Municipalities in Cantabria by registered unemployment rate
Tudanca had the highest registered unemployment rate of 99 municipalities in April 2026, at 16.83%. Tresviso had the lowest, at 0%. The median was 7% and the figure for Cantabria was 7.46%. Source: SEPE and INE.
Top 40 municipalities, April 2026
Full ranking
| Rank | Municipalities | April 2026 (%) | Change on April 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tudanca Estimated | 16.83 | +2.97 pts |
| 2 | San Roque de Riomiera Estimated | 12.45 | 0 pts |
| 3 | Saro Estimated | 11.51 | +0.33 pts |
| 4 | Lamasón Estimated | 11.2 | +1.6 pts |
| 5 | Valdeolea Estimated | 11.09 | -0.21 pts |
| 6 | Miera Estimated | 10.31 | 0 pts |
| 7 | Torrelavega Estimated | 10.06 | -0.09 pts |
| 8 | Arredondo Estimated | 10 | 0 pts |
| 9 | Ramales de la Victoria Estimated | 9.86 | +0.87 pts |
| 10 | Molledo Estimated | 9.62 | -1.1 pts |
| 11 | Vega de Pas Estimated | 9.53 | +1.27 pts |
| 12 | San Pedro del Romeral Estimated | 9.49 | -0.79 pts |
| 13 | Anievas Estimated | 9.43 | 0 pts |
| 14 | Villafufre Estimated | 9.01 | -0.31 pts |
| 15 | Las Rozas de Valdearroyo Estimated | 8.92 | -1.27 pts |
| 16 | Valle de Villaverde Estimated | 8.7 | -1.24 pts |
| 17 | Solórzano Estimated | 8.49 | +0.27 pts |
| 18 | Santiurde de Toranzo Estimated | 8.27 | +0.59 pts |
| 19 | San Miguel de Aguayo Estimated | 8.25 | 0 pts |
| 20 | Los Corrales de Buelna Estimated | 8.19 | -0.14 pts |
| 21 | Santander Estimated | 8.14 | -0.41 pts |
| 22 | Arenas de Iguña Estimated | 8.08 | +1.54 pts |
| 23 | Reinosa Estimated | 8.08 | +0.27 pts |
| 24 | Bárcena de Pie de Concha Estimated | 8.03 | -3.11 pts |
| 25 | Castro-Urdiales Estimated | 8.02 | +0.11 pts |
| 26 | Valderredible Estimated | 7.97 | +1.73 pts |
| 27 | Ruiloba Estimated | 7.94 | -0.81 pts |
| 28 | Luena Estimated | 7.83 | -0.29 pts |
| 29 | Cabuérniga Estimated | 7.71 | +1.75 pts |
| 30 | Rasines Estimated | 7.64 | -0.16 pts |
| 31 | Valdeprado del Río Estimated | 7.61 | -1.63 pts |
| 32 | Laredo Estimated | 7.58 | -0.37 pts |
| 33 | Riotuerto Estimated | 7.58 | -1.46 pts |
| 34 | Udías Estimated | 7.54 | -0.16 pts |
| 35 | Bárcena de Cicero Estimated | 7.5 | +0.31 pts |
| 36 | Ampuero Estimated | 7.49 | -0.07 pts |
| 37 | Polaciones Estimated | 7.46 | -2.24 pts |
| 38 | Hazas de Cesto Estimated | 7.39 | +0.53 pts |
| 39 | Miengo Estimated | 7.38 | +0.11 pts |
| 40 | Cartes Estimated | 7.37 | -0.02 pts |
| 41 | Guriezo Estimated | 7.28 | -0.56 pts |
| 42 | Camargo Estimated | 7.24 | -0.36 pts |
| 43 | Cieza Estimated | 7.24 | -1.97 pts |
| 44 | Ruente Estimated | 7.23 | -0.45 pts |
| 45 | Castañeda Estimated | 7.2 | +0.39 pts |
| 46 | Selaya Estimated | 7.11 | -1.13 pts |
| 47 | El Astillero Estimated | 7.1 | -0.29 pts |
| 48 | Los Tojos Estimated | 7.08 | +1.89 pts |
| 49 | San Felices de Buelna Estimated | 7 | -1.47 pts |
| 50 | Rionansa Estimated | 7 | -0.97 pts |
| 51 | Santa María de Cayón Estimated | 7 | +0.09 pts |
| 52 | Corvera de Toranzo Estimated | 6.98 | -0.07 pts |
| 53 | Santoña Estimated | 6.9 | -0.85 pts |
| 54 | Bareyo Estimated | 6.88 | +0.15 pts |
| 55 | Polanco Estimated | 6.88 | +0.17 pts |
| 56 | Ruesga Estimated | 6.81 | -1.1 pts |
| 57 | Campoo de Yuso Estimated | 6.74 | +0.52 pts |
| 58 | Villaescusa Estimated | 6.68 | +0.12 pts |
| 59 | Limpias Estimated | 6.67 | -1.5 pts |
| 60 | Reocín Estimated | 6.6 | -0.26 pts |
| 61 | Voto Estimated | 6.57 | -0.37 pts |
| 62 | Cabezón de la Sal Estimated | 6.52 | +0.13 pts |
| 63 | Meruelo Estimated | 6.49 | +0.84 pts |
| 64 | Marina de Cudeyo Estimated | 6.49 | +0.31 pts |
| 65 | Argoños Estimated | 6.41 | -0.16 pts |
| 66 | Santillana del Mar Estimated | 6.34 | +0.19 pts |
| 67 | Penagos Estimated | 6.31 | -0.14 pts |
| 68 | Medio Cudeyo Estimated | 6.27 | -0.22 pts |
| 69 | Mazcuerras Estimated | 6.26 | -0.89 pts |
| 70 | Suances Estimated | 6.26 | -0.29 pts |
| 71 | Colindres Estimated | 6.19 | -0.64 pts |
| 72 | Alfoz de Lloredo Estimated | 6.11 | -0.13 pts |
| 73 | Ribamontán al Monte Estimated | 5.84 | +0.31 pts |
| 74 | Arnuero Estimated | 5.83 | +0.49 pts |
| 75 | Villacarriedo Estimated | 5.82 | -0.2 pts |
| 76 | Santa Cruz de Bezana Estimated | 5.77 | -0.05 pts |
| 77 | Valdáliga Estimated | 5.69 | +0.92 pts |
| 78 | Val de San Vicente Estimated | 5.66 | +0.53 pts |
| 79 | Entrambasaguas Estimated | 5.55 | 0 pts |
| 80 | Liendo Estimated | 5.49 | -0.94 pts |
| 81 | Soba Estimated | 5.46 | -0.32 pts |
| 82 | Escalante Estimated | 5.45 | -0.95 pts |
| 83 | Cillorigo de Liébana Estimated | 5.45 | -0.45 pts |
| 84 | Ribamontán al Mar Estimated | 5.43 | -0.44 pts |
| 85 | Herrerías Estimated | 5.41 | -1.91 pts |
| 86 | Puente Viesgo Estimated | 5.31 | +0.5 pts |
| 87 | Piélagos Estimated | 5.27 | -0.46 pts |
| 88 | Campoo de Enmedio Estimated | 5.14 | +0.23 pts |
| 89 | San Vicente de la Barquera Estimated | 5.08 | -0.37 pts |
| 90 | Comillas Estimated | 4.82 | +0.33 pts |
| 91 | Liérganes Estimated | 4.77 | -0.55 pts |
| 92 | Noja Estimated | 4.76 | -1.85 pts |
| 93 | Cabezón de Liébana Estimated | 4.61 | 0 pts |
| 94 | Hermandad de Campoo de Suso Estimated | 4.25 | +0.2 pts |
| 95 | Peñarrubia Estimated | 4.17 | -2.08 pts |
| 96 | Potes Estimated | 4.07 | -0.12 pts |
| 97 | Camaleño Estimated | 4.06 | -0.68 pts |
| 98 | Vega de Liébana Estimated | 3.94 | -0.49 pts |
| 99 | Tresviso Estimated | 0 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Registered unemployment divided by resident population aged 16 to 64 of the same year, times 100. Comparable across municipalities, provinces, regions and Spain.
Use this for municipal comparisons. The survey-based rate (unemployment_rate) is only published down to province.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the municipalities are compared on one definition. 3 municipalities with data in other periods have no value for April 2026 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Invokely calculation from Paro registrado (SEPE) entre población de 16 a 64 años (Censo anual, INE). https://invokely.ai/docs/methodology#registered_unemployment_rate. Retrieved 2026-10-08.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Municipalities in Cantabria by registered unemployment rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"registered_unemployment_rate","level":"municipality","within":"Cantabria","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=registered_unemployment_rate&level=municipality&within=Cantabria&limit=10Questions
Which municipality has the highest registered unemployment rate?
Tudanca, with 16.83% in April 2026, according to SEPE and INE.
Which municipality has the lowest registered unemployment rate?
Tresviso, with 0% in April 2026.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Invokely, Paro registrado (SEPE) entre población de 16 a 64 años (Censo anual, INE). Retrieved 2026-10-08. 3 municipalities have no value for April 2026 and are not ranked.
Registered unemployment rate: other rankings
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Municipalities of Spain
- Municipalities in Castile and León
- Municipalities in Catalonia
- Municipalities in Castilla-La Mancha
- Municipalities in Andalusia
- Municipalities in Aragon
- Municipalities in Valencian Community
- Municipalities in Extremadura
- Municipalities in Burgos province