NUTS 3 areas of Italy by share of population aged 65 and over
Savona had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 107 areas in 2017, at 29%. Caserta had the lowest, at 17%. The median was 23.3% and the figure for Italy was 22.4%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2017
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2017 (%) | Change on 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Savona | 29 | +0.2 pts |
| 2 | Trieste | 28.8 | 0 pts |
| 3 | Genova | 28.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 4 | Biella | 28.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 5 | Imperia | 27.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 6 | Ferrara | 27.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 7 | La Spezia | 27.5 | 0 pts |
| 8 | Alessandria | 27.4 | +0.1 pts |
| 9 | Grosseto | 27.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 10 | Terni | 27 | +0.2 pts |
| 11 | Vercelli | 26.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 12 | Gorizia | 26.7 | +0.1 pts |
| 12 | Livorno | 26.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 14 | Massa-Carrara | 26.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 15 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 26.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 16 | Asti | 25.9 | +0.2 pts |
| 16 | Belluno | 25.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 16 | Siena | 25.9 | +0.1 pts |
| 19 | Udine | 25.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 20 | Oristano | 25.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 21 | Lucca | 25.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 22 | Ravenna | 25.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 22 | Rovigo | 25.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 24 | Firenze | 25.1 | +0.1 pts |
| 25 | Arezzo | 25 | +0.3 pts |
| 25 | Pistoia | 25 | +0.2 pts |
| 27 | Piacenza | 24.9 | 0 pts |
| 27 | Rieti | 24.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 29 | Torino | 24.8 | +0.2 pts |
| 30 | Ascoli Piceno | 24.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 31 | Ancona | 24.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 31 | Fermo | 24.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 31 | Perugia | 24.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 34 | Bologna | 24.5 | 0 pts |
| 34 | Macerata | 24.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 36 | Chieti | 24.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 36 | Isernia | 24.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 36 | Pavia | 24.2 | +0.2 pts |
| 39 | Forlì-Cesena | 24.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 39 | Venezia | 24.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 41 | Pisa | 24 | +0.1 pts |
| 41 | Sud Sardegna | 24 | +0.7 pts |
| 43 | Campobasso | 23.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 43 | Cremona | 23.8 | +0.2 pts |
| 43 | Cuneo | 23.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 43 | Pesaro e Urbino | 23.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 47 | L’Aquila | 23.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 47 | Lecce | 23.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 47 | Mantova | 23.4 | +0.2 pts |
| 47 | Pordenone | 23.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 47 | Viterbo | 23.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 52 | Novara | 23.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 52 | Nuoro | 23.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 52 | Parma | 23.3 | 0 pts |
| 55 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 23.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 55 | Varese | 23.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 57 | Lecco | 22.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 57 | Pescara | 22.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 57 | Sondrio | 22.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 60 | Milano | 22.7 | +0.1 pts |
| 61 | Modena | 22.6 | +0.1 pts |
| 61 | Rimini | 22.6 | +0.3 pts |
| 63 | Potenza | 22.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 63 | Teramo | 22.5 | +0.3 pts |
| 65 | Frosinone | 22.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 65 | Messina | 22.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 67 | Benevento | 22.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 67 | Como | 22.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 67 | Trapani | 22.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 70 | Brindisi | 22.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 70 | Enna | 22.2 | +0.4 pts |
| 70 | Prato | 22.2 | +0.1 pts |
| 73 | Padova | 22 | +0.3 pts |
| 73 | Taranto | 22 | +0.5 pts |
| 75 | Matera | 21.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 75 | Sassari | 21.9 | +0.4 pts |
| 77 | Monza e della Brianza | 21.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 78 | Verona | 21.7 | +0.2 pts |
| 79 | Agrigento | 21.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 79 | Trento | 21.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 81 | Cosenza | 21.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 81 | Treviso | 21.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 83 | Avellino | 21.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 83 | Cagliari | 21.3 | +0.5 pts |
| 83 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 21.3 | +0.2 pts |
| 83 | Vicenza | 21.3 | +0.3 pts |
| 87 | Lodi | 21.2 | +0.3 pts |
| 88 | Brescia | 21.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 88 | Catanzaro | 21.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 88 | Roma | 21.1 | +0.2 pts |
| 88 | Vibo Valentia | 21.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 92 | Reggio Calabria | 20.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 92 | Siracusa | 20.8 | +0.3 pts |
| 94 | Bari | 20.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 94 | Foggia | 20.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 96 | Bergamo | 20.4 | +0.4 pts |
| 96 | Caltanissetta | 20.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 96 | Latina | 20.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 99 | Palermo | 20 | +0.4 pts |
| 99 | Salerno | 20 | +0.3 pts |
| 101 | Ragusa | 19.8 | +0.1 pts |
| 102 | Bolzano-Bozen | 19.3 | +0.1 pts |
| 103 | Catania | 19.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 103 | Crotone | 19.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 105 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 18.7 | +0.4 pts |
| 106 | Napoli | 17.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 107 | Caserta | 17 | +0.3 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?
Savona, with 29% in 2017, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?
Caserta, with 17% in 2017.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Population aged 65 and over: other rankings
- Countries
- EU countries
- US states
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- US counties
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Municipalities of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)