year, times 100. Comparable across municipalities, provinces, regions and Spain.
Use this for municipal comparisons. The survey-based rate (unemployment_rate) is only published down to province.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 1 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for January 2026 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Invokely calculation from Paro registrado (SEPE) entre población de 16 a 64 años (Censo anual, INE). https://invokely.ai/docs/methodology#registered_unemployment_rate. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Municipalities in Cantabria province by registered unemployment rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"registered_unemployment_rate","level":"municipality","within":"Cantabria","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=registered_unemployment_rate&level=municipality&within=Cantabria&limit=10
Questions
Which municipality has the highest registered unemployment rate?
San Roque de Riomiera, with 14.59% in January 2026, according to SEPE and INE.
Which municipality has the lowest registered unemployment rate?
Tresviso, with 0% in January 2026.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Invokely, Paro registrado (SEPE) entre población de 16 a 64 años (Censo anual, INE). Retrieved 2026-10-08. 1 municipalities have no value for January 2026 and are not ranked.
Registered unemployment rate: other rankings
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Municipalities of Spain
- Municipalities in Castile and León
- Municipalities in Catalonia
- Municipalities in Castilla-La Mancha
- Municipalities in Andalusia
- Municipalities in Aragon
- Municipalities in Valencian Community
- Municipalities in Extremadura
- Municipalities in Burgos province